题名

室內設計之新評分方法

并列篇名

A New Assessment Method of the Interior Design

DOI

10.3966/101632122018030103001

作者

呂文堯(Wen-Yao Lu)；王維歆(Wei-Xin Wang)；郭倩彣(Chien-Wen Kuo)；林敏哲(Ming-Che Lin)

关键词

模糊偏好順序評價法 ； 層級分析法 ； 偏好順序評價法 ； 模糊德菲法 ； Fuzzy TOPSIS ； Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) ； TOPSIS ； Fuzzy Delphi Method

期刊名称

建築學報

卷期/出版年月

103期（2018 / 03 / 30）

页次

1 - 15

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本文採用模糊偏好順序評價法(Fuzzy TOPSIS)及層級分析法(AHP)結合偏好順序評價法(TOPSIS)來進行室內設計評分，期望能建立一套客觀的室內設計新評分方法。本研究先由現有的參考文獻中取得6個室內設計評分準則。再透過專家問卷結果並藉由模糊德菲法，刪除其中一個未通過篩選門檻之評分準則。研究結果顯示，Fuzzy TOPSIS或AHP結合TOPSIS 皆可得到客觀之評分結果。Fuzzy TOPSIS之分析程序較AHP結合TOPSIS複雜，然而Fuzzy TOPSIS之問卷調查執行方式及操作過程則較AHP結合TOPSIS簡單。
英文摘要

This study proposes the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) integrated TOPSIS (Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution) as well as Fuzzy TOPSIS to assess the interior design diagrams. Six criteria to assess the interior design diagram are obtained firstly from the available references. One criterion is deleted using the Fuzzy Delphi Method through the results of experts' questionnaires. The present study indicates that the rankings order of interior design diagram assessment can be determined objectively by either the AHP integrated TOPSIS or the Fuzzy TOPSIS. The analysis procedure of Fuzzy TOPSIS is more complicate than that of AHP integrated TOPSIS. However, the work of experts' questionnaires of Fuzzy TOPSIS is much easier than those of AHP integrated TOPSIS.
主题分类 工程學 > 土木與建築工程
参考文献
  1. 第二屆特力家居盃全國室內設計競圖大賽辦法（2013）。http://www.cycu-iidc.org/decorhouse/。The competition rule of the I-HOUSE interior design competition cup national competition held in Taiwan (2013). Accessed July 10. http://www.cycu-iidc.org/decorhouse/.
  2. Ashrafzadeh, M.,Rafiei, F. M.,Isfahani, N. M.,Zare, Z.(2012).Application of fuzzy TOPSIS method for the selection of warehouse location: A case study.Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business,3(9),655-671.
  3. Chen, C. T.(2000).Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment.Fuzzy Sets and Systems,114,1-9.
  4. Ertuğrul, İ.,Karakaşoğlu, N.(2008).Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection.International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,39,783-795.
  5. Hsu, Y. L.,Lee, C. H.,Kreng, V. B.(2010).The application of fuzzy Delphi method and fuzzy AHP in lubricant regenerative technology selection.Expert System with Application,37,419-425.
  6. Hwang, C. L.,Yoon, K.(1981).Multiple Attributes Decision Making Method and Application.Berlin Heidelberg:Springer.
  7. Liu, W. K.(2013).Application of the fuzzy Delphi method and the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for the managerial competence of multinational corporation executives.International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and, e-Learning,3(4),313-317.
  8. Saaty, T. L.(1980).The Analytic Hierarchy Process.New York, USA:McGraw-Hill.
  9. Yüksel, İ.(2012).An integrated approach with group decision-making for strategy selection in SWOT analysis.International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences,2(11),134-161.
  10. Zadeh, L. A.(1965).Fuzzy sets.Information and Control,8,338-353.
  11. 王紀鯤(1999)。建築教育中的評圖制度。建築學報，30，93-112。
  12. 呂文堯、陳葶栩、張震鐘(2015)。以TOPSIS法評估室內設計圖。技術學刊，30(3)，151-161。
  13. 畢威寧(2005)。結合AHP與TOPSIS法於供應商績效評估之研究。科學與工程技術期刊，1(1)，75-83。
  14. 第六屆夆禾盃全國室內設計競圖比賽（2013）。活動辦法簡章http://design.apex.tw/designaward/2013/activ04.html。The competition rule of the Fenghenational interior design competition cup (2013).http://design.apex.tw/designaward/2013/activ04.html.
被引用次数
  1. 蔡錦明、陳鼎周、郭財明、呂文堯(2019)。專業經理人之評選－以室內設計裝修業為例。建築學報，108，1-17。
  2. 李東明(2021)。多準則群體決策法在評選室內設計師之應用。設計學報，26(1)，39-57。
  3. (2024)。多準則群體決策法在室內裝修服務之應用研究。建築學報，128，1-18。
print cancel