校園空間中的恐懼因子：恐懼程度與視覺注意力

Proximate Cause of Fear in Campus: Degrees of Fear and Visual Attention

10.3966/101632122016060096003

施景堯(Jing-Yao Shi)；周紓帆(Su-Fan Chou)；鄭佳昆(Chia-Kuen Cheng)

恐懼 ； 瞳位追蹤 ； 空間設計 ； Eye-tracking ； Fear ； Spatial Design

建築學報

96期（2016 / 06 / 30）

37 - 51

繁體中文

恐懼一直是在公共空間中最大的使用限制因子，它可能導致環境體驗、偏好、使用者情緒甚至是生理上的負面影響。為偵測恐懼在校園空間中的具體因素，Nasar 曾使用「散步」實驗作為研究方法，而本研究試圖採取相同的實驗方式，加入運用行動式瞳位追蹤儀（眼動儀）進行實驗以檢視前人的研究結果，並且辨明恐懼因素與視覺注意力的關係。本研究選定散步的路線後對8名受試者進行瞳位追蹤儀的散步實驗並進行簡單的訪談，試圖辨別出恐懼因素、恐懼感與注意力的關係。研究結果顯示恐懼感較低者較有四處觀看的餘裕的結果，符合恐懼感造成迴避行為的特性；也從散步後訪談的各路段恐懼因素上再度得到了與Nasar& Jones(1997)一致的實驗結果，顯示出間接隱匿與退路受阻在夜間校園空間中具有恐懼的效果，並且進一步指出社會監控與熟悉度兩個降低恐懼的因子。本研究建議未來研究於動態空間中操作瞳位追蹤儀應採取短操作時間、多受試者並選擇單一受試環境的策略，以增加實驗操作上的便利性。在實務上，本研究的訪談部分指出了社會監控的重要性，顯示未來規畫設計應更加重視空間上取得社會性輔助的便利性。

Fear has long been the most important usage limitation in public spaces. It might cause avoidance in certain area therefore resulting in low using rate damage recreation experiences resulting in low preference sometimes even affect user's health. Nasar once applied ＂walk＂ as a method of research to record fear factor in time. This study goes the same way but using an eye-tracker in place of the recorder. The purpose is to examine existing results and to study the relationship between fear factors and visual attention. Mobile eye-tracker was used to record the type period and times focus points stopped. The 8 participants were interviewed after the walk to record the degrees of fear and actual fear factor for every section on the way. The researcher looked into these two results together to examine the relationship between fear factor and visual attention. Result shows that the less fearful routes allowed respondents to look around, conforming to the basic theory of fear causing avoidance. Also did we get the same result as Nasar & Jones's experiment on the short interview showing secondary refuge and blocked escape would result in fear in campus at night also showing two more factors: social surveillance and familiarity might reduce fear. This study suggested that eye-tracking study in dynamic space should use short-operation, large sample size and simple setting to improve operating efficiency. As for practical operation, this paper suggested that future design should pay more attention on the space's access to possible social aid.

1. 石豐宇、陳正哲、蔡東波(2012)。都市公共空間犯罪預防理論之初探：以減少機會途徑為研究方向。建築學報，81，91-105。
   連結：
2. 黃崑山(2007)。校園規劃的遠景與機制。建築學報，59，189-202。
   連結：
3. 歐聖榮、柯嘉鈞、許哲瑜(2012)。景觀設計中眺望藏匿理論模式之應用。建築學報，80，111-129。
   連結：
4. 蘇智鋒、黃乃弘、王子熙(2008)。住宅區公共空間配置型態與住宅侵入竊盜犯罪機率分析─英國及台灣之案例研究。建築學報，66，35-60。
   連結：
5. Andrews, M.,Gatersleben, B.(2010).Variations in perceptions of danger, fear and preference in a simulated natural environment.Journal of Environmental Psychology,30(4),473-481.
6. Appleton, J.(1975).The Experience of Landscape.London, UK:Wiley.
7. Armony, J. L.,Dolan, R. J.(2002).Modulation of spatial attention by fear-conditioned stimuli: An event-related FMRI study.Neuropsychologia,40,817-826.
8. Baum, A.(Ed.),Singer, J. E.(Ed.)(1985).Advances in Environmental Psychology, Vol. 5: Methods and Environmental Psychology.NJ, USA:Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Blöbaum, A.,Hunecke, M.(2005).Perceived danger in urban public space: The impacts of physical features and personal factors.Lighting Research and Technology,37(4),465-486.
10. Bradley, B. P.,Mogg, K.,Millar, N.,Bonham-Carter, C.,Fergusson, E.,Jenkins, J.,Parr, M.(1997).Attentional biases for emotional faces.Cognition and Emotion,11(1),25-42.
11. Clamp, P.,Powell, M.(1982).Prospect-refuge theory under test.Landscape Research,7(3),7-8.
12. De Lucio, J. V.,Mohamadian, M.,Ruiz, J. P.,Banayas, J.,Bernaldez, F. G.(1996).Visual landscape exploration as revealed by eye movement tracking.Landscape and Urban Planning,34(2),135-142.
13. Duchowski, A. T.(2002).A breadth-first survey of eye-tracking applications.Behavior Research Methods,34(4),455-470.
14. Gabriel, U.,Greve, W.(2003).The psychology of fear of crime. Conceptual and methodological perspectives.The British Journal of Criminology,43(3),600-614.
15. Geer, J. H.(1965).The development of a scale to measure fear.Behavior Research and Therapy,3(1),45-53.
16. Hagerhall, C. M.(2000).Clustering predictors of landscape preference in the traditional Swedish cultural landscape: Prospect-refuge, mystery age and management.Journal of Environmental Psychology,20(1),83-90.
17. Henderson, J. M.(2003).Human gaze control during real-world scene perception.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,7(11),498-504.
18. Herzog, T. R.,Kropscott, L. S.(2004).Legibility, mystery, and visual access as predictors of preference and perceived danger in forest settings without pathways.Environment and Behavior,36(5),659-677.
19. Herzog, T.,Smith, G. A.(1988).Danger, mystery, and environmental preference.Environment and Behavior,20(3),320-344.
20. Hillier, B.(1996).Cities as movement economies.Urban Design International,1(1),41-60.
21. Jorgensen, L. J.,Ellis, G. D.,Ruddell, E.(2012).Fear perceptions in public parks: Interactions of environmental concealment, the presence of people recreating, and gender.Environment and Behavior,45(7),803-820.
22. Loewen, L. J.,Steel, G. D.,Suedfeld, P.(1993).Perceived safety from crime in the urban environment.Journal of Environmental Psychology,13(4),323-331.
23. Maltz, M. D.,Gordon, A. C.,Friedman, W.(1990).Mapping Crime in Its Community Setting: Event Geography Analysis.NY, USA:Springer-Verlag.
24. Mogg, K.,Bradley, B. P.(1999).Orienting of attention to threatening facial expressions presented under conditions of restricted awareness.Cognition and Emotion,13(6),713-740.
25. Mogg, K.,Mathews, A.,Eysenck, M.(1992).Attentional bias to threat in clinical anxiety states.Cognition and Emotion,6(2),149-159.
26. Nasar, J. L.,Jones, K.(1997).Landscapes of fear and stress.Environment and Behavior,29(3),291-323.
27. Nordh, H.,Caroline, M.,Hagerhall, C. M.,Holmqvist, L.(2013).Tracking restorative components: Patterns in eye movements as a consequence of a restorative rating task.Landscape Research,38(1),1-16.
28. Rapee, R.(1997).Perceived threat and perceived control as predictors of the degree of fear in physical and social situations.Journal of Anxiety Disorders,11(5),455-461.
29. Schaller, M.,Park, J. H.,Mueller, A.(2003).Fear of the dark: Interactive effects of beliefs about danger and ambient darkness on ethnic stereotypes.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,29(5),637-649.
30. Stamps, A. E., III(2005).Enclosure and safety in urban spaces.Environment and Behavior,37(1),102-133.
31. Stokols, D.(Ed.),Altman, I.(Ed.)(1989).Handbook of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 2.NY, USA:John Wiley.
32. Van den Berg, A. E.,terHeijne, M.(2005).Fear versus fascination: An exploration of emotional responses to natural threats.Journal of Environmental Psychology,25(3),261-272.
33. Wilson, E. O.(1984).Biophilia.MA, USA:Harvard University Press.
34. 王彥力(2008)。台中市=Taichung，逢甲大學景觀與遊憩系=Department of Landscape and Recreation, Feng Chia University。
35. 江彥政(2009)。台中市，中興大學園藝學系。
36. 何英齊、李素馨(2000)。應用瞳位追蹤方法建立景觀偏好模式之研究。造園學報，6(1-2)，71-89。
37. 侯錦雄(1985)。景觀知覺與景觀設計。東海學報，26(1)，51-61。
38. 段義孚(2008)。恐懼: 人類生活中無所不在的恐懼感。臺北:國立編譯館。
39. 胡毓權(2012)。台北市=Taipei，國立國防大學政治作戰學院心理系=Department of Psychological and Social Work, Fu Hsing Kang College, National Defense University。
40. 黃乃弘(2002)。台中市=Taichung，逢甲大學建築研究所=Department of Architecture, Feng Chia University。

1. 鄭佳昆,郭怡君(2020)。環境感知危險的影響因子之再檢視－情境與環境隱匿之關係探討。造園景觀學報，24(3)，37-52。