题名

文化展演設施建設需求評估指標之研究

并列篇名

A Study of Required Index of Cultural Related Fine Arts Exhibition and Performing Arts Facilities

DOI

10.6377/JA.200612.0113

作者

謝玉玲(Yu-Ling Hsieh);賴榮平(Rong-Ping Lai);謝育穎(Yu-Ying Hsieh)

关键词

文化設施 ; 文化展演設施 ; 需求指標 ; 區位決策 ; cultural facilities ; fine arts exhibition ; performing arts facilities ; required index ; location selection process

期刊名称

建築學報

卷期/出版年月

58期(2006 / 12 / 01)

页次

113 - 129

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

文化展演設施為屬社會優等財的重要公共設施之一,為建立一套文化展演設施建設區位評估機制,供政府決策參考,本研究以使用者需求觀點,考量地區間文化展演設施供應資源及使用需求差異,兼具「公平性」與「效率性」評估原則,透過文獻歸納法與層級分析法專家問卷調查,建立「文化展演設施建設需求評估指標」。為使本指標具備實務性,進一步運用相對需求評價法,提出計算模型及評估定量方式,以「文化展演設施建設需求指數」代表該地區對文化展演設施之需求程度。最後以台灣島地區劃分為三種生活圈層級進行實際案例操作,結果顯示與建設需求現況呈吻合。

英文摘要

Cultural related fine arts exhibition and performing arts facilities (C&Ps) are important types of public facilities and merit goods. In order to establish an evaluation index for the government on C&Ps' location selection process, this study perceives from user's requirement and considers the supplying resource and utilizing situation in different communities. The index are determined by research review and experts via using the AHP method. For applying the evaluation index, this study adopted an instrument of comparative priority of need in different communities and proposed a model with evaluation definitions. Finally, regions from Taiwan's island wide are selected to apply the required index of cultural related, line arts exhibition and performing arts facilities in the three classified levels. The results meet the real situation closely.

主题分类 工程學 > 土木與建築工程
参考文献
  1. Council for Cultural Affairs(2004).Cultural Policy, volume 2004.
  2. Deng, C. Y.,Zeng, K. S.(1989).Characters & Application of AHP(2).Journal of the Chinese Statistical Association,27(7),1-20.
  3. Deng, C. Y.,Zeng, K. S.(1989).Characters & Application of AHP(1).Journal of the Chinese Statistical Association,27(6),5-22.
  4. Gratton, C.,Taylor, P.(1998).Economics of Leisure Services Management.
  5. Gratton, C.,Taylor, P.(1988).Economics of Leisure Services Management.
  6. Hodsoll, F.(1998).MEASURING FOR SUCCESS AND FAILURE IN GOVERNMENT AND THE ARTS.Journal of Arts Management, Law & Society,28(3),230-240.
  7. Hsu, H. Y.(2002).A Comparison of the Price among Different types of Performing Arts and their Effect Factors, Master's thesis.
  8. Jang, Y. G(2004).Research on Changes and Present Condition of the Distribution in a South Korean Public Hall.Journal of Archit. Plann.,580,33-34.
  9. Kaple, D.(1998).COMPARING SAMPLE FRAMES FOR RESEARCH ON ARTS ORGANIZATIONS: RESULTS OF A STUDY IN THREE METROPOLITAN AREAS.Journal of Arts Management, Law & Society,28(1),41-67.
  10. Ku, Y. L.(2000).The Participant Behavior of Cultural Activities.National Taipei University, Taiwan.:Doctoral dissertation.
  11. Lai, P. S.(2001).Research on cultural Policy via Modern Dramatic Artists in Taiwan, Master's thesis.
  12. Lai, R. P.(2003).Research on Cultural Facility in Taiwan.
  13. Lee, K. C.(2000).A Reasonable Site Selection Process of Public Facility, Master's thesis.
  14. Radbourne, J.(2001).Full house Theory: A New Theory for Assessing Demand for Arts Centers.Journal of Arts Management,30(4),254-268.
  15. Radbourne, J.(2001).Full House Theory: A New Theory for Assessing Demand for Arts Centers.Journal of Arts Management, Law & Society,30(4),254-268.
  16. Satty, T. L.(1980).The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation.New York:McGraw-Hill International Book Co. ,London.
  17. Satty, T. L.(1980).The Analytic hierarchy Process . Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation.New York:McGraw-Hill International Book Co. ,London.
  18. Shimizu, H.(2003).A Study on Changes of Performing Arts Facilities: Comparison of An Administration Trend of the Past 20 Years.
  19. Sin, W. J.(1996).A Study on Planning of Cultural Facility.
  20. Smith, S. L J.(1982).Recreation geography.
  21. Smith, S. L. J.(1982).Recreation Geography.
  22. Staley, E. J.(1968).An Instrument for Determining Comparative Priority of Need for Neighborhood Recreation Services in the City of Los Angeles.Recreation and Youth Services Planning Council.
  23. Staley, E. J.(1968).An Instrument for Determining Comparative Priority of Need for Neighborhood Recreation Services in the City of Los Angeles.Recreation and Youth Services Planning Council.
  24. Wang, J. H.(1992).Performance Evaluation of Public Cultural Center.
  25. XU, Y. R.(1990).A Study on Requirement of Public Facility via Maximum Usage.
  26. 王振鵠(1992)。縣市文化中心績效評估。行政院研究發展考核委員會委託研究,台北市:
  27. 古宜靈(2000)。都市藝文活動參與選擇行為之研究。國立台北大學博士論文,台北市:
  28. 文化施設·文化政策の評価を考えるー創造的評価に向けて
  29. 行政院文化建設委員會(2004)。文化白皮書.2004年。行政院文化建設委員會,台北市:
  30. 吳必虎(1996)。遊憩地理學:理論與方法。田園城市文化,台北市:
  31. 李國正(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新竹市,國立交通大學交通運輸研究所碩士論文。
  32. 辛晚教(1996)。全國文化生活圈整體規劃先期研究案-全國文化生活圈文化硬體(展演)設施發展綱要計畫。行政院文化建設委員會委託研究,台北市:
  33. 徐曉鶯(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台中縣,朝陽科技大學碩士論文。
  34. 張永鎬、清水裕之(2004)。韓國の公立ホールにおける分布の変遷とそる現況に闋する研究。日本建築字會計面系論文集,日本:
  35. 清水裕之(2003)。文部科學省委託研究報告文部科學省委託研究報告,日本:。
  36. 許亞儒(1990)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台南市,國立成功大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文。
  37. 鄧振源、曾國雄(1989)。層級分析法的內涵特性與應用(下)。中國統計學報,27(7),1-20。
  38. 鄧振源、曾國雄(1989)。層級分析法的內涵特性與應用(上)。中國統計學報,27(6),5-22。
  39. 賴佩珊(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市,國立台灣大學戲劇研究所碩士論文。
  40. 賴榮平(2003)。台灣文化展演設施現況調查與分析。行政院文化建設委員會委託研究,台北市:
被引用次数
  1. 陳文亮、江雅媚(2012)。結合ISM 與ANP 法於吹風機產品選購評價指標之研究。高雄師大學報:人文與藝術類,32,119-136。