题名

運用模糊綜合評估方法進行資訊城市發展計畫評估之研究－以台北市網路新都爲例

并列篇名

The Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of the Plan of the Information City-A Case Study on Taipei Cyber City

DOI

10.6377/JA.200809.0139

作者

張學聖(Hsueh-Sheng Chang)；鄒克萬(Ko-Wan Tsou)；李薇(Wei Lee)

关键词

資訊城市 ； 使用者滿意度 ； 模糊綜合評估方法 ； Information City ； User Satisfaction ； Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method

期刊名称

建築學報

卷期/出版年月

65期（2008 / 09 / 01）

页次

139 - 156

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

在全球數位匯流的發展趨勢下，許多城市紛紛推動資訊城市發展計畫，以提升政府之服務效能與資訊社會環境品質。然而，此類計畫之投資金額大、計畫期程長，因此有必要定期檢視計畫發展內容之優先性與發展成效，作爲後續修訂發展計畫之基礎。有鑒於此，本文嘗試以群體差異分析架構爲基礎，發展出一套結合優先度與滿意度之模糊綜合評估方法，並以台北市資訊城市（網路新都）發展計畫爲實證對象，用以說明評估架構之應用程序與方法。實證結果顯示，台北市民眾之間對於部分資訊城市發展計畫內容之態度呈現明顯的分歧，反映台北資訊城市需求之多樣性與仍存在不小的數位落差，有待在後續計畫中，進一步調整發展內容與加強對數位弱勢團體之協助。
英文摘要

Many cities are trying to promote the development plan of information city to upgrade the service efficiency of government and the quality of information society environment in response to the developing global digital tendency. Owing to the tremendous amount of budget and long term to execute the plan has to be surveyed regularly with reviewing the priority and efficiency of development for revising plans. Therefore, we try to develop one set of fuzzy comprehensive evaluating method for analyzing the priority and satisfaction which is based on the structure of group differential analysis, and take the plan of Taipei Information City (Taipei Cyber City) as experimental object to explain the application procedure and methodology for evaluating structure. The experimental study result shows that the attitude of the people of Taipei towards partial contents of information city development expresses an obvious discrepancy which reflects the diversity of requirements for information city Taipei and possibly there still exists a great digital divide in society. Thus there is a need to further adjust development contents and to strengthen the assistance to digital minority group in the successive development plan of information city.
主题分类 工程學 > 土木與建築工程
参考文献
  1. 鄒克萬、蔡博淵、張學聖(1998)。都市資訊系統發展計畫執行成效檢核方法之研究。都市與計劃，25(1)，1-22。
    連結：
  2. 鄒克萬、蔡博淵、張學聖(1998)。都市資訊系統發展計畫執行成效檢核方法之研究。都市與計劃，25(1)，1-22。
    連結：
  3. Aronoff, S.(1989).Geographic Information System: A Management Perspective.Canada:WDL Publication Ottawa.
  4. Au, N.,Ngai, E.W.T.,Edwin Cheng, T.C.(2002).A critical review of end-user information system satisfaction research and a new research framework.Omega,30(6),451-478.
  5. Byrd, T.A.,Thrasher, E.H.,Lang, T.,Davidson, N.W.(2006).A process-oriented perspective of IS success: Examining the impact of IS on operational cost.Omega,34(5),448-460.
  6. Chakraborty, C.,Chakraborty, D.(2006).A theoretical development on a fuzzy distance measure for fuzzy numbers.Mathematical and Computer Modelling,43(3-4),254-261.
  7. Chen, Y.,Fung, R.Y. K.,Tang, J.(2006).Rating technical attributes in fuzzy QFD by integrating fuzzy weighted average method and fuzzy expected value operator.European Journal of Operational Research,174(3),1553-1566.
  8. Couclelis, H.(2004).The construction of the digital city.Environment and Planning B,31,5-19.
  9. Cross, B.A.(1990).Estimating and Comparing Tangible and Intangible Benefits to the Costs of Geographic Information System.URISA Proceedings,16-28.
  10. DeLone, W.H.,McLean, E.R.(2003).The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten year update.Journal of Management Information Systems,19(4),9-30.
  11. DeLone, W.H.,McLean, E.R.(1992).Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable.Information Systems Research,3(1),60-95.
  12. Dickinson, H.J.,Calkins, H.W.(1988).The Economic Evaluation of Implementing a GIS.International Journal of Geographical Information Systems,2(4),307-327.
  13. Galletta, D.F.,Lederer, A.L.(1989).Some Cautions on the Measurement of User Information Satisfaction.Decision Sciences,20,419-438.
  14. Grover, V.,Jeong, S.R.,Segars, A.H.(1996).Information System Effectiveness: The Construct Space and Patterns of Application.Information and Management,31,177-191.
  15. Gu, X.,Zhu, Q.(2006).Fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making method based on eigenvector of fuzzy attribute evaluation space.Decision Support Systems,41(2),400-410.
  16. Mahizhnan, A.(1999).Smart cities The Singapore case.Cities,16(1),13-18.
  17. Ribeiro, R.A.(1996).Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: A review and new preference elicitation techniques.Fuzzy Sets and Systems,78(2),155-181.
  18. Smith, D.A.,Tomlinson, R.F.(1992).Assessing Costs and Benefits of GIS: Methodological and Implementation issues.International Journal of Geographical Information Systems,6(3),247-256.
  19. Tran, L.,Duckstein, L.(2002).Comparison of fuzzy numbers using a fuzzy distance measure.Fuzzy Sets and Systems,130(3),331-341.
  20. Voxman, W.(1998).Some remarks on distances between fuzzy numbers.Fuzzy Sets and Systems,100(1-3),353-365.
  21. 王財源(1994)。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所。
  22. 朱斌妤、吳濟華、林國清、許翠谷(2001)。都市資訊化衡量指標。中國行政評論，11(1)，1-40。
  23. 林建元、蘇振綱、白仁德(1994)。公共地理資訊系統之價值估計。中華民國區域科學學會第五屆年會論文研討會
  24. 林峰田(2001)。城際資訊資訊都市。21世紀南瀛城鄉發展研討會論文集
  25. 林峰田(2002)。數位資訊的市民城市。建築師，334，110-113。
  26. 施雅月、曾國雄(2002)。運用模糊多準則決策法在網路策略行銷系統之績效評估。第十三屆國際資訊管理學術研討會
  27. 唐有文(2002)。貼近度的改進。青海大學學報自然科學版，20(3)，51-52。
  28. 楊金才、王棟(2002)。提高Hamming模糊貼近度解析度的研究。鄭州大學學報，23(3)，53-55。
  29. 廖淑觀(2004)。義守大學資訊管理研究所。
print cancel