規劃設計階段考量耐震性及經濟性之中小學校舍規劃效率評估

Planning Efficiency Evaluation for School Buildings Considering the Tradeoff of Seismic Resistance and Cost Effectiveness at the Planning and Design Stage

10.3966/101632122015030091001

陳清山(Ching-Shan Chen)

中小學校舍 ； 模糊理論 ； 無異曲線 ； 效率前緣 ； 資料包絡分析法 ； School Buildings ； Fuzzy Theory ； Indifference Curve ； Efficient Frontier ； Data Envelopment Analysis

建築學報

91期（2015 / 03 / 01）

1 - 20

繁體中文

建築師於規劃設計階段規劃建築物時，常會將建築物之耐震性及經濟性列為兩項重要規劃目標。但此兩項目標常常是互相衝突的，故造成建築師規劃設計建築物時極大的困擾，權衡此兩項衝突目標即為多目標最佳化問題。此外，目前的效率評估方法，大部份僅客觀地評估建築物的某項效率，較少融合規劃設計者的主觀規劃偏好。但建築物規劃設計具有某些主客觀因素，因此目前評估方法較不適用於建築物規劃效率評估，故如何發展一融合多目標及規劃偏好的規劃效率評估方法，成為一個值得研究的課題。本研究所使用的研究方法包含：模糊理論、無異曲線、效率前緣以及資料包絡分析法。模糊理論可詮釋建築師偏好具體程度;藉由無異曲線的觀念，可定義建築師各種規劃偏好類型及權重;資料包絡分析法則可計算出校舍之效率前緣曲線，建築師可藉此曲線評估校舍之規劃效率。本研究即以上述四項理論，發展中小學校舍的規劃效率評估模式。文末以臺中市326棟中小學校舍為範例，闡釋上述之方法論，從研究結果中可知，若僅用客觀的分析方法或僅於主觀上做認定，均不足於詮釋建築物規劃設計的意涵，而應兩者兼容並蓄。此研究成果可提供建築師於規劃設計階段規劃校舍之應用，亦可提供學術界後續研究之參考。

At the building planning and design stage, the most important criteria in building planning are safety and cost. However, these two objectives are often in conflict. Thus, architects, who must also strike an optimal balance between two conflicting objectives, may be indecisive when planning buildings. It's a Multi-Objective Optimization Problem (MOOP). Except for the MOOP, there exists the subjective characteristics when architects planning the buildings. It is also deserved further investigation to explain these subjective characteristics adequately to match the architect's planning preference. This research integrates fuzzy theory, indifference curve, efficient frontier and data envelopment analysis (DEA), and defines every type of architect planning preferences. Fuzzy number in fuzzy theory was adopted to identify the degree of architect preference. The slope of the indifference curve was used to determine the architect planning preference. The planning weight could then be deduced. This research applied the efficient frontier via DEA to identify a group of plans with the highest seismic performance index under different unit construction cost conditions for school buildings. This group of plans may create an efficient frontier curve for school buildings, with points serving as benchmarks. A total of 326 school buildings in Taichung City in an empirical study designed to illustrate proposed approach effectiveness. The results show that using only objective evaluation or subjective recognition is insufficient to explain the true nature of building planning. Findings can serve as benchmarks for inefficient school buildings at the planning and design stage.

1. 陳博亮、周劍虹、鄭一俊、林志蒼、戴玉珍(2010)。臺灣地區上市上櫃營建公司經營效率分析。建築學報，73，25-50。
   連結：
2. 歐聖榮、柯嘉鈞、許哲瑜(2012)。景觀設計中眺望藏匿理論模式之應用。建築學報，80，111-129。
   連結：
3. Samuelson, P. A. (1938). A note on the pure theory of consumer's behaviour. Economica, 5, 61-71.
4. Biener, C.,Eling, M.(2012).Organization and efficiency in the international insurance industry: A cross-frontier analysis.European Journal of Operational Research,221(2),454-468.
5. Bodie, Z.,Kane, A.,Marcus, A. J.(2009).Essentials of Investments.MA, USA:McGraw-Hill.
6. Boyer, L. L.,Song, K. D.(1994).Daylighting prediction and sunlight strategies for atrium design in hot climates.ASHRAE Transactions: Symposia,100(2),676-681.
7. Buhl, T.,Jensen, V. F.,Pellegrino, S.(2004).Shape optimization of cover plates for retractable roof structures.Computers and Structures,82,1227-1236.
8. Charnes, A.,Cooper, W. W.,Rhodes, E.(1978).Measuring the efficiency of decision making units.European Journal of Operational Research,12(6),429-444.
9. Chen, J. K.,Chen, I. S.(2011).Inno-Qual efficiency of higher education: Empirical testing using data envelopment analysis.Expert Systems with Applications,38,1823-1834.
10. Cheng, E. W. L.,Li, H.(2004).Exploring quantitative methods for project location selection.Building and Environment,39,1467-1476.
11. Cheng, M. Y.,Chen, C. S.(2011).Optimal planning model for school buildings considering the tradeoff of seismic resistance and cost effectiveness: A Taiwan case study.Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization,43(6),863-879.
12. Coello, C. A. C.(1996).LA, USA,Department of Computer Science, Tulane University.
13. Csaszar, F. A.(2013).An efficient frontier in organization design: Organizational structure as a determinant of exploration and exploitation.Organization Science,24(4),1083-1101.
14. Da Graça, V. A. C.,Kowaltowski, D.,Petreche, J. R. D.(2007).An evaluation method for school building design at the preliminary phase with optimization of aspects of environmental comfort for the school system of the State São Paulo in Brazil.Building and Environment,42(2),984-999.
15. Daniel, T. D.,Moncef, K.(2010).Genetic-algorithm based approach to optimize building envelope design for residential buildings.Building and Environment,45(7),1574-1581.
16. Dubois, D.,Prade, H.(1978).The mean value of a fuzzy number.Fuzzy Sets and Systems,24,279-300.
17. Evans, G. W.(1984).An overview of techniques for solving mathematical programs.Management Science,30(11),1268-1282.
18. Georgy, M. E.,Chang, L. M.,Zhang, L.(2005).Utility-function model for engineering performance assessment.Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,131(5),558-568.
19. Gong, Y. B.(2012).Methods for triangular fuzzy number multi-attribute decision making with given preference information on alternative.Control and Decision,27(2),281-285.
20. Hwang, C. L.,Yoon, K.(1981).Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications.Berlin, DE:Springer-Verlag.
21. Izuma, K.,Adolphs, R.(2013).Social manipulation of preference in the human brain.Neuron,78(3),563-573.
22. Jiang, A.,Issa, R. R. A.,Malek, M.(2011).Construction project cash flow planning using the pareto optimality efficiency network model.Journal of Civil Engineering and Management,17(4),510-519.
23. Johan, A.(2000).Technical Report of Department of Mechanical Engineering, Linkoping UniversityTechnical Report of Department of Mechanical Engineering, Linkoping University,Linkoping, Sweden:Linkoping University.
24. Kavousian, A.,Rajagopal, R.(2014).Data-driven benchmarking of building energy efficiency utilizing statistical frontier models.Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering,28(1),79-88.
25. Kristin, L. W.,Erik, K. A.(1989).Computations with imprecise parameters in engineering designs: Background and theory.ASME Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in design,111,616-625.
26. Lee, W. S.,Lee, K. P.(2009).Benchmarking the performance of building energy management using data envelopment analysis.Applied Thermal Engineering,29,3269-3273.
27. Liu, M.(2003).Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA,Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois.
28. Mankiw, N. G.(2011).Principles of Economics.OH, USA:South-Western College Pub.
29. Mansoor, H. A.(2007).Utility efficient frontier: An application in the oil and gas industry.Natural Resources Research,16(4),305-312.
30. Markowitz, H. M.(1952).Portfolio selection.The Journal of Finance,7(1),77-91.
31. Marsault, X.(2013).A multiobjective and interactive genetic algorithm to optimize the building form at an early design stages.Proceedings of BS2013: 13th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association,Chambéry, France:
32. McGeorge, J. F.(1988).Design productivity: A quality problem.Journal of Management in Engineering,4(4),350-362.
33. Pandey, V.,Mourelatos, Z. P.(2014).Rules for trajectory updating in decision based design.Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization,49(1),49-57.
34. Park, M.,Ha, S.,Lee, H. S.,Choi, Y. K.,Kim, H.,Han, S.(2013).Lifting demand-based zoning for minimizing worker vertical transportation time in high-rise building construction.Automation in Construction,32,88-95.
35. Ramli, A.,Akasah, Z. A.,Masirin, M. I. M.(2013).Factors contributing building safety and health performance of low cost housing in Malaysia.Journal of Safety Engineering,2(1),1-9.
36. Serag, A.,Ono, S.,Nakayama, S.(2008).Using interactive evolutionary computation to generate creative building designs.Artificial life and Robotics,13(1),246-250.
37. Serban, F.,Stefanescu, V.,Ferrara, M.(2011).Portfolio optimization and building its efficient frontier.Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research,45,125-136.
38. Suga, K.,Kato, S.,Hiyama, K.(2010).Structural analysis of Pareto-optimal solution sets for multi-objective optimization: An application to outer window design problems using multiple objective genetic algorithms.Building and Environment,45(5),1144-1152.
39. Sumrall, W.,Mott, M.(2010).Building models to better understand the importance of cost versus safety in engineering.Science Scope,34(3),45-52.
40. Tang, S. L.,Lee, H. K.,Wong, K.(1997).Safety cost optimization of building projects in Hong Kong.Construction Management and Economics,15(2),177-186.
41. Tavana, M.,Abtahi, A. R.,Khalili-Damghani, K.(2014).A new multi-objective multi-mode model for solving preemptive time–cost–quality trade-off project scheduling problems.Expert Systems with Applications,41(4),1830-1846.
42. Wang, W. K.(2005).A knowledge-based decision support system for measuring the performance of government real estate investment.Expert Systems with Applications,29,901-912.
43. Wei, G. W.,Wang, X. R.(2008).Grey relational analysis method for triangular fuzzy number-based multiple attribute decision making with preference information on alternatives.Systems Engineering and Electronics,30(8),1489-1492.
44. Wu, D.,Yang, Z.,Liang, L.(2006).Using DEA-neural network approach to evaluate branch efficiency of a large Canadian bank.Expert Systems with Applications,31,108-115.
45. Yu, F. W.,Chan, K. T.(2013).Improved energy management of chiller systems with data envelopment analysis.Applied Thermal Engineering,50,309-317.
46. Zekeriya, A.,Yusuf, A.(2010).Optimum topology and shape design of pre-stressed concrete bridge girders using a genetic algorithm.Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization,41,151-162.
47. Zeng, R.,Wang, X.,Di, H.,Jiang, F.,Zhang, Y.(2011).New concepts and approach for developing energy efficient buildings: Ideal specific heat for building internal thermal mass.Energy and Buildings,43,1081-1090.
48. Zou, X. K.,Chan, C. M.,Li, G.,Wang, Q.(2007).Multiobjective optimization for performance-based design of reinforced concrete frames.Journal of Structural Engineering,133(10),1462-1474.
49. 陳清山(2011)。台北市=Taipei，國立臺灣科技大學營建工程系=Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology。
50. 黃世建、鍾立來、簡文郁、葉勇凱、王翊光、余建維、張撼軍、陳永蒼、周德光、許丁友、邱建國、邱聰智(2005)。國家地震工程研究中心研究報告國家地震工程研究中心研究報告,台北市=Taipei:國家地震工程研究中心=National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering。

1. 馮世人,陳清山(2020)。規劃設計階段考量多目標最佳化及規劃偏好之校舍規劃標竿學習。建築學報，112，1-20。