CLD建模引導住宅街區友善環境議題推理與思考之演進

The Evolution of Reasoning and Thinking to the Issue of Friendly Environment of City Residential Street Using the CLD Modeling

10.3966/101632122016090097008

陳美智(Mei-Chih Chen)；張淑貞(Shu-Chen Chang)

因果推理 ； 系統思考 ； 學習實驗室 ； CLD模式 ； 友善環境 ； Causality Reasoning ； System Thinking ； Learning Laboratory ； CLD Model ； Friendly Environment

建築學報

97期（2016 / 09 / 30）

119 - 143

繁體中文

住宅街區友善環境是國際關注適居城市的重要議題，這議題跨越環境、社會、心理和文化等領域，組成多元、複雜，必須從系統觀整合友善環境議題全貌，才能找到滿足多元需求的辦法。環境設計者擅長的直覺思考，確實可快速解決功能單純和空間使用明確的問題，卻不適合處理屬於複雜系統的友善環境議題。系統動態學方法論(System Dynamics, SD)圖像化「因果回饋環路圖(Causal Loops Diagram, CLD)，具有聚焦問題、整合跨領域多元組成議題、引導因果推理等系統思考特質，擅長處理複雜系統議題。CLD 圖像模式非常適合輔助熟悉圖像閱讀的設計者，處理具系統與複雜特質的友善環境議題時，引導從系統觀演進式地進行問題的推理與思考。本文以城市住宅街區友善環境議題為例，藉由SD 學習實驗室(Learning Laboratory)概念，輔助設計者體驗：「直覺」、「因果推理」和「CLD 建模」三階段推理與思考論壇活動的演進過程。從設計者的學習評論結果，發現「因果推理」和「CLD 建模」二階段在引導整合問題全貌、找出關鍵因素和推理思考友善環境策略過程，確實讓他們建立了處理複雜議題之系統思考能力。

A friendly environment of residential street is a universal issue to the livable city, which components are complex and multi-disciplines like environment, sociology, psychology and culture. The approach for solving this issue must integrate its components through a view of system to find ways to satisfy the multi-demands of the city. Designers have clever intuitional thinking to deal with problems with simple functions and the definite usage of space, but this character is not adaptable for solving the issue of a friendly environment of residential street properly. The graphic 'Causal Loops Diagram (CLD)' of System Dynamics (SD) approach has characters with system thinking, which help to focus on the core of problems, integrate key components of issues with multi-disciplines, and lead causality reasoning to issues with characters of system and complexity. Therefore, the CLD model is fit in with designers who are familiar with figure reading, and lead them to deal with and make progress on reasoning and thinking to the complex issues of friendly environment. By way of the 'Learning Laboratory' of SD approach, this study takes the issue of a friendly environment of city residential street as a case to advance the designers' experiences on three evolution stages of reasoning and thinking forum activities, which are ＂intuition＂, ＂causality reasoning＂, and ＂CLD modeling＂. The results of designers' self-evaluation in the learning laboratory reveled that in processes of leading to have a holistic view to problems, find key components, and develop strategies, the reasoning and thinking activities do really help designers to have the capabilities of system thinking on dealing with the complex issues.

1. 王思峰、翁望回、鄭繼聖(2007)。組織發展與策略管理的二重奏：策略形成歷程是什麼。應用心理研究，33，127-173。
   連結：
2. 王思峰、黃家齊、陳加屏(2001)。知識型社會中人力資源規劃之權變因素：實驗室實驗研究。管理評論，20(3)，53-83。
   連結：
3. 翁興利、郭香蘭(2010)。M-learning 與員工工作能力關係之研究：系統動態學之觀點。人力資源管理學報，10(2)，27-51。
   連結：
4. 翁興利、郭香蘭(2010)。M-learning 與員工工作能力關係之研究：系統動態學之觀點。人力資源管理學報，10(2)，27-51。
   連結：
5. 陳映均、林晏州(2014)。都市街道景觀封閉感之研究。都市與計劃，41(1)，99-115。
   連結：
6. 黃家齊、王思峰(2008)。團隊知識轉換能力組合與知識分享、知識創造及創新績效：知識螺旋理論的新觀點驗證。組織與管理，1(1)，39-72。
   連結：
7. 黃幹忠、葉光毅(2008)。行人於台中市一中商圈之路徑選擇行為模式探討。都市與計劃，35(1)，79-98。
   連結：
8. Ventana Systems (2015). Vensim PLE (Version: 6.3)[Computer Software]. MA, USA: Ventana Systems Inc. Retrieved Jul 10, 2015 from http:/vensim.com/free-download/.
9. 盧貝松（2009）。HOME：搶救地球。台北市：五泰影音出版公司。Besson, L., Carot, D., & Arthus-Bertrand, Y. (2009). HOME. Taipei: WUTAI Publishing.
10. Ackoff, R. L.(1994).Systems thinking and thinking systems.System Dynamics Review,10(2-3),175-188.
11. Aramburo, S. A.,Acevedo, J. A. C.,Morales, Y. O.(2012).Laboratory experiments in the system dynamics field.System Dynamics Review,28(1),94-106.
12. Barlas, Y.(1996).Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics.System Dynamics Review,12(3),183-210.
13. Booth Sweeney, L.,Sterman, J.(2007).Thinking about systems: student and teacher conceptions of natural and social systems.System Dynamics Review,23(2-3),285-312.
14. Capra, F.(1994).From the Parts to the Whole: Systems Thinking in Ecology and Education.CA, USA:The Center for Ecoliteracy.
15. Cavaleri, S.,Sterman, J. D.(1997).Towards evaluation of systems thinking interventions: A case study.System Dynamics Review,13(2),171-186.
16. Churchman, C. W.(1984).The Systems Approach.NY, USA:Dell Publishing.
17. Coyle, G.,Exelby, D.(2000).The validation of commercial system dynamics models.System Dynamics Review,16(1),27-41.
18. Coyle, R. G.(1996).System Dynamics Modeling: A Practical Approach.NY, USA:Chapman & Hall.
19. Diehl, E.,Sterman, J. D.(1995).Effects of feedback complexity on dynamic decision making.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,62(2),198-215.
20. Doyle, J. K.,Ford, D. N.(1998).Mental models concepts for system dynamics research.System Dynamics Review,14(1),3-29.
21. Fenton, M.(2005).Battling America's epidemic of physical inactivity: Building more walkable, livable communities.Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior,37(Supplement 2),115-120.
22. Finkle, S. L.,Torp, L. L.(1995).Introductory Documents.IL, USA:The Center for Problem-Based Learning, Illinois Math and Science Academy.
23. Forrester, J. W.(2007).System dynamics: the next 50 years.System Dynamics Review,23(2-3),359-370.
24. Forrester, J. W.(1969).Urban Dynamics.MA, USA:Pegasus Communications.
25. Graham, A. K.,Senge, P. M.(1990).Computer-based case study and learning laboratory projects.System Dynamics Review,6(1),100-105.
26. Gregorian, V.(1993).Education and our divided knowledge.Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society,137(4),605-611.
27. Ibrahim, I.(2016).Livable eco-architecture: Masdar city, Arabian sustainable city. Urban planning and architecture design for sustainable development, UPADSD 14-16 October 2015.Social and Behavioral Sciences,216,46-55.
28. Jacobs, J.(1961).The Death and Life of Great American Cities.NY, USA:The Random House.
29. Jan, C. G.(2003).Policies for developing defense technology in newly industrialized countries: A case study of Taiwan.Technology in Society,25(3),351-368.
30. Jan, T. S.,Jan, C. G.(2000).Designing simulation software to facilitate learning of quantitative system dynamics skills: A case in Taiwan.Journal of the Operational Research Society,51,1409-1419.
31. Khan, S.,Luo, Y.,Ahmad, A.(2009).Analysing complex behaviour of hydrological systems through a system dynamics approach.Environmental Modelling & Software,24(12),1363-1372.
32. Kunc, M.(2008).Using systems thinking to enhance strategy maps.Management Decision,46(5),761-778.
33. Kunc, M.(2012).Teaching strategic thinking using system dynamics: Lessons from a strategic development course.System Dynamics Review,28(1),28-45.
34. Kwan, T.,So, M.(2008).Environmental learning using a problem-based approach in the field: A case study of a Hong Kong school.International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education,17(2),93-113.
35. Lane, D. C.(1992).Modelling as learning: A consultancy methodology for enhancing learning in management teams.European Journal of Operational Research,59(1),64-84.
36. Marsal-Llacuna, M. L.,Colomer-Llinàs, J.,Meléndez-Frigola, J.(2015).Lessons in urban monitoring taken from sustainable and livable cities to better address the Smart Cities initiative.Technological Forecasting & Social Change,90,611-622.
37. Martinez-Moyano, I. J.,Richardson, G. P.(2013).Best practices in system dynamics modeling.System Dynamics Review,29(2),102-123.
38. Morecroft, J. D. W.(1985).Rationality in the analysis of behavioral simulation models.Management Science,31(7),900-915.
39. Morecroft, J. D. W.(2007).Strategic Modelling and Business Dynamics: A Feedback Systems Approach.London, UK:John Wiley & Sons.
40. Morgan, G.(1983).Rethinking corporate strategy: A cybernetic perspective.Human Relations,36(4),345-360.
41. Nuhoğlu, H.(2010).The effect of the system dynamics approach on understanding causal relationship skills in science education.Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences,2,3614-3618.
42. O'Brien, F.(Ed.),Dyson, R. G.(Ed.)(2007).Supporting Strategy: Frameworks, Methods and Models.Chichester, UK:Wiley.
43. Qudrat-Ullah, H.(2010).Perceptions of the effectiveness of system dynamics-based interactive learning environments: An empirical study.Computers & Education,55,1277-1286.
44. Richmond, B.(1994).Systems thinking/system dynamics: Let's just get on with it.System Dynamics Review,10(2-3),135-157.
45. Roberts, E. B.(Ed.)(1978).Managerial Applications of System Dynamics.Cambridge, MA, USA:MIT Press.
46. Rosenthal, A. T.(2003).Teaching systems thinking and practice through environmental art.Ethics & The Environment,8(1),153-168.
47. Säumel, I.,Weber, F.,Kowarik, I.(2016).Toward livable and healthy urban streets: Roadside vegetation provides ecosystem services where people live and move.Environmental Science & Policy,62,24-33.
48. Senge, P. M.(1992).The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization.Sydney, AU:Random House.
49. Senge, P. M.,Cambron-McCabe, N.,Lucas, T.,Smith, B.,Dutton, J.(2012).Schools That Learn: A Fifth Discipline Fieldbook for Educators, Parents, and Everyone Who Cares about Education.NY, USA:Bantam Dell Publishing Group.
50. Senge, P. M.,Kliener, A.,Roberts, C.,Ross, R. B.,Smith, B.(1994).The Fifth Discipline Field book: Strategies and Tools for Building a Learning Organization.NY, USA:Bantam Dell Pub Group.
51. Southworth, M.(2005).Designing the walkable city.Journal of Urban Planning and Development,131(4),246-257.
52. Sterman, J. D.(1994).Learning in and around complex systems.System Dynamics Review,10(2-3),291-323.
53. Sterman, J. D.(2000).Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World.MA, USA:Irwin McGraw-Hill.
54. Thurston, W. P.(1994).On proof and progress in mathematics.Bulletin (New Series) of the American Mathematical Society,30(2),161-177.
55. 王友龍(2012)。會圖解思考的人最厲害。台北市=Taiwan, Taipei:臉譜出版／城邦文化=Faces Publishing。
56. 王承豪譯、O'Connor, J.、McDermott, I.(1999)。系統思考實用手冊。新北市=New Taipei, Taiwan:世茂出版社=SHI-MAO Publishing。
57. 王思峰(1994)。動態複雜案例之處方性實驗研究─管理學習實驗室、系統思考、績效與學習不對稱。中山管理評論，2(3)，97-122。
58. 王思峰(1994)。高雄市=Kaohsiung，國立中山大學企業管理研究所=Department of Information Management, National Sun Yat-Sen University。
59. 李國偉(2000)。證明的流變：一個數學哲學與數學史的綜合觀察。臺灣哲學研究，3，1-22。
60. 汪維揚(2001)。高雄市=Kaohsiung，國立中山大學資訊管理學系研究所=Department of Information Management, National Sun Yat-sen University。
61. 林肇志(2010)。台南市=Tainan，國立成功大學都市計劃研究所=Department of Urban Planning, National Cheng Kung University。
62. 高一中譯、Meadows, D.、Randers, J.、Meadows, D.(2007)。成長的極限：三十週年最新增訂版。台北市:臉譜出版社。
63. 屠益民(1996)。國科會專題研究計畫報告國科會專題研究計畫報告,台北市=Taiwan, Taipei:行政院國家科學委員會=Taiwan Ministry of Science and Science and Technology of Republic of China。
64. 陶在樸(1999)。系統動態學―直擊第五項修鍊奧秘。台北市=Taiwan, Taipei:五南圖書出版股份有限公司=Wunan Publishing。
65. 詹秋貴(2000)。新竹市=Hsinchu，國立交通大學經營管理研究所=Institute of Business and Management, National Chiao Tung University。
66. 漢寶德(2012)。築人間―漢寶德回憶錄。台北市=Taipei:天下遠見出版股份有限公司=Global Views - Commonwealth Publishing。
67. 齊若蘭譯、Gore, A.(2013)。驅動大未來：牽動全球變遷的六個革命性巨變。台北市=Taipei:天下文化出版社=Global Views - Commonwealth Publishing。
68. 蔡雅泰(2006)。高雄市=Kaohsiung，國立高雄師範大學教育學系=Department of Education, National Kaohsiung Normal University。
69. 謝長宏(1987)。系統動態學－理論、方法與應用。台北市=Taipei:中興管理顧問公司=Zhong Xing Management。