题名

綜合性地震脆弱度與風險評估：以新竹市爲例

并列篇名

A Comprehensive Assessment of the Earthquake Vulnerability and Risk: A Case Study of the Hsinchu City

DOI

10.6377/JA.200912.0012

作者

何明錦(Ming-Chin Ho)；洪鴻智(Hung-Chih Hung)；陳建忠(Chien-Jung Chen)；陳令韡(Ling-Wei Chen)；簡長毅(Chang-Yi Chian)；陳素櫻(Su-Ying Chen)；王暉堯(Huei-Yao Wang)

关键词

地震風險評估 ； 地震脆弱度 ； 土地使用規劃 ； 新竹市 ； Earthquake Risk ； Earthquake Vulnerability ； Land-use Planning ； Hsinchu City

期刊名称

建築學報

卷期/出版年月

70_S期（2009 / 12 / 31）

页次

111 - 126

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本文結合整體性地震風險評估與地方災害評估模型，進行都市層級的綜合性地震風險評估。此方法是以多元性概念，從事跨空間單元地震脆弱度與風險評估，以利於進行不同地理單元的地震脆弱度與風險比較分析，及助於暸解影響地震脆弱度與風險的主要因素。透過地震脆弱度指數與地震風險指數的估計，發現新竹市最高地震脆弱度與風險地區，集中在東區、東南與部分市中心區。此結果可提供土地使用與建築管理決策者，瞭解迫切需要進行減災的地區。
英文摘要

A novel method of incorporating holistic earthquake risk evaluation with hazard-of-place model was applied to assess the comprehensive earthquake vulnerability and risk at an urban-level. This method involves a multidimensional concept that is not only useful to identify and to demonstrate the spatial variability in earthquake vulnerability and risk, but also helps to understand the range in the underlying causes of that vulnerability and risk. By mapping the earthquake vulnerability and earthquake risk index, it shows that the relatively higher earthquake vulnerability and risk areas are located in the east, southeast parts of and a portion of central business district of Hsinchu City. The findings can assist the decision making process of land-use planning and judge where the mitigation efforts most required.
主题分类 工程學 > 土木與建築工程
参考文献
  1. 洪鴻智、陳一杰、簡長毅(2008)。土地使用變遷之地震風險分析－以新竹市爲例。都市與計劃，35(4)，359-378。
    連結：
  2. 陳亮全、洪鴻智、詹士樑、簡長毅(2003)。地震災害風險–效益分析於土地使用規劃之應用：應用HAZ-Taiwan 系統。都市與計劃，30(4)，281-299。
    連結：
  3. 黃宏謀、魏秀凌(2007)。台北市國小建築物地震災損評估。建築學報，59，45-62。
    連結：
  4. Adger, W.N.(2006).Vulnerability.Global Environmental Change,16,268-281.
  5. Blaikie, P.,T. Cannon, I. Davis,B. Wisner(1994).At Risk: Natural hazards, people's vulnerability, and disasters.London:Routledge.
  6. Burby, R.J.,B.A. Cigler,S.P. French,E.J. Kaiser,J. Kartez,D. Roenigk,D. Weist,D. Whittington(1991).Sharing Environmental Risks: How to Control Governments' Losses in Natural Disasters.Oxford:Westview Press.
  7. Carreño M.L.,O.D. Cardona,A.H. Barbat(2007).Urban seismic risk evaluation: A holistic approach.Natural Hazards,40,137-172.
  8. Cutter, S.L.,B.J. Boruff,W.L. Shirley(2003).Social vulnerability to environmental hazards.Social Science Quarterly,84,242-261.
  9. Cutter, S.L.,J.T. Mitchell,M.S. Scott(2000).Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: A case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina.Annuals of the Association of American Geographers,90,713-737.
  10. Davidson, R.A.,H. Zhao,V. Kumar(2003).Quantitative model to forecast changes in hurricane vulnerability of regional building inventory.Journal of Infrastructure Systems,9,55-64.
  11. Gallopín, G.C.(2006).Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity.Global Environmental Change,16,293-303.
  12. Greenberg, M.R.,L. Michael,N. Mantell(2007).Understanding the economic costs and benefits of catastrophes and their aftermath: A review and suggestions for the U.S. federal government.Risk Analysis,27,83-96.
  13. Ho, M.C.,H.C. Hung,C.J. Chen,Y.J. Chen,C.Y. Chian,S.Y. Chen(2007).The earthquake risk analysis for land-use changes: A case study of Hsinchu City, Taiwan.In the proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on Urban Disaster Reduction: 9,Taipei:
  14. Hung, H.C.,L.C. Chen(2007).The application of seismic risk-benefit analysis to land-use planning in Taipei City.Disasters,31,256-276.
  15. Jonson, R.A.,D.W. Wichern(1971).Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis.London:Prentice-Hall.
  16. Kates, R.W.(1971).Natural hazard in human ecological perspective: Hypotheses and models.Economic Geography,47,438-451.
  17. Luers, A.L.,D.B. Lobell,L.S. Sklar,C.L. Addams,P.A. Matson(2003).A method for quantifying vulnerability, applied to the agricultural system of the Yaqui Valley, Mexico.Global Environmental Change,13,255-267.
  18. McGuire, R.K.(2001).Deterministic vs. probabilistic earthquake hazards and risks.Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,21,377-384.
  19. Olshansky, R.B.,Y. Wu(2001).Earthquake risk analysis foe Los Angeles County under present and planned land uses.Environment and Planning B,28,419-432.
  20. UNDRO(1980).Natural Disasters and Vulnerability Analysis.Report of Experts Group Meeting.
  21. White, G.F.(1964).Choice of adjustment of floods.Research Paper 93.
  22. Whitman, R.V.(1973).Structures Publication 380.Boston, Massachusetts, USA:Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  23. 何明錦、洪鴻智(2007)。內政部建築研究所研究計畫成果報告內政部建築研究所研究計畫成果報告,未出版
  24. 何明錦、洪鴻智(2004)。內政部建築研究所研究計畫成果報告內政部建築研究所研究計畫成果報告,未出版
  25. 吳杰穎、卲珮君、林文苑、柯于璋、洪鴻智、陳天健、陳亮全、黃智彥、詹士樑、薩支平(2007)。災害管理學辭典。五南圖書公司。
  26. 葉錦勳(2006)。台灣地震災害損失評估系統－TELES技術手冊。國家地震工程研究中心。
被引用次数
  1. 陳令韡、洪鴻智(2012)。颱洪災害之整合性脆弱度評估─大甲溪流域之應用。地理學報，65，79-96。
  2. 陳彥儒,張國楨,張家浚(2021)。應用手機信令軌跡資料推估通勤道路之時空地震災害風險。地理研究，74，105-141。
  3. 戴政安、林慶元、李泳龍、何明錦(2011)。都市防災空間系統避難據點區位評估─SITATION 及TELES 與Google Earth之整合應用。建築與規劃學報，12(1)，23-46。
  4. 謝孟勳、雷祖強、詹雯州、李秉乾(2016)。地震災害引發避難救災路網阻斷風險之研究－以臺中市高脆弱度社經環境地區為例。都市與計劃，43(1)，59-87。
  5. 張長義、林冠慧(2015)。脆弱性研究的演變與當前發展。地理學報，77，49-82。
  6. (2011)。都市防災空間系統避難據點區位評估－SITATION 及TELES 與GoogleEarth 之整合應用。藝術研究學報，4(2)，23-46。
print cancel