题名

台灣教學醫院急診室除污空間動線與設備系統規劃之研究

并列篇名

The Study for the Decontamination Area Plan and Equipment System of Taiwan Teaching Hospital Emergency Department

DOI

10.3966/101632122017060100002

作者

邵詩媛(Shih-Yuan Shao);蘇鴻奇(Hung-Chi Su);郭建源(Chien-YuanKuo);曾俊達(Chun-Ta Tzeng)

关键词

醫院建築 ; 急診除污室 ; 空間規劃 ; Hospital Architecture ; Decontamination Room ; Space Planning

期刊名称

建築學報

卷期/出版年月

100期(2017 / 06 / 30)

页次

17 - 33

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究針對台灣教學級醫院急診除污空間,提出設置規劃要素之建議。研究以毒性化學災變分析與國內外相關文獻為基礎,歸納出14項重要規劃因素並設計研究問卷,發放國內教學醫院急診室與工務室主任。研究過程,以雙樣本t檢定分析受訪者對規劃要素意見之看法,並以卡方檢定檢視受訪者對未來規劃方向意見之異同。研究發現,急診室設有除污空間者達66.3%,兩組問卷受訪者意見一致性具顯著水準。其中「獨立入口」、「有污水排水系統」、「獨立廢水儲存槽」三項因子,不論為室內除污室或戶外除污區皆為重要規劃要素。問卷之量表信度,Cronbach α值高於0.7,研究結果可提供台灣醫院建築界參考,並作為醫院設置標準之依據。

英文摘要

This study based on toxic chemical analysis and literature research intends to provide suggestions for hospital emergency decontamination space planning. Surveying 120 teaching hospitals emergency and affairs department directors in Taiwan, the study found that the 66.3% teaching hospitals have set up the decontamination room. The respondents' views about two samples are consistent with 95% significant level."The separate entrance", "sewage drainage system", and "independent waste deposit sump" are the most important factors and the Cronbach αvalue is higher than 0.7. These results can provide references and recommendations for the hospital and establish the guideline for the architecture.

主题分类 工程學 > 土木與建築工程
参考文献
  1. 勞動部職業安全衛生署(2015)。GHS 化學品全球調和制度,CCB 化學品分級管理。引用於2015 年12月2 日, 取自http://ghs.osha.gov.tw/frontpage/index.html。Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Ministry of Labor (2015). GHS and CCB (Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals, Chemical Control Banding). Retrieved Dec. 2, 2015 from http://ghs.osha.gov.tw/frontpage/index.html。
  2. 樊國恕,蘇昭郎,黃詩倩,李沁妍,黃俊宏(2008)。毒化災風險分析與決策支援系統之研究。引用於2008 年12 月16 日,取自http://ncdr.nat.gov.tw/。Fan, K. S., Su, J. L., Huang, S. C., Ho, Y. T., Teng, M. C., Wu, C. C., & Huang, C. H. (2008). Risk Analysis and Decision Support System of Toxic Hazard. Retrieved Dec. 16, 2008 from http://ncdr.nat.gov.tw/.
  3. Koenig, K. L.,Boatright, C. J.,Hancock, J. A.,Denny, F. J.,Teeter, D. S.,Kalin, C. A.,Schultz, C. H.(2008).Health care facility-based decontamination of victims exposed to chemical, biological and radiological materials.American Journal of Emergency Medicine,26(1),71-80.
  4. Nunnally, J. C.,Bernstein, I. H.(1994).Psychometric theory.NY, USA:McGraw-Hill.
  5. Tan, G. A.,Fitzgerald, M. C. B.(2002).Chemical-biological-radiology (CBR) response: A template for hospital emergency departments.Medical Journal of Australia,177(4),196-199.
  6. Timm, N.,Reeves, S.(2007).A mass casualty incident involving children and chemical decontamination.Disaster Management & Response,5(2),49-55.
  7. Wetter, D. C.,Daniell, W. E.,Treser, C. D.(2001).Preparedness for victims of chemical or biological terrorism.American Journal of Public Health,91(5),710-716.
  8. Williams, J.,Walter, D.,Challen, K.(2007).Preparedness of emergency departments in northwest England for managing chemical incidents: A structured interview survey.BMC Emergency Medicine,7,20.
  9. 石富元(2010)。毒化災的緊急醫療處置原則。醫療品質雜誌,4(4),4-7。
  10. 李偉強(2012)。由醫務管理角度看醫院實證設計的發展。醫療品質雜誌,6(6),4-9。
  11. 唐嘉蓮、廖光裕、洪肇嘉(2011)。高科技產業化學危害除污及防護之探討。2011 區域與環境資源永續發展研討會論文集,台北市:
  12. 黃英傑、石富元、顏慕庸(2005)。醫院對核生化恐怖攻擊傷患處置準備度調查。中華民國急救加護醫學會雜誌,16(3),107-119。
被引用次数
  1. (2024)。區域醫院啟動大量傷患之經歷與探討。醫學與健康期刊,13(3),99-109。