题名

全球高齡友善城市推動模式比較研究初探

并列篇名

The Comparative Study of Age-Friendly Cities Operational Strategies

DOI

10.3966/101632122014120090008

作者

趙子元(Tzu-Yuan Chao)；黃彙雯(Hui-Wen Huang)

关键词

高齡友善城市 ； 發展脈絡 ； 推動模式 ； Age-Friendly Cities ； Development Context ； Promote Strategies

期刊名称

建築學報

卷期/出版年月

90期（2014 / 12 / 01）

页次

129 - 152

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

隨著醫療及社會經濟的進步，人民壽命延長與出生率降低，使得高齡人口數量及其佔總人口的比率顯著增加，聯合國指出廿一世紀人類兩大挑戰即為人口都市化及高齡化。世界衛生組織（WHO）提出高齡友善城市的推動也在國際間引起相當共鳴與迴響，本研究以WHO於2010年起推動全球高齡友善城市網絡計畫之目的與架構為藍本，透過背景描述、推動層級與尺度、推動面向、推動策略和部門角色等分析英國、加拿大、澳洲與台灣等國推動高齡友善城市之模式與歷程並進行個案比較研究，探討在不同在地條件特性下，各國所演繹的高齡友善城市推動架構之差異，及各項差異所將面臨的可能潛在問題分析；進而歸納出：建構高層級的合作機制、適合高齡者主動回饋的系統、主要推動組織整合力等三大關鍵成功要素，做為未來建立完善推動架構之建議參考。
英文摘要

Population ageing has become one of the emerging issues in the world due to the success of advanced science, public health, medical knowledge, and technology in the past Century. Accordingly, in response to the vision of Age-friendly cities program proposed by the WHO, this research took the ＂Global Age-Friendly Cities-A Guide＂ (WHO, 2007) published by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a blueprint to explore the practical framework of different country and city. One city in four counties each including the United States of America, UK, Australia, Canada and Taiwan are selected as research targets. By conducting comparative studies from five perspectives, this study further concludes three key elements for a better framework to deliver age-friendly cities program. These three key elements include establishing higher-level collaboration platform at central/federal government level, creating sustainable participation system for elderly and enhancing the organizational integration force of the major promoters.
主题分类 工程學 > 土木與建築工程
参考文献
  1. 李百麟(2013)。中高齡者宗教信仰與心理健康之關係。危機管理學刊，10(2)，61-68。
    連結：
  2. 彭渰雯(2008)。基層員警取締性交易的執行研究：批判性詮釋途徑之應用。公共行政學報，28，115-151。
    連結：
  3. AARP (2014). AARP's Network of Age-Friendly Communities Booklet. Retrieved Mar. 25, 2014 from http://www.aarpinternational.org/events/agefriendly2012.
  4. AGE Platform Europe (歐洲高齡平台) (2014). About Age. Retrieved Mar. 18, 2014 from http://www.age-platform.eu/about-age.
  5. Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) (2014). Age-Friendly Communities. Retrieved Mar. 18, 2014 From http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/seniors-aines/afc-caa-eng.php.
  6. The City of New York & The New York Academy of Medicine (2011). Age-friendly NYC: A Progress Report. Retrieved Mar. 24, 2014 from http://www.nyam.org/agefriendlynyc/Age-Friendly-NYC-Report-Final-High-Res2_new.pdf.
  7. 國民健康署（2011）。高齡友善城市指標建立與導入計畫-100 年擴充。台北市：國民健康署。Health Promotion Administration (2011). The Project of Age-Friendly Cities Indicators Establishment and Implement: Expansion in 2011. Taipei: Health Promotion Administration.。
  8. City of Melville (2013b). Review of The Age Friendly Melville Strategy Directions from Seniors, 2010-2012. Retrieved Mar. 11, 2014 from http://www.melvillecity.com.au/newproxy/service/api/node/workspace/SpacesStore/a2c91a0c-da61-4992-8859-435e083211ae/DFS%202013-2017%20Strategy.pdf/content/Review%20of%20Age%20Friendly%20Melville%20Strategy%202010-2012?alf_ticket=TICKET_1fe584e64ff67f4add93130b2446d38f847a91f8.
  9. The City of Edmonton (2014). Age Friendly Edmonton: One Sheet. Retrieved Mar. 19, 2014 from http://www.edmonton.ca/city_government/documents/AgeFriendly_onesheet.pdf.
  10. City of Melville (2013a). Western Australia: An Age-Friendly Community. Retrieved Mar. 10, 2014 from http://www.acswaconferenceperth.com.au/docs/Friday/03-Concurrent-Session-Living-Together/Christine%20Young_WA%20An%20Aged%20Friendly%20Community.pdf.
  11. Manchester City Council (2009). Manchester: A Great Place to Grow Older 2010-2020. Retrieved Mar. 10, 2014 from http://www.manchester.gov.uk/downloads/file/11899/manchester_a_great_place_to_grow_older_2010-2020.
  12. WHO (2007b). World Health Organization (WHO) Age-Friendly Cities Project City of Melville Summary. Retrieved Mar. 18, 2014 from http://www.melvillecity.com.au/index.php/component/alfrescocontent/?path=/Community_x0020__x0026__x0020_Facilities/Seniors/Age-Friendly_x0020_Melville_x0020_Strategy_x0020_Directions_x0020_from_x0020_Seniors.
  13. 蔡淑瑩（2011）。台灣地區城鄉高齡者對社區公共設施之需求比較分析。引用於2014 年8 月27 日，取自http://tag.org.tw/admin/uploads/20120906115825_2422.pdf。Tsai, S. Y. (2011). A Comparative Analysis of the Demands of Public Facilitie For Elderly Between Urban And Rural In Taiwan. Retrieved Aug. 27, 2014 From http://tag.org.tw/admin/uploads/20120906115825_2422.pdf.
  14. Age-friendly World (2014). WHO Global Network. Retrieved Mar. 10, 2014 from http://www.agefriendlyworld.org/afcc-network.
  15. District of Saanich (2008). Municipality of Saanich Age Friendly Cities Report. Retrieved Jul. 20, 2010 from http://www.saanich.ca/parkrec/community/pdf/SaanichWHOAgeFriendlyCitiesReport.pdf.
  16. 江清馦，侯穎蕙，林慧芬（2003）。臺灣老人福利需求與政策方向。台北市：財團法人國家政策研究基金會。引用於2014 年3 月18 日， 取自http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/SS/092/SS-R-092-009.htm。Chiang, C. H., Hou, Y. H., & Lin, H. F. (2003). The Welfare Needs and Policy Direction of Elderly in Taiwan. Taipei: National Policy Foundation. Retrieved Mar. 18, 2014 from http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/SS/092/SS-R-092-009.htm.
  17. The Edmonton Seniors Coordinating Council, ESCC (2011). Vision for an Age-friendly Edmonton: Action Plan. Retrieved Mar. 19, 2014 from http://www.edmonton.ca/city_government/documents/Final-Final_Seniors_council_plan_May26.pdf.
  18. 國家教育研究院 (2014)。比較研究。引用於2014 年8 月27 日， 取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1679273/。National Academy for Education Research (2014). The Interpretation of Comparative Research. Retrieved Aug. 27, 2014 from http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1679273/.
  19. DeLeon, P.,deLeon, L.(2002).What ever happened to policy implementation? An alternative approach.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,12(4),467-492.
  20. Hill, M.,Hupe, P.(2002).Implementing Public Policy.London, UK:Sage.
  21. Lui, C. W.,Everingham, J. A.,Warburton, J.,Cuthill, M.,Bartlett, H.(2009).What makes a community age-friendly: A review of international literature.Australasian Journal on Ageing,28(3),116-121.
  22. Plouffe, L.,Kalache, A.(2010).Towards Global Age-Friendly Cities: Determining urban features that promote active aging.Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine,87(5),733-739.
  23. Stillman, R. J., II(Ed.)(1995).Public Administration.MA, USA:Houghton Mifflin Company.
  24. WHO(2002).Active Ageing: A Policy Framework.
  25. WHO(2007).Global Age-friendly Cities: A Guide.
  26. 林秀鈴(2012)。彰化縣=Changhua County，國立彰化師範大學資訊管理學所=Department of Information Management, National Changhua University of Education。
  27. 范光中、許永河(2010)。台灣人口高齡化的社經衝擊。台灣老年醫學會暨老年學雜誌，5(3)，149-168。
  28. 劉見祥、吳秀玲(2009)。高齡化對全民健康保險制度之影響。社區發展季刊，125，112-127。
  29. 蔡淑瑩、陳世倚(2010)。應用GPS 探討城鄉高齡者的生活軌跡。建築學報，74，107-126。
被引用次数
  1. 陳素梅(2019)。我國高齡友善城市理念推動中高齡及高齡就業政策與反思：借鏡「歐洲中高齡及高齡平台」。慈濟大學人文社會科學學刊，22，28-64。
  2. 董娟鳴(2019)。都市鄰里供給友善度對老人活動與對鄰里環境供給滿意度比較之研究。地理學報，92，55-88。
print cancel