農村環境生物多樣性研究－以屏東縣五溝村水圳地景為例

A Biodiversity Study on the Rural Ditch Landscape in the Wuggo Village, Pingtung County, Taiwan

10.6377/JA.200703.0163

盧惠敏(Apeil Huei-Min Lu)；彭仁君(Jen-Jinn Perng)；郭文健(Wen-Chien Kuo)；葉慶龍(Ching-Long Yeh)；丁澈士(Chen-Shyh Ting)；陳鈞華(Jin-Hwua Chen)

生物多樣性 ； 水圳地景 ； 生物多樣性指數 ； 空間結構指數 ； Rurae Landscape ； Biodiversity ； Shannon-Wiener index ； Spatial Structure index

建築學報

59期（2007 / 03 / 01）

163 - 188

繁體中文

The purpose of this study is to analyze biodiversity indexes that are based on ecological (biotic and spatial) data, in order to provide strategies for a rural environment on biodiversity. It includes the diversity index of aquatic insects, plantations, birds, landscape, and spatial structure index (SSI), as well as the hydrological data and water quality index. From January to July 2004, three field visits were done to eleven sites located on the ditches of the Wuggo village. In this area, six sites were selected to build up the landscape and bird diversity index. The relationships between biota, space, and environmental quality are tested by statistics, such as Pearson's Product Moment Correlation Coefficient and ANOVA. The results show that aquatic insects diversity (＞2) at low but close to middle polluted water is higher then at none or slight polluted water (＜2). Except for hydrology and water quality, the condition influencing aquatic insects is SSI. Only the SSI reaches above 0.5, aquatic insect diversity can have the level of 0.91-2.37. In statistics, it displays that at the district level, landscape diversity is related to bird diversity, while at the location level, the spatial structure is related to aquatic insect diversity. The correlation between aquatic insect diversity and sectional structure is significant. Under the same conditions of environmental qualities, the influence of spatial pattern upon biota is significant. In statistics, environmental quality and spatial pattern both have significant influence on biodiversity of aquatic insects. The interaction between environmental quality and spatial pattern also has significant influence on biodiversity of aquatic insects. Therefore, applying SSI to discuss biodiversity is necessary and important. Spatial structure index and biodiversity index can be useful and objective references.

The purpose of this study is to analyze biodiversity indexes that are based on ecological (biotic and spatial) data, in order to provide strategies for a rural environment on biodiversity. It includes the diversity index of aquatic insects, plantations, birds, landscape, and spatial structure index (SSI), as well as the hydrological data and water quality index. From January to July 2004, three field visits were done to eleven sites located on the ditches of the Wuggo village. In this area, six sites were selected to build up the landscape and bird diversity index. The relationships between biota, space, and environmental quality are tested by statistics, such as Pearson's Product Moment Correlation Coefficient and ANOVA. The results show that aquatic insects diversity (＞2) at low but close to middle polluted water is higher then at none or slight polluted water (＜2). Except for hydrology and water quality, the condition influencing aquatic insects is SSI. Only the SSI reaches above 0.5, aquatic insect diversity can have the level of 0.91-2.37. In statistics, it displays that at the district level, landscape diversity is related to bird diversity, while at the location level, the spatial structure is related to aquatic insect diversity. The correlation between aquatic insect diversity and sectional structure is significant. Under the same conditions of environmental qualities, the influence of spatial pattern upon biota is significant. In statistics, environmental quality and spatial pattern both have significant influence on biodiversity of aquatic insects. The interaction between environmental quality and spatial pattern also has significant influence on biodiversity of aquatic insects. Therefore, applying SSI to discuss biodiversity is necessary and important. Spatial structure index and biodiversity index can be useful and objective references.

1. Boothby, J.(1997).Pond conservation: towards a delineation of pondscape.Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems.
2. Büchs, W.(2003).Biodiversity and agri-environmental indicators - general scopes and skills with special reference to the habitat level.Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment.
3. Center of Rural Improvement Planning(1996).Science of Rural Improvement Planning.
4. Duelli, P.(1997).Biodiversity evaluation in agricultural landscape: an approach at two different scales.Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment.
5. Forman, R. T.T.,Godron, Michael(1988).Landscape Ecology.
6. Forman, R.T.T.(1995).Land Mosaics: The ecology of Landscapes and Regions.
7. Forman, R.T.T.,Godron, M..Landscape Ecology.
8. Fukui, Wataru, Masuda, Noboru, and Abe, Daisyu(1998).A Case Study on the Relationship between Rural Land Use and Avifauna in West Kobe and East Harima.Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture.
9. Gee, John, H.R.,Smith Barbara D.,Lee, Katherine M.,Griffiths, Sian W.(1997).The ecological basis of freshwater pond management for biodiversity.Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems.
10. Jhen, S.Y.(1993).Evaluations on Ecological Environment.
11. Jhen, Y.L.(1991).Environmental Indicator Species.
12. Kameyama, Akira,Kuramoto, Noboru(1998).Eco-park: Planning and Design for Ecology Park.
13. Kuo, Y.Y.(2001).Water Ecological Environment Research Center of Chinese University.Ecological Engineering for Water.
14. Lin, Y.S.(2000).Department of Life Sciences.A Report of National Biodiversity Research and Planning.
15. Lu, April H.M.(2003).Environment Ecological Planning and Engineering: Rural Landscape on Biodiversity.
16. Lu, April H.M.,Perng, J.J.,Chen, C.T.,Chou, C.H.,Ye, C.L.,Ting, C.S.,Chen, C.H.,Kuo, W.C.,Chen, J.W(2004).Sustainable Rueal Environment (Ⅱ)-Ecological Engineering on Biodiversity of Rural EnvironmentSustainable Rueal Environment (Ⅱ)-Ecological Engineering on Biodiversity of Rural Environment,Taipei:Executive Yuan.
17. Molles, M. C. Jr.(2002).Ecology: Concepts and Applications.
18. Molles,Manuel C. Jr.(2002).Ecology: Concepts and Applications.
19. Nishio, Michinoli, Moriyama, Hiroshi, and Mazimoto, Sigeo(2003).Seminar on Basics of Agriculture Environment and Agriculture.
20. Ogushi, L.(1983).The World of Aquatic Insects: Ecology of Lotic Freshwaters.Tokyo, Japan:Rural Culture Association.
21. Rung, T.S.(2004).Applying Excel to Marketing.
22. Rural Development Planning Commission(1989).A Series of Rural Engineering Study, No. 47: New Planning Techniques For Improvement of Rural Environment.
23. Sun, R.Y.(2000).General Ecology.
24. Ward, J.V.(1992).Aquatic Insect Ecology.
25. Yamamoto, Satoshi, Masuda, Noboru, Shimomola, Yashuhito, Daisyu, Abe, Duku, Wataru,and Machiya, Tomoe(1998).A study on biotic preservation of agriculture and rural space with landscape as paddy field as the center in Osaka.Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture.
26. Yan, S.H.,Yang, Y.P.,Lin, J.G.(2001).Council of Agriculture.Hydrophytes of Taiwan.
27. Yide, Hisado,Kameyama, Akira(1996).Landscape Ecology.
28. 大串龍一(1983)。水生昆蟲の世界：流水。生態。
29. 山本 聰、增田 昇、下村泰彥、安部大就、福井洹、待谷朋江(1998)。大阪府能勢盯における水田を中心とした農業、農村空か保有景する觀生物保全機能研究。うソドスケープ研究，61(5)，589-592。
30. 井手 久登、龜山 章(1993)。綠地生態學。
31. 西尾 道德、守山弘、松本 重男(2003)。農學基礎ㄝミナ一環境と農業。
32. 林曜松(2000)。國家生物多樣性研究規劃報告。
33. 孫儒泳(2000)。普通生態學。臺北，台灣:藝軒圖書。
34. 郭一羽(2001)。水域生態工程。
35. 農村開發企劃委員會(1989)。農村工學研究47：農村環境の計劃技法一農村空問の多面整備主穗をめさして。
36. 農村環境整備ㄝンダ一編(1996)。農村環境整備の科學。東京，日本:朝倉書店。
37. 榮泰生(2004)。活用Excel精通行銷研究。
38. 福井 洹、增田 昇、安部 大就(1998)。西神戶と東播磨地區における農地の存在形態と鳥類生息との關連に關する研究。うンドスケープ研究，61(5)，545-550。
39. 鄭先祐(1993)。生態環境影響評估學。
40. 鄭育麟(1991)。環工指標微生物。臺北，台灣:復文書局。
41. 盧惠敏(2003)。環境生態規劃與工法：生物多樣性與農村環境。
42. 盧惠敏、彭仁君、葉慶龍、陳炤杰、丁澈士、郭文健、陳鈞華、陳朝圳、周昌弘(2004)。永續農村環境生態研究與管理一農村環境生物多樣性營造技術之研究。
43. 龜山 章、倉本宣(1998)。エコパーク生物のいる公園づくり。
44. 顏聖絃、楊遠波、林仲剛(2001)。台灣水生植物圖誌。

1. 籃世旭,盧惠敏(2023)。景觀樹木外科手術的工法和成效。建築學報，125，79-96。