臺北市實施綠覆率對空氣淨化累積效果之動態模擬分析

A Dynamic Simulation Analysis of Green Coverage Ratio on the Accumulative Air Pollution Alleviation Effect of Taipei City

10.6377/JA.200709.0021

陳美智(Mei-Chih Chen)；何東波(Tong-Po Ho)；詹秋貴(Chiou-Guey Jan)

綠覆率 ； 永續都市 ； 因果回饋環路 ； 系統動態學 ； 整體觀 ； Green Coverage Ratio ； Sustainable City ； Causal Loops Diagrams ； System Dynamics ； Holistic View

建築學報

61期（2007 / 09 / 01）

21 - 42

繁體中文

都市綠覆率理念近年來備受國內學術界和各級政府積極推動，冀望帶動營建業在環境規劃設計實務的新潮流。然而，綠覆率這種生態設計作法在提升空氣品質，是一種動態、複雜、延滯和累積的型態，必須經過長期發展才會呈現具體效果。因此，需要一個具備整體觀、建構空氣淨化系統結構、長期動態模擬等功能的方法論，來協助人們瞭解綠覆率政策對於環境的實質生態效益，增進決策者對推動綠覆率的信心。 本研究以臺北市為案例，利用系統動態學方法論的因果回饋環路，探討臺北市空氣品質下降之問題核心與找出關鍵變數，並藉由空氣淨化之系統動態模式和情境模擬分析，說明執行綠覆率政策對於未來減緩臺北市空氣污染氣體量的具體效果和宏觀價值。研究發現：國內營建業若能長期實施綠覆率，將能具體增加都市綠地面積並增進綠地吸收污染氣體能力，具備淨化都市空氣之效果。因此，綠覆率是非常值得長期推廣的都市永續發展作法。

The idea of green coverage ratio recently is interested by governments and research fields of environmental planning and design for cooperation with the practical fields of building trades. However, air purification effect of green coverage ratio works as a form of dynamic, complex, delayed, and accumulated action, which needs a longer-term for evaluation. Therefore, the policy analysis of green coverage ratio needs a special methodology with a holistic view to help decision maker to have confidence by building its accumulated construction of air purification system and simulating its long-term dynamic development trend. In this article, Taipei's problem of declined air quality is demonstrated, which shows the long-term air purification effect and the holistic value of green coverage ratio by applying causal feedback loops, dynamic simulation models, and scenarios analysis under System dynamics (SD) approach. Results show that policy of increasing green coverage ratio would bring significant contributions to increase urban green land area and its modification ability to air purification effect. Therefore, the policy of increasing green coverage ratio is worth to carry out for urban sustainable development.

1. Environmental Protection Agency
2. (1999).Now available from Pegasus Communications.Canada:Waltham, MA.
3. (2001).WHO Strategy on Air Quality and Health.Geneva:Revised final draft.
4. Encyclopedia Americana Online
5. Adams, D.(1994).Urban planning and the development process.London:UCL Press.
6. Smart Growth Policy
7. Barlas, Y.(1996).Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics.System Dynamics Review,12(3),183-210.
8. Beatley, T.(2000).Green urbanism: learning from European cities.U.S.A.:Island Press.
9. Brand, M.(2003).Consensus building and "Smart Growth".Conflict Resolution Quarterly,21(2),189-209.
10. Cavana, R. Y.,Ford, A.(2004).Environmental and Resource Systems: Editors` Introduction.System Dynamics Review,20,89-98.
11. Coyle, G.,Exelby, D.(2000).The Validation of Commercial System Dynamics Models.System Dynamics Review,16(1),27-41.
12. Coyle, R. G.(1996).System Dynamics Modeling: A Practical Approach.New York:Chapman & Hall.
13. Davidson, Eric A.(2001).YOU CAN'T EAT GNP: Economics as If Ecology Mattered.The Perseus Books Group Perseus.
14. Forrester, J. W.(1961).Industrial Dynamics.Portland, OR: Productivity Press.
15. Forrester, J. W.(1973).World Dynamics.Cambridge, MA:Productivity Press.
16. Forrester, J. W.(1969).Urban Dynamics.Waltham, MA:Pegasus Communications.
17. Forrester, J. W.,Senge, P. M.(1980).Tests for Building Confidence in System Dynamics Models.Time Studies in the Management Sciences,14,209-228.
18. Hawken, Paul,Lovins Amory,Lovins L. Hunter(2000).Natural Capitalism: The Next Industrial Revolution.James & James (Science Publishers) Ltd Earthscan.
19. Hayami, H.,Nakamura, M.,Yoshioka, K.(2003).A Joint Japan-China Research Project for Reducing Pollution in China in the Context of the Kyoto Protocol Clean Development Mechanism (CDM): Case Study of the Desulfurdized Bio-Coal Briquette Experiments in Shenyang and Chengdu.MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS,24,213-229.
20. Hsieh, W. W.,Sun, E. J.(2001).Determination of Uptake Rates of Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen and Ozone by Ten Plant Species or Varieties in Wind Tunnel.Journal of the Environmental Protection Society of the Republic of China,24(2),142-155.
21. Jan, C. G.(2003).Policies for developing defense technology in newly industrialized countries: a case study of Taiwan.Technology in Society,25(3),351-368.
22. Jan, T. S.,Jan, C. G.(2000).Designing Simulation Software to Facilitate Learning of Quantitative System Dynamics Skills: A Case in Taiwan.Journal of the Operational Research Society,51,1409-1419.
23. Jensen, E. S.,Pilegaard, K.(1993).Absorption of nitrogen dioxide by barley in open-top chamber.The New Phytologist,123,359-364.
24. Kaiser, E. J.,Godschalk, D. R.,Chapin, J. F. S.(1995).Urban Land Use Planning.Urbana, Chicago:University of Illinois Press.
25. Kayden, J. S.,Szold, T. S.,Carbonell, A.(eds.)(2002).Smart Growth: Form and Substance.Cambridge, Mass:Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
26. Kimmins, J. P.(1997).Forest ecology: a foundation for sustainable management.Prentice Hall.
27. Lane, D. C.,Smart, C.(1995).Reinterpreting `generic structure`: evolution, application and limitations of a concept.System Dynamics Review,12(6),87-120.
28. The Earth Day 2000 Condition Critical
29. Meadows, D. H.,Meadows, D. L.,Randers, J.(1992).Beyond the Limets: Confronting Global Collapse, Envisioning a Sustainable Future.Chelsea Green:Post Mills, VT.
30. Meadows, D. H.,Meadows, D. L.,Randers, J.,Behrens, W. W. III(1972).The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome`s Project on the Predicament of Mankind.New York:Universe Books.
31. Meadows, D. H.,Robinson, J.(2002).The Electronic Oracle: Computer Models and Social Decisions (excerpt).System Dynamics Review,18(2),271-308.
32. Miller, J. G. T.(2004).Living in the environment: principles, connections, and solutions.USA:Brooks, Cole.
33. Morecroft, J. D. W.(1983).System Dynamics: Portraying Bounded Rationality.OMEGA,11(2),131-142.
34. Pargal, S.,Heil, M.(2000).Reducing Air Pollution from Urban Passenger Transport: A Framework for Policy Analysis.Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,43(5),665-688.
35. Priemus, H.(1999).Sustainable cities: How to realize an ecological breakthrough: A Dutch approach.International Planning Studies,4(2),213-136.
36. Repenning, N.(2002).A simulation-based approach to understanding the dynamics of innovation implementation.Organization Science,13(2),109-127.
37. Roberts, E. B.(1978).An Introduction, from: Managerial Applications of System Dynamics.Waltham, MA, U.S.A.:Pegasus Communications.
38. Roberts, N.,Andersen, D.,Deal, R.,Garet, M.,Shaffer, W.(1983).Introduction to Computer Simulation: A System Dynamics Approach.Portland, OR:Productivity Press.
39. Senge, P.(1992).The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization.Sydney:Random House.
40. Simonovic, S. P.(2002).World water dynamics: global modeling of water resources.Journal of Environmental Management,66,249-267.
41. Stave, K. A.(2002).Using system dynamics to improve public participation in environmental decisions.System Dynamics Review,18(2),139-167.
42. Stave, K. A.(2003).A system dynamics model to facilitate public understanding of water management options in Las Vegas, Nevada.Journal of Environmental Management,67,303-313.
43. Sterman, J. D.(2000).Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World.Boston:Irwin McGraw-Hill.
44. Sterman, J. D.(2002).All Models Are Wrong: Reflections on Becoming a Systems Scientist.System Dynamics Review,8(4),501-531.
45. Sung, C. H.,Wang, Y. N.,Sun, E. J.,Ho, L. H.(1998).Evaluation of Tree Species for Absorption and Tolerance to Ozone and Nitrogen Dioxide (III).Quarterly Journal of the Experimental Forest of National Taiwan University,12(4),269-288.
46. Tsai, J. H.,Hsu, Y. C.,Weng, H. C.,Lin, W. Y.,Jeng, F. T.(2000).Air pollutant emission factors from new and in-use motorcycles.Atmospheric Environment,34,4747-4754.
47. Vensim(2002).DSS32 Version 5.0c1.Ventana Systems, Inc.
48. Walton, W.,Carmichael, K.,Hunter, C.(2001).Local Air Pollution Control in the USA: Potential Lessons for the Introduction of Air Quality Management Areas and Action Plans in the UK.International Planning Studies,6(3),311-333.
49. Weng Q.,Yang, S.(2004).Managing the adverse thermal effects of urban development in a densely populated Chinese city.Journal of Environmental Management,70,145-156.
50. Wheeler, S.(1996).Sustainable Urban Development: A Literature Review and Analysis.California:University of California at Berkeley Press.
51. 行政院環保署(2000)。空氣品質保護25年紀實(1975-2000)。臺北:
52. 行政院環保署(1999)。南高屏地區空氣污染總量管制規劃─F6子計畫：移動源管制對策之減量效益及成本分析研究。臺北:
53. 行政院環保署(1997)。綠化樹種篩選之研究－綠化植物對都市落塵與懸浮微粒滯留及抗性之比較研究綠化樹種篩選之研究－綠化植物對都市落塵與懸浮微粒滯留及抗性之比較研究,未出版
54. 何友鋒、王小璘(2000)。行政院國家科學委員會研究報告行政院國家科學委員會研究報告,臺北:。
55. 何東波(2000)。行政院國科會專題研究報告行政院國科會專題研究報告,臺北:。
56. 吳信如譯(2000)。綠色資本主義：創造經濟雙贏的策略。臺北:天下雜誌股份有限公司。
57. 俞金康主編(1993)。系統動態學原理及其應用。中國北京:國防工業出版社。
58. 孫岩章(1993)。綠色植物淨化空氣的機能。科學農業，41(7、8)，163-176。
59. 陳美智、何東波、詹秋貴(2004)。綠地政策在高密度人口都市空氣污染改善成效之動態模擬分析。產業論壇，6(5)，31-52。
60. 黃書禮(1998)。行政院國家科學委員會研究報告行政院國家科學委員會研究報告,臺北:。
61. 詹秋貴(2000)。新竹，國立交通大學經營管理研究所。
62. 統計畫臺北網際網站
63. 臺北市政府主計處(2004)。臺北市統計要覽。臺北:
64. 都市發展建築相關法規網站
65. 齊立文譯(2001)。生態經濟大未來。臺北:經濟新潮社。
66. 蕭新煌、蔣本基、劉小如、朱雲鵬(2000)。行政院國家科學委員會研究報告行政院國家科學委員會研究報告,臺北:。
67. 謝長宏(1987)。系統動態學－理論、方法與應用(三版)。臺北:中興管理顧問公司。

1. 陳美智(2009)。高階管理政策研議：系統動力學方法論。組織與管理，2(1)，145-196。
2. 鍾健平、賴信廷、張志強、李靜芳(2014)。台灣砂糖供需系統動態模擬分析。管理資訊計算，3(2)，235-254。