建築物耐震性能設計採用直接位移設計法之效益

Benefit of Using Direct Displacement-based Design Method in the Performance-based Seismic Design of Buildings

10.6377/JA.200712.0011

薛強(Qiang Xue)；陳國慶(Kuo-Chin Chen)；陳正忠(Cheng-Chung Chen)；吳嘉偉(Chia-Wei Wu)；劉明怡(Ming-Yi Liu)

耐震性能設計 ； 直接位移設計法 ； 效益 ； Performance-Based Seismic Design ； DisplaCement-Based Design ； Benefit

建築學報

62_S期（2007 / 12 / 01）

67 - 80

繁體中文

直接位移設計法一直被視為耐震性能設計最有潛力之簡便初步設計法之一，該方法以位移限度為標準進行目標導向設計，非常適合於控制結構變位之設計。本文說明耐震性能設計應用強度設計法與直接位移設計法之設計流程差異性，並提出－簡便有效之設計流程，提升設計效率。最後，以一RC建築物為例說明該設計流程，並以非線性靜力側推分析驗證直接位移設計法相較於強度設計法之效益。

A direct displacement-based design approach has been recognized as one of the most potential methods for a simple- and easy-to-use preliminary design when using performance-based seismic design methodology. Such a method is oriented by displacement limit. Therefore, it is very suitable for a design to control structural displacement. This paper describes the difference in the design flowchart by applying a displacement-based design method from using a force-based method in the performance-based seismic design. The paper also focused on proposing a simple but efficient design procedure to increase design efficiency. Finally, the design procedure is described by using a RC building as example. Nonlinear static pushover analysis has been adopted to demonstrate the benefit of a displacement-based design over a traditionally force-based design method.

1. Aschheim, M.(2002).Seismic design based on the yield displacement.Earthquake Spectra,18,581-600.
2. Aschheim, M.,Black, E. F.(2000).Yield point spectra for seismic design and rehabilitation.Earthquake Spectra,16(2),317-335.
3. ATC-40(1996).Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings.California, USA.:Applied Technology Council, Redwood City.
4. Chopra, B. K.,Goel, R. K.(1999).Capacity-Demand-Diagram Methods for Estimating Seismic Deformation of Inelastic Structures: SDF Systems.Berkeley, April:Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
5. Court, B. B.,Kowalsky, M. J.,N. K. Srivastava, (Edit.)(1998).SEWC`98.San Francisco, USA:
6. Fajfar, P.(1999).Capacity Spectrum Method Based on Inelastic Demand Spectra.Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,28,979-993.
7. FEMA 356(2000).prepared by ASCE, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.Prestandard and Commentary for The Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings,Washington, DC. USA:
8. Iwan, W. D.,Gates, N. C.(1979).Estimating Earthquake Response of Simple Hysteretic Structures.Journal of The Engineering Mechanics Division,105(3),391-405.
9. Kowalsky, M. J.,Priestley, M. J. N.,MacRae G. B.(1994).Structural Systems Research, University of California.California, San Diego, La Jolla:
10. Newmark, N. M.,Hall, W. J(1982).Earthquake Spectra and Design.Berkeley:Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
11. Priestley, M. J. N.,Calvi, G. M.,Fajfar,Krawinkler (eds.)(1997).Proceedings, Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes.Rotterdam:Balkema.
12. Priestley, M. J. N.,Kowalsky, M. J.(2000).Direct Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Concrete Buildings.Bulletin of The New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering,33(4)
13. SEAOC(1999).Recommended Lateral Force Requirements and commentary.Structural Engineers Association of California-Seismology Committee.
14. Xue, Q.(2001).Assessing the Accuracy of The Damping Model Used in Displacement-Based Seismic Demand Evaluation and Design of Inelastic Structures.Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology,3(2),37-45.
15. Xue, Q.(2001).A Direct Displacement-Based Seismic Design Procedure of Inelastic Structures.Engineering Structures,23(11),1453-1460.
16. 薛強、吳嘉偉(2004)。以結構變位、韌性與強度為設計標的之直接位移設計法。結構工程，19(4)，69-85。
17. 薛強、陳國慶、吳嘉偉、陳正忠(2005)。建築物耐震性能設計規範之研擬－子計畫二：案例研究。內政部建築研究所。
18. 薛強、陳國慶、吳嘉偉、陳正忠、石豐銘、周文陽(2005)。建築物耐震性能設計規範之研擬－子計畫一：規範與解說。內政部建築研究所。
19. 薛強、陳國慶、陳正忠、吳嘉偉、劉明怡(2006)。耐震性能設計規範適用性及合理性之檢討。內政部建築研究所。