推動室內設計技師高考之策略研究

Research on the Strategy of Promoting the Senior Examination of Professional Interior Design Engineers

10.3966/101632122017060100005

呂文堯(Wen-Yao Lu)；王維歆(Wei-Xin Wang)；郭倩彣(Chien-Wen Kuo)；吳霽哲(Ji-Jhe Wu)；李淑媚(Shu-Mei Lee)

室內設計技師 ； 層級分析法 ； 偏好順序評價法 ； 模糊偏好順序評價法 ； 模糊德菲法 ； Professional Interior Design Engineers ； AHP ； TOPSIS ； Fuzzy TOPSIS ； Fuzzy Delphi Method

建築學報

100期（2017 / 06 / 30）

77 - 94

繁體中文

本研究針對推動室內設計技師高考，尋求目前應積極努力改進之事項並尋求策略之優先順序。19項與推動室內設計技師高考相關之SWOT因素中，有17項SWOT因素藉由模糊德菲法，取得專家之共識。本研究針對層級分析法(AHP)所得權重較高及專家評分較低之國內專業定位不明確、室內設計與裝修人員素質參差不齊、建築師既有室內設計業務之排擠效應、室內裝修管理辦法之法律位階太低及缺乏整體規劃與完善之制度等五項SWOT因素，列為推動室內設計技師高考須優先改進之項目。針對推動室內設計技師高考之7個策略，採用偏好順序評價法(TOPSIS)及模糊偏好順序評價法(Fuzzy TOPSIS)進行擇優排名。推動室內設計技師高考中排名第1之策略為，訂立合適之法律，明訂室設、建築、土木之專業分工事項，降低三者之排擠效應；排名第2之策略為提升室內裝修管理辦法之法律位階，保障業主與業者之權益。

This research aims to look for items that should be significantly improved and determine the strategies priority of promoting the senior examination of professional interior design engineers. Among 19 SWOT factors associated with the promoting the senior examination of professional interior design engineers, there are 17 SWOT factors reaching consensus by fuzzy Delphi method. The weightings and scores of SWOT factors will be investigated through expert questionnaires and analyzed by the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). The improvement should be focused on 5 SWOT factors with higher weightings and lower scores as follows: Unclear domestic professional orientation, Uneven quality of decorators and interior designers, Exclusion effect of existing interior design business of architect, Low legal hierarchy of Regulations of Interior Decoration, and Lack of overall planning and complete system. Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Fuzzy TOPSIS are used to preference ranking of 7 strategies of promoting the senior examination of professional interior design engineers. The first strategy is to build up an appropriate law to distinguish division of professional work of interior design, architecture, and civil engineering in order to lower exclusion effect; the second strategy is to raise legal hierarchy of Regulations of Interior Decoration in order to protect the rights of proprietors and practitioners.

1. 宋慶財、李雪香(2011)。從SWOT 矩陣分析法探討傳統民居永續發展之可行性─以五溝村客家伙房民宿為例。設計學研究，特刊=Special Issue，111-132。
   連結：
2. 葉晉嘉、翁興利、吳濟華(2007)。德菲法與模糊德菲法之比較研究。調查研究─方法與應用，21，31-58。
   連結：
3. Alptekin, N.(2013).Integration of SWOT analysis and TOPSIS method in strategic decision making process.The Macrotheme Review,2(7),1-8.
4. Ashrafzadeh, M.,Rafiei, F. M.,Isfahani, N. M.,Zare, Z.(2012).Application of fuzzy TOPSIS method for the selection of warehouse location: A case study.Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business,3(9),655-671.
5. Bas, E.(2013).The integrated framework for analysis of electricity supply chain using an integrated SWOT-fuzzy TOPSIS methodology combined with AHP: The case for Turkey.Electrical Power and Energy Systems,44,897-907.
6. Chen, C. T.(2000).Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment.Fuzzy Sets and Systems,114,1-9.
7. Ertuğrul, İ.,Karakaşoğlu, N.(2008).Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection.International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,39,783-795.
8. Ghorbani, M.,Velayati, R.,Ghorbani, M. M.(2011).Using fuzzy TOPSIS to determine strategy priorities by SWOT analysis.International Conference on Financial Management and Economics, IDPEDR
9. Hsu, Y. L.,Lee, C. H.,Kreng, V. B.(2010).The application of fuzzy Delphi method and fuzzy AHP in lubricant regenerative technology selection.Expert System with Application,37,419-425.
10. Lee, C. C.,Chiang, C.,Chen, C. T.(2012).An evaluation model of e-service quality by applying hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS method.International Journal of Electronic Business Management,10(1),38-49.
11. Lee, T. H.,Liu, R. T.(2011).Strategy formulation for the recreational areas of Central Taiwan: An application of SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) analysis.Journal of Hospitality Management and Tourism,2(3),38-47.
12. Liu, W. K.(2013).Application of the fuzzy Delphi method and the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for the managerial competence of multinational corporation executives.International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and, e-Learning,3(4),313-317.
13. Saaty, T. L.(1980).The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation.NY, USA:McGraw Hill.
14. Tavana, M.,Yousefpoor, N.(2012).A hybrid strategic development and prioritization model for information and communication technology enhancement.International Journal of Operations Research and Information Systems,3(4),19-40.
15. Weihrich, H.(1982).The TOWS matrix- A tool for situational analysis.Long Range Planning,15(2),54-66.
16. Yüksel, İ.(2012).An integrated approach with group decision-making for strategy selection in SWOT analysis.International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences,2(11),134-161.
17. Zadeh, L. A.(1965).Fuzzy sets.Information and Control,8(3),338-353.
18. 王伶芳(2014)。室內設計專業訓練與教育。台灣室內設計，11，12-19。
19. 王和源、蔡志榮(2011)。應用Delphi 和AHP 方法評估漁港轉型遊艇港適宜性之研究─以高雄市漁港為例。技術學刊，26(2)，87-94。
20. 柯于璋(2008)。土地使用減災工具之政策規劃可行性評估：模糊德菲層級法之應用。行政暨政策學報，47，57-90。
21. 畢威寧(2005)。結合AHP 與TOPSIS 法於供應商績效評估之研究。科學與工程技術期刊，1(1)，75-83。
22. 莊修田(2002)。中華民國國科會專題研究報告中華民國國科會專題研究報告,台北市=Taipei:中華民國國家科學委員會=National Science Council of the Republic of China。
23. 莊修田(2013)。,台北市=Taipei:中華民國室內設計裝修商業同業公會全國聯合會=China Interior Design Decoration Business Association National Federation。
24. 劉時泳、陳子淳、劉懿瑾(2013)。,台北市=Taipei:中華民國室內設計裝修商業同業公會全國聯合會=China Interior Design Decoration Business Association National Federation。
25. 蘇振綱、黃躍雯、江玲穎(2010)。國家公園永續性評鑑之研究。國家公園學報，20(4)，1-22。

1. 蔡錦明、陳鼎周、郭財明、呂文堯(2019)。專業經理人之評選－以室內設計裝修業為例。建築學報，108，1-17。
2. 陳逸聰(2020)。室內設計職場與設計實務教學之行動研究。國際數位媒體設計學刊，12(1)，60-72。
3. (2024)。多準則群體決策法在室內裝修服務之應用研究。建築學報，128，1-18。