题名

由認知面向探討智慧化居住空間評估

并列篇名

The Evaluation of Smart Living Space Using a Cognitive Approach

DOI

10.6377/JA.201112.0005

作者

陳嘉懿(Jia-Yih Chen)；鄭泰昇(Tay-Sheng Jeng)

关键词

互動空間 ； 人機互動 ； 智慧化環境 ； Interactive Space ； Human-Computer Interaction ； Smart Environments

期刊名称

建築學報

卷期/出版年月

78期（2011 / 12 / 01）

页次

81 - 106

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本研究針對智慧生活環境之互動空間提供一認知面向評估。互動空間擴增了實體空間的感知能力，使其可以感測活動並回應使用者的需求。本研究藉著兩個互動庭園空間原型案例，透過互動模型描述互動空間的運作模式，並說明人機互動科技對空間所提供的支援。互動空間評估的重點在於驗證互動模型中認知因子所發揮的作用，並藉由互動空間對智慧生活的「有用性」、「易用性」、「享用性」作為評估媒介。透過結構方程式分析，證明「承擔特質」（affordance）及「符徵」（signifiers）確實影響使用者對互動空間的接受度。本文結論如下：「承擔特質」有助於使用者對「有用性」及「享用性」的感受；然而，「符徵」則有助於使用者對「易用性」的感受。
英文摘要

This study provides a cognitive evaluation of interactive space relating to the smart living environments. The interactive space is an augmented physical space which can sense, interact with, and respond to human behavior. Applications for using human-computer interaction technologies in support of interactive space are exemplified by two prototypes of interactive gardens and described in a model of interaction. An evaluation of interactive space is conducted with an emphasis on cognitive perspectives, and is mediated by users' perception of usefulness, ease of use, and the enjoyment. With an analysis by Structural Equation Modeling, the study proves that affordance and signifiers affect users' acceptance of interactive space. This paper concludes that affordance greatly affects users' perception of usefulness and enjoyment, while signifiers affect users' perception of ease of use.
主题分类 工程學 > 土木與建築工程
参考文献
  1. Jeng, T.,C. H. Chen, J. F. Wang, C. H. Wu, J. F. Yang, S. T. Cheng, J. J. Fang, and P. C. Chung(2008)House of the Future Relies on Multimedia and Wireless Sensors, SPIE Newsroom, http://soie.org/x19165.xml?highlight=x2414
  2. Ringle, C. M., S. Wende and A. Will (2005) SmartPLS 2.0 University of Hamburg (http://www.smartpls.de), Hamburg, Germany..http://www.smartpls.de
  3. Miles, I. (2003) Foresight Tools-scenario Planning, UNlDO Technology Foresight for Practitioners-Training course, 6- 10 October 2003, Prague, Czech Republic..
  4. Barclay, D.,Thompson, R.,Higgins, C.(1995).The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach to Causal Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption and Use an Illustration.Technology Studies,2(2),285-309.
  5. Barnum, C. M.(2002).Usability Testing and Research.New York, USA:Longman.
  6. Buxton, B.(2007).Sketching User Experiences: Getting The Design Right and the Right Design.Morgan Kaufmann.
  7. Chen, J. Y.,Ma, Y. P.,Jeng, T. S.,Chang, C. C.(2010).An Assessment of User Needs for Intelligent Living Space.Intelligent Building International,2(1),20-40.
  8. Chin, W. W.(1998).Modern Methods for Business Research.Mahwah, NJ, USA:
  9. Cook, D.J.(ed.),Das, S. K.(ed.)(2005).Smart Environments: Technology, Protocols, and Applications.New Jersey, USA:Wiley.
  10. Cuieford, J. P.(1965).Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education.New York,USA:McGraw-Hill.
  11. Davis, F. D.(1989).Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.MIS Quarterly,13(3),319-340.
  12. Efron, B.(1979).Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife.The Annals of Statistics,7(1),1-26.
  13. Efron, B.,Gong, G.(1983).A Leisurely Look at the Bootstrap, the Jackknife, and Cross-Validation.The American Statistician,37(1),36-48.
  14. Fishbein, M.,Ajzen, I.(1975).Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research.MA, USA:Addison-Wesley.
  15. Fornell, C.,Bookstein, F.(1982).Two Structural Equations Models:LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-voice Theory.Journal of Marketing Research,19,440-452.
  16. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D.(1981).Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.Journal of Marketing Research,18,39-50.
  17. Gefen, D.,Straub, D.,Boundreau, M.(2000).Structural Equation Modeling Techniques and Regression:Guidelines for Research Practice.Communications of AIS,7(7),1-78.
  18. Gero, J. S.(1990).Design Prototypes:A knowledge Representation Wchema for Design.AI Magazine,Winter,26-36.
  19. Greenberg, S.,Buxton, B.(2008).Usability Evaluation Considered Harmful.Proceedings of CHI 2008,New York, USA:
  20. Heijden, H. V. D.(2004).User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems.MIS Quarterly,28(4),695-705.
  21. Heijden, H. V. D.(2003).Factors Influencing the Usage of Websites: The Case of a Generic Portal in the Netherlands.Information & Management,40(6),541-549.
  22. Higgins, E. T.(2006).Value from Hedonic Experience and Engagement.Psychological Review,113,439-460.
  23. Hulland, J.(1999).Use of Partial Least Squares (PLS) in Strategic Management Research: A Review of Four Recent Studies.Strategic Management Journal,20(2),195-204.
  24. Jaimes, A.,Sebe, N.(2005).Multimodal Human Computer Interaction: A Survey.Lecture Notes in Computer Science,3766,1-15.
  25. Jung, Y.(2006).Weblog Attraction: Enjoyment Accompanied by Sense of Presence.Proceeding of ICIS 2006, Twenty Seventh International Conference on lnformation Systems,Milwaukee, WI,USA:
  26. Ko, D. G.,Kirsch, L. J.,King, W. R.(2005).Antecedents of Knowledge Transfer from Consultants to Clients in Enterprise System Implementations.MlS Quarterly,29(1),59-85.
  27. Lin, S.,Jeng, T.(2005).IP++: Computer-Augmented Information Portal in Place.Proceedings of CAADRIA2005,New Delhi, India:
  28. Mahdavi, A.(2004).A Combined Product-Process Model for Building Systems Control.eWork and eBusiness in Architecture, Engineering and Construction Proceedings of the 5th ECPPM conference,London, UK:
  29. Marcoulides, G. A.,Saunders, C.(2006).PLS: A silver bullet?.MIS Quartely,30(2),1-1.
  30. Markopoulos, P. J.,Read, C.,MacFarlane, S.,Hoysniemi, J.(2008).Evaluating Children's Interactive Products: Principles and Practices for Interaction Designers.San Francisco, CA, USA:Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc..
  31. Meyer, S.,Rakotonirainy, A.(2003).A Survey of Research on Context-aware Homes.ACSW Frotiers'03 Proceedings of the Australasian information security workshop conference on ACSW frontiers 2003,Australia:
  32. Nisbett, R.(2003).The Geography of Thought of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently… and Why.New York, USA:Simon & Schuster.
  33. Norman, D. A.(2004).Emotional Design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things.New York, USA:Basic Books.
  34. Norman, D. A.(1999).Affordances, Conventions and Design.Interactions,6(3),38-43.
  35. Norman, D. A.(1988).The Psychology of Everyday Things.New York, USA:Basic Books.
  36. Norman, D. A.(2008).The way I see it: Signifiers, not affordances.Interactions,15(6),18-19.
  37. Nunnally, J. C.(1978).Psychometric Theory.New York, USA:McGraw-Hill.
  38. Reber, R.,Schwarz, N.,Winkielman, P(2004).Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure:Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience?.Personality and Social Psychology Review,8(4),364-382.
  39. Sellen, A.,Harper, R.(2002).The Myth of the Paperless Office.Cambridge, MA, USA:MIT Press.
  40. Shaw, Robert(ed.),Bransford, John(ed.)(1977).Preceiving, Acting, and Knowing.Hillsdale, NJ, USA:Lawrence Erlbaum.
  41. Takeda, H.,Simomura, Y.,Umeda, Y.,Tomiyama, T.(1994).Function Modeling: Confluence of Process Modeling and Object Modeling.AID' 94 Workshop notes on Representing Function in Design,Pittsburgh, PA, USA:
  42. Wellman, B.,Quan-Haase, J.,Boase, W.,Chen, K.,Hampton, I.,Diaz, I.,Miyata, K.(2003).The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism.Journal of Computer Mediated Communication,8(3),0.
  43. Wixom, B. H.,Watson, H. J.(2001).An Empirical Investigation of the Factors Affecting Data Warehousing Success.MIS Quarterly,25(1),17-41.
  44. Zeisel, J.(1981).Inquiry by Design.CA, USA.:Brooks/Cole Publication.
  45. 劉世南、陳振宇、成戎珠、鄭泰昇(2009)。人本智慧生活科技之人性化設計的方法。國科會「智慧生活科技區域整合中心計畫」暨「前膽優質生活環境計畫」聯合成果發表會論文集，台北:
print cancel