地震引致軟弱砂質地盤液化發生機率之評估

Evaluating Liquefaction Probability of Sandy Soil Due to Earthquake Shaking

10.6377/JA.200606.0051

紀雲曜(Y. Y. Chi)；歐麗婷(L. T. Ou)；李雅芬(Y. F. Lee)；李德河(D. H. Lee)

液化 ； 機率 ； 能量消散 ； 評估 ； liquefaction ； probability ； seismic energy dissipation ； evaluation

建築學報

56期（2006 / 06 / 28）

51 - 74

繁體中文

軟弱砂質地盤在強烈地震時所產生的液化現象，極易損害都市地下維生管線及結構物，常造成嚴重的都市災害。本文乃利用地震能量消散理論及極限狀態觀念，提出一新的地震引致軟弱砂質地盤液化機率的評估方法，並以分層平均的概念，來計算土層之平均年液化機率(average annual liquefaction probability, AALP)。本文以1999年921地震時產生土層液化現象之彰化員林地區為研究案例，評估結果顯示區域內地面下第一層砂土層的AALP較第二層砂土層為高，符合一般淺層砂土具高液化潛能的概念，本文以第一層砂土層的AALP代表整孔之AALP值，由所繪之區域內點位AALP等值圖，顯示員林地區在縣道148以南及縣道137以西區域，其AALP值約0.01為最高，此結果與921地震時現地液化調查之液化區域相符，可推測其液化重現期約為100年。

In this paper, a new evaluation method of annual liquefaction probability was developed based on both seismic energy dissipation theory and limit state concept to change seismic loading in order to search for the liquefied and non-liquefied curve. Furthermore, a new approach was developed using the average annual liquefaction probability (AALP) of divided soil layer to represent the AALP of over hole. The case study evaluating the AALP is in Yunlin, where the soil liquefaction occurred in the Chi-Chi earthquake, 1999. The results show that the AALP of surface sand layer is more than the second sand layer ones, which conform to the general assumption. By mapping of AALP in Yunlin area, the results show that revealed the high AALP area is located between south of county road No. 148 and west of county road No. 137, where the AALP is approximately 0.01 indicating the cycle of liquefaction is about 100 years. The distribution characteristics of liquefaction average probability are also discussed in this paper.

1. Bulletin of the Central Geological Survey(1985).Reports of Engineering Geological Investigation and Boring of Slope Community in Taiwan.
2. Campbell, K.W.(1981).Near source attenuation of peak horizontal acceleration.Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.
3. Chang, H.C.,Lin, C.W.,Chen, M.M.,Lu, S.T.(1998).Summary of Active Faults in Taiwan: Manual of 1/500,000 Active Faults Map.Bulletin of the Central Geologic Survey.
4. Chen, S.G.(1992).Risk Assessment of Soil Liquefaction Potential.Sino-Geotechnics,38,5-16.
5. Cheng, C. T.,Lee, C.T.,Tsai, Y. B.(1998).Seismic Hazard Analysis Assisted By A Geographic Information System.Sino-Geotechnics,69,41-50.
6. Chi, Y. Y.,Ou, L. T.,Chen, Y. R.(2003).Probability-Based Method for Assessing Liquefaction Potential of Soils.Proceeding of the evaluation of liquefaction potential after the Taiwan Chi-Chi Earthquake.
7. Chu, B.L.,Chang, Y.M.,Chen, K.M.,Hsu, S.C.,Chang, C.M.(2000).Liquefaction and Settling in Wufeng and Taiping Counties During the Chi-Chi Earthquake.Sino-Geotechnics,17,19-28.
8. Davis, R.O.,Berrill, J.B.(1982).Energy Dissipation and Seismic Liquefaction in Sands.Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics.
9. Der Kiureghian, A.,Ang, A.,H-S.(1977).A Fault-Rupture Model for Seismic Risk Analysis.Bull. Seis. Soc. Am..
10. Der Kiureghian, A.,Ang, A.,H-S.(1977).A fault-rupture model for sismic risk analysis.Bull. Seis. Soc. Am..
11. Gutenberg, B.,Richter, C.F.(1954).Seismicity of the Earth.
12. Gutenberg, B.,Richter, C.F.(1954).Seismicity of the earth.Princeton University Press.
13. Haldar, A.,Tang, W.H.(1979).Probabilistic evaluation of liquefaction potential.Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE,105(2),145-162.
14. Hardin, B. O.(1965).The nature of damping in sands.J. soil Mech. Found. Div., ASCE.
15. Hardin, B. O.(1965).The nature of damping in sands.J. soil Mech. Found. Div., ASCE.
16. Harr, M. E.(1987).Reliability-Based Design in Civil Engineering.
17. Ishihara, K.,Acacio, A.A.,Towhata, I.(1993).Soils and Foundations.
18. Iwasaki, T.,Arakawa, T.,Tokida, K.(1982).Simplified Procedures for Assessing Soil Liquefaction During Earthquakes.Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering Conference Southampton
19. Juang, C.H.,Chen, C.J.(2000).A Rational Method for Development of Limit State for Liquefaction Evaluation Based on Shear Wave Velocity Measurements.International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics,24,1-27.
20. Juang, C.H.,Chen, C.J.,Jiang, T.,Andrus, D(2000).Risk-Based Liquefaction Potential Evaluation Using Standard Penetration Test.Canadian Geotechnical Journal,37,1195-1208.
21. Lai, S.Y.,Lin, P.S.,Lee, F.B.,Xie, M.Z.(1989).Study of the Dutch Cone Test and Reliability of Soil Liquefaction.Journal of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering,16(2),43-60.
22. Lee, D.H.,Ku, C.S.(2001).A Study of CPT Data at Liquefied Areas.Chinese Institute of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering.
23. Lee, D.H.,Ku, C.S.,Lin, H.M.,Tien, K.G.,Kao, C.C.,Lin, Z.F.(1999).Soil Liquefaction and Subsidence.Conference on Hazard Investigation of 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake.
24. Lee, S.H.H.,Wu, C.M.,Kuo, C.Y.(2001).Liquefaction Potential Analysis Methods for Taiwan Area.Proceeding of the evaluation of liquefaction potential Applying on Geotechnique.
25. Lee, Y.F.(2001).The Study on Probabilistic in Evaluation Method of Seismic Liquefaction.M.D. Dissertation, Department of Land Management and Development.
26. Liao, S.S.,Veneziano, D.,Whitman, R.V.(1988).Regression Model for Evaluating Liquefaction Probability.Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE,114(4),389-411.
27. Lin, P.S.(2000).Primary Investigation of Soil Liquefaction in Nan-Tau County after 921 Earthquake.Department of Civil Engineering.
28. Moh,Association, INC.(2000).The Research of Soil Liquefaction Conducted in the areas of Yunlin and Dacun.National Science Council.
29. Nasser, S.N.,Shokooh, A.(1979).A unified approach to densification and liquefaction of cohesionless sand in cyclic shearing.Journal of Canadian Geotechnical,16,659-678.
30. Ni, S.H.,Lai, H.Y.(2000).The suitability of Current Liquefaction Potential Assessing Methods on Cases in Taiwan Chi-Chi Earthquake.An Anniversary Proceeding of the Taiwan Chi-Chi Earthquake.
31. Peck, R. B.,Hanson, W, E.,Thornburn, T. H.(1974).Foundation engineering.
32. Reiter, L.(1990).Earthquake Hazard Analysis-Issues and Insights.
33. Robertson, P.K.,Wride, C.E.(1998).Evaluation Cyclic Liquefaction Potential Using the Cone Penetration test.Canadian Geotechnical Journal,35,442-459.
34. Seed, H.B.,Tokimatsu, K.,Harder, L.F.,Chung, R.M.(1985).Influence of SPT Procedures in Soil Liquefaction Resistance Evaluation.Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE,111(12),1425-1445.
35. Tokimastu, K.,Yoshimi, Y.(1983).Soil and Foundations.
36. Wen, H.Y.,Shoung, D.G.(2003).Investigation on Damages of Building Caused by Ground Liquefaction and Their Remediation in Yuan-Lin Area After the Chi-Chi Earthquake.Chinese Institute of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering.
37. Youd, T. L.,Idriss, I.M.(1997).Proceeding of the NCEER workshop on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils, Salt Lake.
38. 李咸亨、吳志明、郭政彥(2001)。本土化液化評估方法之探討。2001年土壤液化評估在大地工程上之應用研討會論文集
39. 李崇正、溫惠鈺、熊大綱(2003)。集集地震員林地區液化災損及復舊調查之研究。中國土木水利工程學刊，15(4)，851-858。
40. 李雅芬(2001)。台南，長榮大學土地管理與開發學系碩士論文。
41. 李德河、古志生(2001)。液化區CPT資料之探討。中國土木水利工程學刊，13(4)，779-791。
42. 李德河、古志生、林宏明、田坤國、高清泉、林鋕鋒(1999)。地盤液化與沉陷。1999集集大地震災害調查研討會論文集
43. 亞新工程顧問股份有限公司(2000)。土壤液化評估與處理對策研擬第一期計畫總報告
44. 林炳森(2000)。921集集大地震南投市液化初步調查報告
45. 紀雲曜、歐麗婷、陳怡睿(2003)。機率式液化潛能評估方法。集集地震土壤液化總評估91學年度期末研究成果研討會論文集
46. 倪勝火、賴宏源(2000)。常用液化評估法對921地震案例適用性探討。921集集大地震週年紀念學術研討會論文集
47. 張徽正、林啓文、陳勉銘、盧詩丁(1998)。台灣活動斷層概論，五十萬分之一台灣活動斷層分布圖說明書。經濟部中央地質調查所特刊
48. 陳俶季(1992)。土壤液化潛能之風險評估。地工技術雜誌，38，5-16。
49. 經濟部中央地質調查所(1985)。台灣坡地社區工程地質調查與探勘報告，4(4)
50. 褚炳麟、張益銘、陳冠閔、徐松圻、張錦銘(2000)。921地震霧峰、太平地區液化及下陷調查分析。地工技術，17，19-28。
51. 鄭錦桐、李鍚堤、蔡義本(1998)。利用地理資訊系統輔助地震危害度分析。地工技術，69，41-50。
52. 賴聖耀、林炳森、李豐博、謝明志(1989)。荷式錐貫入試驗與液化可靠度之相關研究。土木水利，17(2)，43-60。