题名

數位傳媒的創意:一個數位行動導向的分析取徑

并列篇名

Digital Frontiers of Media Creativity: An Enactive Approach

DOI

10.30386/MCR.201004_(103).0004

作者

孫式文(Se-Wen Sun)

关键词

隱喻 ; 概念合成 ; 物錨 ; 生活脈絡 ; 數位傳媒創意 ; 數位行動導向模式 ; Metaphor ; Conceptual blending ; Material anchor ; Daily living context ; Creativity of digital media ; Digital-action-oriented many space model

期刊名称

新聞學研究

卷期/出版年月

103期(2010 / 04 / 01)

页次

175 - 214

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

數位時代的傳媒創意不僅止於認知層次的意義溝通,還需要進入與數位傳媒互動的行動層次。探討數位傳媒的創意,也不能侷限於創作者端的新設計理念,而是要同時關注數位傳媒在使用中,在日常生活脈絡的調節下,由行動導引而出的創意。本文整合物錨的觀點(Hutchins, 2005)、概念隱喻理論(Lakoff & Johnson, 1980, 1999)和概念合成理論(Fauconnier & Turner, 1998, 2002),而提出一個數位行動導向的模式,以分析與行動交織而成的數位傳媒創意。本文應用此新模式分析桌面介面、微軟咖啡桌,和CNN魔幻牆,來闡述數位傳媒創意的傳承、變化與行動意涵。

英文摘要

This study proposes an enactive approach to media creativity in the era of digital networks. The goal is to highlight and explain an enactive dimension of media creativity in the digital age. The proposed explanatory model integrates the notion of material anchors (Hutchins, 1995), conceptual metaphor theory (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980, 1999) and blending theory (Fauconnier & Turner, 1998, 2002) into an enactive framework of media creativity. I argue that media creativity in digital networks is deeply enmeshed in daily living contexts, and the creativity is not just a play of ideas but, to an important extent, anchored to, and made possible by, the material products we create. I use desktop interface, Microsoft coffee table and CNN's magic wall as exemplars to illustrate and explain media creativity.

主题分类 社會科學 > 傳播學
参考文献
  1. 蔡琰、臧國仁(2007)。「創新∕創意」與時間概念:敘事理論之觀點。新聞學研究,93,1-39。
    連結:
  2. 鄧育仁(2005)。生活處境中的隱喻。歐美研究,35(1),95-138。
    連結:
  3. Baig, E. C.,Swartz, J.(2008).Election-night news to co-star latest technology.USA TODAY(2008/10/30).
  4. Bauder, D.(2004).CNN looks to reverse slump with splashy election night at Nasdaq.The Associated Press
  5. Boroditsky, L.,Ramscar, M.(2002).The role of body and mind in abstract thought.Psychological Science,13(2),185-189.
  6. The inventor behind CNN's election 'Magic Wall'. CNN.com/technology
  7. Carter, B.(2008).Politics benefits CNN.The New York Times(2008/04/01).
  8. TVTechnology
  9. Cuprisin, T.(2006).Inside TV & radio CNN show will take political turn.Milwaukee Journal Sentinel,6.
  10. Dana, R.(2005).Rrrreeoww! 'blog chicks' boot up on Blitzer.New York Observer.
  11. Popular Mechanics
  12. Dunbar, K.,D. Gentner (Eds.),K. J. Holyoak (Eds.),B. K. Kokinov (Eds.)(2001).The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science.Cambridge, MA:MIT press.
  13. Dunbar, K.,R. J. Sternberg (Eds.),J. E. Davidson (Eds.)(1995).The nature of insight.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
  14. Erickson, T.,B. Laurel (Ed.)(1990).The art of human-computer interface design.New York:Addison-Wesley.
  15. Farhi, P.(2008).CNN hits the wall for the election.The Washington Post.
  16. Fauconnier, G.(1997).Mappings in thought and language.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  17. Fauconnier, G.,Turner, M.(2002).The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities.New York:Basic Books.
  18. Fauconnier, G.,Turner, M.(1998).Conceptual integration networks.Cognitive Science,22(2),133-187.
  19. Faulkner, C.(1998).The essence of human-computer interaction.Hemel Hempstead, UK:Prentice Hall.
  20. Finke, R. A.,Ward, T. B.,Smith, S. M.(1992).Creative cognition: Theory, research, and application.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
  21. Flaherty, M.(2008).Nets thinking big.Daily Variety.
  22. Forceville, C.,R.W. Gibbs (Ed.)(2008).The cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  23. Gentner, D.(1983).Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy.Cognitive Science,7,155-170.
  24. Gentner, D.,Bowdle, B.,R. W. Gibbs (Ed.)(2008).The cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  25. Gentner, D.,Markman, A. B.(1997).Structure mapping in analogy and similarity.American Psychologist,52,45-56.
  26. Greppi, M.(2004).Election goes to the street; CNN, NBC preparing elaborate outdoor coverage in New York.Television Week.
  27. Hesse, M. B.(1954).Science and the human imagination: Aspects of the history and logic of physical Science.New York:Philosophical Library.
  28. Hesse, M. B.(1963).Models and analogies in science.London:Sheed and Ward.
  29. Austin 360
  30. Holyoak, K. J.,Thagard, P.(1997).The analogical mind.American Psychologist,52,35-44.
  31. Holyoak, K.J.,Thagard, P.(1995).Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
  32. Hutchins, E.(2005).Material anchors for conceptual blends.Journal of Pragmatics,37(10),1555-1577.
  33. Wired News
  34. Kay, A.,B. Laurel (Ed.)(1990).The art of human-computer interface design.New York:Addison-Wesley.
  35. Kay, A.,T. J. Bergin(Eds.),R. G. Gibson(Eds.)(1996).History of programming languages-II.New York:ACM.
  36. Kövecses, Z.(2005).Metaphor in culture.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  37. Lakoff, G.,Johnson, M.(1980).Metaphors we live by.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  38. Lakoff, G.,Johnson, M.(1999).Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought.New York:Basic Books.
  39. Levy, S.(1994).Insanely great: The life and times of Macintosh, the computer that changed everything.London:Penguin.
  40. Mandel, T.(1997).The elements of user interface design.New York:Wiley.
  41. Mario, M.(2008).Scratching the surface.CRN,1258,12.
  42. Mcdaniel, M.(2004).Television: For some viewers, many happy returns.The Houston Chronicle.
  43. CENT news
  44. Moggridge, B.(2007).Designing for interactions.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
  45. Moore, F.(2005).CNN's innovative 'Situation Room' puts news all over the screen.The Associated Press.
  46. Morris, M.,Ogan, C.(1996).The Internet as mass medium.Journal of Communication,46(1),39-50.
  47. Nielson, J.(1995).Multimedia and hypertext: The internet and beyond.Academic Press Professional.
  48. Norman, D. A.(1998).The invisible computer: Why good products can fail, the PC is so complex, and information appliance the answer.
  49. O''sullivan, P. B.(1999).Bridging the mass-interpersonal divide synthesis scholarship in HCR.Human Communication Research,25(4),569-588.
  50. Pippin, B.,S. Jones(Eds.),M. Masodian (Eds.)(2002).A taxonomy of user-interface metaphor.Proceedings SIGCHI-NZ symposium on computer-human interaction
  51. Rheingold, H.(2000).Tools for thought: The history and future of mind-expanding technology.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
  52. Rogers, E. M.(1962).Diffusion of innovations.New York:Free Press.
  53. Seifert, C. M.,McKoon, G. ,Abelson, R. P. ,Ratcliff, R.(1986).Memory connections between thematically similar episodes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,12,220-231.
  54. Simon, H. A.,R. L. Kuhn (Ed.)(1988).Handbook for creative and innovative managers.New York:McGraw-Hill.
  55. Steinberg, J.(2008).CNN's election night interpreter revels in a high-tech toy.The New York Times(2008/04/22).
  56. Sternberg, R. J.,Davidson, J. E.,F. D. Horowitz(Eds.),M. O''Brien (Eds.)(1985).The gifted and talented.Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.
  57. Sternberg, R. J.,R. J. Sternberg (Ed.)(1988).The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  58. Teng, N. Y.(2006).Metaphor and coupling: An embodied, action-oriented perspective.Metaphor and Symbol,2(2),67-85.
  59. Teng, N. Y.,C. Forceville(Eds.),E. Urios-Aprisi (Eds.)(2009).Multimodal metaphor.Mouton De Gruyter.
  60. Economist
  61. Walberg, H. J.,R.J. Sternberg (Ed.)(1988).The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  62. Watson, J. D.(1980).The double helix.London:Norton.
  63. Weisberg, R. W.(1993).Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius.New York:W.H. Freeman and Company.
  64. Weisberg, R. W.,L. Shavinina (Ed.)(2003).International handbook of innovation.New York:Elsevier.
  65. Weisberg, R. W.,S. M. Smith(Eds.),T. B. Ward(Eds.),R. A. Finke (Eds.)(1995).The creative cognition approach.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
  66. Welling, H.(2007).Four mental operations in creative cognition: the importance of abstraction.Creative Research Journal,19,163-177.
  67. Williams, R. F.(2004).San Diego,University of California.
  68. 孫式文(2002)。網際網路在災難事件中的傳播功能:理論與實務的辯證。新聞學研究,71,133-158。
  69. 孫式文、馮建三編(2005)。自反縮不縮?新聞系七十年。台北:政治大學傳播學院新聞系。
  70. 趙雅麗(2007)。2007年中華傳播學會年會。台北縣:淡江大學淡水校園驚聲國際會議廳。
  71. 趙雅麗(2005)。傳播如何看創意:繪製創意研究的新藍圖。第三屆創新與創造力研討會,台北:
  72. 鄧育仁、孫式文(2000)。廣告裡的圖象隱喻:從多空間模式分析。新聞學研究,62,35-71。
  73. 鄧育仁、孫式文(2000)。廣告裡圖象隱喻的構圖原則:一個認知取徑的分析。廣告學研究,14,95-130。
被引用次数
  1. 鄧育仁(2011)。隱喻與公民論述:從王者之治到立憲民主。清華學報,41(3),523-550。
  2. 鄧育仁(2011)。隱喻與自由:立命在民主與科學聯合脈絡中的新意涵。臺灣東亞文明研究學刊,8(1),173-208。
  3. 鄧育仁(2018)。新啟蒙:對美國政治言說的認知與跨文化分析。歐美研究,48(3),429-480。
  4. 鄧育仁、孫式文(2010)。身境與隱喻觀點中的創意。中正大學中文學術年刊,16,141-160。
  5. 孫式文(2012)。圖像設計與隱喻閱讀。新聞學研究,110,171-214。