题名

廣電新聞訪問者之不同閱聽人想像:論述心理學之觀點

并列篇名

Analysis on the Broadcast News Interviewers' Imagination of the 'Audience': A Discursive Psychological Approach

DOI

10.30386/MCR.201001_(102).0001

作者

江靜之(Chin-Chih Chiang)

关键词

論述心理學 ; 廣電新聞訪問 ; 閱聽人 ; 論述 ; 語藝策略 ; discursive psychology ; broadcast news interview ; audience ; discourse ; rhetorical strategy

期刊名称

新聞學研究

卷期/出版年月

102期(2010 / 01 / 01)

页次

35 - 72

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文採論述心理學觀點探究廣電新聞訪問者如何在談話中使用語言建立不同「閱聽人」版本,以及如何將「閱聽人」當成論述資源以進行自我定位,進而正當化自己所為並歸屬責任。本文分析十位廣電新聞訪問者之訪談資料,發現廣電新聞訪問者透過模糊、條列和對比等論述技巧將閱聽人形塑成事實,以此解釋自己的訪問設計及表現。而同樣將閱聽人描繪成各元意見,訪問者既可藉此樹立中立形象,也能突顯自己是獨立且可自我決策的新聞工作者。此外,在某些閱聽人論述上,訪問者也會運用「事先打預防針」及「坦白立場」等語藝策略避免可能來自研究者的批評及挑戰。

英文摘要

Adopting the perspective from the discursive psychology, this study examines how broadcast news interviewers construct various versions of audiences, and how they use the audience as a discursive resource to deal with the dilemmas of stake in research interviews. Based on the researcher's in-depth interviews with ten senior anchors, this study explored how the anchors described the audience as factual notions with discursive techniques, such as systematic vagueness, lists and contrasts. In addition, this study found that different notions of the audience were used by the anchors to justify their news interview designs and performances. As a discursive resource, the audience was used to establish the anchor's neutral position as well as to emphasize the independence of a journalist. The anchors also used stake inoculation and stake confession to mitigate or to avoid the potential criticism and blame from the researcher.

主题分类 社會科學 > 傳播學
参考文献
  1. Beattie, G.,Doherty, K.(1995)."I saw what reality happened": The discursive construction of victims and perpetrators in firsthand accounts of paramilitary violence in Northern Ireland.Journal of Language and Social Psychology,14(4),408-433.
  2. Clayman, S. E.(2002).Tribune of the people: Maintaining the legitimacy of aggressive journalism.Media, Culture & Society,24,197-216.
  3. Costera Meijer, I.(2003).What is quality television news? A plea for extending the professional repertoire of newsmakers.Journalism Studies,4(1),15-29.
  4. Edwards, D.,Potter, J.(1992).Discursive psychology.London:Sage.
  5. Edwards, D.,Potter, J.,A. McHoul(Eds.),M. Rapley (Eds.)(2001).How to Analyse Talk in Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods.London:Continuum.
  6. Edwards, D.,Potter, J.,H. te Molder (Eds.),J. Potter (Eds.)(2005).Conversation and Cognition.Cambridge, U.K.:Cambridge University Press.
  7. Fariclough, N.(1995).Media discourse.New York:Arnold.
  8. Griffin, C.(2007).Different visions: A rejoinder to Henwood, Potter and Hepburn.Discourse Studies,9(2),283-287.
  9. Heikkilä, H.,Kunelius, R.(2006).Journalists imagining the European public sphere: professional discourses about the EU news practices in ten countries.Javnost,13(4),63-80.
  10. Henwood, K.(2007).Beyond hypercriticality: Taking forward methodological inquiry and debate in discursive and qualitative social psychology.Discourse Studies,9(2),270-275.
  11. Hepburn, A.,Wiggins, S.(2005).Developments in discursive psychology.Discourse & Society,16(5),595-601.
  12. Heritage, J.,Roth, A.(1995).Grammar and institution: Questions and questioning in the broadcast news interview.Research on Language and Social Interaction,28(1),1-60.
  13. Heritage, J.,T. A. van Dijk(Ed.)(1985).Handbook of Discourse.London:Academic Press.
  14. Heritage, J.,Watson, R.,G. Pasthas (Ed.)(1979).Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology.New York:Irvington.
  15. Horton-Salway, M.,M. Wetherell (Eds.),S. Taylor (Eds.),S. J. Yates (Eds.)(2001).Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis.London:Sage in association with The Open University.
  16. Hutchby, I.,Wooffitt, R.(1999).Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications.MA:Polity Press.
  17. Jørgensen, M.,Phillips, L.(2002).Discourse analysis: As theory and method.London:Sage.
  18. Potter, J.(2005).Making psychology relevant.Discourse & Society,16(5),739-747.
  19. Potter, J.(1996).Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction.London:Sage.
  20. Potter, J.(2000).Post-cognitive psychology.Theory and Psychology,10(1),31-37.
  21. Potter, J.,Edwards, D.,Wetherell, M.(1993).A model of discourse in action.American Behavioral Scientist,36(3),383-401.
  22. Potter, J.,Wetherell, M.(1987).Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes, and behaviour.London:Sage.
  23. Roth, A. L.(1998).Who makes the news? Descriptions of television news interviewees' public personae.Media, Culture & Society,20,79-107.
  24. Schlesinger, P.(1978).Putting "reality" together.London:Methuen.
  25. Speer, S. A.(2002).What can conversation analysis contribute to feminist methodology? Putting reflexivity into practice.Discourse & Society,13(6),783-803.
  26. Speer, S. A.,Potter, J.(2000).The management of heterosexist talk: Conversational resources and prejudiced claims.Discourse & Society,11(4),543-572.
  27. Stubbe, M.,Lane, C.,Hilder, J.,Vine, E.,Vine, B.,Marra, M.(2003).Multiple discourse analyses of a workplace interaction.Discourse Studies,5(3),351-388.
  28. Wood, L. A.,Kroger, R. O.(2000).Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  29. Wooffitt, R.(2005).Conversation analysis and discourse analysis: A comparative and critical introduction.London:Sage.
  30. 湯廷池(1992)。英語認知語法:結構、意義與功用(中集)。台北:台灣學生。
  31. 馮小龍(1996)。廣播新聞原理與製作。台北:正中。
被引用次数
  1. 江靜之(2014)。電視新聞訪談之知識形式:一個分析架構。中華傳播學刊,25,43-69。