永續建築評估工具GBTool2005本土適用性之研究

A Study on the Procedure of Customizing by Using a Sustainable Building Assessment Tool_ Taking GBTool2005 as an Example

10.6377/JA.200706.0177

張桂鳳(Kuei-Feng Chang)；江哲銘(Che-Ming Chiang)；周伯丞(Po-Cheng Chou)

永續建築 ； 層級程序分析法 ； 評估工具 ； GBTool2005 ； Sustainable Building ； Analytic Hierarchy Process AHP ； Assessment Tool ； GBTool2005

建築學報

60期（2007 / 06 / 01）

177 - 196

繁體中文

Cole在1998年提出，評估工具是應該具備完整明確之架構模型，以提供做為發展適用於不同用途建築物、地區區位特性等重要基準點，同時做為新的評估方法和建立基準值的基礎依據，亦可隨著時空條件之變遷調整修正，以適切落實「因地制宜」。故本研究透過國外具指標性意義的永續建築評估工具GBTool2005，運用層級程序分析法(AHP)，進行台灣地區各相關永續建築之產、官、學等領域專家之問卷調查，以探討「產官學領域別」及「區位環境別」對評估指標群看法之差異性，期能提出台灣地區之永續建築環境性能評價研究之參考。其中，本研究已有效地驗證「專家評價方式」應用在國際永續建築評估架構轉化於台灣地區適用性之探討；在調查結果方面：全體台灣專家對GBTool2005 第一層指標群分析，顯示優先決策的前三者權重值依次為：「C.環境負荷」0.211、「B.能源資源」0.186、「D.室內環境」0.162。

Cole (1998) said the assessment methods need an accepted credible assessment framework, and can serve as a test-bed for comparing and contrasting the effectiveness of new methods and for setting performance benchmarks, in order to carry out customization to local conditions. Therefore, this study utilized the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) method to investigate the international demonstration sustainable building assessment tool, by compiling and completing an experts' questionnaire of professionals, the Government, and professors, et cetera, in Taiwan, and explore the differences between 'different professionals' and 'regional characteristics'. Through a test of case-study projects, this research hopes that results will be advantageously employed in sustainable building assessment studies in the future for Taiwan. The results can be summarized the following points: this study verified validly to apply the experts' evaluation method on a regional customizing procedure by a international sustainable building assessment framework in Taiwan; the AHP result of all experts' opinions outlines the priority issues and the weighting value in Taiwan, these are: 'C. Environmental Loadings' is 21.1%, 'B. Energy and Resource Consumption' is 18.6%, and 'D. Indoor Environmental Quality' is 16.2%.

1. Crawley, D.,I. Aho(1999).Building Environmental Assessment Methods: Applications and Development Trends.BUILDING RESEARCH & INFORMATION,27(4),300-308.
2. Dagmar, B. Epsten(2002).A National Rating System (LEED™ 2.0) as a Source of Benchmarks and Data for GBTool.Proceedings of Sustainable Building 2002 Conference,Oslo, Norway:
3. Deakin, M.,P. Huovila,S. Rao,Sunikka, M.,Vreeker, R.(2002).The Assessment of Sustainable Urban Development.BUILDING RESEARCH & INFORMATION,30(2),95-108.
4. iiSBE(2005).GBC Green Building Tool 2005.International Initiative for a Sustainable Built Environmen.
5. Larsson, K. Nils,J. Cole Raymond(2001).Green Building Challenge: the development of an idea.BUILDING RESEARCH & INFORMATION,29(5),336-345.
6. Larsson, Nils K.(1999).Development of a building performance rating and labeling system in Canada.BUILDING RESEARCH & INFORMATION,27(4),332-341.
7. Lü tzkendorf T.,D. Lorenz(2005).Sustainable property investment: valuing sustainable buildings through property performance assessment.BUILDING RESEARCH & INFORMATION,33(3),212-234.
8. Murakam Shuzoi(2002).Comprehensive Assessment System of Building Environmental Efficiency in Japan (CASBEE-J).Proceedings of Sustainable Building 2002 Conference,Oslo, Norway:
9. Ramanathan, R.(2001).A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment.Journal of Environmental Management,63(1),27-35.
10. Raymond, J. Cole(1999).Building environmental assessment methods: clarifying intentions.BUILDING RESEARCH & INFORMATION,27(4),230-246.
11. Raymond, J. Cole(2004).Changing context for environmental knowledge.BUILDING RESEARCH & INFORMATION,32(2),91-109.
12. Raymond, J. Cole(1998).Emerging trends in building environmental assessment methods.BUILDING RESEARCH & INFORMATION,26(1),3-16.
13. Saaty, T. L.(2000).Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with The Analytic Hierarchy Process.Pittsburg:RWS.
14. Todd, J.A.,D. Crawley,S. Geissler,G. Lindsey(2001).Comparative Assessment of Environmental Performance Tools and the Role of the Green Building Challenge.BUILDING RESEARCH & INFORMATION,29(5),324-335.
15. US Green Building Council(2006).LEED Product Development and Maintenance Manual.USA:LEED Steering Committee.
16. Yokoo Noriyoshi(2002).Comparison of buildings-assessment results of green housing in Japan by using Eco Homes, LEED, GBTool and Green housing A-Z.Proceedings of Sustainable Buildings 2002.
17. 小野寛也、村上周三(2004)。空気調和・衛生工学会大会学術講演論文集。日本:名古屋。
18. 日本財建築環境省エネルギー機構(2006)。CASBEE《建築物の総合的環境性能評価システム》。日本:
19. 江哲銘、周伯丞(1999)。獨立性效應在室內物理環境品質定量化之應用－以高齡者安養中心爲例。建築學報，31，33-49。
20. 張桂鳳(2005)。成功大學建築系。
21. 郭信霖、許淑卿(2000)。初等統計學。台北:華立圖書股份有限公司。

1. 陳振誠、陳文亮、李訓谷、江哲銘、王佑萱(2012)。以層級程序分析法應用在玻璃建材評選之決策分析。建築學報，79，67-83。
2. 郭怡君、張桂鳳、周伯丞、江哲銘(2009)。台灣地區室內溫熱環境改變對於課業學習及工作效率心理滿意度影響之探討。建築學報，67，25-40。
3. 黃永泰、陳耀光(2010)。運用室內環境品質診斷方法於台灣實驗研究類建築之健康影響評估。建築學報，73，143-159。
4. 張桂鳳(2008)。永續建築居住效益對購屋選擇之影響。住宅學報，17(1)，51-70。