中國與印度傳統建築朝向原則之比較研究

A Comparative Study on the Chinese and Indian Traditional Principles of Architectural Orientation

10.3966/101632122018090105005

黃恩宇(En-Yu Huang)

建築朝向 ； 風水 ； Vāstu-Shāstra ； 再現 ； 比較研究 ； Architectural Orientation ； Feng-Shui ； Vāstu-Shāstra ； Representation ； Comparative Studies

建築學報

105期（2018 / 09 / 30）

71 - 91

繁體中文

人類對於建築朝向之關注乃重要普世現象，世界各個文化與宗教傳統中，皆可輕易找到多樣的建築朝向原則；這些原則要求人們在建造各式建築時，須使其正面或主入口對準某個（些）特定方向。從眾多案例來看，建築朝向原則至少呈現兩種主要分類，第一類與「四正向方位系統」有關，第二類與「環境中特定對象」有關；前者要求人造空間能夠朝向東、西、南與北之中的某一個方向；後者則要求人造空間能夠朝向外部環境中的特定重要對象，如一座山、聚落中心、或遙遠的聖山與聖城。在中國與印度方面，由於風水與Vāstu-Shāstra這兩套歷史久遠之建築理論傳統的深厚影響，傳統朝向原則早已發展出更加多元與複雜的型態，已非上述兩種分類所能涵蓋；即便如此，從中國與印度的傳統建築理論與觀念中，我們仍可找到許多較具簡單與基本之型態、且符合上述兩種分類的古老朝向原則，它們將成為本文主要探討對象。本比較研究以「世界軸及宇宙十字」作為比較分析之架構，藉由檢視這些中國與印度的傳統朝向原則，探討人類建築朝向觀念的原始寰宇意涵。

Human concern about 'architectural orientation' is a significant worldwide phenomenon. A great many principles of architectural orientation can be easily found in many cultural and religious traditions. These principles instruct people, during the construction of buildings, to orient their front side or main entrance to a (or several) particular direction(s). As shown in many examples, it seems likely that the principles of architectural orientation can be categorized into two groups at least. The first group is related to the 'directional system based on the four cardinal points', while the second group is concerned with the 'particular object(s) in the physical environment'. The former usually stipulates thata built space should be orientated towards the east, west, south or north, while the latter normally prescribes that a built space should be pointed to a mountain or hill, the center of a settlement, or a holy city/mountain located far from the site. In China and India, due to the profound influence of Feng-Shui and Vāstu-Shāstra, two age-old traditions of architectural theories, most of the traditional principles of architectural orientation have developed into diverse and complicated forms, which cannot easily be categorized as either of the above-mentioned two groups. Nevertheless, we still can discern quite a few old principles which have simpler and more fundamental forms and aregenerally in accordance with the characteristics of the two groups. This research aims to conduct a comparative analysis of theses Chinese and Indian traditional principles of architectural orientation in the frame of the 'Axis Mundi & Cosmic Cross', so as to explore the original and universal meaning of the human ideas about architectural orientation.

1. 林希娟, H. J.,林憲德, H. D.,周榮華, J. H.(2011)。雅美族傳統民居防風對策之研究。建築學報，75，99-114。
   連結：
2. 黃恩宇, E. Y.(2016)。比較中國風水與印度Vāstu-Shāstra兩傳統中與平面格局方正相關的建築守則。建築學報，97，35-54。
   連結：
3. 中國哲學書電子化計劃（2017）。漢書．郊祀志。引用於2017 年3 月30 日， 取自http://ctext.org/han-shu/jiao-si-zhi/zh。Chinese Text Project (2017). Treatise on Sacrifices, the Book of Han. Retrieved March 30, 2017 from http://ctext.org/han-shu/jiao-si-zhi/zh.
4. 中國哲學書電子化計劃（2017）。周禮．春官宗伯。引用於2017 年3 月30 日， 取自http://ctext.org/rites-of-zhou/chun-guan-zong-bo/zh#n36923。Chinese Text Project (2017). Offices of Spring, Rites of Zhou. Retrieved March 30, 2017 from http://ctext.org/rites-of-zhou/chun-guan-zong-bo/zh#n36923.
5. 中國哲學書電子化計劃（2017）。後漢書．南蠻西南夷列傳。引用於2017 年3 月30 日， 取自http://ctext.org/hou-han-shu/lie-zhuan/zh。Chinese Text Project (2017). Treatise on the Nanman, Southwestern Barbarians, the Book of the Later Han. Retrieved March 30, 2017 from http://ctext.org/hou-han-shu/lie-zhuan/zh.
6. 中國哲學書電子化計劃（2017）。禮記．大傳。引用於2017 年3 月29 日， 取自http://ctext.org/liji/da-zhuan/zh。Chinese Text Project (2017). Da Zhuang, the Book of Rites. Retrieved March 27, 2017 from http://ctext.org/liji/da-zhuan/zh.
7. 中國哲學書電子化計劃（2017）。爾雅注疏．釋山第十一。引用於2017 年3 月31 日， 取自http://ctext.org/wiki.pl?if=gb&chapter=409705#%E9%87%8B%E5%B1%B1%E7%AC%AC%E5%8D%81%E4%B8%80。Chinese Text Project (2017). Chapter I: Explaining Mountains, Commentary and Subcommentary of the Erya. Retrieved March 31, 2017 from http://ctext.org/wiki.pl?if=gb&chapter=409705#%E9%87%8B%E5%B1%B1%E7%AC%AC%E5%8D%81%E4%B8%80.
8. Acharya, P.(1994).Architecture of Manasara: Translated from Original Sanskrit, Mānasāra Series Vol. IV.New Delhi:Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt. Ltd..
9. Arya, R.(2000).Vaastu: The Indian Art of Placement.Rochester:Destiny Books.
10. Bhat, M. (trans.)(1986).Varāhamihira's Bṛhat Samhitā with English Translation, Exhaustive Notes and Literary Comments.Delhi:Motilal Banarsidass.
11. Blacker, C.(ed.),Loewe, M.(ed.)(1975).Ancient Cosmologies.London:George Allen & Unwin Ltd..
12. Cherniak, A. (trans.)(2008).Maha-bharata Book Six: Bhishma.New York:New York University Press.
13. Crowe, N.(1997).Nature and the Idea of a Man-made World: An Investigation into the Evolutionary Roots of Form and Order in the Built Environment.Cambridge:MIT Press.
14. Dagens, B. (trans.)(1994).Mayamatam: Treatise of Housing, Architecture and Iconography.New Delhi:Indira Gandhi National Center for the Arts.
15. Dallapiccola, A. L.(2002).Dictionary of Hindu Lore and Legend.London:Thames & Hudson Ltd..
16. Dripps, R.(1997).The First House: Myth, Paradigm, and the Task of Architecture.Cambridge:The MIT Press.
17. Eliade, M.,Trask, Willard R.(Trans.)(1987).The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religions.Orlando:Harcourt, INC.
18. Hillenbrand, R.(1994).Islamic Architecture.New York:Columbia Unicersity Press.
19. Huang, E. Y.(2009).Different representations, same realities: The Chinese system of the superiority of the left over the right and the Indian system of the clockwise applied in ritual spaces and practices.2009 International Conference on East Asian Architectural Culture,Tainan:
20. Jacobsen, K.(2009).Brill's Encyclopedia of Hinduism (Volume I).Leiden:Brill.
21. Mekking, A.(2009).The Architectural Representation of Reality: The Built Environment as the Materialization of a Mental Construct.The Global Built Environment as a Representation of Realities: Why and How Architecture should be Subject of Worldwide Comparison,Amsterdam:
22. Morgan, M. (trans.)(1960).Vitruvius: The Ten Books on Architecture.New York:Dover Publications.
23. Oliver, P.(2003).Dwellings: The Vernacular House Worldwide.London:Phaidon Press.
24. Robb, P.(2002).A History of India.New York:Palgrave.
25. Sachdev, V.,Tillotson, G.(2002).Building Jaipur: The Making of and Indian City.London:Reaktion Books LTD..
26. Sharma, S. (trans.)(2007).Samarāngana-Sūtradhāra of Bhojadeva 1& 2..Delhi:Parimal Publications.
27. Sharmasastry, R. (trans.)(1961).Kautilya's Arthaśāstra.Mysore:Mysore Printing and Publishing House.
28. Shastri, M. (trans.)(1967).Agni Purānam.Varanasi:The Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office.
29. Stierlin, H.(1998).Hindu India: From Khajuraho to the Temple City of Madurai.Köln:Taschen.
30. 王充, C.(2001).王充論衡.台北市=Taipei City:鼎文書局=Co., Ltd..
31. 王洙, Z.(2003).圖解校正地理新書.台北市=Taipei City:集文出版社=Jiwen Publishers.
32. 余光弘, G. H.,董森永, S. Y.(1998).臺灣原住民史─雅美族史篇.台北市=Taipei City:國史館台灣文獻館=Taiwan Historica, Adademia Historica.
33. 周履靖, L. J.(1987).黃帝宅經.台北市=Taipei City:新文豐出版公司=Shinwenfeng Publishing.
34. 姚廷鑾, T. L.(2002).陽宅集成.台北市=Taipei City:武陵出版有限公司=Xiang-Da Press.
35. 徐善繼, S. J.(2007).地理人子須知.新竹市=Hsinchu City:竹林書局=Chu-Lin Book Store.
36. 曾晨安, C. A.(2012)。台北市=Taipei，國立台北藝術大學=Taipei National University of the Arts。
37. 黃一鳳, Y. F.(1998).八宅造福周書.台北市=Taipei City:育林出版社=Yulin Publishers.
38. 黃宣衛, S. W.(1991).東部海岸阿美族社會文化之調查研究.交通部觀光局東部海岸國家風景區管理處=Management Office of the East Coast National Scenic Area, Tourism Bureau, Ministry of Transportation and Communications.
39. 楊筠松, Y. S.(2011).標點撼龍經疑龍經.台北市=Taipei City:育林出版社=Yulin Publishers.
40. 漢寶德, B. D.(2006).風水與環境.台北市=Taipei City:小異出版=Locus Publishers.
41. 聞人軍, R. J.(1993).考工記譯註.上海市=Shanghai City:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House.
42. 劉樂賢, Y. X.(1994).睡虎地秦簡日書研究.台北市=Taipei City:文津出版社=Wenchin Publishers.
43. 賴炎元, Y. Y.(2003).春秋繁露今註今譯.台北市=Taipei City:台灣商務印書館股份有限公司=The Commercial Press, Ltd..
44. 魏青江, Q. J.(1985).宅譜大成.台北市=Taipei City:集文出版社=Jiwen Publishers.
45. 鄺芷人, Z. R.(2003).陰陽五行及其體系.台北市=Taipei City:文津出版社=Wenchin Publishers.
46. 關華山, H. S.(2016)。重構與詮釋卑南族的居住文化。再來的建築史：2016 台灣建築史論壇論文集