台中州廳再利用方案決策評估

Strategy Assessment of the Reuse for Taichung City Hall

10.6377/JA.201109.0001

何友鋒(Yu-Feng Ho)；徐慧民(Hui-Ming Hsu)；劉晏呈(Tzu-Chuen Lu)

台中州廳 ； 再利用 ； 模糊德爾菲法 ； 網路程序分析法 ； City Hall ； Reuse ； Fuzzy Delphi ； Analytical Network Process

建築學報

77期（2011 / 09 / 28）

1 - 18

繁體中文

台中市政府在州廳部分行政部門已於2010年底陸續搬遷至新市政中心。台中州廳蘊藏豐富的歷史資源和文化資產，其空間將如何再利用，受到各界的矚目。有鑑於此，本文的目的是根據建築空間再利用的觀點，利用模糊德爾菲法及網絡程序分析法的技術，評估建構歷史建築再利用方法，探討台中州廳再利用的類型與方案。研究結果發現學者專家認爲評估準則優先順序爲區域網絡資源的串連、永續經營計畫的發展、社區總體營造的認同、深層人文涵構的推廣、紀念性場域的維護、實質空間環境的改善，州廳再利用的優先次序則爲展覽類、藝術類、住宿類、休閒類及商業類，使台中州廳空間活化再利用，延續其生命周期，以達永續發展和其歷史風華的再現。

Taichung City Government is expected by the City Hall for the relocation to a new CDB area in 2010. The City Hall of rich historical resources and cultural assets, how it will be re-use of its space has been aroused public attention. For this reason, the purpose of this paper is based on the views of re-use of architectural space by using Fuzzy Delphi and Analytical Network Process to explore the types and the programs of re-use. The results show that experts have concluded the priority of assessment criteria are: the linkage of the regional network resources, development of sustainable management plan, and recognition of community overall development, the promotion of human culture, maintenance of commemorative field, improvement of spatial environment. The priorities of re-use categories of City Hall are exhibition, art, accommodation, leisure and business. By the activation and re-use of City Hall, extending its life cycle in order to attain sustainable development and its history, elegance reappearance.

1. 洪文雄，黃俊銘（2004）《歷史建築調查研究、修復、再利用規劃結案報告書（一）台中州廳》，台中市政府，台中。Hong, W. X. and C. M. Huang (2004) Report of historic buildings severy, repair and reuse (1)- Taichung City Hall, Taichung City Government, Taichung, Taiwan。
2. Giove, S.,Rosato, P.,Breil, M.(2009).University Ca' Foscari of Venice, Dept. of Economics Research Paper Series No. 3University Ca' Foscari of Venice, Dept. of Economics Research Paper Series No. 3,未出版
3. Ishikawa, A.,Amagasa,T.,Tamizawa, G.,Totsuta, R.,Mieno, H.(1993).The Max-Min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration.Fuzzy Sets and Systems,55,241-253.
4. Murray, T. J.,Pipino, L. L.,van Gigch ,J. P.(1985).A pilot study of fuzzy set modification of Delphi.Human Systems Management,5,76-80.
5. Research, Wolfram(2007).Mathematica 6.0.Champaign, IL, USA:
6. Saaty, T. L.(1980).Analytical Hierarchy Process.NY:McGraw Hill.
7. Saaty, T. L.(1996).Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback, The analytic network process.Pittsburgh, USA:RWS Publications.
8. Saaty, T. L.(1990).How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process.European Journal of Opertional Research,48,9-26.
9. Saaty, T. L.,Takizawa, M.(1986).Dependence and independence: from linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks.European Journal of Operational Research,26(1),229-237.
10. Wang, H. J.,Zeng, Z. T.(2010).A multi-objective decision-making process for reuse selection of historic buildings.An International Journal of Expert Systems with applications,37(2),1241-1249.
11. 行政院文化建設委員會(2004)。歷史建築保存‧維護‧再利用執行手冊。台北=Taipei:行政院文化建設委員會= Council for Cultural Affairs。
12. 林華苑(2002)。政治大學地政學系=Department of Land Economics, National Chengchi University。
13. 徐慧民、王志華(2005)。歷史建築再利用方案優先順序評比之研究─以台中放送局為例。中華民國建築學會第十七屆第一次建築研究成果發表會論文集，台北=Taipei, Taiwan:
14. 陳文苑(2004)。彰化師範大學商業教育學系在職進修專班=Department of Business Education, National Changhua University of Education。
15. 傅朝卿(1994)。高雄地區歷史性建築再利用之研究分析。高雄=Kaohsiung, Taiwan:高雄市建築師公會=Kaohsiung Architects Association。
16. 黃雪晴(2000)。成功大學工業管理學系=Department of Industrial Management, National Cheng Kong University。
17. 黃瑞茂(2001)。淡水殼牌倉庫建築再利用策略。2001 推動閒置空間再利用國際研討會，台北=Taipei:
18. 劉曉波、張俊容(2006)。基於ANP 的企業可持續發展評價指標體系與方法。桂林電子科技大學學報，26(3)，222-225。
19. 蕭麗虹、黃瑞茂(2002)。文化空間創意再造：閒置空間再利用國外案例。台北=ROC, Taipei:行政院文化建設委員會=Council for Cultural Affairs。