從歷史街區的重塑探討都市保存理念的實踐之道－以台南市三級古蹟開基靈佑宮與B-11號都市計劃道路衝突之解為例

Searching for Ways of Putting Urban Conservation Ideas into Practice through the Reform of Historic Districts-The Case of Planning Conflict between Class 3 Historic Temple Kai-ji-ling-yio-gong and the

10.6377/JA.200206.0111

翁金山(Chin-Shan Weng)

都市保存 ； 歷史性街區 ； 都市計劃道路 ； 城市函構 ； 道路形式 ； urban conservation ； historic district ； planned road ； urban context ； road pattern

建築學報

40期（2002 / 06 / 01）

111 - 129

繁體中文

「都市保存」與「都市成長」互相抵觸時，或「歷史性建築暨環境」與「象徵交通掛帥之都市計劃道路」互相競存時，孰輕孰重？是長久以來存在的問題。事實上若能考量都市在「量」的成長過程，應同時充實「質」的社會文化涵構，則「保存與成長」或「歷史性建築暨環境與都市計劃道路」是可兼容並得的。為佐證並提倡這一理念，本文以位於台南府城的歷史街區，亦即劃過三級古蹟「開基靈佑宮」之B-11號9M寬的計劃道路之興闢與該街區的重塑為例，從：「古蹟與計劃道路之相關沿革；街廓及道路形式的城市涵構」等層面探討所得，提出都市設計方案，作為實踐之依據；並為「兼容與詮釋」，「都市成長與都市保存」理念之借鏡。

The conflict between ”urban conservation” and ”urban growth” is never new. To strike a balance between conserving historic buildings and their neighboring environments and the development of planned roads to serve ever-increasing traffic needs is a big challenge to and urban designers. However, if quantitative considerations of urban growth can be well managed with qualitative socio-cultural considerations, the conflict between road development and conservation of historic buildings and their surroundings can be solved. Taking the reforming of the 9-meter B-11 road, which is planned to cut through Class 3 historic temple Kai-ji-ling-yio-gong, and the design of its neighboring historic district as an example, this paper explores the following aspects:「The historical background of the temple, and the planned road; the street blocks and road patterns in the urban context.」 The findings of these researches form the basis for a few urban design proposals that will help develop innovative solutions. These urban design proposals also demonstrate sound interpretations of balance between urban growth and urban conservation.

1. Barnett, J.(1986).The Elusive City.Harper ＆ Row.
2. Benevolo, L.(1988).The History of the City.MIT.
3. Braunfels, W.(1988).Urban Design in Western Europe.University of Chicago.
4. Cohen, N.(1999).Urban Conservation.The MIT Press.
5. Hall, T.(1997).Planning Europe's Capital Cities.E＆Fn Spon.
6. Kostof, S.(1992).The City Assembled: The Elements of Urban Form Through History.London:Themes and Hudson.
7. Kostof, S.(1991).The City Shaped - Urban Patterns and meanings Through History.London:Thames and Hudson.
8. Morris, A. E. J.(1994).History of Urban From.Addison Wesley Longman.
9. Sert, J. L.(1947).Can Our Cities Survive?.Harvard university.
10. 周菊香(1993)。府城今昔。
11. 徐明福 Hsu, Min-Fu(1996)。台南市古蹟使用調查與評估。國立成功大學建築研究所。
12. 翁金山 Weng, Chin-San(2001)。都市空間的塑源與演化。

1. 殷寶寧(2014)。以博物館為方法之古蹟活化策略探討—淡水古蹟博物館觀眾經驗研究個案。博物館學季刊，28(4)，23-53。
2. 張剛維、林森田(2008)。以容積移轉進行都市保存之制度與執行——財產權觀點分析。建築學報，66，97-118。
3. 趙又嬋、郭幸萍、吳綱立(2007)。歷史街區環境改善綜合性評估架構之研究—以台南市府中街歷史街區爲例。建築學報，62，1-22。
4. 鄭婷文,陳志宏(2020)。以地方權益關係人觀點探討臺南市新化區歷史街區振興推動經驗。規劃學報，38(2)，29-58。