數位貧窮與天災風險資訊來源：來自臺灣傳播調查的證據

Digital Poverty and Disaster Risk Information Seeking: Evidence from the Taiwan Communication Survey

10.30386/MCR.201901_(138).0004

林宗弘(Lin, Thung-Hong)

天災 ； 數位貧窮 ； 電視 ； 網路 ； 脆弱性 ； Natural Disaster ； Risk Information Seeking ； TV ； Internet ； Digital Poverty

新聞學研究

138期（2019 / 01 / 01）

131 - 162

繁體中文

以網路科技協助民眾獲得天災風險資訊是熱門學術與實務議題，然而很少研究考慮數位貧窮對民眾天災資訊取得能力的影響。本文認為數位貧窮限制天災脆弱群體上網的風險資訊取得能力，使其更依賴傳統媒體電視來取得颱洪資訊。2016年臺灣傳播調查資料庫（Taiwan Communication Survey, TCS）分析顯示天災脆弱群體屬於數位貧窮群體，反之亦然，難以上網而更依賴電視取得颱洪風險資訊，社經地位高者較少受災且更常從網路獲得颱洪風險資訊。災難管理政策應留意數位貧窮造成的風險資訊落差。

Using the Internet for natural disaster management and civic participation is now a hot issue in communication and disaster studies, but in the related literature the effect of digital poverty on people's risk information seeking is largely neglected. This paper argues that a high risk population of climate disaster suffers from both social vulnerability and digital poverty, and therefore it is difficult for the Internet to become the most effective source of disaster risk information. Using the 2016 Taiwan Communication Survey, the data analysis shows that vulnerable people in Taiwan rely much more on TV rather than on the Internet to access disaster information for typhoons and floods, because of their digital poverty.

1. 李孟壕,曾淑芬(2005)。數位落差再定義與衡量指標之研究。資訊社會研究，9，89-124。
   連結：
2. 李孟壕,曾淑芬(2005)。數位落差再定義與衡量指標之研究。資訊社會研究，9，89-124。
   連結：
3. 李欣,楊惠萱,廖楷民,蕭代基(2010)。水災社會脆弱性指標之建立。建築與規劃學報，10(3)，163-182。
   連結：
4. 林宗弘(2012)。非關上網？台灣的數位落差與網路使用的社會後果。台灣社會學，24，55-97。
   連結：
5. 林冠慧,林宗弘,胡伯維,張宜君,葉錦勳,詹忠翰,劉季宇(2017)。地震、屋毀與傷亡：集集地震風險的因果分析。都市與計畫，44(1)，83-112。
   連結：
6. 林照真(2013)。台灣電視新聞之災難報導：以莫拉克風災為例。新聞學研究，115，141-185。
   連結：
7. 洪鴻智,林家鈺(2015)。利害相關者對颱洪災害預警系統規劃要素之價值評估：多屬性效用理論之應用。台灣公共衛生雜誌，34(4)，349-361。
   連結：
8. 徐美苓,施琮仁(2015)。氣候變遷相關政策民意支持的多元面貌。中華傳播學刊，28，239-278。
   連結：
9. 徐美苓,施琮仁(2015)。氣候變遷相關政策民意支持的多元面貌。中華傳播學刊，28，239-278。
   連結：
10. 張宜君,林宗弘(2012)。不平等的災難：921 大地震下的受災風險與社會階層化。人文與社會研究集刊，24(2)，193-231。
    連結：
11. 張維安,李宗義,李士傑(2013)。跨越官僚的專業線：網路力量與救災行動。思與言，51(1)，55-102。
    連結：
12. 陳百齡,鄭宇君(2014)。從流通到聚合： 重大災難期間浮現的資訊頻道。新聞學研究，121，89-125。
    連結：
13. 楊意菁,徐美苓(2012)。環境風險的認知與溝通：以全球暖化議題的情境公眾為例。中華傳播學刊，22，169-209。
    連結：
14. 葉高華(2013)。社會脆弱性可解釋九二一地震死亡率分布嗎？。思與言，51(1)，135-153。
    連結：
15. 潘金谷,曾淑芬,林玉凡(2009)。數位吉尼係數應用之擴充：我國數位落差現況。資訊社會研究，16，1-32。
    連結：
16. 鄭宇君,陳百齡(2012)。溝通不確定性：探索社交媒體在災難事件中的角色。中華傳播學刊，21，119-153。
    連結：
17. Aldrich, D. P.(2012).Building resilience: social capital in post-disaster recovery.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago.
18. Cutter, S. L.,Boruff, B. J.,Shirley, W. L.(2003).Social vulnerability to environmental hazards.Social Science Quarterly,84,242-261.
19. Franzen, A.(2003).Social capital and the Internet: evidence from Swiss panel data.Kyklos,56(33),341-360.
20. Galperin, Hernan(Ed.),Mariscal, Judith(Ed.)(2007).Digital poverty: Latin American and Caribbean perspectives.Rugby, UK:Practical Action.
21. Griffin, R. J.,Dunwoody, S.,Zabala, F.(1998).Public reliance on risk communication channels in the wake of a cryptosporidium outbreak.Risk Analysis,18(4),367-375.
22. Griffin, R. J.,Neuwirth, K.,Dunwoody, S.,Giese, F.(2004).Information sufficiency and risk communication.Media Psychology,6,23-61.
23. Griffin, R.J.,Dunwoody, S.,Neuwirth, K.(1999).Proposed model of the relationship of risk information-seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors.Environmental Research, Section A,80,S230-S245.
24. Ho, M. C.,Shaw, D.,Lin, S.,Chiu, Y. C.(2008).How do disaster characteristics influence risk perception?.Risk Analysis,28(3),635-643.
25. Ho, S. S.,Detenber, B. H.,Rosenthal, S.,Lee, E. W. J.(2014).Seeking information about climate change: Effects of media use in an extended PRISM.Science Communication,36(3),270-295.
26. Hsu, Chiung-wen.(2013).The emergence of "star disaster-affected areas" and its implications to disaster and communication interdisciplinary studies: A Taiwan example from Typhoon Morakot.Natural Hazards,69(1),39-57.
27. Huang, S. K.,Lindell, M. K.,Prater, C. S.,Wu, H. C.,Siebeneck, L.(2012).Household evacuation decision making in response to Hurricane Ike.Natural Hazards Review,13(4),283-296.
28. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change=IPCC(2012).Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation.New York:Cambridge Umversity Press.
29. Kahlor, L. A.(2010).PRISM: A planned risk information seeking model.Health Communication,25,345-356.
30. Kahlor, L. A.(2007).An augmented risk information seeking mode: The case of global warming.Media Psychology,10,414-435.
31. Karlson, K. B.,Anders, H.,Breen, R.(2012).Comparing regression coefficients between same-sample nested models using logit and probit: A new method.Sociological Methodology,42(1),286-313.
32. Katz, J. E.,Rice, R. E.(2002).Social consequences of internet use: Access, involvement and expression.Cambridge, MA:MIT.
33. Kellens, W.,Terpstra, T.,De Maeyer, P.(2013).Perception and communication of flood risks: a systematic review of empirical research.Risk Analysis,33(1),24-49.
34. Lai, C. H.(2017).A study of emergent organizing and technological affordances after a natural disaster.Online Information Review,41(4),507-523.
35. Lai, C. H.,Chib, A.,Ling, R.(2018).Digital disparities and vulnerability: mobile phone use, information behaviour, and disaster preparedness in Southeast Asia.Disasters,42(4),734-760.
36. Lai, C. H.,She, B.,Ye, X.(2015).Unpacking the network processes and outcomes of online and offline humanitarian collaboration.Communication Research
37. Lai, C. H.,Tao, C. C.,Cheng, Y. C.(2017).Modeling resource network relationships between response organizations and affected neighborhoods after a technological disaster.International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,28(5),2145-2175.
38. Lin, K. H. E.,Lee, H. C.,Lin, T. H.(2017).How does resilience matter? An empirical verification of the relationships between resilience and vulnerability.Natural Hazards,88(2),1229-1250.
39. Lindell, M. K.,Ge, Y.,Huang, S. K.,Prater, C. S.,Wu, H. C.,Wei, H. L.(2013).Behavioral study: Valley hurricane evacuation study, Willacy, Cameron, and Hidalgo counties, Texas.College Station, TX:Hazard Reduction & Recovery Center, Texas A&M University.
40. Lindell, M. K.,Lu, J. C.,Prater, C. S.(2005).Household decision making and evacuation in response to Hurricane Lili.Natural Hazards Review,6,171-179.
41. Lindell, M. K.,Perry, R. W.(2012).The protective action decision model: Theoretical modifications and additional evidence.Risk Analysis,32,616-632.
42. Palen, L.,Liu, S.(2007).Citizen communications in disaster: anticipating a future of ICT-supported public participation.Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
43. Pénard, T.,Poussing, N.(2010).Internet use and social capital: The strength of virtual.Ties Journal of Economic Issues,44(3),569-595.
44. Renn, O.(2008).Risk governance: coping with uncertainty in a complex world.London, UK:Earthscan.
45. Roder, G.,Ruljigaljig, T.,Lin, C. W.,Tarolli, P.(2016).Natural hazards knowledge and risk perception of Wujie indigenous community in Taiwan.Natural Hazards,81(1),641-662.
46. Shan, H. Y.,Lai, Y. L.(2015).Smartphone application and management system for disaster resistant community.Australian & New Zealand Disaster and Emergency Management Conference,Gold Coast, Australia:
47. Slovic, P.(2000).The perception of risk.London, UK:Earthscan.
48. Slovic, P.(2010).The feeling of risk.London, UK:Earthscan.
49. Sorensen, J. H.(2000).Hazard warning systems: Review of 20 years of progress.Natural Hazards Review,1(2),119-125.
50. ter Huurne, E.,Griffin, R. J.,Gutteling, J.(2009).Risk information seeking among U.S. and Dutch residents: An application of the model of risk information seeking and processing.Science Communication,31(2),215-237.
51. UNISDR (2017). Early warning where there is no internet. Retrieved from https://www.unisdr.org/archive/53369
52. Wachinger, G.,Renn, O.,Begg, C.,Kuhlicke, C.(2013).The risk perception paradox-implications for governance and communication of natural hazards.Risk Analysis,33(6),1049-1065.
53. Wisner, B.,Blaikie, P.,Cannon, T.,Davis, I.(2004).At risk: natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters.New York, NY:Routledge.
54. Yang, Z. J.,Aloe, A. M.,Feeley, T. H.(2014).Risk information seeking and processing model: A meta-analysis.Journal of Communication,64(1),20-41.
55. 林宗弘（2017 年 9 月 18 日）。〈國家防災日談未來災難〉，《自由評論網》。取自 http://talk.ltn.com.tw/article/paper/1136348
56. 林宗弘,李宗義(2016)。災難風險循環：莫拉克風災的災害潛勢、脆弱性與韌性。永續與綠色治理新論，臺北市:
57. 林宗弘,蕭新煌,許耿銘。邁向世界風險社會？台灣民眾的社會資本、風險感知與風險因應行為。調查研究—方法與應用
58. 孫式文(2002)。網際網路在災難事件中的傳播功能：理論與實務的辯證。新聞學研究，71，133-158。
59. 陳亮全(2005).水災與土石流風險認知調查執行報告.臺北:國家災害防救科技中心.
60. 臧國仁,鍾蔚文(2000)。災難事件與媒體報導：相關研究簡述。新聞學研究，62，143-151。
61. 鄭宇君(2014)。災難傳播中的群體力量：社交媒體促成新型態的公民參與。傳播與社會學刊，27，179-205。

1. (2023)。國防資訊來源對國防支持度與再傳播行為之影響。東吳政治學報，41(2)，189-235。