言論自由與真理追求－觀念市場隱喻的溯源與檢視

Freedom of Speech and Truth Seeking-On Marketplace of Ideas Metaphors

10.30386/MCR.201107_(108).0008

賴祥蔚(Weber H. W. Lai)

言論自由 ； 真理追求 ； 第一修正案 ； 憲法 ； 觀念市場 ； constitution ； First Amendment ； freedom of speech ； marketplace of ideas ； truth-seeking

新聞學研究

108期（2011 / 07 / 01）

103 - 139

繁體中文

憲法保障言論自由，學理上認為這是因為言論有民主自治、真理追求、自我實現與社會安定等多元價值。其中，真理追求的價值日漸受到重視。言論能夠追求真理，當代的憲政詮釋是從觀念市場隱喻出發。觀念市場隱喻的內涵究竟如何？與真理追求的古典思潮是否符合？本文從思想史與觀念史的角度切入，探討觀念市場隱喻與古典思潮在追求真理的論述上有何差異，特別針對美國最高法院的憲政詮釋與John Milton、John Stuart Mill兩人的古典思潮進行對照與比較，分析其差異。

Constitutions protect the freedom of speech. There are many reasons why freedom of speech is important, one of which is the claim that truth will confute false. The claim was thought to be the inheritance of John Milton and John Stuart Mill. In fact, the contemporary constitutional interpretation argues that truth will emerge in an open marketplace of ideas. What are the contents of the marketplace of ideas theory? How does the marketplace operate? Is the contemporary constitutional interpretation equivalent with the original thoughts of truth-seeking theories addressed by Milton and Mill? This paper analyzed how the U.S. Supreme Court has applied the marketplace of ideas metaphors to interpret the First Amendment. It then compared the ontology, epistemology, and methodology of the marketplace of ideas metaphors with the texts of Milton's and Mill's truth-seeking theories.

1. 賴祥蔚(2010)。商業言論與憲法的言論自由保障。台灣政治學刊，14(1)，159-199。
   連結：
2. 賴祥蔚(2010)。媒介經濟學的特性與政策回應。中華傳播學刊，18，1-12。
   連結：
3. 賴祥蔚(2006)。新聞自由的臨摹與反思。新聞學研究，87，97-129。
   連結：
4. 大法官會議（2008）。〈釋字第644 號〉。取自http://www.judicial.gov.tw/constitutionalcourt/p03_01.asp?expno=644
5. 大法官會議（2010）。〈釋字第678 號〉。取自http://www.judicial.gov.tw/constitutionalcourt/p03_01.asp?expno=678
6. 大法官會議（2000）。〈釋字第509 號〉。取自http://www.judicial.gov.tw/constitutionalcourt/p03_01.asp?expno=509
7. Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927).
8. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323 (1974).
9. Anderson v. Celebrezze, 460 U.S. 780 (1983).
10. CBS, Inc. v. FCC, 453 U.S. 367 (1981).
11. 大法官會議（1998）。〈釋字第445 號〉。取自http://www.judicial.gov.tw/constitutionalcourt/p03_01.asp?expno=445
12. Stromberg v. California, 283 U.S. 359 (1931).
13. Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc., 427 U.S. 50 (1976).
14. Meiklejohn, A. (1948). Free speech and its relation to self government. New York, NY: Harper.
15. FEC v. Mass. Cit. for Life, 479 U.S. 238 (1986).
16. Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 630 (1919).
17. FCC v. League of Women Voters, 468 U.S. 364 (1984).
18. Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 395 U.S. 367 (1969).
19. Debs v. United States, 249 U.S. 211 (1919).
20. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York, NY: Harper.
21. Williams v. Rhodes, 393 U.S. 23 (1968).
22. Austin v. Michigan State Chamber of Commerce, 494 U.S. 652 (1990).
23. Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919).
24. Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976).
25. 大法官會議（1986）。〈釋字第414 號〉。取自http://www.judicial.gov.tw/constitutionalcourt/p03_01.asp?expno=414
26. Lamont v. Postmaster General, 381 U.S. 301 (1965).
27. Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347 (1976).
28. United States v. Rumely, 345 U.S. 56 (1953).
29. Associated Press v. United States, 326 U.S. 1 (1945).
30. Tinker v. Des Moines School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969).
31. Baker, C. E.(1978).Scope of the First Amendment Freedom of speech.UCLA Law Review,25,967-981.
32. Baker, C. E.(1989).Human liberty and freedom of speech.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
33. Baker, C. E.、馮建三譯(2008)。傳媒、市場與民主。台北:巨流。
34. Blasi, V.(1995).Milton's Areopagitica and the modern First Amendment.Yale Law School Occasional Papers
35. Blasi, V.(1977).The checking value in first amendment theory.American Bar Foundation Research Journal,2(3),521-649.
36. Blocher, J.(2008).Institutions in the marketplace of ideas.Duke Law Journal,57(4),821-889.
37. Coase, R. H.(1974).The economics of the First Amendment: The market for goods and the market for ideas.American Economic Review,64(2),384-391.
38. Cole, D.(1986).Agon at Agora: Creative misreadings in the First Amendment Tradition.Yale Law Journal,95,857-905.
39. Emerson, T. I.(1980).First Amendment doctrine and the Burger Court.California Law Review,68,422-481.
40. Goldman, A.,Cox, J.(1996).Speech, truth, and the free market for ideas.Legal Theory,2,1-32.
41. Gordon, J.(1997).John Stuart Mill and the "marketplace of ideas.".Social Theory and Practice,23,235-249.
42. Grey, T. C.(1989).Holmes and legal pragmatism.Stanford Law Review,41,787-870.
43. Habermas, J.,Burger, T.(Trans.)(1989).The structural transformation of the public sphere.London, UK:Polity.
44. Hopkins, W. W.(1996).The supreme court defines the marketplace of ideas.Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly,73,40-52.
45. James, W.、劉宏信譯(2007)。實用主義。台北:立緒。
46. Kecskemeti, P.(Ed.)(1953).Essays on sociology and social psychology.London, UK:Routledge.
47. Laslett, P.(Ed.),Runciman, W. G.(Ed.)(1962).Philosophy, politics and society, second series.Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
48. Lin, Tzu-Yi(1987).Cornell University.
49. Mackinnon, C. A.(1993).Only words.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
50. Mill, J. S.(2008).On liberty and other essays.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
51. Milton, J.(2004).Areopagitica and other prose works.New York, NY:Kessinger.
52. Napoli, P. M.(1999).The marketplace of ideas metaphor in communications regulation.Journal of Communication,49(4),151-169.
53. Post, R.(2000).Reconciling theory and doctrine in First Amendment jurisprudence.California Law Review,88,2353-74.
54. Redish, M. H.(1982).The value of free speech.University of Pennsylvania Law Review,130,591-645.
55. Schwarzlose, R. A.(1989).The marketplace of ideas: A measure of free expression.Journalism Monographs,118,1-41.
56. Shiffrin, S. H.(1983).The First Amendment and economic regulations: Away from a general theory of the First Amendment.Northwestern University Law Review,78,1212-1283.
57. Siebert, F. S.(Ed.),Peterson, T.(Ed.),Schramm, W.(Ed.)(1956).Four theories of the press.Urbana, IL:University of Illinois Press.
58. Sunstein, C.(1999).One case at a time: Judicial minimalism on the supreme court.Boston, MA:Harvard University Press.
59. Sunstein, C.(1993).Democracy and the problem of free speech.New York, NY:The Free Press.
60. Weinstein, J.(2007).Fool, knaves, and the protection of commercial speech: A response to professor Redish.Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review,41,133-168.
61. Wonnell, C. T.(1986).Truth and the marketplace of ideas.University of California at Davis Law Review,19,669-76.
62. 李郁青(2009)。論傳媒外部性及其政治：檢視《壹週刊》。新聞學研究，98，193-244。
63. 林子儀(1999)。言論自由與新聞自由。台北:元照。
64. 林元輝(2006)。新聞公害的批判基礎。台北:巨流。

1. (2020)。AI時代之分裂社會與民主──以美國法之表意自由與觀念市場自由競爭理論為中心。月旦法學雜誌，302，109-126。
2. (2021)。論Thomas Scanlon的彌爾式原則及其修正— 從言論自由自主理論的角度分析。中研院法學期刊，29，1-54。