以行動研究法探討鄉鎮文化生活循環之組成與永續運作

Apply the Action Research to Explore the Composition and Sustainable Operation of Township Cultural Life Circuit

10.3966/101632122018120106005

陳品竹(Pin-Chu Chen)；王本壯(Ben-Chaung Wang)

文化生活循環 ； 文化生活圈 ； 認知地圖 ； 在地生活文化特色 ； Cultural Life Circuit ； Culture Life Circle ； Cognitive Mapping ； Regional Life Cultural Characters

建築學報

106期（2018 / 12 / 30）

71 - 88

繁體中文

全球化及資訊化的發展大幅提升人類文明生活的便利性，並縮短地域之間的差距，但同時也造成地方生活文化特色衰退的副作用。當社會群聚網絡遭遇到巨大的變化與衝擊時，各因子間（空間、行為、社群）的鑲嵌關係就會隨之改變，造成地方獨特生活文化的流失與消逝，連帶影響聚落運行之永續性。本研究以行動研究探討具危機的鄉鎮型村落文化生活循環的組成及運作模式，分析其如何俾利具有地域特色文化生活循環之穩固與傳承。研究過程觀察到，文化生活循環運作的成功與否，與日常生活中各因子的連結互動程度密切相關。因子的組成會隨著時間有所轉移（shift），因此若能滿足文化生活循環內不同群體的生活需求，讓空間與行為緊密鑲嵌，在時間中反覆的交錯、互動產生正向的效應，也就是文化生活循環的確立，即可作為進行地域振興及永續發展時規劃策略的參考依據。

Under the trend of globalisation and informatisation, which is greatly enhance the convenience of modern life and decreases the distance of multiple areas, however, human society also face the side-effects of the decline of local culture features. It represents that when the social network encounters greatly change and impact, the interior embedded connection of each factor (space, behaviour, group) will broke, and accordingly, causing the loss of local culture feature. In addition, it affects the regional operation. The research applies action research to explore the composition and operation model of one crisis township village. To discuss how it maintain the regional features by forming a stable cultural life circuit. The research results show that a successful operation of a cultural life circuit is related to every factor interaction tightly indaily life. Moreover, it shows that within a cultural life circuit which interior composition of different factors will shift to satisfy different groups’ daily life needs. It can embody space and behaviour closely. Moreover, maintaining interior interaction and intersection repeatedly process in time can also enhance positive effect on regional development. In conclusion, supporting sustainable operation of cultural life circuit is the key point and reference of creating and supporting regional rejuvenation and planning strategy.

1. 王本壯(2005)。公眾參與社區總體營造相關計畫執行之行動研究─以苗栗縣推動社區規劃師運作模式為例。公共行政學報，17，1-35。
   連結：
2. 王本壯(2016)。從地區發展歷程探討文化生活圈組構之研究—以苗栗大西村為例。建築學報（建築人文空間專刊），96，109-134。
   連結：
3. 劉為光、盧紀邦、陳世明(2013)。台南市舊城邊緣帶空間型態在當代都市生活中的文化意涵。建築學報，85，227-244。
   連結：
4. Barker, R. G.(1968).Ecological Psychology: Conceptsand Methods for Studying the Environment of Human Behavior.Palo Alto, CA.:Stanford University Press.
5. Chase, M.(ed.),Shaw, C.(ed.)(1989).The Imagined Past: History and Nostalgia.London, UK:Manchester University Press.
6. deCerteau, M.,Giard, L.,Mayol, P.(1998).The practice of everyday life: Living and cooking.Minneapolis. Minnesota:Minnesota University.
7. Goto, H.,Shimura, H.(2009).Lifescape.Tokyo, JP:Gakugei University.
8. Jackson, P.(1989).Maps of Meaning.London:Unwin Hyman Ltd..
9. Lee, Y. J.,Wang, B. C.,Chen, P. C.(2012).Exploring sustainable development of cultural living circles through action research: The case of Sanyi Township, Miaoli, Taiwan.Systemic Practice and Action Research,26(3),239-256.
10. Lefebvre, H.(1991).The Production of Space.United Stated:Wiley Blackwell.
11. Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34-46.
12. Lynch, K.,Banerjee, Tridib(ed.),Southworth, Michael(ed.)(1995).City Sense and City Design: Writings and Projects of Kevin Lynch.Cambridge, UK:MIT Press.
13. May, J.(ed.),Thrift, N.(ed.)(2001).Time Space.London, UK:Routledge.
14. Meethan, K.(1997).York: Managing the tourist city.Cities,14(6),333-342.
15. Middleton, A.,Murie, A.,Groves, R.(2005).Social capital and neighborhood that work.Urban Studies,42(10),1711-1738.
16. Norberg-Schulz, C.(1980).Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture.New York, USA:Rizzoli.
17. Ren, X.(2014).The political economy of urban ruins: Redeveloping Shanghai.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,38(3),1081-1091.
18. Rushton, G.(1971).Behavioral Correlates of Urban Spatial Structure.London, UK:Hutchinson Press.
19. Shurmer, P.(2002).Doing Cultural Geography.London, UK:SAGE Simpson.
20. Simpson, P.(2008).Chronic everyday life: Rhythm analysing street performance.Social & Cultural Geography,9,807-829.
21. Tolman, E. C.(1951).Behavior and Psychological Man: Essays in Motivation and Learning.Berkeley:University of California Press.
22. Walter, E. V.(1988).Placeways: A Theory of the Human Environment.North Carolina: Chapel Hill:University of North Carolina.
23. Wang, B. C.,Chen, P. C.(2012).Conferring the development process of the culture life circle through a historical map: A case study of Da-si Village, Zaoqiao Township, Miaoli County.Taiwan International Symposium on City Planning
24. Yeoh, B.,Kong, L.(1999).The notion of place in the construction of history, nostalgia and heritage.Our Place in Time: Exploring Heritage and Memory in Singapore,Singapore:
25. Zukin, S.(1995).The cultures of cities.Massechusetts:Blackwell Press.
26. 王本壯(2016)。行政院科技部專題研究計畫成果報告行政院科技部專題研究計畫成果報告,台北市=Taipei:行政院科技部=Ministry of Science and Technology。
27. 王本壯(2008)。淺談文化生活循環。台北市=Taipei:三民書局股份有限公司=Sanmin Press。
28. 古宜靈、辛晚敎(1997)。文化生活循環與文化設施發展之研究。都市與計劃期刊，1(24)，43-68。
29. 吳姝宣、陳品竹、王本壯(2018)。探討文化行為地景之特性、組合與互動關係網絡之建立。臺灣建築學會第三十屆第一次建築研究成果發表會
30. 辛晚敎(1995)。文化生活圈與文化展演設施規劃理念。地方文化與區域發展研討會論文集，台北市=Taipei:
31. 國立聯合大學(2010)。苗栗縣造橋鄉委託專業服務案成果報告書苗栗縣造橋鄉委託專業服務案成果報告書,苗栗縣=Maioli County:造橋鄉公所=Zaociao Township Office。
32. 蔣玉嬋(2007)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學社會教育系=Department of Adult and Continuing Education, National Taiwan Normal University。