亮度評估模型應用於辦公室TAL照明之空間明亮感與節能研究

Luminance Evaluation Model Applied to Office TAL Lighting for Space Brightness Evaluation and Energy Saving

10.3966/101632122018060104004

周鼎金(Ding-Chin Chou)；周澤亞(Tse-Ya Chou)；林鈺琪(Yu-Chi Lin)；謝惠羽(Hui-Yu Hsieh)

辦公室照明 ； TAL照明 ； 空間亮度評價指標 ； 空間明亮感 ； 節能 ； Office lighting ； TAL lighting ； Luminance Evaluation Index ； Space brightness ； energy conservation

建築學報

104期（2018 / 06 / 30）

53 - 71

繁體中文

辦公室照明常採用全般照明均勻照亮空間，此種照明形式易造成能源過量消耗。在節能需求下，TAL照明形式已行之有年，雖具節能效果卻未能大量應用的原因，來自於過去對於空間陰暗的負面認知與誤解；欲在空間中感覺空間明亮，需透過具直觀性之視覺感受，現行研究多以受測者主觀評價進行探討，僅依靠水平面的照度亦難以呈現空間明亮感受。故本研究擬以松下電工提出之空間亮度評價指標為基礎應用於TAL照明設計，以DIALux照明設計軟體模擬，藉由相關因子分別探討TAL之最佳空間明亮感型式以及與節能之關連性。透過研究發現，本研究於設計階段在環境照明與作業面照明之照度分配上，透過田口法與SN比值進行分析，符合空間明亮感標準且照明用電密度低之最佳組合為環境照明200 lux搭配作業面照明300 lux，環境照明採用半間接照明將有助於提升空間明亮感並具節能功效。

Although commonly used to evenly illuminate spaces in offices, general lighting is relatively energy consuming. For many years, the task and ambient lighting (TAL) method has been implemented to meet energy-saving requirements; however, it was not widely applied in the past due to negative perceptions and misunderstandings regarding dark spaces. Therefore, this study adopted the space brightness index proposed by Panasonic and applied the lighting design software DIALux to perform simulation experiments. The methods used in this study can be applied during the design stage for estimating the perception of spatial brightness. In TAL design, The Taguchi method and signal-to-noise ratio analysis indicated that when applying the TAL method, the most suitable illuminance values are 200 and 300 lux for ambient and task lighting, respectively. Semi-indirect lighting illuminance distribution for ambient lighting enhances the perception of spatial brightness and increases energy saving.

1. 謝明燁、陳昭宇(2011)。室內照明之照度分佈形式對空間印象的影響。建築學報，75，81-98。
   連結：
2. Benya, J.,Heschong, L.,McGowan, T.,Miller, N.,Rubinstein, F.(2001).Advanced Lighting Guidelines 2001 Edition. New Buildings Institute, Inc..Journal of Illuminating Engineering Society of North America,8(3),161-180.
3. Boyce, R. P.(2003).Human Factors in Lighting.London, UK:Taylor and Francis.
4. Chraibi, S.,Crommentuijn, L.,van Loenen, E.,Rosemann, A.(2017).Influence of wall luminance and uniformity on preferred task illuminance.Building and Environment,117,24-35.
5. Chraibi, S.,Lashina, T.,Shrubsole, P.,Aries, M.,van Loenen, E.,Rosemann, A.(2016).Satisfying light conditions: A field study on perception of consensus.Building and Environment,105,116-127.
6. CIE(2002).ISO/CIE 8995-1:2002 Lighting of indoor work places-Part 1: Indoor.:International Organization for Standardization.
7. Dixon, C.(1991).The Shape of space : office spacesn.New York, USA:Van Nostrand Reinhold.
8. Eley, C.,Tolen, T. M.,Benya, J. R.,Rubinstein, F.,Verderber, R.(1993).Advanced lighting guidelines: 1993. Final report.San Francisco, CA, US:Eley Associates.
9. Energimyndighet Statens(2011).,Eskilstuna, Sweden:Statens Energimyndighet.
10. IESNA(2000).IESNA LIGHTING HANDBOOK.New York:Illuminating Engineering Society of North America.
11. Ishii, H.,Kanagawa, H.,Shimamura, Y.,Uchiyam, K.,Miyagi, K.,Obayashi, F.,Shimoda, H.(2016).Intellectual productivity under task ambient lighting.Lighting Research & Technology,16(1)
12. LEED (2018). BD+C: New Construction | v4-LEED v4. Retrieved Apr 20, 2018 from https://new.usgbc.org/leed
13. Manav, B.(2007).An experimental study on the appraisal of the visual environment at offices in relation to colour temperature and illuminance.Building and Environment,2(42),979-983.
14. Newsham, G.,Veitch, J.,Arsenault, C.,Duval, C.(2004).Effect of Dimming Control on Office Worker Satisfaction and Performance.IESNA Conference,Tampa, Florida:
15. Ooyen, M. V.,Weijgert, J. V. D.,Begeman, S.(1987).Preferred luminances in offices.Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society,152-156.
16. Panasonic (2013). Panasonic. JAPAN. Retrieved Mar 20, 2013 from http://www2.panasonic.biz/es/lighting/plam/knowledge/feu.html
17. Panasonic (2016). Office Feu recommended value. Retrieved Dec 1, 2016 from http://www2.panasonic.biz/es/lighting/plam/knowledge/feu/office-2.html
18. Roisin.,B.,Bodart, M.,Deneyer, A.,Herdt, P. D.(2008).Lighting energy savings in offices using different control systems and their real consumption.Energy and Buildings,40(4),514-523.
19. Ryckaert, W. R.,Lootens, C.,Geldof, J.,Hanselaer, P.(2010).Criteria for energy efficient lighting in buildings.Energy and Buildings,42,341-347.
20. Santamouris, M.,Dascalaki, E.(2002).Passive retrofitting of office buildings to improve their energy performance and Indoor Environment: the OFFICE project.Building and Environment,6(37),575-578.
21. Tiller, D. K.,Veitch, J. A.(1995).Perceived room brightness: Pilot study on the effect of luminance distribution.Lighting Research & Technology,27(2),93-101.
22. Touw, L. M. C.(1951).Preferred brightness ratio of task and its immediate surroundings.Proceedings of the CIE 12th Session,Austria:
23. Williams, A.,Atkinson, B.,Garbesi, K.,Page, E.,Rubinstein, F.(2012).Lighting Controls in Commercial Buildings.The Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society,8(3)
24. ソフトユニオン、洪淳瀅譯(2014)。圖解環保住宅。臺北市=Taipei:英屬蓋曼群島商家庭傳媒股份有限公司城邦分公司=Yi Doctor Culture Co., Ltd.。
25. 小谷朋子、中村芳樹、金谷末子、三木保弘(2012)。タスク・アンビエント照明方式を用いたオフィス照明の明るさ感向上に関する研究。照明学会誌，699-710。
26. 山口秀樹、篠田博之(2007)。色モード境界輝度による空間の明るさ感評価。日本學會誌，91(5)，266-271。
27. 山本果奈、行生明石(2014)。タスク・アンビエント照明における作業環境の質の向上。日本建築学会大会学術講演梗概集，日本=Japan:
28. 中華民國國家標準CNS 12112 (2012)。室內工作場所照明標準。台灣：經濟部標準檢驗局。CNS 12112 Z1044 (2012). Lighting of indoor work places.Taiwan: Bureau of Standards Metrology and Inspection M.O.E.A.
29. 內政部建築研究所(2015)。綠建築評估手冊。臺灣=Taiwan:內政部建築研究所=Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior。
30. 文放懷(2006)。田口方法。廣東省=Guangdong Province:廣東經濟出版社=Guangdong Economic Publishing House。
31. 日本建築学会一般社團法人(2016)。日本建築学会環境基準AIJES-L0002-2016 照明環境規準・同解説。東京都，日本=Tokyo Japan:一般社團法人日本建築??=Architectural Institute of Japan。
32. 王韻嵐(2012)。桃園市=Taoyuan，中原大學室內設計研究所=Chung Yuan Christian University Interior Design Institute。
33. 田聖元(1988)。實驗設計與數據處理。中國=China:中國建築工業出版社=China Building Industry Press。
34. 石曉蔚(2004)。室內照明設計應用。臺北市=Taipei:淑馨出版社=Shuxin Publishing House。
35. 江欣政(2014)。桃園市=Taoyuan，中原大學建築研究所=Chung Yuan Christian University Architecture Institute。
36. 岩井彌(2009)。空間の明るさ感評価指標「Feu」の開発と照明設計への適用。照明学会誌，93(12)，907- 912。
37. 岩井彌、井口雅行(2008)。空間の明るさ感指標「Feu」による快適な空間創りのための新しい照明評価手法。Matsushita Technical Journal，64-66。
38. 明石行生(2012)。タスク・アンビエント照明（TAL）。普及促進委員会報告書。日本=Japan:照明學會=The Illuminating Engineering Institute of Japan。
39. 林李旺(2013)。突破品質水準─實驗設計與田口法之實務應用。新北市=New Taipei city:全華圖書股份有限公司=Chuan Hwa Book Co.。
40. 林怡辰、張哲維、楊穎穆(2010)。,新竹市=Hsinchu:中華大學通訊工程學系=Chung Hua University Department of Communication。
41. 林鈺琪(2013)。臺北市=Taipei，國立臺北科技大學建築與都市設計研究所=Graduate Institute of Architecture and Urban Design National Taipei University of Technology。
42. 陳佳君(2016)。臺南市=Tainan，國立成功大學建築研究所=Architectural Institute National Cheng Kung University。
43. 謝惠羽(2016)。臺北市=Taipei，國立臺北科技大學建築系建築與都市設計碩士班=Graduate Institute of Architecture and Urban Design National Taipei University of Technology。
44. 畑田豊彦(1986)。VDT と視覚特性。人間工学，2(2)，45-52。

1. 謝明燁,易昌廷(2021)。整合照度需求與照明節能之照明功率密度基準及簡易圖表法－以辦公空間為例。建築學報，116，19-35。