Sustainable Urban Development for Commercial and Residential Areas: A Case Study of Paradoxical Mixed Land Use in the Taipei Shida Area, Taiwan

都市住商區永續發展－探討師大住商混合衝突

10.3966/101632122014060088014

蘇瑛敏(Ying-Ming Su)

土地混合使用 ； 相容性 ； 環境品質 ； 環境認知 ； 永續都市發展 ； Mixed Land Use ； Compatibility ； Environmental Quality ； Environmental Cognition ； Sustainable Urban Development

建築學報

88_S期（2014 / 06 / 30）

17 - 31

英文

混合使用是台灣長久以來主要的土地使用型態。本研究以實地觀察和問卷調查了422個受訪者對於臺北師大土地混合使用地區的生活環境品質評價及環境認知，應用SPSS來處理和分析受訪者回應資料。研究結果顯示住民和非住民對於土地混合使用明顯有不同的評價，雖然住民強調居住環境的安全、健康、舒適的重要性，非住民更重視因土地混合使用而導致的便利性和多樣性。健康在住民與非住民的環境認知重要性都是最低，但住民對環境評價最不滿的就是健康。住商混合相容發展的關鍵是藉由政府、非政府組織及私部門三者協力合作去管理維護住民生活環境，以自我管理機制去控制不同土地混合使用類型產生的外部性。因此我們可以落實人類活動及環境品質的相容性，朝向永續都市發展的目標。

Until recently, mixed land-use theory has been applied as the primary land-use philosophy in Taiwan. In this study, we surveyed 422 people in the Taipei Shida area to investigate their assessment of the environmental quality in the Shida area, which is zoned as a mixed land-use area. SPSS was used to process and analyze the response data. The results indicate d that residents and non residents have distinct views regarding the environmental impact of mixed land use. The residents focused on the importance of safety, health, and comfort when assessing their residential environment, whereas the nonresidents considered the convenience and diversity of mixed land-use areas to be more critical. The issue of health was considered the least crucial factor affecting environmental quality by both residents and nonresidents, despite causing the highest level of dissatisfaction among the residents. The key to attaining a compatible outlook of residential and commercial involves controlling the negative externalities of various types of mixed land use by developing autonomous mechanisms. Government and nongovernment organizations should collaborate with the private sector to maintain residential living environments. Hence, the compatibility of human activity and environmental quality can be realized to facilitate sustainable urban development goals.

1. Lee, Y. J.,Wu, M. F.(2005).Subjective quality of life measurement in Taipei City.Journal of City and Planning,32(4),387-420.
   連結：
2. Barton, H.(2009).Land use planning and health and well-being.Land Use Policy,26S,S115-S123.
3. Brown, K.(Ed.),Hall, W. L(Ed.).,Snook, M.(Ed.),Garvin, K.(Ed.)(2010).Sustainable Land Development and Restoration: Decision Consequence Analysis.MA, USA:Butterworth-Heinemann.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(2011).Strategies to Prevent Obesity and other Chronic Diseases: The CDC Guide to Strategies to Increase Physical Activity in the Community.GA, USA:U. S. Department ofHealth and Human Services.
5. Chen, L. C.(1989).Taipei,Graduate Institute of Building and Planning, National Taiwan University.
6. Chen, M. H.,Lin, Y. J.(2007).The influences of residential environment quality on residential satisfaction in urban areas.Journal of Landscape,12(4),57-77.
7. Congress for the New Urbanism(2001).Charter of the New Urbanism.IL, USA:CNU.
8. Cortes, K. E.,Friedson, A.(2010).Ranking up by moving out: The effect of the Texas top 10% plan on property values.Urban Economics,29(6),1110-1124.
9. Freeman, C.(2004).Sustainable development from rehetoric to pratice? A New Zealand perspective.International Palnning Studies,9(4),307-326.
10. Hemdon, J. D.(2011).GA, USA.,Georgia Institute of Technology.
11. Hoppenbrouwer, E.,Louw, E.(2005).Mixed-use development: Theory and practice in Arnsterdam's Eastem Docklands.European Planning Studies,13(7),967-983.
12. Huang, C. E.(1991).Report of Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the InteriorReport of Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior,New Taipei City:Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior.
13. Huang, S. W.(2008).Tainan,Department of Urban Planning, National Cheng Kung University.
14. Jacobs, J.(1961).The Death and Life of Great American Cities.NY, USA:Random House.
15. Jenks, M.,Burton, E.,Williams, K.(1996).The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form.London, UK:E & FN Spon.
16. Lai, Y. L.(2006).Taichung,Graduate Institute of Urban Planning, Feng Chia University.
17. Seghezzo, L.(2009).The five dirnensions of sustainability.Environmental Politics,18(4),539-556.
18. Song, L. Z.(1986).Taipei,Department of Architecture and Urban design, Chinese Culture University.
19. Song, Y.,Knaap, G. J.(2004).Measuring the effects of mixed land-uses on housing values.Regional Science and Urban Economics,34,663-680.
20. Stivers, R. L.(1976).The Sustainable Society: Ethics and Economic Growth.PA, USA:Westminster Press.
21. UN-HABITAT(2002).Sustainable Urbanization: Achieving Agenda 21.Nairobi, Kenya:UN-HABITAT.
22. WHO(2010).World Health Report 2010.Geneva, Switzerland:World Health Organization.

1. 高郁婷,王志弘(2022)。連屬公共性－新北市三重區公園／廟宇複合體的領域調適。地理學報，101，3-32。