多對一電視政治新聞專訪之對話分析研究

A Conversation Analysis of Televised Many-to-One Political News Interviews

10.30386/MCR.201310_(117).0003

江靜之(Chin-Chih Chiang)

中立 ； 問題 ； 電視政治訪談 ； 對立 ； 對話分析 ； adversarialism ； conversation analysis ； neutralism ； questions ； television political news interviews

新聞學研究

117期（2013 / 10 / 01）

89 - 134

繁體中文

本研究採對話分析，探究多對一政治訪問者如何協力提問及形塑立場。本研究分析2010年【新聞面對面】五都市長候選人專訪，發現主持人透過維持問答互動來形塑訪問者中立性，並以重述及協力追問而在對立訪問中維持中立，主持人也透過日常對話機制塑造輕鬆氣氛，甚至為受訪者創造友善環境。此外，主持人對立性低於其他訪問者，因前者多藉他人之名提問且使用較多開放式問題，後者則直接表達個人觀點、使用結構複雜的問題，較多追問。

Focusing on many-to-one political news interviews, this study adopted a conversation analysis to explore how interviewers construct questions collaboratively and establish their positions. By conducting a case study on Face News, this study discovered that the host on this program typically remains neutral by returning the discussion to a normal question-and-answer system. In addition, by reformulating other interviewers' questions and issuing follow-up questions, this host manages to conduct confrontational interviews while still maintaining his/her neutral stance.Furthermore, by mixing casual conversations into the discussion, the host creates a friendly environment for guests and enables a political interview to be casual in nature. Finally, this study demonstrated that the host is less adversarial than other interviewers because the host tends to ask questions attributed to third parties and employ questions that are more open-ended. By contrast, the other interviewers do not hesitate to express opinions directly, ask multiple questions in succession, and ask more follow-up questions than the host does.

1. Antaki, C.(ed.),Widdicombe, S.(ed.)(1998).Identities in talk.London, UK:Sage.
2. Atkinson, P.,Silverman, D.(1997).Kundera's immortality: The interview society and the invention of the self.Qualitative Inquiry,3(3),304-325.
3. Bell, A.(ed.),Garrett, P.(ed.)(1998).Approaches to media discourse.Oxford, UK:Blackwell Publishers.
4. Bell, P.,van Leeuwen, T.(1994).The media interview: Confession, contest, conversation.Kensington, NSW:University of New South Wales Press.
5. Ben-Porath, E. N.(2010).Interview effects: Theory and evidence for the impact of televised political on viewer attitudes.Communication Theory,20,323-347.
6. Boden, D.(ed.),Zimmerman, D. H.(ed.)(1993).Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis.Oxford, UK:Polity Press.
7. Clayman, S. E.(2002).Disagreements and third parties: Dilemmas of neutralism in panel news interviews.Journal of Pragmatics,34,1385-1401.
8. Clayman, S. E.(1988).Displaying neutrality in television news interviews.Social Problems,35(4),474-492.
9. Clayman, S. E.(1989).The production of punctuality: Social interaction, temporal organization, and social structure.The American Journal of Sociology,95(3),659-691.
10. Clayman, S. E.,Heritage, J.(2002).Questioning presidents: Journalistic deference and adversarialness in the press conferences of U.S. presidents Eisenhower and Reagan.Journal of Communication,52,749-775.
11. Clayman, S. E.,Heritage, J.(2002).The news interviews: Journalists and public figures on the air.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
12. Corner, J.(ed.),Pels, D.(ed.)(2003).Media and the restyling of politics: Consumerism, celebrity and cynicism.London, UK:Sage.
13. Drew, P.(ed.),Heritage, J.(ed.)(1992).Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
14. Ekström, M.(2002).Epistemologies of TV journalism.Journalism,3(3),259-282.
15. Emmertsen, S.(2007).Interviewers' challenging questions in British debate interviews.Journal of Pragmatics,39,570-591.
16. Fairclough, N.(1995).Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language.London, UK:Longman.
17. Fairclough, N.(1992).Discourse and social change.Cambridge, MA:Polity Press.
18. Fairclough, N.(1989).Language and power.London, UK:Longman.
19. Garrison, B.(1992).Professional news reporting.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Grant, D.(ed.),Keenoy, T.(ed.),Oswick, C.(ed.)(1998).Discourse and organization.London, UK:Sage.
21. Heritage, J.(1984).Garfinkel and ethnomethodology.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
22. Heritage, J.,Roth, A.(1995).Grammar and institution: Questions and questioning in the broadcast news interview.Research on Language and Social Interaction,28(1),1-60.
23. Huls, E.,Varwijk, J.(2011).Political bias in TV interviews.Discourse & Society,22(1),48-65.
24. Hutchby, I.(1996).Confrontation talk: Arguments, asymmetries, and power on talk radio.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Hutchby, I.(2011).Non-neutrality and argument in the hybrid political interview.Discourse Studies,13(3),349-365.
26. Hutchby, I.,Wooffitt, R.(1999).Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications.Malden, MA:Polity Press.
27. Koshik, I.(2003).Wh-questions used as challenges.Discourse Studies,5(1),51-77.
28. Lauerbach, G.(2010).Manoeuvring between the political, the personal and the private: Talk, image, and rhythm in TV dialogue.Discourse & Communication,4(2),125-159.
29. Rendle-Short, J.(2007).Neutralism and adversarial challenges in the political news interview.Discourse & Communication,1(4),387-406.
30. Thornborrow, J.,Montgomery, M.(2010).Special issue on personalization in the broadcast news interview.Discourse & Communication,4(2),99-104.
31. Titscher, S.,Meyer, M.,Wodak, R.,Vetter, E.(2000).Methods of text and discourse analysis.London, UK:Sage.
32. van Dijk, Teun A.(ed.)(1985).Handbook of discourse analysis.London, UK:Academic Press.
33. Wadensjö, C.(2008).The shaping of Gorbachev: On framing in an interpreter-mediated talk-show interview.Text & Talk,28(1),119-146.
34. 江靜之(2009)。從論述角度探析廣電新聞訪問者的現實與理想。台北:秀威。
35. 江靜之(2005)。博士論文(博士論文)。政治大學新聞研究所。
36. 李昱慧(2010)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。清華大學語言學研究所。
37. 徐業平、丁小燕(2005)。新聞採訪。北京:新華出版社。
38. 臧國仁編、蔡琰編(2007)。新聞訪問：理論與個案。台北:五南。

1. 江靜之(2014)。電視新聞訪談之知識形式：一個分析架構。中華傳播學刊，25，43-69。