圖像設計與隱喻閱讀

Pictorial Design and Metaphorical Interpretation

10.30386/MCR.201201_(110).0005

孫式文(Sewen Sun)

文化創意 ； 多空間模式 ； 認知原則 ； 圖像設計 ； 隱喻 ； cultural creativity ； many-space model ； cognitive principle ； pictorial design ； metaphor

新聞學研究

110期（2012 / 01 / 01）

171 - 214

繁體中文

本文由文化、創意、認知與傳播的角度，提出三種跨域組合的圖像設計（部件組合設計、替代組合設計、主從融合設計），其援用的四項圖像認知原則（層次原則、重組原則、框架原則、拓僕原則），以及導引出的四種隱喻閱讀型態（共通性的隱喻閱讀、單邊主導的隱喻閱讀、雙邊主導的隱喻閱讀、新義浮現的隱喻閱讀），並以廣告圖像為素材實驗研究檢證相關的三項假設：（1）跨域組合圖像的隱喻閱讀的假設；（2）跨域組合設計的認知假設；（3）跨域組合設計的逆轉假設。

In this paper I examine three types of image-blending pictorial design (the part-part combination design, the replacement design and the principal-subordinate merging design), review four cognitive principles of pictorial design (the principle of layered composition, the principle of recomposition, the principle of framing and the principle of topology), and propose four types of metaphorical interpretation of image-blending pictures (the commonality-based interpretation, the single-scope interpretation, the double-scope interpretation and the emergent-meaning interpretation). Based on the examination, the review and the proposal, I advance three hypotheses about image-blending pictorial design (a metaphorical interpretation hypothesis, a cognitive hypothesis and an interpretation reversal hypothesis), and obtain experimental results that corroborate the hypotheses. Finally, implications of the present study for culture and creativity research are highlighted - the types of designs selected for the present study are pervasive and already weave themselves into the fabric of everyday life, and robustly corroborated generalizations about them give us a glimpse into the basics of cognitive regimes that support and guide cultural and creative activities.

1. 孫式文(2010)。數位傳媒創新：一個數位行動導向的分析取徑。新聞學研究，103，175-214。
   連結：
2. Arnheim, R.(1988).The power of the center: A study of composition in the visual arts.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
3. Benczes, R.(2006).Creative compounding in English: The semantics of metaphorical and metonymical noun-noun combinations.Amsterdam, NL:John Benjamins Publishing Company.
4. Bordwell, D.(2008).Poetics of cinema.New York, NY:Routledge.
5. Fauconnier, G.,Turner, M.(2002).The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities.New York, NY:Basic Books.
6. Forceville, C.(2002).The identification of target and source in pictorial metaphors.Journal of Pragmatics,34(1),1-14.
7. Forceville, C.(1996).Pictorial metaphor in advertising.London, UK:Routledge.
8. Forceville, C.(ed.),Urios-Aprisi, E.(ed.)(2009).Multimodal metaphor.Berlin, GM:Mouton De Gruyter.
9. Gibbs, R. W.(ed.)(2008).The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought.Cambridge, NY:Cambridge University Press.
10. Gkiouzepas, L.,Hogg, M.(2011).Articulating a new framework for visual metaphors in advertising.Journal of Advertising,40(1),103-120.
11. Gravetter, F.,Forzano, L. B.(2011).Research methods for the behavioral sciences.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
12. Kantowitz, B. H.,Roediger III, H. L.,Elmes, D. G.(2009).Experimental psychology.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
13. Leigh, J. H.(1994).The use of figures of speech in print ad headlines.Journal of Advertising,23(2),17-33.
14. McQuarrie, E. F.,Mick, D. G.(1996).Figures of rhetoric in advertising language.Journal of Consumer Research,22(4),424-438.
15. McQuarrie, E. F.,Phillips, B. J.(2005).Indirect persuasion in advertising: How consumer process metaphors presented in pictures and words.Journal of Advertising,34(2),7-20.
16. Phillips, B. J.(1997).Thinking into it: Consumer interpretation of complex advertising images.Journal of Advertising,26(2),77-88.
17. Phillips, B. J.(2000).The impact of verbal anchoring on consumer response to image ads.Journal of Advertising,29(1),15-25.
18. Phillips, B. J.,McQuarrie, E. F.(2004).Beyond visual metaphor: A new typology of visual rhetoric in advertising.Marketing Theory,4(1/2),113-136.
19. Phillips, B. J.,McQuarrie, E. F.(2002).The development, change, and transformation of rhetorical style in magazine advertisements 1954-1999.Journal of Advertising,30(4),1-13.
20. Scott, L. M.(1994).Image in advertising: The need for a theory of visual rhetoric.Journal of Consumer Research,21(September),62-70.
21. Teng, N. Y.,Sun, S.(2002).Grouping, simile, and oxymoron in pictures: A designbased cognitive approach.Metaphor and symbol,17(4),295-316.
22. Wimmer, R. D.,Dominick, J. R.(2003).Mass media research: An introduction.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth/Thomson.
23. Wisniewski, E.,Love, B. C.(1998).Relations versus properties in conceptual combination.Journal of Memory and Language,38(2),177-202.
24. 吳岳剛(2008)。隱喻廣告：理論、研究與實作。台北市:五南。
25. 吳岳剛、呂庭儀(2007)。譬喻平面廣告中譬喻類型與表現形式的轉變：1974-2003。廣告學研究，28，29-58。
26. 鄧育仁、孫式文(2000)。廣告裡圖象隱喻的構圖原則：一個認知取徑的分析。廣告學研究，14，95-130。
27. 鄧育仁、孫式文(2000)。廣告裡的圖象隱喻：從多空間模式分析。新聞學研究，62，35-71。

1. 黃詩珮、王韋堯(2014)。視覺隱喻程度對廣告效果之影響。設計學研究，17(1)，113-134。