告別杜思妥也夫斯基？晚期巴赫汀思想的空間語藝觀與其時間／實踐性

Farewell Dostoevsky? Mikhail Bakhtin's Late Writing on Spatial Rhetoric and its Implication for Time Politics/Emancipatory Politics

10.30386/MCR.201807_(136).0005

王孝勇(Hsiao-Yung Wang)

巴赫汀 ； 成長迸生 ； 空間語藝 ； 教育小說 ； 跨性別 ； 複調小說 ； Bakhtin ； emergence ； spatial rhetoric ； Bildungsroman ； transgender ； polyphonic novel

新聞學研究

136期（2018 / 07 / 01）

185 - 222

繁體中文

本研究旨在推敲晚期Bakhtin自歌德「教育小說」中所提陳揭示的空間語藝觀與其時間／實踐性。首先，透過摸索Bakhtin如何從盛讚杜思妥也夫斯基複調小說的對話性，轉而婉言質疑其理想言說情境的困境，本研究指出「從自我到社會」、「從時間到空間」實乃晚期Bakhtin轉向歌德研究的理論脈絡。接著，本研究藉由批判性地閱讀Bakhtin論及教育小說的經典專著，勾勒演繹其間的「時間匯聚」與「空間打造」之雙迴圈機制，及其所結晶醞釀的「時間視覺化」與「成長迸生性」之空間語藝觀。基於研究發現，本研究將指出晚期Bakhtin的思想實乃飽含階段性策略戰略思維的語藝洞察。晚期Bakhtin既有歷史感又有未來性的空間語藝理論，其最關鍵的意義，在於它確實將語言的社會改革與實踐性置於「對話」的位階之前或之上。

This paper elaborates upon Mikhail Bakhtin's late writing on spatial rhetoric and its implication for time politics/emancipatory politics. First, it explains why and how Bakhtin contradictorily evaluated the dialogicity of Dostoevsky's polyphonic novel, especially the failure to model the so-called ideal speech situation. Herein, the standpoints of ＂from the self to the social＂ and ＂from time to space＂ might serve as the rhetorical resources for Bakhtin's turn to Goethe during the later period. Second, it outlines the two revolving rings of spatiality in Bildungsroman, which proceed from ＂recollecting the past＂ to ＂foreseeing the future＂ on the basis of visuality and ＂vision of emergence.＂ Therefore, Bakhtin has temporarily been substituting his previous research concern on polyphonic novel with spatial rhetoric, which sets up the rhetorical agency in phases. Based on the research findings, this paper argues that the importance of Bakhtin's embodied spatial rhetoric is indeed its subscription to the primacy of resistance and rhetorical practice over dialogue.

1. 王孝勇(2011)。Mikhail Bakhtin 狂歡節概念的民主化意涵：從批判取向論述分析的理論困境談起。新聞學研究，108，183-223。
   連結：
2. 王孝勇(2012)。Mikhail Bakhtin 的對話主義及其對批判論述分析的再延伸：以白玫瑰運動為例。政治與社會哲學評論，40，149-202。
   連結：
3. 王孝勇(2016)。Mikhail Bakhtin「時空型」概念的視覺語藝意識與實踐之初探：以2014 年台北同志遊行為例。中華傳播學刊，30，143-178。
   連結：
4. 王孝勇(2016)。從小說話語看眾聲群像：評介巴赫汀之《對話的想像：四篇論文》。傳播研究與實踐，6(1)，271-288。
   連結：
5. 王孝勇(2013)。從對話到對立的民主化實踐—Mikhail Bakhtin 對話主義的理論轉折與政治方案之初探。臺灣民主季刊，10(3)，1-39。
   連結：
6. 王孝勇(2009)。掙脫語言的枷鎖？從Mikhail Bakhtin 論「表述」談起。政治與社會哲學評論，30，203-244。
   連結：
7. 王孝勇(2014)。眾聲喧嘩即倫理實踐：從Mikhail Bakhtin 的語藝觀談起。中華傳播學刊，26，137-173。
   連結：
8. 何春蕤(2002)。認同的「體」現：打造跨性別。台灣社會研究季刊，46，1-43。
   連結：
9. Arendt, H.(1993).Between past and future.New York, NY:Penguin.
10. Bakhtin, M. M.(1993).Toward a philosophy of the Act.Austin, TX:University of Austin Press.
11. Bakhtin, M. M.,Emerson, C.(Trans.)(1984).Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics.Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
12. Bakhtin, M. M.,Iswolsky, H.(Trans.)(1984).Rabelais and his world.Indianapolis, IN:Indiana University Press.
13. Bakhtin, M. M.,Medvedev, P. N.(1991).The formal method in literary scholarship: A critical introduction to sociological poetics.Baltimore, MD:The John Hopkins University Press.
14. Bitzer, L. F.(1968).The rhetorical situation.Philosophy and Rhetoric,1,1-14.
15. Blair, C.(1992).Contested histories of rhetoric: The politics of preservation, progress, and change.Quarterly Journal of Speech,78,403-428.
16. Doty, A.(1993).Making things perfectly queer: Interpreting mass culture.Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
17. Emerson, C.(Ed.)(1984).Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics.Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
18. Emerson, C.(Ed.),Holquist, M.(Ed.)(2004).Speech genres and other late essays.Austin, TX:University of Texas Press.
19. Farmer, F.(Ed.)(1998).Landmark essays on Bakhtin, rhetoric, and writing.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Foucault, M.(1986).Of other spaces.Diacritics,16(1),22-27.
21. Gagne, P.,Tewksbury, R.,McGaughey, D.(1997).Coming out and crossing over: Identity formation and proclamation in a transgender community.Gender & Society,11(4),478-508.
22. Gardiner, M. E.(2013).Weak messianism: Essays in everyday utopianism.New York, NY:Peter Lang.
23. Goethe, J. W.,Auden, W. H.(Trans.),Mayer, E.(Trans.)(1962).The Italian journey.London, UK:Collins.
24. Goethe, J. W.,Oxenford, J.(Trans.)(1974).Goethe's autobiography.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
25. Hancock, A. B.,Stutts, H. W.,Bass, A.(2015).Perceptions of gender and femininity based on language: Implications for transgender communication therapy.Language and Speech,58(3),315-333.
26. Herrick, J.(2009).The history and theory of rhetoric: An introduction.New York, NY:Hope College.
27. Holquist, M.(2002).Dialogism.New York, NY:Routledge.
28. Holquist, M.(Ed.)(2002).The dialogic imagination: Four essays.Austin, TX:University of Texas Press.
29. Marciano, A.(2014).Living the virtureal: Negotiating transgender identity in cyberspace.Journal of Computer-mediated Communication,19,824-838.
30. Montesano, M.(1995).Kairos and kerygma: The rhetoric of Christian proclamation.Rhetoric Society Quarterly,25,164-178.
31. Morris, P.,(Ed.)(1994).The Bakhtin reader: Selected writings of Bakhtin, Medvedev, Voloshinov.London, UK:Arnold.
32. Murphy, J.(2001).Mikhail Bakhtin and the rhetorical tradition.Quarterly Journal of Speech,87(3),259-277.
33. Norwood, K.(2012).Transitioning meanings? Family members' communicative struggles surrounding transgender identity.Journal of Family Communication,12,75-92.
34. Pauley, G. E.(1998).Rhetoric and timeliness: An analysis of Lyndon B. Johnson's voting rights address.Western Journal of Communication,62,26-53.
35. Perlina, N.(1988).A dialogue on dialogue: The Baxtin-Vinogradov exchange (1924-65).Slavic and East European Journal,32,526-541.
36. Saindon, B. A.(2012).doubled heterotopia: Shifting spatial and visual symbolism in the Jewish museum Berlin's development.Quarterly Journal of Speech,98(1),24-48.
37. Scott, J. B.(2006).Kairos as indeterminate risk management: The pharmaceutical industry's response to Bioterrorism.Quarterly Journal of Speech,92,115-143.
38. Slagle, R.(2003).Queer criticism and sexual normativity: The case of Pee-Wee Herman.Journal of Homosexuality,45,129-146.
39. Spencer, L. G.(2014).Performing transgender identity in The Little Mermaid: From Anderson to Disney.Communication Studies,65(1),112-127.
40. Tihanov, G.(2000).The master and the slave: Lukács, Bakhtin, and the ideas of their time.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
41. Vološinov, V. N.,Matejka, L.(Trans.),Titunik, I. R.(Trans.)(1986).Marxism and the philosophy of language.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
42. 王得宇(2016)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。政治大學社會研究所。
43. 何春蕤編(2003)。跨性別。桃園:中央大學性／別研究室。
44. 陳長房(1994)。西方成長／教育小說的模式與演變。幼獅文藝，80(6)，5-16。
45. 陳薇真(2016)。台灣跨性別前史：醫療、風俗誌與亞際遭逢。新北:跨性別倡議站。
46. 葉宗顯譯、黃元鵬譯、Meen, D. T.、Gibson, M. A.、Alexander, J. F.(2012)。發現女同性戀、男同性戀、雙性戀與跨性別。新北:韋伯。
47. 劉康(1995)。對話的喧聲：巴赫汀文化理論述評。臺北:麥田。

1. 王孝勇(2019)。對話之外：從巴赫汀晚年「外部性」的觀點新義看理解的（不）可能性。政治與社會哲學評論，70，57-108。
2. 王孝勇(2020)。「謝尖順事件」之媒體語藝框架分析：「跨性別國家主義」的觀點。台灣社會研究季刊，117，47-111。