構造遺存型態學：閱讀臺灣日治時期建築立面面磚的觀點

Skeuomorph: Reading Surface Tile of Architectural Elevation during the Japanese Colonial Period

吳南葳(Nan-Wei Wu)；傅朝卿(Chao-Ching Fu)

構造遺存型態學 ； 構築性 ； 立面面磚 ； Skeuomorph ； Architectonics ； Surface Tile

建築學報

85期（2013 / 09 / 30）

161 - 183

繁體中文

臺灣日治時期建築式樣的表現及構造材料的運用受日本明治維新的西化運動影響甚鉅，然而臺灣（和日本）常見的面磚貼覆卻不容易在十九至二十世紀前期歐洲興建的建築上看到。這代表在建築材料的使用方式與概念上，日本及臺灣並未直接模仿西方建築立面慣用的方式；因此，筆者認為有必要尋求一個新的視角來看待西化的過程，本研究試圖以臺灣（和日本）建築立面之面磚使用為例來說明：西化是一個轉化的開端，而非全盤接受。為解讀臺灣建築立面材料的使用在現代化過程中的轉化意義，本研究以構造遺存型態學（skeuomorph）來解釋日治時期臺灣公共建築面磚的運用。構造遺存型態學以歷時性的角度解釋構造方式改變時裝飾型態的延續。此理論基礎可以檢視：臺灣近代建築由磚構造（1910年代）轉為鋼筋混擬土構造（1920年代）時，立面材料（面磚）使用之角色轉變及其背後之文化背景的意義。透過上述文化面向的討論，本研究企圖進一步檢視構造遺存型態學的理論，並嘗試提供雙向、回應西方理論的研究方式，藉此使西方的理論不再佔據主導的檢視地位、而與臺灣的案例產生對話的關係，希望在設計者設計思慮及評論者檢視討論的過程中提供有別於單純沿用西方理論的窠臼之討論面向。

Although architectural design in Taiwan during the Japanese colonial period was significantly influenced by the Japanese westernization, surface tiles, as a common surface material in Taiwan and Japan, were hardly found on architectural elevation in the nineteenth and the first half of the twentieth centuries in the West. This signifies the fact that, in terms of material use, Japan and colonial Taiwan did not directly imitate western material use. This research therefore considers surface tile use in Japan and colonial Taiwan as examples to approach a new possible viewpoint of the westernized process: the Westernization can be considered as a beginning of the transformation instead of a pronoun of unconditional acceptance.In order to understand the transformation of surface material use under the westernization of Taiwanese architecture, this research considers skeuomorph as the key concept. Skeuomorph provides a theoretical foundation to interpret ornamental morphology and to examine the diachronic transformation of surface material use and its cultural milieu and meaning in Taiwan, specifically within the major change of construction systems from brick to reinforced concrete.By doing so, this research could propose another cultural approach, differing from the conventional understanding, to re-consider the ideas of tectonics and skeuomorph. It is a two-way approach that shows the reflection on Western theories and builds a conversation between Western theories and Taiwanese empirical works. It is finally possible to provide an alternative understanding, which differs from the cliché based on Western theories and design approach, for architectural design and theoretical discussions.

1. 臺灣建築會 (1931) 。附圖說明：臺北帝國大學圖書館事物室其他新築工事概要。臺灣建築會誌， 3(6)，59-60。Taiwan Kenchikukai (1931). Fuzu setsumei: Taipei Teikoku Daigaku Toshokan jimutsu shitsu sonota shinchiku kouji gaiyou. Taiwan Kenchiku Kaishi, 3(6), 59-60
2. Müller, K. O., Welcker, F. G. & Leitch, J. (1852). Ancient Art and Its Remains, or a Manual of the Archaeology of Art. London, UK: B. Quaritch.
3. 金光裕建築師事務所（2005）。國立臺灣大學校史館空間整修工程施工記錄報告書。台北市：國立臺灣大學。King Shih Architects (2005). Guoli Taiwan Dasyue Siaoshihguan Kongjian Jhengsiou Gongcheng Shihgong Jilu Baogaoshu. Taipei: National Taiwan University.。
4. 井手薰 (1939) 。臺灣に於ける建築の今昔。載於大塚清賢主編，躍進臺灣大観続篇 (pp. 58-63) 。東京都：中外每日新聞社。Ide, K. (1939). Taiwan ni oke ru kenchiku no konjaku. In S. Otsuka (Ed.), Yakushin Taiwan Taikan Zokuhen (pp. 58-63). Tokyo: Chuugai Mainichi Shinbun Sha.
5. Cunliffe, R. J. (1924). A Lexicon of the Homeric Dialect. London, UK: Blackie.
6. March, H. C. (1889). The meaning of ornament, or its archaeology and its psychology. Transactions of the Lancashire and Cheshire Antiquarian Society, 7, 160-192
7. Cawley, G. (1878). Some remarks on constructions in brick and wood and their relative suitability for Japan. Transactions of the Asiatic Society of Japan, 6(2), 291-320
8. 井手薰 (1939 ) 。改隸四十年間の臺灣の建築の變遷。臺灣建築會誌， 8 (1) ，44-47。Ide, K. (1939). Kairei yonjunenkan no Taiwan no kenchiku no hensen. Taiwan Kenchiku Kaishi, 8(1), 44-47.
9. Broadbent, G.(Ed.),Bunt, R. B.(Ed.),Jencks, C.(Ed.)(1980).Signs, Symbols and Architecture.Chichester, UK:John Wiley & Sons Ltd..
10. Clancey, G. K.(2006).Earthquake Nation: The Cultural Politics of Japanese Seismicity, 1868-1930.CA, USA:University of California Press.
11. Frampton, K.,Cava, J.,Graham Foundation for Advanced Studies in the Fine Arts(1995).Studies in Tectonic Culture: The Poetics of Construction in Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Architecture.MA, USA:MIT Press.
12. Hermann, W.(Ed.),Hèubsch, H.(Ed.)(1992).In What Style Should We Build?: The German Debate on Architectural Style.CA, USA:Getty Center for the History of Art and Humanities.
13. Herrmann, W.(Trans.),Laugier, M. A.(1977).An Essay on Architecture.CA, USA:Hennessey & Ingalls.
14. INAXライフ.ミューシ.アム企画委員会編(2007)。水と風と光のタイル─F.L.ライトか.つくった土のテ.サ.イン。東京都=Tokyo:INAX。
15. Kepes, G.(Ed.)(1965).Structure in Art and in Science.London, UK:Studio Vista.
16. Knappett, K.(2002).Photographs, skeuomorphs and marionettes: Some thoughts on mind, agency and object.Journal of Material Culture,7(1),97-117.
17. Koolhaas, R.(1978).Delirious New York: A Retroactive Manifesto for Manhattan.NY, USA:Monacelli Press.
18. Kruft, H. W.(1994).A History of Architectural Theory: From Vitruvius to the Present.NY, USA:Princeton Architectural Press.
19. Le Corbusier(1967).The Radiant City: Elements of a Doctrine of Urbanism to Be Used as the Basis of Our Machine-Age Civilization.London, UK:Faber.
20. Mallgrave, H. F.(Trans.),Herrmann, W.(Trans.),Semper, G.(1989).The Four Elements of Architecture and Other Writings.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
21. Mallgrave, H. F.(Trans.),Robinson, M.(Trans.)(2004).Style: Style in the Technical and Tectonic Arts; or, Practical Aesthetics.CA, USA:Getty Publications.
22. Mallgrave, H. F.(Trans.),Wagner, O.(1988).Modern Architecture: A Guidebook for His Students to This Field of Art.CA, USA:Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities.
23. Newman, J. O.(Trans.),Smith, J. H.(Trans.),Loos, A.(1982).Spoken into the Void: Collected Essays, 1897-1900.MA, USA:MIT Press.
24. Nute, K.(1993).Frank Lloyd Wright and Japan: The Role of Traditional Japanese Art and Architecture in the Work of Frank Lloyd Wright.London, UK:Chapman & Hall.
25. Raymond, A.(1973).Antonin Raymond: An Autobiography.VT, USA:C.E. Tuttle.
26. Rowland, I. D.(Ed.),Howe, T. N.(Ed.)(1999).Vitruvius. Ten Books on Architecture.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
27. Sanmartin, A.(Ed.)(1986).Venturi, Rauch & Scott Brown.London, UK:Academy Editions.
28. Smith, K.(1985).Frank Lloyd Wright and the Imperial Hotel: A postscript.The Art Bulletin,67(2),296-310.
29. Stewart, D. B.(2002).The Making of Modern Japanese Architecture: From the Founders to Shinohara and Isozaki.Tokyo:Kodansha International.
30. Tilley, C.(Ed.),Keane, W.(Ed.),Kuchler, S.(Ed.),Rowlands, M.(Ed.),Spyer, P.(Ed.)(2006).Handbook of Material Culture.London, UK:SAGE Publications Ltd..
31. Wigley, M.(1995).White Walls, Designer Dresses: The Fashioning of Modern Architecture.MA, USA:MIT Press.
32. 大阪歷史博物館(2006)。煉瓦のまちタイルのまち：近代建築と都市の風景：特別展：大阪歴史博物館開館5周年紀念／泉布観重要文化財指定50周年記念。大阪市=Osaka:大阪歷史博物館=Osaka Museum of History。
33. 日本建築学会編(1972)。近代日本建築学発達史。東京都=Tokyo:文生書院丸善株式?社=Bunseishoin, Maruzen Kabushiki Gaisha。
34. 加藤有保、田中弘(1976)。日本のタイル文化。大阪市=Osaka:淡陶株式?社=Danto Corporation。
35. 古田智久(1987)。東京都=Tokyo，日本大學建築學科=Department of Architecture, Nihon University。
36. 田中大作(2005)。臺灣島建築之研究。台北市=Taipei:國立臺北科技大學=National Taipei University of Technology。
37. 何肇喜建築師事務所(2003)。臺中火車站整體修護工程調查研究及修護計畫。台中市=Taichung:臺中市政府文化局=Cultural Affairs Bureau, Taichung City Government。
38. 谷川正己(1970)。日本の建築明治大正昭和：9ライトの遺產。東京都=Tokyo:三省堂=Books Sanseidou。
39. 東京ステーションギャラリ(1988)。東京駅と煉瓦：JR東日本で巡る日本の煉瓦建築。東京都=Tokyo:東日本旅客?道株式會社=East Japan Railway Company。
40. 林怡君(1998)。台南市=Tainan，國立成功大學建築學系=Department of Architecture, National Cheng Kung University。
41. 桐敷真次郎(2001)。明治の建築。東京都=Tokyo:本?友社=Hon-no-tomosha Publishers。
42. 陳正哲(1998)。桃園縣=Taoyuan County，中原大學建築學系所=Department of Architecture, Chung Yuan Christian University。
43. 傅朝卿(2003)。日治時期1895-1945 臺灣建築。台北市=Taipei:秋雨文化=Choice Publishing Co.。
44. 黃俊銘(2003)。,嘉義市=Chiayi City:嘉義市政府文化局=Cultural Affairs Bureau, Chiayi City Government。
45. 詹慧玲編、藤島亥治郎(1993)。臺灣的建築。台北市=Taipei:臺原=Taiuan Publishing Co.。
46. 鈴木博之、山口廣(1993)。近代、現代建築史。東京都=Tokyo:彰?社=Shokokusha Publishing Co.。
47. 榛澤廣巳、吉川盛一、水野信太郎(1990)。東京駅と辰野金吾。東京都=Tokyo, Japan:東日本旅客鐵道株式會社=East Japan Railway Company。
48. 劉舜仁、謝明峰、盧耀正、楊永智(2001)。臺灣七大經典車站建築圖集。台北市=Taipei:行政院文化建設委員會=Council for Cultural Affairs, Executive Yuan。
49. 薛琴(2003)。,嘉義市=Chiayi Cit:嘉義市政府文化局=Cultural Affairs Bureau, Chiayi City Government。
50. 薛琴(2003)。,台北市=Taipei:內政部=Ministry of the Interior。
51. 藤森照信(1993)。日本の近代建築。東京都=Tokyo:岩波書店=Iwanami Shouten Publishers。

1. 張恭領(2016)。陶瓷結合皮革的設計與策略。設計研究學報，9，50-69。
2. (2024)。閱讀二戰後臺灣的中國古典式樣新建築之木構遺存型態。建築學報，127，1-25。