流動的群聚（mob-ility）：網路起鬨的社會心理基礎

Mob-ility: The Social Psychological Foundation of Online Rabbling

10.30386/MCR.201304_(115).0001

黃厚銘(Arthur Hou-Ming Huang)；林意仁(Yi-Ren Lin)

含混性 ； 「批踢踢實業坊」電子佈告欄系統 ； 流動性 ； 集體亢奮 ； 愛恨交織 ； 虛擬社區 ； ambiguity ； ambivalence ； collective effervescence ； mobility ； PTT BBS ； virtual community

新聞學研究

115期（2013 / 04 / 01）

1 - 50

繁體中文

本文提出「流動的群聚」（mob-ility）概念，嘗試重新介入虛擬社區的研究。過去網路人際關係研究的核心爭議之一，在於虛擬社區的性質。持正面態度的學者主張，網際網路為冷漠與疏離的現代社會人際關係，創造了改變的契機，並試圖藉由經驗研究提出佐證，而提出虛擬社區等概念來加以描述；持反面態度的學者則強調網路人際關係的匿名性、選擇性與流動性，不利發展長期與親密的人際關係或信任，而否認虛擬「社區」存在，甚至憂心網際網路對真實世界社區生活的衝擊；此即所謂「虛擬社區的社區議題」，借鏡自都市社會學的討論。為超越前述爭議，本文主張任何二元對立、非此即彼的選項，不管是在事實的認定上、還是在價值的選擇上，或許只是長期以來，科學理性影響下的思想慣性，卻會導致無法面對與看見世界原本就具有的含混性（ambiguity）與愛恨交織（ambivalence）面向。據此，本文企圖以一種含混性的思考方式，重新切入虛擬社區的社區議題，以期更貼近與凸顯台灣網路文化的特性。

This paper develops a theoretical and conceptual system to grasp the interpersonal relationships on the net, which we have named ”mob-ility.” One of the debates regarding interpersonal relationships on the Internet is that of the nature of virtual community. Some researchers consider the Internet to be the key to restoring the intimate, affective, and primary relationships in ”estranged” modern life. In contrast, other researchers dismiss this hope and regard the anonymity, fluidity, and electivity as threatening to the community aspect of both virtual reality and real life. This is what we have termed the Community Question of virtual community, as appropriated from urban sociology. We contend that all dichotomized choices are symptoms of the inclination of thinking under the influence of scientific rationality, but miss the ambiguity and ambivalence of the postmodern culture of our era. The theory and concept of ”mob-ility” attempt to transcend this dilemma and re-explore the Community Question of virtual community with new thinking for us to manifest the characteristics of Taiwanese Internet culture.

1. 劉慧雯(2008)。網際網路公共領域功能角色的反思：以東海劈腿事件與鴻海打壓新聞自由事件為例。新聞學研究，97，45-81。
   連結：
2. zseal（2008）。〈Re: [好奇] 有Ｈａｔｅ板沒落的八卦嗎？？？〉。取自 PTT Gossiping 看板精華區（精華區路徑：「藝文新知」－「批踢踢專屬」－「Hate 板」－「沒落原因」）。
3. Bulletin board system. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved July 4, 2012, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulletin_board_system
4. Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. American Jounal of Sociology, 44(1), 1-24.
5. Parsons, T. (1949). The structure of social action: A study in social theory with special reference to a group of recent European writers (2nd Ed.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press
6. Bakhtin, M.,Iswolsky, Hélène(Trans.)(1984).Rabelais and his world.Bloomington, IN:Indiana University Press.
7. Bauman, Z.(2001).Community: Seeking safety in an insecure world.London, UK:Polity Press.
8. Bauman, Z.(2001).The individualized society.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
9. Bauman, Z.(2003).Liquid love.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
10. Bauman, Z.(1992).Simmel, or the dawn of postmodern experience.Societes,35,3-16.
11. Bauman, Z.(2000).Liquid modernity.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
12. Beck, U.,Beck-Gernsheim, E.(2002).Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences.London, UK:SAGE.
13. Beck, U.,Beck-Gernsheim, E.,Ritter, Mark(Trans.),Wiebel, Jane(Trans.)(1995).The normal chaos of love.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
14. Carey, J. W.(1989).Communication as culture: Essays on media and society.Boston, MA:Unwin Hyman.
15. Certeau, M. D,Rendall, Steven(Trans.)(1984).The practice of everyday life.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
16. Collins, R.(2004).Interaction ritual chains.Princeton, N.J.:Princeton University Press.
17. Coyne, R.(1999).Technoromanticism: Digital narrative, holism, and the romance of the real.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
18. DiMaggio, P.,Hargittai, E.,Neuman, W. R.,Robinson, J. P.(2001).Social implications of the internet.Annual Review of Sociology,27,307-336.
19. Driskell, R. B.,Lyon, L.(2002).Are virtual communities real communities? Examining the environments and elements of community.City & Community,1(4),373-390.
20. Durkheim, E.,Bellah, Robert N.(Ed.)(1973).On morality and society: Selected writings.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
21. Durkheim, E.,Fields, Karen E.(Trans.)(1995).The elementary forms of the religious life.New York, NY:Free Press.
22. Durkheim, E.,Hall, W. D.(Trans.)(1984).The division of labor in society.London, UK:Macmillan.
23. Durkheim, E.,Lukes, Steven(Ed.),Hall, W. D.(Trans.)(1982).The rules of sociological method.New York, NY:Free Press.
24. Durkheim, E.,Spaulding, John A.(Trans.),Simpson, George(Trans.)(1951).Suicide: A study in sociology.New York, NY:Free Press.
25. Fischer, C.(1994).America calling.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
26. Fischer, C.(1984).The urban experience.San Diego, CA:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
27. Frisby, D.(Ed.),Featherstone, M.(Ed.)(1997).Simmel on culture: Selected writings.London, UK:Sage.
28. Gans, H. J.(1962).The urban villagers: Group and class in the life of Italian-Americans.New York, NY:Free Press.
29. Giddens, A.(1971).Capitalism and modern social theory: An analysis of the writings of Marx, Durkheim and Max Weber.London, UK:Cambridge University Press.
30. Granovetter, M. S.(1973).The strength of weak ties.American Journal of Sociology,78(6),1360-1380.
31. Granovetter, M. S.(1983).The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited.Sociological Theory,1,201-233.
32. Grieco, M.(Ed.),Urry, J.(Ed.)(2011).Mobilities: New perspectives on transport and society.Farnham, UK:Surrey.
33. Hamilton, P.(1983).Talcott Parsons.E. Horwood:Chichester [West Sussex], UK.
34. Kraut, R.,Patterson, M.,Lundmark, V.,Kiesler, S.,Mukopadhyay, T.,Scherlis, W.(1998).Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?.American Psychologist,53(9),1017-1031.
35. Kron, T.(2000).Georg Simmel as a postmodern theorist?.Simmel Studies,10(2),179-219.
36. Lee, N.(Ed.),Munro, R.(Ed.)(2001).The consumption of mass.Oxford, UK:Blackwell/Sociological Review.
37. Levine, D.(Ed.)(1971).Georg Simmel on individuality and social forms.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
38. Maffesoli, M.,Emanuel, Susan(Trans.)(1996).The contemplation of the world: Figures of community style.Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
39. Maffesoli, M.,Smith, Don(Trans.)(1996).The time of the tribes: The decline of individualism in mass society.London, UK:Sage.
40. McLuhan, M.(1994).Understanding media: The extension of man.London, UK:Routledge.
41. Meštrovic, S. G.(1991).The coming fin de siècle: An application of Durkheim's sociology to modernity and postmodernism.London, UK:Routledge.
42. Mitchell, W. J.(1955).City of bits: Space, place, and the infobahn.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
43. Rheingold, H.(2000).The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
44. Rheingold, H.(2003).Smart mobs: The next social revolution.Cambridge, MA:Perseus Pub..
45. Slouka, M.(1995).War of the worlds: Cyberspace and the high-tech assault on reality.New York, NY:BasicBooks.
46. Smith, M. A.(Ed.),Kollock, P.(Ed.)(1995).Communities in cyberspace.New York, NY:Routledge.
47. Stoll, C.(1995).Silicon snake oil: second thoughts on the information highway.New York, NY:Doubleday.
48. Thrift, N.(2004).Movement-space: The changing domain of thinking resulting from the development of new kinds of spatial awareness.Economy and Society,33(4),582-604.
49. Tuan, Y. F.(1996).Cosmos and hearth: A cosmopolite's viewpoint.Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
50. Urry, J.(2007).Mobilities.London, UK:Polity Press.
51. Virilio, P.,Camiller, Patrick(Trans.)(2000).Polar inertia.London, UK:Sage.
52. Virilio, P.,Rose, Julie( Trans.)(1995).The art of the motor.Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
53. Virilio, P.,Rose, Julie(Trans.)(1997).Open sky.New York, NY:Verso.
54. Wellman, B.(1979).The community question: The intimate networks of East Yorkers.American Journal of Sociology,84(5),1201-1231.
55. Wellman, B.(1982).Studying personal communities.Social structure and network analysis,Beverly Hills, CA:
56. Wellman, B.(1990).Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support.American Journal of Sociology,96(3),275-302.
57. Wellman, B.(1997).The road to utopia and dystopia on the information highway.Contemporary Sociology,26(4),445-449.
58. Wellman, B.(1988).The community question re-evaluated.Comparative Urban & Community Research,1,81-107.
59. Wellman, B.(Ed.),Berkowitz, S. D.(Ed.)(1988).Social structure: A network approach.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
60. Wellman, B.,Leighton, B. (1979). Networks, neighborhoods, and communities: Approaches to the study of the community question(1979).Urban Affairs Quarterly,14(3),363-390.
61. Whyte, W.(1993).Street corner society: The social structure of an Italian slum.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
62. 林意仁(2010)。由PTT Gossiping看板看「網路公眾」。文化研究月報，108，52-70。
63. 林意仁(2011)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。政治大學社會學研究所。
64. 黃厚銘(1994)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台灣大學社會學研究所。
65. 黃厚銘(2001)。博士論文(博士論文)。台灣大學社會學研究所。
66. 葉啟政(2010)。象徵交換與「正負情愫並存」現象。「社會理論：現代性與本土化」研討會，北京:
67. 潘桂成譯、Tuan, Yi-fu(1998)。經驗透視中的空間和地方。台北:國立編譯館。

1. 曹琬凌(2021)。紀錄片的時間政治：《老鷹想飛》的媒介化故事效應。新聞學研究，147，101-149。
2. 陳志賢(2017)。新盲點辯論與賽伯人商品生產：數位使用者的勞動、剝削與抵抗。政治與社會哲學評論，63，65-129。
3. 黃厚銘、曹家榮(2015)。「流動的」手機：液態現代性的時空架構與群己關係。新聞學研究，124，39-81。
4. 林思平(2017)。網路八卦與真理政治：批踢踢八卦板之閱聽人研究。新聞學研究，133，135-188。
5. 林思平(2020)。純粹社群、掛釘社群與網絡個人主義：以批踢踢八卦板（PTT Gossiping）為例。資訊社會研究，38，127-161。
6. 彭憶祖,林伯賢(2018)。公共空間導入情緒釋放與情感互動療癒性活動需求之探討。造園景觀學報，22(2)，73-100。
7. 譚躍(2019)。候選人臉書粉絲專頁的使用、決定因素和影響：以2016年臺灣區域立委選舉為例。中華傳播學刊，36，81-115。
8. 譚躍,蕭蘋(2019)。線上災難傳播的議題設定效果：高雄氣爆事件中媒體臉書粉絲專頁主文與回應文的互動影響。新聞學研究，138，163-224。
9. 鄭宇君、陳百齡(2014)。從流通到聚合：重大災難期間浮現的資訊頻道。新聞學研究，121，89-125。
10. 鄭宇君、陳百齡(2014)。探索2012 年台灣總統大選之社交媒體浮現社群：鉅量資料分析取徑。新聞學研究，120，121-165。
11. (2017)。流動媒介與脫域的認同。考古人類學刊，86，211-216。
12. (2018)。真真假假，假假真真：青少年認同與社群網路使用研究取向之研究。教育研究月刊，296，14-30。
13. (2020)。AI時代之分裂社會與民主──以美國法之表意自由與觀念市場自由競爭理論為中心。月旦法學雜誌，302，109-126。
14. (2021)。大學生與Dcard。教育研究月刊，328，17-25。
15. (2021)。臺灣空污新聞在網路中的擴散、集體守門和議題設定。中華傳播學刊，39，147-193。
16. (2024)。影子戰術：台灣當代數位創作的修復性幽默。中外文學，53(2)，17-54。