網路與公共領域：從審議模式轉向多元公眾模式

The Internet and the Public Sphere: From the Normative Model to the Model of Multiple Publics

10.30386/MCR.201401_(118).0002

林宇玲(Yu-Ling Lin)

公共領域 ； 多元公眾模式 ； 爭勝多元主義 ； 對抗性公眾 ； 網路研究 ； 審議模式 ； agonistic pluralism ； counter publics ； internet research ； public sphere ； the model of multiple publics normative model

新聞學研究

118期（2014 / 01 / 01）

55 - 85

繁體中文

從新聞媒體對各種發燒議題的報導來看，網路輿論的影響力已不容小覷，但學者對「網路能否成為公共領域」卻有不同看法。這類爭辯多採用Habermas觀點，試圖以一套公共領域的規範性標準來評估網路的言論表現。為瞭解這類研究應用在網路的限制，本文回頭檢視Habermas的審議模式，並建議採用Fraser提出的多元公眾模式，從「權力競逐」角度將研究焦點從靜態的形構問題轉移至「網路對公共領域的衝擊」，進一步掌握網路公眾和參與的民主意涵。

Based on news coverage of ”hot issues,” the influence of online public opinion should not be underestimated; however, scholars have divergent views regarding the Internet as a public sphere. These debates primarily use the Habermasian public sphere model, evaluating online speech performance according to a set of normative standards.To understand the limitations of such works applied to the internet, this study examined the assumption of Habermas's normative model and suggested replacing it with the Fraserian model of multiple public spheres. From a power struggle perspective, this research focused on the shift from a static configuration of the Internet as a public sphere to the impact of the Internet on public spheres, and explored the democratic implications of online public spheres and participation.

1. 洪貞玲、劉昌德(2004)。線上全球公共領域？網路的潛能、實踐與限制。資訊社會研究，6，341-363。
   連結：
2. 楊意菁(2008)。網路民意的公共意涵：公衆、公共領域與溝通審議。中華傳播學刊，14，115-167。
   連結：
3. 劉世鼎、勞麗珠(2010)。網路作為澳門的另類公共領域。新聞學研究，102，255-294。
   連結：
4. 劉慧雯(2008)。網際網路公共領域功能角色的反思：以東海劈腿事件與鴻海打壓新聞自由事件為例。新聞學研究，97，45-81。
   連結：
5. 墨晉(2010)。線上「理想言談情境」有多理想？蘇花國道論壇的檢視質分析。行政暨政策學報，5，125-170。
   連結：
6. 謝宗學(2003)。網際民主與審議民主之實踐：資訊化社會的桃花源村？。資訊社會學，4，87-139。
   連結：
7. Mouffe, C. (2000). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism. Retrieved from http://www.ihs.ac.at/publications/pol/pw_72.pdf
8. MacDonald, F. (2007). “Political” autonomy: What does Mouffe offer contemporary cultural politics? Retrieved from http://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/papers-2007/MacDonald-Fiona.pdf
9. Mouffe, C. (2005). Which public space for artistic practices? Retrieved from http://readingpublicimage.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/chantal_mouffe_cork_caucus.pdf
10. Kellner, D. (2000). Habermas, the public sphere, and democracy: A critical intervention. Retrieved from http://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/papers/habermas.htm
11. Poster, M. (1995). Cyberdemocracy: Internet and the public sphere. Retrieved from http://www.humanities.uci.edu/mposter/writings/democ.html
12. Mouffe, C. (2002). Politics and passions: The stakes of democracy. Retrieved from http://www.westminster.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/6456/Politics-and-Passions.pdf
13. Asen, R.(2000).Seeking the 'counter' in counterpublics.Communication Theory,10(4),424-446.
14. Bruns, A.(2008).Life beyond the public sphere: Towards a networked model for political deliberation.Information Polity,13(1-2),65-79.
15. Buchstein, H.(1997).Bytes that bite: The internet and deliberative democracy.Connstellations,4(2),248-263.
16. Cammaerts, B.(Ed.),Carpentier, N.(Ed.)(2006).Reclaiming the media: Communication rights and expanding democratic media roles.Bristol, UK:Intellect.
17. Cammaerts, B.(Ed.),Carpentier, N.(Ed.)(2007).Reclaiming the media: Communication rights and democratic media roles.Bristol, UK:Intellect Books.
18. Chang, Woo-Young(2005).The internet, alternative public sphere and political dynamism: Korea's non-gaek (polemist) websites.The Pacific Review,18(3),393-415.
19. Dahlberg, L.(2001).Computer-mediated communication and the public sphere: A critical analysis.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communications,7(1)
20. Dahlberg, L.(2007).The internet, deliberative democracy, and power: Radicalizing the public sphere.International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics,3(1),47-64.
21. Dahlberg, L.(2004).Net-public sphere research: Beyond the 'first phase'.Javnost/The Public,11(1),5-22.
22. Dahlberg, L.(2004).The Habermasian public sphere: A specification of the idealized conditions of democratic communication.Studies in Social and Political Thought,10,2-18.
23. Dahlberg, L.(2001).The Habermansian public sphere encounters cyber-reality.Javnost/The Public,8(3),83-96.
24. Dahlberg, L.(2001).The internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere.Information, Communication, and Society,4(4),615-633.
25. Dahlberg, L.(2007).Rethinking the fragmentation of the cyberpublic: From consensus to contestation.New Media & Society,9(5),827-847.
26. Dahlberg, L.(2011).Re-constructing digital democracy: An outline of four 'positions'.New Media and Society,13(6),855-872.
27. Dahlgren, P.(2002).In search of the talkative public: Media, deliberative democracy and civic culture.Javnost/The Public,9(3),5-25.
28. de Vreese, C.(Ed.),Schmitt, H.(Ed.)(2007).A European public sphere: How much of it do we have and how much do we need?.Mannheim, DE:CONNEX.
29. Dean, J.(2003).Why the net is not a public sphere.Constellations,10(1),95-112.
30. Fenton, N.(2008).Mediating hope: New media, politics and resistance.International Journal of Cultural Studies,11(2),230-248.
31. Fenton, N.(2008).Mediating solidarity.Global Media and Communication,4(1),37-57.
32. Fenton, N.,Downey, J.(2003).Counter public spheres and global modernity.Javnost/The Public,10(1),15-32.
33. Fisher, D. R.,Wright, L. M.(2001).On utopias and dystopias: Toward an understanding of the discourse surrounding the Internet.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,6(2)
34. Fraser, N.(1990).Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy.Social Text,25/26,56-80.
35. Fraser, N.(2007).Transnationalizing the public sphere: On the legitimacy and efficacy of public opinion in a post-Westphalian world.Theory, Culture & Society,24(4),7-30.
36. Habermas, J.(2006).Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research.Communication Theory,16(4),411-426.
37. Habermas, J.(1984).The theory of communicative action.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
38. Habermas, J.(1992).Further reflections on the public sphere.Habermas and the public sphere,Cambridge, MA:
39. Habermas, J.(1989).The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society.Cambridge, UK:Polity.
40. Habermas, J.(2001).On the pragmatics of social interaction: Preliminary studies in the theory of communicative action.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
41. Habermas, J.(Ed.)(1979).Communication and the evolution of society.Boston, MA:Beacon Press.
42. Habermas, J., Lennox, S.(Trans.),Lennox, F.(Trans.)(1974).The public sphere: An encyclopedia article.New German Critique,3,49-55.
43. Hass, T.,Steiner, L.(2001).Public journalism as a journalism of publics: Implications of the Habermas-Fraser debate for public journalism.Journalism,2(2),123-147.
44. Karppinen, K.(2007).Against naïve pluralism in media politics: on the implications of the radical pluralist approach to the public sphere.Media, Culture and Society,29(3),489-502.
45. Koçan, G(2008).Models of public sphere in political philosophy.Working Paper,2
46. Lunat, Z.(2008).The Internet and the public sphere: Evidence from civil society in developing countries.EJISDC,35(3),1-12.
47. Milioni, D. L.(2009).Probing the online counterpublic sphere: The case of Indymedia Athens.Media Culture & Society,31(3),409-431.
48. Moe, H.(2009).Online media participation and the transformation of the public sphere: Moving beyond the fragmentation debate.AoIR conference Internet Research 10.0–Internet: Critical
49. Mouffe, C.(2005).On the political.London, UK:Routledge.
50. Negt, O.,Kluge, A.(1972).Public sphere and experience: Toward an analysis of bourgeois and proletarian public sphere.Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
51. Owens, L.,Palmer, L. K.(2003).Making the news: Anarchist counter-public relations on the World Wide Web.Critical Studies in Media Communication,20(4),335-361.
52. Papacharissi, Z.(2002).The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere.New Media and Society,4(1),9-27.
53. Rasmussen, T.(2008).The internet and differentiation in the political public sphere.Nordicom Review,29(2),73-83.
54. Sunstein, C.(2001).Republic.com.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
55. Thörn, H.(2007).Social movements, the media and the emergence of a global public sphere.Current Sociology,55(6),896-918.
56. Travers, A.(2003).Parallel subaltern feminist: Counterpublics in cyberspace.Sociological Perspectives,46(2),223-237.
57. van den Boomen, M. V. T.(ED.)(2009).Digital material: Tracing new media in everyday life and technology.Amsterdam, NL:Amsterdam University Press.
58. Verstraeten, H.(1996).The media and the transformation of the public sphere.European Journal of Communication,11,347-370.
59. Wiegmink, P.(2011).Performance and politics in the public sphere.Journal of Transnational American Studies,3(2)
60. Wilhelm, A.(2000).Democracy in the digital age: Challenges to political life in cyberspace.New York, NY:Routledge.
61. Wright, A. L.(2012).Counterpublic protest and the purpose of occupy: Reframing the discourse of occupy.Plaza: Dialogues in Language and Literature,4(1)
62. 胡敏琪(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。世新大學傳播研究所。

1. 黃東益(2017)。資訊通訊科技驅動治理轉型？趨勢與研究議題。文官制度季刊，9(3)，1-25。
2. 蔣旭政,廖執善,周昆璋(2021)。人工智慧科技在臺灣新聞傳播領域之運用與發展。臺灣東亞文明研究學刊，18(1)，43-87。
3. 林思平(2017)。網路八卦與真理政治：批踢踢八卦板之閱聽人研究。新聞學研究，133，135-188。
4. 劉大華,曹開明(2019)。網路論述的語藝生態學初探：以網路社群討論軍中同志議題為例。傳播研究與實踐，9(1)，65-103。
5. 劉慧雯,楊竹惠(2023)。從「韓粉出征，寸草不生」現象論庶民對抗型公共領域的再現。資訊社會研究，44，71-96。
6. 王嵩音(2017)。社交媒體政治性使用行為與公民參與之研究。資訊社會研究，32，83-112。
7. 張惠堂、李威翰(2015)。網路社群參與地方公共事務之研究：以觀新藻礁生態保育議題為例。中國行政評論，21(3)，49-76。
8. (2020)。「私人」話語如何成為公共議題？－共情、再構與「底層」表達。傳播與社會學刊，54，193-221。
9. (2020)。公領域私語化：臺灣社群媒體政治新聞貼文與討論分析。中華傳播學刊，38，215-252。
10. (2022)。台灣亡國感？台灣民眾對香港反送中運動的媒體信任、風險感知、負面情感與行為意圖分析。傳播與社會學刊，61，161-195。