题名

高齡友善社區永續規劃之研究與評估—以八個銀髮社區為例

并列篇名

Assessment of Sustainable Planning for Elder-Friendly Community-Taking Eight Elderly Communities as an Example

DOI

10.3966/101632122014120090001

作者

王价巨(Jieh-Jiuh Wang);蔡寧又(Ning-Yu Tsai)

关键词

永續發展 ; 永續社區 ; 銀髮社區 ; 環境規劃 ; 社區規劃 ; 建築規劃 ; Sustainable Development ; Sustainable Community ; Elderly Community ; Environment Planning ; Community Planning ; Architecture Planning

期刊名称

建築學報

卷期/出版年月

90期(2014 / 12 / 01)

页次

1 - 21

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

「高齡化」已是全世界五大趨勢之一。人類不當的環境開發,不但破壞了生態系統,且引發了許多災害,「永續發展」成為最切身的生存問題。本研究從永續發展、生態友善的環境思維及銀髮社區的實務發展加以討論,將銀髮社區納入永續社區實踐的一環。透過既有永續相關指標體系的文獻回顧,整合適用於銀髮社區之重點來建立初步指標層級架構,再利用模糊層級分析法專家問卷建立指標權重系統,以評估現有銀髮社區的實際規劃案例和作法。本研究建立之銀髮永續社區規劃指標系統具備46個評估指標,分屬環境規劃、社區規劃及建築規劃3大層面。本研究的個案在社區規劃與建築規劃層面普遍具備良好規劃與重視;然而,針對環境規劃層面之水資源、建造規劃、社會經濟等構面,投入不足,提供未來銀髮社區符合永續規劃須積極強化之面向。

英文摘要

"Aging" is now one of the five major trends worldwide. In addition, inappropriate human exploitation of the environment has damaged the eco-system and triggered more disasters. "Sustainable development" is now an issue of survival. This study tries to situate an elderly community as a part of a sustainable community practice. Firstly, it analyzes sustainable development and eco-friendliness, as well as the practical development of elderly communities. It then reviews an existing sustainability-related indicator system and uses it as a basis for integrating and establishing a preliminary indicator hierarchical structure suitable for a sustainable elderly community. Fuzzy Analytic Hierarch Process is also used to construct important indicators. Finally, an overall planning is proposed based on the assessment results, and is used to evaluate current elderly communities. A sustainable elderly community indicator system is established with 46 evaluation indicators, which belong to environmental planning, community planning and architectural planning levels. The case study indicates community planning and architectural planning are well-structured. Unfortunately, indicators of water resources, construction planning, and socio-economic dimensions under environmental planning are the least sufficient of all and require more effort in the future.

主题分类 工程學 > 土木與建築工程
参考文献
  1. Tso, N. (2009). Why has Taiwan's birthrate dropped so low?. Retrieved Jan. 9, 2014 from http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1945937,00.html.
  2. 行政院主計總處(2002)。中華民國社會統計指標-民國九十年。台北市:行政院主計總處。Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan (2002). Social Indicators 2001. Taipei: Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan.
  3. Anton, C. N.(1994).Vision for A New American Dream: Process, Principles, and An Ordinance to Plan and Design Small Communities.Washington, D. C., USA:American Planning Association Press.
  4. Blowers, A. (Ed.)(1994).Planning for a Sustainable Environment- A Report by the Town and Country Planning Association.London, UK:Earthscan Publications Ltd..
  5. Brown, L.(2006).Plan B 2.0: Rescuing a Planet Under Stress and A Civilization in Trouble.NY, USA:W. W. Norton.
  6. Calthrope, P.(1993).The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community and the American Dream.NY, USA:Princeton Architectural Press Inc..
  7. Ewing, R.(1996).Best Development Practices: Doing the Right Thing and Making Money at the Same Time.Washington, D. C., USA:American Planning Association Press.
  8. Gaffron, P.(Ed.),Huismans, G.(Ed.),Scala, F.(Ed.)(2006).Ecocitybook II: How to Make It Happen.
  9. Gilman, R.(1991).The Eco-Village Challenge.In Context,29,10-14.
  10. Handy, J.(2013).What role can senior housing play in care transitions?.Generations,36(4),102-104.
  11. Heinberg, R.(2004).Powerdown: Options and Actions for A Post-Carbon World.BC, CA:New Society.
  12. Izuhara, M.(2000).Family Change and Housing in Post-War Japanese Society: The Experiences of Older Women.London, UK:Ashgate Publishing Ltd..
  13. Kastura, H. M.,Struyk, R. J.,Newman, S. J.(1989).Housing for the Elderly in 2010: Projections and Policy Options.Washington, D. C., USA:The Urban Institute Press.
  14. Layard, A.(Ed.),Davoidi, S.(Ed.),Batty, S.(Ed.)(2001).Planning for a Sustainable Future.NY, USA:Spon Press.
  15. Peace, S. M.,Holland, C.(2001).Inclusive Housing in An Ageing Society: Innovative Approaches.Bristol, UK:The Policy Press.
  16. Powell, L. M.,Newcomer, R. J.,Byerts, T. O.(1976).Community Planning for An Aging Society: Designing Services and Facilities.PA, USA:Dowden, Hutchington & Ross, Inc..
  17. Saaty, T.(1977).A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,15(30),234-28.
  18. Scarfo, B.(2011).Building a more sustainable future for senior living.Educational Gerontology,37,466-487.
  19. Shah, S.(2006).OH, USA.,College of Design, Architecture, Art and Planning, University of Cincinnati.
  20. Sucher, D.(2003).City Comforts: How to Build an Urban Village.WA, USA:City Comforts Inc..
  21. Toscano, C.(2012).Environmentally friendly senior living.Environmental Design & Construction,15(12),28-32.
  22. 周京安(1998)。美國長期照護的新趨勢—協助式養護。社區發展季刊,83,201-211。
  23. 尚祺(1989)。銀髮族為旅遊市場創新機。突破雜誌,42,204-206。
  24. 林柏霖(2008)。從鄉村社區永續觀點探討生態旅遊造成之衝擊—以南投縣埔里鎮桃米休閒農業區為例。農業推廣文彙,53,267-280。
  25. 邱慧寧(2002)。高雄市=Kaohsiung,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所=Institute of Human Resource Management, National Sun Yat-sen University。
  26. 高忠義譯、Posner, R. A.(2001)。老年、社會、法律經濟學。台北市=Taipei:商周=Business Weekly。
  27. 陳明男(2009)。台中市=Taichung,逢甲大學經營管理研究所=School of Management Development, Feng Chia University。
  28. 陳政雄(2006)。銀髮住宅整體規劃理念。臺灣老年醫學暨老年學雜誌,1(3),122-137。
  29. 陳政雄(2010)。如何塑造銀髮住宅的室內環境。建築+裝修,5,17-22。
  30. 陳映樺(2005)。台北市=Taipei,國立政治大學科技管理研究所=Graduate Institute of Technology, Innovation & Intellectual Property Management, National Chengchi University。
  31. 曾冬鈺(2008)。桃園縣=Taoyuan County,銘傳大學觀光研究所=Department of Tourism, Ming Chuan University。
  32. 曾思瑜(1995)。我國自費老人安養設施與日本的高齡者住宅制度。空間雜誌,72,76-81。
  33. 黃金蓮、劉慧音(2006)。瑞典急性醫院與老人住宅學習之旅。領導護理,7(1),9-11。
  34. 黃國彥編、詹火生編(1994)。銀髮族之社會資源。嘉義市=Chiayi City:紅豆出版社=Red Bean Publishing。
  35. 廖佳展(2008)。台北市=Taipei,國立政治大學地政學系=Department of Land Economics, National Chengchi University。
  36. 趙增偉(2009)。新北市=New Taipei City,天主教輔仁大學藝術學院景觀設計研究所=Department of Landscape Architecture, Fu Jen Catholic University。
  37. 賴明德(2009)。台中市=Taichung,朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理系=Department of Leisure Services Management, Chaoyang University of Technology。
被引用次数
  1. 陳建和,王宜樺(2020)。高齡者健康樂活旅遊友善環境檢核表。商略學報,12(4),299-317。