文法解讀－日治時期台灣鐵道車站空間的形式與機能

Interpretation by Grammars-The Forms and Functions of Taiwanese Railroad Stations during Japanese Colonial Period

宋玉真(Sharon Yu-Chen Sung)；陳怡玲(Yi-Ling Chen)

形狀文法 ； 空間型構 ； 鐵道車站 ； 日治時期 ； Shape Grammar ； Space Syntax ； Railroad Station ； Japanese Colonial Period

建築學報

86期（2013 / 12 / 01）

33 - 49

繁體中文

形狀文法（Shape Grammar）透過形式的文法規則操作與衍生，成為空間形式分析運算的主要工具；空間型構（Space Syntax）藉著空間單元的機能與路徑系統法則與構成，亦為空間組織與路徑深度解析之重要利器，兩者皆為形態學的相關方法論。本研究接續這幾年來有學者開始嘗試結合形狀文法和空間型構的方法論特性，以圖像操作方式，進行空間平面之形式與機能分析，並且以現存之日治時期鐵道車站為例，透過文法之圖像分析操作，進而解讀其建築空間平面之形式與機能組成，企圖連結兩個形態學中不同的方法論，並且以樹狀分析圖歸納其空間平面組成之相似性與相異性，將研究對象之分析圖整理成一圖像層級發展系統。

Through the operation and generation of grammar rules, Shape Grammar became the main tool by applying analysis and algorithm of spatial forms. By the principles and networks of convex spaces' functions and axial lines, Space Syntax is the vital instrument on configuration of spatial compositions and circulations. Both are methodologies in the field of morphology. This study attempted to continue the methodology used by certain scholars recently by way of a combination of the features of Shape Grammar and Space Syntax. This is operated by graphs and also analyzes the forms and functions of spatial planes using the samples of Taiwanese train stations in the Japanese colonial period. Through the operation and analysis of grammatical graphs, the result interprets the compositions of the forms and functions of architectural planes. This paper attempts to connect the two distinguish methodologies in morphologies and induce the similarity and difference of the spatial planes by pruning a layout tree. The analytical graphs will then be arranged into a hierarchical system of spatial development.

1. Lin, C. J.,Chiu, M.(2011).Spatial topology retrieval interface for encoding and indexing spatial topology in an architectural design case library.Journal of Architecture,78,25-44.
   連結：
2. Al-kazzaz, D. A.,Bridges, A. H.(2012).A framework for adaption in shape grammar.Design Studies,33(4),342-356.
3. Batty, M.(2004).CASA Working Paper (No. 75)CASA Working Paper (No. 75),London, UK:Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London.
4. Chiu, M. L.(1998).Cased-based design and reasoning in architectural design (2): Building a case-based reasoning system.Journal of Architecture,26,1-17.
5. Cross, N.(Ed.)(1984).Developments in Design Methodology.NY, USA:John Wiley & Sons.
6. Curtis, W.(2006).Le Corbusier- Ideas and Forms.London, UK:Phaidon Press.
7. Duarte, J. P.(2005).Towards the mass customization of housing: The grammar of Siza's houses at Malagueira.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,32(3),347-380.
8. Eilouti, B. H.(2008).A formal language for Palladio Palazzo Facades represented by a string recognition drive.Nexus Network Journal,10(2),245-268.
9. Eloy, S.,Duarte, J. P.(2011).A transformation grammar for housing rehabilitation.Nexus Network Journal,13(1),49-71.
10. Ferguson, T. J.(1996).Historic Zuni Architecture and Society: An Archaeological Application of Space Syntax.AZ, USA:University of Arizona Press.
11. Flemming, U.(1987).More than sum of parts: The grammar of Queen Anne houses.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,14(3),323-350.
12. Heitor, T. V.,Duarte, J. P.,Pinto, R. M.(2004).Combining grammars and space syntax: formulating, generating and evaluating design.International Journal of Architectural Computing,2(4),492-515.
13. Hillier, B.(2007).Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture.London, UK:Space Syntax.
14. Hillier, B.(1999).The hidden geometry of deformed grids: Or, why space syntax works, when it looks as though it shouldn't.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,26(2),169-191.
15. Hillier, B.,Hanson, J.(1984).The Social Logic of Space.NY, USA:Cambridge University Press.
16. Knight, T.(1994).Transformations in Design: A Formal Approach to Stylistic Change and Innovation in The Visual Arts.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
17. Knight, T.(1983).Transformations of languages of designs: Part 3.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,10,155-177.
18. Koning, H.,Eizenberg, J.(1981).The language of the prairie: Frank Lloyd Wright's prairie houses.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,8(3),295-323.
19. Macdonald, S.(Ed.)(2006).A Companion to Museum Studies.Oxford, UK:Blackwell Publishing Ltd..
20. Mitchell, W.(1990).The Logic of Architecture: Design, Computations, and Cognition.MA, USA:MIT Press.
21. Norberg-Schulz, C.(1980).Meaning in Western Architecture.NY, USA:Rizzoli.
22. Norberg-Schulz, C.(1980).Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture.NY, USA:Rizzoli.
23. Penn, A.(2003).Space syntax and spatial cognition or why the axial line?.Environment and Behavior,35(1),30-65.
24. Sass, L.(2007).A Palladian construction grammar-design reasoning with shape grammars and rapid prototyping.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,34(1),87-106.
25. Seo, K. W.(2007).Space puzzle in a concrete box: Finding design competence that generates the modern apartment houses in Seoul.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,34(6),1071-1084.
26. Steadman, P.(1983).Architectural Morphology: An Introduction to the Geometry of Building Plans.London, UK:Pion.
27. Stiny, G.(1980).Introduction to shape and shape grammar.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,7(3),343-351.
28. Stiny, G.(2006).Shape: Talking about Seeing and Doing.MA, USA:MIT Press.
29. Stiny, G.,Gips, J.(1972).Shape grammars and the generative specification of painting and sculpture.Information Processing,Amsterdam, NL:
30. Stiny, G.,Mitchell, W.(1978).The Palladian grammar.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,5(1),5-18.
31. Venturi, R.,Brown, D. S.(2004).Architecture as Signs and Systems: For a Mannerist Time.MA, USA:Harvard University Press.
32. Venturi, R.,Brown, D. S.,Izenour, S.(1972).Learning from Las Vegas.MA, USA:MIT Press.
33. Yue, K.,Krishnamurti, R.,Grobler, F.(2012).Estimating the interior layout of building using a shape grammar to capture building style.Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering,26(1),113-130.
34. 台灣省文獻委員會(1969)。台灣省通治。台中市=Taichung:台灣省文獻委員會=Council of Taiwan Historica。
35. 台灣鐵路管理局(1998)。劉銘傳與台灣鐵路。台北市=Taipei:台灣鐵路管理局=Taiwan Railways Administration。
36. 台灣鐵路管理局(1987)。臺灣鐵路百週年紀念。台北市=Taipei:台灣鐵路管理局=Taiwan Railways Administration。
37. 周俊霖、許永河(2007)。南灜鐵道誌。台南縣=Tainan County:台南縣政府=Tainan County Government。
38. 周振綱(2003)。屏東縣=Pintung County，屏東師範學院視覺藝術教育研究所=Department of Visual Arts, National Pingtung Univesity of Education。
39. 周錦宏(1998)。山線舊鐵路文化資產保存與再利用。苗栗縣=Miaoli County:苗栗縣文化中心=Cultural Center of Miaoli County。
40. 陳怡玲(2012)。台中市=Taichung，逢甲大學建築研究所=Department of Architecture, Feng Chia Univesity。
41. 陳豐文(2008)。台中市=Taichung，東海大學建築系=Department of Architecture, Tunghai Univesity。
42. 劉舜仁(2001)。台灣七大經典車站建築圖集。南投縣=Nantou County:行政院文化建設委員會中部辦公室=The Council for Cultural Affairs, Executive Yuan。
43. 劉舜仁(2005)。台灣中小經典車站建築圖集。南投縣=Nantou County:行政院文化建設委員會中部辦公室=The Council for Cultural Affairs, Executive Yuan。
44. 謝明峰(2001)。台中市=Taichung，東海大學建築系=Department of Architecture, Tunghai University。

1. 高郁婷,王志弘(2020)。臺灣鐵道基礎設施的文創轉生。台灣社會研究季刊，116，151-199。
2. 葉麗美(2014)。應用灰結構模型法於建築立面樣式之研究─以台灣日據時期鐵道車站的構造與形式特徵為例。聯大學報，11(2)，99-129。