题名 |
推動中小學建筑鋼構造范例之分析 |
并列篇名 |
A Case Study for Promoting The Steel Construction for Elementary And Middle School Classroom Building |
DOI |
10.6377/JA.200111.0115 |
作者 |
林草英(Chao-Ying Lin);陳勇男(Yung-Nan Cheng);莊憲正(Shen-Chen Chuang) |
关键词 |
中小學建筑 ; 鋼構造 ; 范例 ; elementary-middle school ; steel construction ; case study |
期刊名称 |
建築學報 |
卷期/出版年月 |
38期(2001 / 11 / 01) |
页次 |
115 - 127 |
内容语文 |
繁體中文 |
中文摘要 |
本研究配合內政部「綠建築與居住環境科技專案」及行政院經濟建設委員會「因應節約能源政策推廣綠建築鋼構造行動策略」,進行低層建築推動鋼構造範例之研究,目的在分析比較中小學建築以傳統之鋼筋混凝土構造與推動之鋼構造之差異,以作為推動鋼構造之參考。研究中比較鋼筋混凝土構造與鋼構造在結構行為之差異,並以鋼筋混凝土設計施工之四層樓國民中學之普通教室作為範例,使用鋼構造模式進行結構設計,最後依二種構造方式所得結果分別對工期及及造價等技術及經濟性因素進行分析比較。根據所得結果,四層樓之中小學校教室建築使用鋼構造時,其造價比使用鋼筋混凝土構造高19%,而其工期則減短29天。 |
英文摘要 |
This study was based on”Special project on green architectures and living environment technology”and”The strategy of promoting architectural steel construction in response to conservationof energy policy”sponsored by Ministry of Inferior and Council for Economic Planning andDevelopment respectively,to carry out a case study on low rise building with steel construction.The objective was to analyze and compare the differences between traditional reinforced concreteconstruction and steel construction for elementary and middle school classroom buildings,whichmay be used as a reference for promoting the steel construction.During the study,a four storyclassroom building,which was constructed with reinforced concrete construction,was redesignedby using steel construction.The cost and construction schedule were compared.Based on theresults of this study,the steel construction will cost around 19% more than reinforced concreteconstruction,while the construction period will be 29 days shorter. |
主题分类 |
工程學 >
土木與建築工程 |
参考文献 |
|
被引用次数 |