檢視社區居民參與城鄉風貌計畫的計畫行爲理論

An Examination of the Theory of Planned Behavior for Community Practices in a Landscape Renaissance Project

10.6377/JA.200909.0137

郭彰仁(Chang-Jen Kuo)；侯錦雄(Jing-Shoung Hou)；郭瑞坤(Jui-Kun Kuo)；歐雙磐(Shuang-Pan Ou)；謝政勳(Cheng-Hsun Hsieh)

營造都市社區新風貌計畫 ； 營造農村新風貌計畫 ； 計劃行爲理論 ； Urban Community Landscape Renaissance Project ； Rural Community Landscape Renaissance Project ； Theory of Planned Behavior

建築學報

69期（2009 / 09 / 01）

137 - 154

繁體中文

「城鄉風貌改造運動」旨在推動社區居民自發的參與環境改造可以讓社區環境永續經營，並間接促進地區的發展。居民在參與公部門推動環境改造，參與行為驅動的因素為何？是否是一種理性計畫行爲？透過研究瞭解居民的參與歷程有助於日後社造的推動。Ajzen認爲人類行爲受態度(Attitude, AT)、主觀規範(Subjective Norm, SN)、行爲控制知覺(Perceived Behavioral Control, PBC)與行爲意向(Behavioral Intention, BI)影響。本研究以社區居民爲研究對象，希望由計畫行爲理論探討社區居民參與環境改造的行爲模式，並檢驗此模式之配適度。 本研究以南部縣市（高雄縣市、屏東縣、澎湖縣、台南縣市）過去曾參與營建署「營造都市社區新風貌計畫」及農委會「營造農村新風貌計畫」之社區中的成員爲研究標的，以問卷調查共計獲得有效問卷616份，並以SEM（結構方程模式）爲分析工具。 檢視TPB模型運用在社區參與環境改造行爲的適合度。經結構模式(structural model)分析結果發現TPB模型是可接受的模式，其主觀規範、參與態度、行爲控制知覺對參與行爲傾向有顯著正面影響；參與行爲傾向對參與行爲也有顯著正面影響，證實了計畫行爲理論適用於解釋民眾參與環境改造行爲，同時也說明了推動城鄉風貌計畫居民參與行爲的理性模式。

The purpose of the landscape renaissance movement is to encourage people to participate in environmental improvement actions and help the community environment management to be more sustainable. The purpose of this study is to understand what makes community residents participate in such environmental improvement projects. Specifically, is it a kind of planned behavior? A better understanding of why residents choose to participate in environmental improvement actions can help to enhance community participation. Ajen believes that people's behavior is affected by attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, and behavioral intention. The study subjects are community residents, and the purpose of this study is to utilize the theory of planned behavior (TPB) model to investigate the behavioral model of residents who participate in environmental improvement projects, and to test the fitness of the conceptual model. This study surveyed community residents who had participated in an ”urban community landscape renaissance project” supported by the Construction and Planning Agency, and a ”rural community landscape renaissance project” founded by the Soil and Water Conservation Bureau. A total of 616 community residents completed a self-report questionnaire. At the same time, Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was employed to test the conceptual model. The findings showed that the conceptual model developed in this work is acceptable. The findings also supported the notion that ”attitude”, ”subjective norm”, and ”perceived behavioral control” significantly influenced the ”behavioral intention” of participating in environmental improvement behaviors. Moreover, resident's ”behavioral intention” significantly impacted their participation in environmental improvement ”behaviors”. This study demonstrated that the TPB model is suitable for explaining residents' participation in environmental improvement behavior. Meanwhile, this study also examined the resident's reasoned action model of participating in a community landscape renaissance project.

1. 余泰魁、李能慧(2001)。台灣地區北部民眾對金門旅遊滿意度模式之建構與實證。戶外遊憩研究，14(4)，51-76。
   連結：
2. 李能慧、古東源、吳桂森、余泰魁(2004)。金門觀光客行爲傾向模式之建構。管理學報，21(1)，131-151。
   連結：
3. 林明瑞、陳柏言(2007)。社區營造對居民自然保育態度、行為模式影響之探討－以南投縣桃米生態社區爲例。環境教育研究，5(1)，73-129。
   連結：
4. Ajzen, I.(1991).The theory of planned behavior.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,50,179-211.
5. Ajzen, I.(1988).Attitude, personality, and behavior.Milton Keynes:Open University Press.
6. Ajzen, I.(2002).Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,32,1-20.
7. Ajzen, I.,Driver, B. L.(1992).Application of the theory of planned behavior to leisure choice.Journal of Leisure Research,24(3),207-240.
8. Ajzen, I.,Fishbein, M.(1980).Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior.NJ:Engelwood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.
9. Ajzen, I.,Kuhl J.(eds.),J. Beckman(eds.)(1985).Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior.Heidelberg:Springer.
10. Ajzen, I.,Schmidt, P.(2003).Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: The roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action.Basic and Applied Social Psychology,25(3),175-187.
11. Armitage, C. J.,Conner, M.(2001).Efficacy of a minimal intervention to reduce fat intake.Social Science and Medicine,52,1517-1524.
12. Arnstein, S. R.(1969).A ladder of participation.Journal of the American Institute of Planners,35,216-224.
13. Autrey, P. S.(1999).Birmingham,University of Alabama.
14. Bagnall, R. G.(1989).Researching participation in adult education: A case of quantified distortion.International Journal of Lifelong Education,8(3),251-260.
15. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation for structural equation models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16,74-94.
16. Bandura, A.(1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.New Jersey:Prentice-Hall.
17. Bandura, A.(1991).Social cognitive theory of self-regulation.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,50,248-287.
18. Berger, I.,Varadarjan R.(eds.),Jaworski B.(eds.)(1993).Marketing theory and application.Chicago:American Marketing Association.
19. Burnkrant, R. E.,Page, Jr. T. J.(1982).An examination of the convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of Fishbein's behavioural intention model.Journal of Marketing Research,19,550-561.
20. Chan, D. K. S.,Cheung, S. F.(1998).An examination of premarital sexual behavior among college students in Hong Kong.Psychology and Health,13,285-301.
21. Chau, P. Y. K.,Hu, P. J.(2001).Examining a model of information technology acceptance by individual professionals: An exploratory study.Journal of Management Information Systems,18(4),191-229.
22. Chin, W. W.,Todd, P.(1995).On the use, usefulness and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: A note of caution.MIS Quarterly,19(2),237-246.
23. Chu, P. Y.,Chiu, J. F.(2003).Factors influencing household waste recycling behavior: Test of an integrated model.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,33,604-626.
24. Davis, F. D.(1993).User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts.International Journal of Man-Machine Studies,38,475-487.
25. Doll, W. J.,Raghunathan T. S.,Lim J. S.,Gupta, Y. P.(1995).A confirmatory factor analysis of the user information satisfaction instrument.Information Systems Research,6(2),177-189.
26. Fishbein, M.,Ajzen, I.(1975).Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.Mass:Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc..
27. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unbervables and Measurement Error.Journal of Marketing Research,18,39-50.
28. Godin, G.,Valois, P.,Lepage, L.(1993).The pattern of influence of perceived behavioral control upon exercising behavior: An application of Ajzen's theory of planned behavior.Journal of Behavioral Medicine,16,81-102.
29. Hairs, Jr. F.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C.(2006).Multivariate Data Analysis.NJ:Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.
30. Hansen, T.,Jensen, T. M.,Solgaard, H. S.(2004).Predicting online grocery buying intention: A comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior.International Journal of Information Management,24(6),539-550.
31. Harrison, A. W.,Rainer, R. K.,Hochwarter, W. A.,Thompson, K. R.(1997).Testing the self-efficacy-performance linkage of social-cognitive theory.The Journal of Social Psychology,137(1),79-87.
32. Javenpaa, S. L.,Todd, P. A.(1997).Consumer reactions to electronic shopping on the World Wide Web.International Journal of Electronic Commerce,1(2),59-88.
33. Jöreskog, K. G.,Sörbom, D.(1992).LISREL: A guide to the program and applications.Chicago:Scientific Software International, Inc..
34. Lau, A. S. M.(2002).Strategies to motivate brokers adopting on-line trading in Hong Kong financial market.Review of pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies,5(4),471-489.
35. Ohmer, M.,Beck, E.(2006).Citizen participation in neighborhood organizations in poor communities and its relationship to neighborhood and organizational collective efficacy.Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare,33(1),179-202.
36. Osborne, D.、Gaebler, T.、劉毓玲譯(1993)。新政府運動。臺北:天下文化。
37. Paul, S.(1987).World Bank Discussion Paper No. 6World Bank Discussion Paper No. 6,Washington:World Bank, DC..
38. Renn, O.,Webler, T.,Wiedemann, P.(1995).Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Evaluating models for environmental discourse.London:Kluwer Academic.
39. Rhodes, R. E.,Courneya, K. S.(2003).Investigating multiple components of attitudes, subjective norm, and perceived control: An examination of the theory of planned behavior in the exercise domain British.Journal of Social Psychology,42,129-146.
40. Rhodes, R. E.,Courneya, K. S.,Jones, L. W.(2004).Personality and social cognitive influences on exercise behavior: Adding the activity trait to the theory of planned behavior.Psychology of Sport and Exercise,5,243-254.
41. Ryu, S.,Ho, S. H.,Han, I.(2003).Knowledge sharing behavior of physicians in hospitals.Expert Systems with Applications,25,113-122.
42. Schunk, D. H.,Schunk, D. H.(eds.),Zimmerman, B. J.(eds.)(1994).Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications.New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Sheeran, P.,Orbell, S.(1999).Implementation intentions and repeated behaviours: Enhancing the predictive validity of the theory of planned behaviour.European Journal of Social Psychology,29,349-369.
44. Sheeran, P.,Taylor S.(1999).Predicting intentions to use condoms: A meta-analysis and comparison of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,298,1624-1675.
45. Sheeran, P.,Trafimow, D.,Finlay, K. A.,Norman, P.(2002).Evidence that the type of person affects the strength of the perceived behavioural control-intention relationship.British Journal of Social Psychology,41,253-270.
46. Shimp, T. A.,Kavas, A.(1984).The theory of reasoned action applied to coupon usage.Journal of Consumer Research,11(3),795-809.
47. Taylor, S.,Todd, P.(1995).Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience.MIS Quarterly,19(4),561-570.
48. Van-Ryn, M.,Lytle, L. A.,Kirscht, J. P.(1996).A test of the theory of planned behavior for two health-related practices.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,26,871-883.
49. Wood, R.,Bandura, A.(1989).Social cognitive theory of organizational management.Academy of Management Review,14(3),361-384.
50. 創造城鄉新風貌計畫與規定
51. 王國川(1997)。計畫行爲理論各成份量表之信、效度評估－以青少年搭機車帶安全帽之研究爲例。國立中正大學學報，1，95-121。
52. 吳坤良(1999)。老人的社區參與動機、參與程度與生活適應之相關研究。成人教育輔導季刊，16，38-46。
53. 吳忠宏、范莉雯、蘇珮玲(2003)。大學生參與生態旅遊行爲意向之相關研究。環境與管理研究，4(1)，1-28。
54. 宋郁玲、姜蘭虹(2002)。生態旅遊發展與社區參與－以高雄縣美濃鎮爲例。地理學報，32，19-40。
55. 李光中、王鑫(2004)。建立和評估自然保護區社區參與論壇之研究－以櫻花鈎吻鮭野生動物保護區爲例。地理學報，36，1-22。
56. 李茂能(2006)。結構方程模式軟體AMOS之簡介及其在測驗編制上之應用。台北:心理出版社。
57. 林瑞欽(1994)。社區意識的概念－測量與提振策略。社區發展研究學刊，31，1-21。
58. 侯錦雄、宋念謙(1998)。台中市黎明住宅社區居民社區意識之研究。建築學報，24，51-65。
59. 夏鑄九、林鍫、顏亮一(1992)。古市街與傳統聚落保存方式之研究。台北:行政院文化建設委員會。
60. 張紹勳(2004)。研究方法。台北:滄海書局。
61. 莊煥銘、王淑娟(2003)。資訊系統採用行爲意向之研究－以某大學爲例。商管科技季刊，4(3)，239-235。
62. 郭瑞坤、汪夢怡、邱鴻遠(2006)。影響大學教師參與社區公共事務因素之研究。公共事務評論，7(2)，135-165。
63. 黃瑞茂、羅文貞(2001)。社區參與公共空間的營造－後竹圍公園的經驗研究。環境與藝術學刊，2，133-150。
64. 葉國樑(1997)。城鄉地區國中學生資源回收行爲意圖比較研究。台北:師大書苑。
65. 葉國樑(1996)。鹿谷地區國中學生紙張回收行爲意圖研究。衛生教育論文集刊，9，81-96。
66. 盧禹聰(1999)。國立成功大學政治經濟研究所。

1. 蔡長清、曾鈞麟、耿英蕊(2013)。教師之休閒調適、工作情緒與自我效能之關聯研究─以高雄市國民中學教師為例。運動休閒餐旅研究，8(2)，82-112。
2. 林家聖、吳桂陽(2012)。鄕村型社區永續發展評估與規劃策略之研究—以苗栗「黃金小鎮」為例。建築學報，79，25-45。
3. (2012)。從社會資本探討農村居民參與社區環境改造行為模式。造園景觀學報，18(2)，19-44。