以暫時性開放空間探討環境公益性－以臺北好好看系列二為例

Study on Environmental Public Interest Based on Temporary Open Space: Case Study of Taipei Beautiful II Plan

10.3966/101632122018030103004

王中逸(Chung-Yi Wang)；邱英浩(Yin-Hao Chiu)；張至淵(Chih-Yuan Chang)

容積獎勵 ； 環境公益性 ； 差異性分析 ； 重要-滿意程度分析法(IPA) ； Zoning Bonus ； Public Interest of Environment ； Analysis of Differences ； Importance-Performance Analysis(IPA)

建築學報

103期（2018 / 03 / 30）

51 - 67

繁體中文

臺灣的容積獎勵制度多元，各項制度訂定的主要目的是提高私部門投入開發意願，並提升公部門取得公共設施的效率，然各項制度施行至今已逾三十餘年，由於土地價值差異、環境容受力的衝擊、及後續管理維護不易，使容積獎勵制度未臻解決問題，卻先衍生許多環境負面的問題。本研究藉由國內外相關容積獎勵研究及文獻，歸納後研提環境公益性指標，以容受力、開放性、經濟效益、民眾觀感、社會成本及必要性等六項指標，針對專家學者及政府從業人員進行問卷調查，並藉由重要性-表現績效分析法(IPA)分析各指標的重要性及滿意度成果，再以「臺北好好看系列二」計畫為案例，調查民眾滿意度問卷，瞭解民眾對於容積獎勵制度之觀感，比較專家學者與民眾對於容積獎勵執行成果之差異性，並透過深度訪談瞭解該計畫推動過程與現行容積獎勵制度所遭遇之困難等。經本研究發現，臺灣在容積獎勵制度上仍有一些課題與待解決問題，包含容積獎勵制度應提高法令位階、獎勵條件應符合環境公益性、因地制宜的差異性、訂定額度上限及提出檢驗容積獎勵後續執行管理之機制等。期望藉由研究成果提供政府後續制訂容積獎勵制度能在兼具環境公益性與開發利益下，達成政策的預期目標，落實地區環境品質提升的目的。

There are numerous types of bulk reward system in Taiwan. The main purpose is to increase the willingness of the private sector to invest and ensure the public sector obtaining the infrastructure efficiently. The bulk reward system has been in place for over 30 years, however, many problemsremain because the different land values, the increasing carrying capalcity of the environment and the unsatisfactory post-maintenance efforts which induce multiple negative environmental effects. After referring relevant local and foreign literature on bulk rewards, six environmental public interest indicators were developed as follows: carrying capacity, openness, economic benefits, public perception, social cost, and necessity. Questionnaires were used to survey the views of the experts, scholars and public servants. The importance of satisfaction levels toward each indicator was analyzed using Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA). Furthermore, questionnaires were conducted with the public at the three sites of Taipei Beautiful II Plan to survey the public perceptions toward the reward system. In-depth interviews were carried on to discern the obstacles encountered in implementing the plan and the existing bulk reward system. This study concluded that there are still some problems in bulk reward system of Taiwan, as to raise the system’s decree level, the reward conditions should meet the environmental public interests, to reach the flexible adaptations of various local conditions, as well as to set a upper reward quota limit and to create a mechanism monitoring the implementation outcome. It is suggested that the government can use the study findings to make the bulk reward system be able to enhance environmental public interest and meet the policy goal and the environmental quality can be improved.

1. Adair, A.,Berry, J.,McGreal, S.,Deddis, B.,Hirst, S.(1999).Evaluation of investor behaviour in urban regeneration.Urban Studies,36(12),2031-2045.
2. Breg, B. L.(2007).Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Science.Long Beach:
3. Getzels, J.,Jaffe, M. S.(1988).Zoning bonuses in central cities.American Planning Association,410,1-26.
4. Sampson, S. E.,Showalter, M. J.(1999).The performance-importance response function: Observations and implications.Service Industries Journal,19(3),1-25.
5. Schmidt, S.,Nemeth, J.,Botsford, E.(2011).The evolution of privately owned public spaces in New York City.Urban Design International,16(4),270-284.
6. Varna, G.,Tiesdell, S.(2010).Assessing the publicness of public space: The star model of publicness.Journal of Urban Design,15(4),575-598.
7. Yoon, H.,Srinivasan, S.(2015).Are They Well Situated? Spatial Analysis of Privately Owned Public Space, Manhattan, New York City.Urban Affairs Review,51(3),358-380.
8. 內政部營建署城鄉發展分署(2014)。,台北:內政部營建署。
9. 王雲東(2012)。社會研究方法：量化與質性取向及其應用。台北=Taipei:社會學=sociology。
10. 林慧敏(1993)。社會成本問題之研究。大同商專學報，81-117。
11. 國家發展委員會(2006)。國家發展委員會(2006)。公共建設計畫經濟效益評估及財務計畫。National Development Council (2006). Public Construction Design Painting Economic Evaluation and Financial Plan.。
12. 陳怡蓁(2012)。新北市=New Taipei City，國立臺北大學不動產與城鄉規劃學系=Department of Real Estate and Built Environment National Taipei University。
13. 黃玉芸(2015)。臺北市=Taipei City，國立臺灣科技大學建築系=Department of Architecture, Taipei Tech。
14. 臺北市政府(2011)。臺北市年鑑 (2010)。
15. 臺北市政府(2009)。臺北市政府 (2009)。「臺北好好看」成果文宣。Taipei City Government. (2009). Taipei Beautiful.。
16. 臺北市政府都市發展局(2009)。2009 年臺北市都市發展年報。
17. 潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究─理論與應用。台北=Taipei:心理=Psychological。
18. 蔡仁毅(2004)。都市地區開放空間之設計及相關獎勵措施之探討。空間雜誌，45，44-53。
19. 謝文娟(2004)。臺南市=Tainan City，國立成功大學都市計畫學系=Department of Urban Planning, National Cheng Kung University。

1. 羅煊,謝一鋒,李得全(2021)。都市更新容積獎勵制度之謬誤與導正－以臺北市為例。都市與計劃，48(3)，283-309。
2. 鄭人豪,高㬏婈,林建元(2020)。臺北市獎勵廢棄建物拆除改作暫時性公共開放空間之政策評估。都市與計劃，47(3)，219-242。