行動通訊的持續完成：「講手機」的俗民方法學探問

The Ongoing Accomplishment of the Mobile Telecommunication: An Ethnomethodological Study of ＂Talking on a Mobile Phone＂

10.30386/MCR.201507_(124).0001

曹家榮(Chia-Rong Tsao)

行動電話 ； 技術現象學 ； 俗民方法學 ； 講手機 ； 雙面舞台 ； double-sided stage ； ethnomethodology ； mobile phone ； phenomenology of technology ； talking on a mobile phone

新聞學研究

124期（2015 / 07 / 01）

1 - 37

繁體中文

本研究試圖透過俗民方法學的視野探究「講手機」是如何可能。有別於既有研究多半關注行動電話做為一種社會事實所帶來的影響，本研究聚焦於此一事實本身如何在日常實作中持續被建構與維繫。以「講手機」為例，本研究主張，行動電話使用者透過理所當然地使用諸如「詮釋」、「體現」、「記錄詮釋法」、「合理解明」等方法，才持續完成了「講手機」之實作過程，也才進而反身地確認與再生產了行動電話普及所帶來的結構性變遷與影響。

This paper attempts to explore the practices of ＂talking on a mobile phone＂ through the ethnomethodological approach. Instead of paying attention to the influences of the prevalence of mobile phones, this paper focuses on the ongoing accomplishment of the practices of cellphone-using. This paper contends that the mobile phone users accomplish the practices of ＂talking on a mobile phone＂ continuously by methods such as ＂reading hermeneutically＂, ＂embodying＂, ＂the documentary method of interpretation＂, and ＂accounting reasonably＂, etc. Users not only take these methods for granted, but also see but unnoticed what they really do by these cellphoneusing practices. The practices identify and reproduce reflexively the structural influences brought by the prevalence of mobile phones while accomplishing the process of ＂talking on a mobile phone＂.

1. Bauman, Z.(2000).Liquid modernity.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
2. Bourdieu, P.,Wacquant, L. J. D.(1992).An invitation to reflexive sociology.Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press.
3. Castells, M.,Fernandez-Ardevol, M.,Qiu, J. L.,Sey, A.(2007).Mobile communication and society: A global perspective.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
4. Chayko, M.(2008).Portable communities: The social dynamics of online and mobile connectedness.New York, NY:SUNY Press.
5. Conein, B.(Ed.),d. Fornel, M.(Ed.),Quéré, L.(Ed.)(1990).Les formes de la conversation.Paris, FR:CNET.
6. de Certeau, M.,Rendall, S.(Trans.)(1984).The practice of everyday life.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
7. Fortunati, L.(2002).The mobile phone: Towards new categories and social relations.Information, Communication & Society,5(4),513-528.
8. Fortunati, L.(2005).The mobile phone: Local and global dimension.A sense of place: The global and local in mobile communication,Vienna, AT:
9. Garfinkel, H.(1967).Studies in ethnomethodology.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
10. Goffman, E.(1959).The presentation of self in everyday life.New York, NY:Doubleday.
11. Goggin, G.(2006).Cell phone culture : Mobile technology in everyday life.London, UK:Routledge.
12. Green, N.(2002).On the move: Technology, mobility, and the mediation of social time and space.The Information Society,18(4),281-292.
13. Haddon, L.(2003).Domestication and mobile telephony.Machines that become us: The social context of personal communication technology,New Brunswick, CA:
14. Hahn, H. P.,Kibora, L.(2008).The domestication of the mobile phone: Oral society and new ICT in Burkina Faso.Journal of Modern African Studies,46(1),87-109.
15. Heritage, J.(1984).Garfinkel and ethnomethodology.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
16. Hutchby, I.(2001).Conversation and technology: From the telephone to the internet.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
17. Ihde, D.(1979).Technics and praxis.Boston, MA:D. Reidel Pub. Co..
18. Ihde, D.(1990).Technology and the lifeworld.Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
19. Katz, J. E.(Ed.)(2008).Handbook of communication studies.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
20. Katz, J. E.(Ed.),Aakhus, M. A.(Ed.)(2002).Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
21. Leiter, K.(1980).A primer on ethnomethodology.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
22. Levinson, P.(2004).Cellphone: The story of the world's most mobile medium and how it has transformed everything.New York, NY:Palgrave Macmillan.
23. Licoppe, C.(2003).Two modes of maintaining interpersonal relations through telephone: From the domestic to the mobile phone.Machines that become us: The social context of personal communication technology,New Brunswick, CA:
24. Ling, R.(2008).New tech, new ties: How mobile communication is reshaping social cohesion.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
25. Ling, R.(2004).The mobile connection: The cell phone's impact on society.San Francisco, CA:Morgan Kaufmann.
26. Ling, R.,Donner, J.(2009).Mobile communication.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
27. McLuhan, M.(1964).Understanding media: The extension of man.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
28. Meyrowitz, J.(2005).The rise of glocality: New senses of place and identity in the global village.A sense of place: The global and local in mobile communication,Vienna, AT:
29. Meyrowitz, J.(2003).Global nomads in the digital veldt.Mobile democracy: Essays on society, self and politics,Vienna, AT:
30. Rawls, A. W.(Ed.)(2002).Ethnomethodology's program: Working out Durkheim's aphorism.Lanham, MD:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc..
31. Rheingold, H.(2002).Smart mobs : The next social revolution.Cambridge, MA:Perseus Pub..
32. 曹家榮(2012)。博士論文(博士論文)。政治大學社會學系。
33. 盧嵐蘭譯、Schütz, A.(1992)。舒茲論文集（第一冊）。台北:桂冠。
34. 蘇碩斌譯、吉見俊哉(2009)。媒介文化論—給媒介學習者的15 講。台北:群學。

1. 曹家榮(2020)。Pokémon GO的「擴增實境」如何可能？一種科技現象學的詮釋。資訊社會研究，39，71-98。
2. 金麟(2020)。中文打字機與科技語言的現代性。新聞學研究，142，201-208。
3. (2023)。科技中介的日常生活實作：一個分析框架的提出－以血糖監測與胰島素注射技術為例。政治與社會哲學評論，79，57-114。