建構式學習活動應用於建築設計課程教學成效之探討

Exploring the Effects of Constructive Learning Activities on Architectural Design Learning

翁國華(Guo-Hua Weng)；吳韻吾(Yun-Wu Wu)；孫啟榕(Ci-Rong Sun)

行動研究 ； 建構理論 ； 建築設計 ； 創造力 ； 教學成效 ； Action Research ； Constructivism ； Architectural Design ； Creativity ； Teaching Effectiveness

建築學報

83期（2013 / 03 / 28）

1 - 18

繁體中文

The purpose of this study was to explore the teaching effects and the rising of students' creativity based on constructivist learning environment with creative-problem-solving theory. One hundred and fourteen China University of Technology students (male=71, 62.3%; female=43, 37.7%, average age=18) participated in the experiment. Action research, paired-t test and teaching effectiveness questionnaire were conducted in analyzing the students' response and the collected data. The results showed that constructivism learning were effective in flexibility (t=-2.85, p＜.01) but ineffective in fluency (t=2.63, p＜.05). In General, participants showed positive attitudes in constructivism learning environment.

The purpose of this study was to explore the teaching effects and the rising of students' creativity based on constructivist learning environment with creative-problem-solving theory. One hundred and fourteen China University of Technology students (male=71, 62.3%; female=43, 37.7%, average age=18) participated in the experiment. Action research, paired-t test and teaching effectiveness questionnaire were conducted in analyzing the students' response and the collected data. The results showed that constructivism learning were effective in flexibility (t=-2.85, p＜.01) but ineffective in fluency (t=2.63, p＜.05). In General, participants showed positive attitudes in constructivism learning environment.

1. 王本壯、周芳怡(2006)。以行動研究探討契約學習教學模式應用大學建築設計教學之可行性。建築學報，58，63-93。
   連結：
2. 涂志銘、林秀玉、張賴妙理、鄭永涇(2008)。符合建構論理念的教學策略對植物的養分與能量概念學習的成效。科學教育學刊，16(1)，75-103。
   連結：
3. Amabile, T. M.(1997).Entrepreneurial creativity through motivational synergy.The Journal of Creative Behavior,31(1),18-26.
4. Burton, J. B.(1976).The Culture of Professionalism: The Middle Class and Development of Higher Education in America.NY, USA:W. W. Norton.
5. Chiu, S. H.(2010).Students' knowledge sources and knowledge sharing in the design studio-an exploratory study.International Journal of Technology and Design Education,20(1),27-42.
6. Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1996).Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention.NY, USA:Harper Collins Publishers.
7. Ensor, J.,Cottam, A.,Band, C.(2001).Fostering knowledge management through the creative work environment: a portable model from the advertising industry.Journal of Information Science,27(3),147-155.
8. Feist, G. J.,Gorman, M. E.(1998).The psychology of science: Review and integration of a nascent discipline.Review of General Psychology,2(1),3-47.
9. Fensham, P.(Ed.)(1988).Development and Dilemmas in Science Education.London, UK:Falmer Press.
10. Firestien, R. L.,Treffinger, D. J.(1983).Ownership and converging: Essential ingredients of creative problem solving.The Journal of Creative Behavior,17(1),32-38.
11. Gallagher, J. J.(1994).Teaching the Gifted Child.MA, USA:Allyn and Bacon.
12. Gardner, H.(1988).Creativity: An interdisciplinary perspective.Creativity Research Journal,1(1),8-26.
13. Glover, J. A.(Ed.),Ronning, R. R.(Ed.),Reynolds, C. R.(Ed.)(1989).Handbook of Creativity.NY, USA:Plenum.
14. Glynn, S. M.(Ed.),Duit, R.(Ed.)(1995).Learning Science in the Schools: Research Reforming Practice.NJ, USA:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Guilford, J. P.(1967).The Nature of Human Intelligence.NY, USA:McGraw Hill.
16. Guilford, J. P.(1986).Creative Talents: Their Nature, Uses and Development.NY, USA:Bearly Limited.
17. Hocevar, D.(1979).Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality.Journal of Educational Psychology,71(2),191-196.
18. Hocevar, D.(1981).Measurement of creativity: Review and critique.Journal of Personality Assessment,45(5),450-464.
19. Husen, T.(Ed.),Postlethwaite, T. N.(Ed.)(1989).The International Encyclopedia of Education.Oxford, UK:Pergamon Press.
20. Lawson, B.(2005).How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified.Oxford, UK:Architectural Press.
21. McGourty, J.,Tarshis, L. A.,Dominick, P.(1996).Managing innovation: Lessons from world class organizations.International Journal of Technology Management,11,354-368.
22. Posner, G. J.,Strike, K. A.,Hewson, P. W.,Gerzog, W. A.(1982).Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change.Science Education,66(2),211-227.
23. Runco, M. A.(Ed.)(1997).The Creativity Research Handbook.NJ, USA:Hampton press.
24. Runco, R. A.(1990).Implicit theories and ideational creativity.Theories of Creativity,CA, USA:
25. Scott, G.,Leritz, L. E.,Mumford, M. D.(2004).The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review.Creativity Research Journal,16(4),361-388.
26. Shiffler, R. E.(1988).Maximum Z score and outliers.The American Statistician,42(1),79-80.
27. Simonton, D. K.(1990).History, chemistry, psychology, and genius: An intellectual autobiography of historiometry.Theories of Creativity,CA, USA:
28. Sternberg, R. J.(Ed.),Smith, E. E.(Ed.)(1988).The Psychology of Human Thought.NY, USA:Cambridge University Press.
29. Sternberg, R. J.,Lubart, T. I.(1995).Defying the Crowd: Cultivating Creativity in a Culture of Conformity.NY, USA:Free Press.
30. Sternberg, R. J.、Lubart, T. I.、洪蘭譯(1999)。不同凡想。台北市=Taipei:遠流出版社=Yuan-Liou Publishing Co., Ltd。
31. Von Glasersfeld, E.(1995).Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning.Washington D. C., USA:The Falmer Press.
32. Warr, A.,O''Neill, E.(2006).The effect of group composition on divergent thinking in an interaction design activity.Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems,NY, USA:
33. 毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台(2000)。創造力研究。台北市=Taipei:心理出版社=Psychological。
34. 王紀鯤(1998)。談建築教育中的評圖制度。淡江理工學刊，1(1)，39-48。
35. 王紀鯤(1999)。建築教育中的設計工作室。建築學報，30，41-68。
36. 唐玄輝(2006)。設計過程中創意產出的可能性─以 PSEP比例為測量標準。工業設計，34(2)，155-162。
37. 徐雍智、蔡今中、陳明璋(2002)。數學創意類比與同儕評量及網路案例設計之初探。師大學報：科學教育類，47(1)，1-14。
38. 張世彗(2005)。創造力理論、技法與教學。台北市=Taipei:心理出版社=Psychological。
39. 張新仁編(2010)。學習與教學新趨勢。台北市=Taipei:心理出版社=Psychological。
40. 教育部(2003)。創造力教育白皮書。
41. 傅朝卿(2010)。建築新鮮人的建議。台灣建築，180，52。
42. 蔡清田(2000)。教育行動研究。台北市=Taipei:五南圖書=Wu-Nan。

1. 賴榮平、呂世明、朱文松、王俞晢(2015)。微孔水平百葉消音特性之研究。建築學報，93，55-72。