题名

家庭權力關係中的第三人效果:數位家庭人我影響評估的性別差異與支持行為分析

并列篇名

The Third-Person Effect in Family Power Relationship: Gender Differences and Supporting Behaviors in Digit Home Related Self-Other Comparison

DOI

10.30386/MCR.201507_(124).0004

作者

陳志賢(Chih-Hsien Chen)

关键词

第三人效果 ; 數位家庭 ; 社會家庭鑲嵌 ; 性別 ; 文化研究 ; 人我比較 ; the third-person effect ; digit home ; social and family embedment ; gender ; cultural studies ; self-other comparison

期刊名称

新聞學研究

卷期/出版年月

124期(2015 / 07 / 01)

页次

117 - 164

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究嘗試分析社會家庭鑲嵌的第三人效果,問卷調查實證統計發現大致上支持本研究所提出的假設:不僅家庭數位科技的瞭解與使用有顯著的性別差異,鑲嵌於不同家庭權力關係中的男女也對數位家庭影響做出迥異的人我評估。人我認知差距對行為層面的影響也有男女之別:男性傾向因他人與自己之間的第三人效果認知差距增加而更支持數位家庭發展,女性則不因任何人我影響比較而改變支持度。

英文摘要

To analyze the social/family-embedded third-person effect, an islandwide survey was conducted to test the hypotheses. The statistic results mostly support the contextualized arguments: Gender differences are found around the understanding and use of family digital technologies, whereas women with more power and resources at home tend to have some significant firstperson perceptual disparity. For men, the perceived discrepancy between the impacts of digital home on themselves and on other people leads to the supportive behavior, but it is not the case for women.

主题分类 社會科學 > 傳播學
参考文献
  1. 李明哲(2005)。從女性影像探討個人電腦居家化之意含變遷:以《PC home》雜誌廣告為分析對象。台灣社會研究季刊,57,1-40。
    連結:
  2. 林素真(2013)。第三人效果:社會向下比較過程的自利偏差。新聞學研究,116,1-46。
    連結:
  3. 陳志賢、陳志萍(2007)。電視改革的第三人效果與新社會運動模式。新聞學研究,91,35-83。
    連結:
  4. 彭文正(2007)。第三人效果的理論與疑惑。中華傳播學刊,12,3-52。
    連結:
  5. Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation. New York, NY: Farrar & Rinehart.
  6. Ang, I.(1996).Living Room Wars: Rethinking media audiences for a postmodern world.London, UK:Routledge.
  7. Atwood, L. E.(1994).Illusions of media power: The third-person effect.Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly,71(2),269-281.
  8. Bourdieu, P.,Wacquant, L. J. D.(1992).An invitation to reflexive sociology.Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press.
  9. Bryant, J.(Ed.),Zillmann, D.(Ed.)(2002).Media effects: Advances in theory and research.Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
  10. Chia, S. C.(2007).Third-person perceptions about idealized body image and weight-loss behavior.Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly,84(4),677-694.
  11. Chia, S. C.,Lu, K. H.,Mcleod, D. M.(2004).Sex, lies, and video compact disc: A case study on third-person perception and motivations for media censorship.Communication Research,31(1),109-130.
  12. Chia, S. C.,Wen, N.(2010).College men's third-person perceptions about idealized body image and consequent behavior.Sex Role,63,542-555.
  13. Cockburn, C.,Furst-Dilic, R.(1994).Bringing technology home: Gender and technology in a changing Europe.Milton Keynes, UK:Open University Press.
  14. Craig, S.(Ed.)(1992).Men, Masculinity, and the Media.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  15. David, P.,Liu, K.,Myser, M.(2004).Methodological artifact or persistent bias?.Communication Research,31(2),206-233.
  16. David, P.,Morrison, G.,Johnson, M.,Ross, F.(2002).Body image, race and fashion models: Social distance and social identification in third-person effects.Communication Research,29(3),270-294.
  17. Davison, W. P.(1983).The third-person effect in communication.Public Opinion Quarterly,47,1-13.
  18. Diefenbach, D. L.,West, M. D.(2007).Television and attitudes toward mental health issues: Cultivation analysis and the third-person effect.Journal of Community Psychology,35(2),181-195.
  19. Duck, J. M.,Mullin, B.(1995).The perceived impact of the mass media: Reconsidering the third-person effect.European Journal of Social Psychology,25,77-95.
  20. Elder, T. J.,Douglas, K. M.,Sutton, R. M.(2006).Perceptions of social influence when message favor "us" versus "them": A closer look at the social distance effect.European Journal of Social Psychology,36,353-365.
  21. Eveland, W. P., Jr,Nathanson, A. I.,Detenber, B. H.,McLeod, D. M.(1999).Rethinking the social distance corollary: Perceived likelihood of exposure and the third-person perception.Communication Research,26,275-302.
  22. Goodman, J. R.,Walsh-Childers, K.(2004).Sculpting the female breast: How college women negotiate the media's ideal breast image.Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly,81,657-674.
  23. Gordon, J.(2007).The mobile phone and the public sphere: Mobile phone usage in three critical situations.Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies,13(3),307-319.
  24. Granovetter, M.(1985).Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness.The American Journal of Sociology,91(3),487.
  25. Gripsrud, J.(2010).Television in the digital public sphere.Relocating television: Television in the digital context,London, UK:
  26. Gunther, A. C.(1991).What we think others think: Cause and consequence in the thirdperson effect.Communication Research,18,355-372.
  27. Gunther, A. C.(1995).Overrating the x-rating: The third-person perception and support for censorship of pornography.Journal of Communication,45,27-38.
  28. Gunther, A. C.,Bolt, D.,Borzekowski, D. I. G.,Liebhart, J. L.,Dillard, J. P.(2006).Presumed influence on peer norms: How mass media indirectly affect adolescent smoking.The Journal of Communication,56,52-68.
  29. Gunther, A. C.,Hwa, A. P.(1996).Public perceptions of television influence and opinions about censorship in Singapore.International Journal of Public Opinion Research,8(3),248-265.
  30. Gunther, A. C.,Mundy, P.(1993).Biased optimism and the third-person effect.Journalism Quarterly,70,58-67.
  31. Haddon, L.(2006).The contribution of domestication research to in-home computing and media consumption.The Information Society,22,195-203.
  32. Haridakis, P. M.,Rubin, A. M.(2005).Third-person effects in the aftermath of terrorism.Mass Communication & Society,8(1),39-59.
  33. Hartmann, M.(Ed.),Berker, T.(Ed.),Punie, Y.(Ed.),Ward, K.(Ed.)(2005).Domestication of media and technology.Milton Keynes, UK:Open University Press.
  34. Henriksen, L.,Flora, J. A.(1999).Third-person perception and children: Perceived impact of pro- and anti-smoking ads.Communication Research,26,643-665.
  35. Hoffner, C.,Buchanan, M.(2002).Parents' responses to television violence: The thirdperson perception, parental mediation, and support for censorship.Media Psychology,4,231-252.
  36. Innes, J. M.,Zeitz, H.(1988).The public's view of the impact of the mass media: A test of the "third person" effect.European Journal of Social Psychology,18,457-463.
  37. Jensen, J. D.,Hurley, R. J.(2005).Third-person effects and the environment: Social distance, social desirability, and presumed behavior.Journal of Communication,55(2),242-256.
  38. Jung, J.,Jo, S.(2013).Third-person effects of internet stock recommendations.Social Behavior and Personality,41(9),1435-1444.
  39. Kennedy, H.(2005).Subjective intersections in the face of the machine: Gender, race, class and PCs in the home.European Journal of Women's Studies,12(4),471-487.
  40. Koh, Y. J.,Sundar, S. S.(2010).Heuristic versus systematic processing of specialist versus generalist sources in online media.Human Communication Research,36,103-124.
  41. Lee, B.,Tamborini, R.(2005).Third-person effect and internet pornography: The influence of collectivism and internet self-efficacy.Journal of Communication,55(2),292-310.
  42. Lee, C.,Yang, S.(1996).Third-person perception and support for censorship of sexually explicit visual content: A Korean case.Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication,Anaheim, CA.:
  43. Little, S. E.(2000).Networks and neighborhoods: Household, community and sovereignty in the global economy.Urban Studies,37(10),1813-1825.
  44. Lo, V.,Wei, R.(2002).Third-person effect, gender, pornography on the internet.Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media,46(1),13-33.
  45. Lull, J.(1990).Inside family viewing.London, UK:Routledge.
  46. McLeod, D. M.,Eveland, W. P., Jr,Nathanson, A. I.(1997).Support for censorship of violent and misogynic rap lyrics: An analysis of the third-person effect.Communication research,24,153-174.
  47. Meirick, P. C.(2004).Topic-relevant reference groups and dimensions of distance: Political advertising and first- and third-person effects.Communication Research,31(2),234-255.
  48. Meirick, P. C.(2005).Rethinking the target corollary: The effect of social distance, perceived exposure, and perceived predispositions on first-person and third-person perceptions.Communication Research,32,822-843.
  49. Morley, D.(1992).Television, audiences and cultural studies.London, UK:Routledge.
  50. Morley, D.(2000).Home territories: Media, mobility, and identity.London, UK:Routledge.
  51. Morley, D.(1986).Family television.London, UK:Routledge.
  52. Paek, H.,Pan, Z.,Sun, Y.,Abisaid, J.,Houden, D.(2005).The third-person perception as social judgement: An exploration of social distance and uncertainty in perceived effects of political attack ads.Communication Research,32(2),143-170.
  53. Paradise, A.,Sullivan, M.(2012).(In)Visible threats? The third-person effect in perceptions of the influence of Facebook.Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking,15(1),55-60.
  54. Park, S.,Yun, G. W.,McSweeney, J. H.,Gunther, A. C.(2007).Do third-person perceptions of media influence contribute to pluralistic ignorance on the norm of ideal female thinness?.Sex Role,57,569-578.
  55. Radway, J.(1984).Reading the romance.Chapel Hill, NC:University of North Carolina Press.
  56. Reid, S. A.,Byrne, S.,Brundidge, J. S.,Shoham, M. D.,Marlow, M. L.(2007).A critical test of self-enhancement, exposure, and self-categorization explanations for first- and third-person perceptions.Human Communication Research,33,143-162.
  57. Reid, S. A.,Hong, M. A.(2005).A self-categorization explanation of the third-person perception.Human Communication Research,31,129-161.
  58. Rojas, H.,Shah, D. V.,Faber, R. J.(1996).For the good of others: Censorship and the third-person effect.International Journal of Public Opinion Research,8,163-186.
  59. Salwen, M. B.,Driscoll, P. D.(1997).Consequences of third-person perception in support of press restrictions in the O. J. Simpson trial.Journal of Communication,47(2),60-78.
  60. Scharrer, E.,Leone, F.(2008).First-person shooters and the third-person effect.Human Communication Research,34,210-233.
  61. Shah, D. V.,Faber, R. J.,Youn, S.(1999).Susceptibility and severity: Perceptual dimensions underlying the third-person effect.Communication Research,26,240-267.
  62. Silva, E. B.(Ed.),Smart, C.(Ed.)(1999).The new family?.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  63. Silverstone, R.(Ed.),Hirsch, E.(Ed.)(1992).Consuming technologies: Media and information in domestic spaces.London, UK:Routledge.
  64. Spigel, L.(2001).Media home: Then and now.International Journal of Cultural Studies,4(4),385-411.
  65. Sun, Y.,Pan, Z.,Shen, L.(2008).Understanding the third-person perception: Evidence from a meta-analysis.Journal of Communication,58,280-300.
  66. Taylor, L. D.,Bell, R. A.,Kravitz, R. L.(2011).Third-person effects and direct-toconsumer advertisements for antidepressants.Depression and Anxiety,28,160-165.
  67. Tewksbury, D.,Moy, P.,Weis, D. S.(2004).Preparations for Y2K: Revisiting the behavioral component of the third-person effect.Journal of Communication,54,138-155.
  68. Tsfati, Y.,Cohen, J.(2005).The influence of presumed media influence on democratic legitimacy: The case of Gaza settlers.Communication Research,32(6),794-821.
  69. Tsfati, Y.,Livio, O.(2008).Exploring journalists' perceptions of media impact.Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly,85(1),113-130.
  70. van Zoonen, L.(2002).Gendering the internet: Claims, controversies and cultures.European Journal of Communication,17(1),5-23.
  71. Vangelisti, A. L.(Ed.)(2004).Handbook of family communication.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  72. Wajcman, J.(2000).Reflections on gender and technology studies: In what state is the art?.Social Studies of Science,30(3),447-464.
  73. Walker, A. J.(1996).Couples watching television: Gender, power, and the remote control.Journal of Marriage and the Family,58,813-23.
  74. Wartella, E. A.,Vandewater, E. A.,Rideout, V. J.(2005).Introduction: Electronic media use in the lives of infants, toddlers, and preschoolers.American Behavioral Scientist,48(5),501-504.
  75. Xu, J.,Gonzenbach, W. J.(2008).Does the perceptual discrepancy lead to action? A meta-analysis of the behavioral component of the third person effect.International Journal of Public Opinion Research,20(3),375-385.
  76. Zhang, Jie,Daugherty, T.(2009).Third-person effect and social networking: Implications for online marketing and word-of-mouth communication.American Journal of Business,24,53-63.
  77. Zhang, Jinguang(2010).Self-enhancement on a self-categorization leash: Evidence for a dual-process model of first- and third-person perceptions.Human Communication Research,36,190-215.
  78. 方念萱(2003)。性別與傳播科技:數位落差中的女性網路退用者研究。2003 年中華傳播學會年會,新竹:
  79. 伊慶春、章英華(2012)。導讀。家庭與婚姻:台灣的社會變遷1985-2005,台北:
  80. 吳嘉苓編、傅大維編、雷祥麟編(2004)。科技渴望社會。台北:群學。
  81. 李天任譯、藍莘譯、Wimmer, R.、Dominick, J.(1995)。大眾媒體研究。台北:亞太。
  82. 周華欣(2004)。家庭不只有一種。天下雜誌,301,130-133。
  83. 官振萱(2003)。決戰客廳。天下雜誌,53,96-106。
  84. 林芳玫(1994)。觀眾研究初探—由《梅花三弄》談文本、解讀策略與大眾文化意識型態。新聞學研究,49,123-155。
  85. 胡幼偉(1998)。傳播訊息的第三人效果。台北:五南。
  86. 胡幼慧(1994)。三代同堂:迷思與陷阱。台北:巨流。
  87. 孫秀蕙(1996)。觀看電視:家庭生活情境、權力關係與消費行為。1996 傳播生態研討會,嘉義縣民雄:
  88. 孫智綺譯、Bonnewitz, P.(2002)。布赫迪厄社會學的第一課。台北:麥田。
  89. 國立政治大學選舉研究中心編(2001)。民意調查。台北:五南。
  90. 張晉芬(2011)。勞動社會學。台北:政大。
  91. 楊永妙(2004)。家庭新變貌:個體族群的崛起。天下雜誌,301,110-124。
  92. 詹偉雄(2005)。美學的經濟:台灣社會變遷的60 個微型觀察。台北:藍鯨。
  93. 羅文輝(2000)。媒介負面內容與社會距離對第三人效果認知的影響。新聞學研究,65,95-129。
被引用次数
  1. (2021)。Facebook假新聞第三人效果研究。傳播與社會學刊,55,19-56。
  2. (2021)。政黨認同與社會距離如何影響第三人效果與第一人效果:以大數據與網路調查來檢視85°C事件。中華傳播學刊,40,191-230。