網上行走：Facebook使用者之打卡戰術與地標實踐

Traversing the Web: Check-in Tactics and Place Practice of Facebook Users

10.30386/MCR.201601_(126).0003

吳筱玫(Hsiao-Mei Wu)

日常生活實踐 ； 打卡 ； 行人言說行動 ； 地標 ； 戰術 ； Facebook ； check in ； everyday life practice ； Facebook ； pedestrian speech acts ； place ； tactics

新聞學研究

126期（2016 / 01 / 01）

93 - 131

繁體中文

本研究以de Certeau 日常生活實踐理論為本，從戰略與戰術角度分析Facebook 使用者之打卡實踐，方法上以深度訪談為主，搭配跨領域資料撈取技術進行個案式行人言說分析，接著從四大面向：地點、時間點、同行者、使用者，探討所有受訪者之打卡戰術。研究發現，地標使用和使用者當下心境密切相關，喜歡戲耍的使用者會有虛擬地標出現；延遲打卡或許是基於技術限制，但更多時候，深受日常生活實踐脈絡之影響，此外個人是否在意「實存」，也影響補打卡的意願；同行者不同在現象普遍，而且花招百出、目的多元。凡此皆顯示著，使用者懂得掌握各種不同機遇，將科技原始設計挪用成資源，去構築自己的興趣與慾望，從而開展殊異的行人言說行動。

Based upon de Certeau’s theory of everyday life practice, this paper examines Facebook users’ check-in actions from the perspectives of strategies and tactics. Methodologically, in-depth interviews of 15 subjects as well as interdisciplinary API technique are conducted to facilitate the pedestrian speech acts analysis. The check-in tactics are then discussed in four dimensions: place, timing, people tagged, and the user. The results show that the use of ‘place’ is significantly related to the mood at present. Those who enjoy playing the function would create virtual places. The late check-in, be not a technical restriction, may be a tactic of inviting likes. And it is also influenced by each user’s everyday life context or his/her recognition about ‘reality’. Users frequently tag people who are not with them with multiple purposes. All these demonstrate that users are sophisticated with the capture of ‘opportunities’, appropriating the Facebook ‘place’ as resources to fulfill their interests and desires, and to develop their discrete pedestrian speech acts.

1. Bawa-Cavia, A.(2010).Sensing the urban: Using location-based social network data in urban analysis.Proceedings of the First Workshop on Pervasive Urban Applications (PURBA),San Francisco, CA:
2. Cheng, Z.,Caverlee, J.,Lee, K.,Sui, D.(2011).Exploring millions of footprints in location sharing services.Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media,Barcelona, ES:
3. Crandall, D. J.,Backstrom, L.,Cosley, D.,Suri, S.,Huttenlocher, D.,Kleinberg, J.(2010).Inferring social ties from geographic coincidences.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,107(52),22436-22441.
4. Cranshaw, J.,Schwartz, R.,Hong, J.,Sadeh, N.(2012).The livehoods project: Utilizing social media to understand the dynamics of a city.Proceedings of the Sixth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media,Dublin, IE:
5. de Certeau, M.(1984).The practice of everyday life.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
6. de Souza, e S. A.,Frith, J.(2010).Locative mobile social networks: Mapping communication and location in urban spaces.Mobilities,5,485-505.
7. Evans, L.(2014).Being-towards the social: Mood and orientation to location-based social media, computational things and applications.New Media & Society
8. Fiske, J.(1989).Reading the popular.Boston, MA:Unwin Hyman.
9. Humphreys, L.(2007).Mobile social networks and social practice: A case study of Dodgeball.Journal of Computer-mediated Communication,13(1),341-360.
10. Humphreys, L.(2010).Mobile social networks and urban public space.New Media & Society,12(5),763-778.
11. Kitchin, R.,Dodge, M.(2011).Code/space: Software and everyday life.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
12. Kleinman, S.(2009).The culture of efficiency: Technology in everyday life.New York, NY:Peter Lang.
13. Lefebvre, H.(1991).Critique of everyday life.London, UK:Verso.
14. Liao, T.,Humphreys, L.(2014).Layar-ed places: Using mobile augmented reality to tactically reengage, reproduce, and reappropriate public space.New Media & Society,1-18.
15. Ling, R.(2008).New tech, new ties: How mobile communication is reshaping social cohesion.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
16. Noulas, A.,Scellato, S.,Mascolo, C.,Pontil, M.(2011).An empirical study of geographic user activity patterns in Foursquare.Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media
17. Pink, S.,Mackley, K. L.(2013).Saturated and situated: Expanding the meaning of media in the routines of everyday life.Media Culture & Society,35(6),677-691.
18. Roick, O.,Heuser, S.(2013).Location based social networks: Definition, current state of the art and research agenda.Transactions in GIS,17(5),763-784.
19. Scellato, S.,Noulas, A.,Mascolo, C.(2011).Exploiting place features in link prediction on location-based social networks.Proceedings of the Seventeenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and DataMining (KDD _11),San Diego, CA.:
20. Sutko, D. M.,de Souza, e. S. A.(2011).Location-aware mobile media and urban sociability.New Media & Society,13(5),807-823.
21. Tomlinson, J.(2007).The culture of speed: The coming of immediacy.London, UK:SAGE.
22. Tuan, Y-F.(1977).Space and place: The perspective of experience.Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
23. Wilken, R.(2009).Mobilizing place: Mobile media, peripatetics, and renegotiation of urban places.Journal of Urban Technology,15(3),39-55.
24. 石婉婷(2013)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。政治大學新聞研究所。

1. 單蔓婷,林怡潔(2021)。中國大陸女性社交直播主的數位勞動與性別政治。新聞學研究，146，53-95。
2. 金麟(2020)。適地性媒介研究與城市特質探討：以移居香港的中國大陸居民之地方經驗為例。新聞學研究，145，101-145。
3. 李蔡彥、吳筱玫(2018)。資訊科學與質性研究之對話：Facebook打卡實踐之視覺化行人言說分析。中華傳播學刊，33，19-63。
4. 劉倚帆(2020)。城市空間中的「協作移動」：以WeMo Scooter共享電動機車為例。新聞學研究，145，49-99。
5. 蘇柔郡、吳筱玫(2018)。高中女生使用Instagram之日常美學：符擔性觀點。新聞學研究，135，139-191。
6. (2024)。動物倫理日常化的建構：都市公眾養雞的戰術與反身性思考。地理研究，80，101-131。
7. (2024)。臺灣無家者的污名：針對其日常生活實踐戰術的分析。新聞學研究，158，1-55。