競選總部之類型分析

Type Analysis of Campaign Headquaters

10.3966/101632122015090093005

謝子良(Tzyy-Liang Hsieh)

競選總部 ； 類型 ； 拓樸學 ； 空間數值 ； Campaign Headquarters ； Type ； Topology ； Spatial Values

建築學報

93期（2015 / 09 / 01）

73 - 88

繁體中文

本研究實際調查了36個立法委員候選人之競選總部，並藉由類型學與拓樸學理論分析競選總部之平面空間，將競選總部空間區分成2大類型共9種型態，同時建立28個生成規則，生成其他機能之空間，進而構成競選總部之完整空間組織。此外，本研究透過空間結構圖之數學運算分析，探討空間組織及行為活動的互動情形。研究發現台灣兩大黨候選人競選總部的空間型態有明顯的差異，分析結果另外發現，競選總部採用開放型（Type A）的立法委員當選率遠大於採用管制型（Type B）的立法委員，這現象亦值得未來進一步深入研究。透過此次研究的調查，我們得以了解競選總部之各種特性，並為此特殊類型之建築留下實際記錄，提供未來更深入探討及其他學科提供相關資訊。

This study investigated the campaign headquarters of 36 legislator candidates in Taiwan, analyzing the spatial configuration of campaign headquarters based on typology theory and topology. It divided the campaign headquarters into two major types with 9 kinds of patterns and established 28 generation rules to generate other functions of the space, and thus constituted a complete spatial organization of the campaign headquarters. In addition, through mathematical analysis of spatial configuration, this study explores the interaction between spatial organization and behavioral activities. The results show that spatial patterns of campaign headquarters between the two major political parties in Taiwan are significantly different. It also found that candidates whose campaign headquarters adopted ＂Open Type (Type A)＂ have much greater probability of winning than those who adopted ＂Control Type (Type B)＂. The situation is worth further study in the future. Through the investigation, we were able to understand the various features of the campaign headquarters. The study has also left a recording of this special type of building, which provides information for further study in relevant disciplines in the future.

1. Hillier, B.,Hanson, J.(1984).The Social Logic of Space.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
2. 劉育東譯、Mitchell, W. J.(1995)。建築的設計思考。台北市=Taipei:胡氏圖書=Hu Book Publishing。
3. 蕭寶森譯、Gaarder, J.(1996)。蘇菲的世界。台北市=Taipei:智庫文化=Triumph Book Store。