專業經理人之評選－以室內設計裝修業為例

Selection of Professional Managers - Taking the Interior Design and Decoration Industry as an Example

10.3966/101632122019060108001

呂文堯(Wen-Yao Lu)；陳鼎周(Ting-Chou Chen)；蔡錦明(Chin-Ming Tsai)；郭財明(Tsai-Ming Kuo)

層級分析法 ； 田口損失函數 ； 偏好順序評價法 ； 模糊偏好順序評價法 ； 模糊德菲法 ； Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) ； Taguchi loss Function ； TOPSIS ； Fuzzy TOPSIS ； Fuzzy Delphi method (FDM)

建築學報

108期（2019 / 06 / 30）

1 - 17

繁體中文

台灣室內設計裝修業由於規模不大，故而鮮有引進專業經理人來增加公司獲利之作法。本研究採用層級分析法（AHP）結合田口損失函數、AHP結合偏好順序評價法（TOPSIS）及模糊偏好順序評價法（Fuzzy TOPSIS），來評選合適之室內設計裝修專業經理人。13項與選擇合適之室內設計裝修專業經理人有關之評估準則，藉由模糊德菲法（FDM）取得共識。本研究以AHP問卷及分析求得13項評估準則之權重。並採用下列三種方法求得三位室內設計裝修專業經理候選人之排名。方法一是以AHP所得之權重結合田口損失函數計算各候選人之加權田口損失值，根據加權損失值之大小決定各候選人之排名。方法二及三則是分別以AHP結合TOPSIS及Fuzzy TOPSIS，求得各候選人之接近係數，根據接近係數之大小來進行候選人之排名，接近係數愈高之候選人排名愈好。研究結果顯示，三種評選室內設計裝修專業經理人方法中，以Fuzzy TOPSIS為最佳。本研究之成果可以供室內設計裝修業尋求合適之專業經理人以追求更大利潤之參考。

In Taiwan, the magnitude of the interior decoration design industries is relative small, to introduce the professional manager to increase the profitability of the company are very rare. This research aims to select a proper interior decoration professional manager by the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) combined Taguchi loss Function, AHP combined Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Fuzzy TOPSIS, respectively. Thirteen criteria associated with the selecting a proper interior decoration professional manager reaching consensus by fuzzy Delphi method (FDM). The weightings of 13 criteria have been obtained from the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Three methods are used to determine the rankings among three interior professional managers. In the method of AHP combined Taguchi loss Function, the smaller the weighted Taguchi's loss values, the better are the order of the interior decoration professional managers. In the method of AHP combined TOPSIS and Fuzzy TOPSIS, the larger the coefficient of closeness, the better are the order of the interior decoration professional managers. The results of this study indicate that, Fuzzy TOPSIS is the best method in selecting a proper interior decoration professional manager. The results of this research can be used by the interior design and decoration industry to find a suitable professional manager for the pursuit of greater profits.

1. 吳韻吾、顏行誠、郭怡助、徐暐倉(2013)。室內設計公司服務流程服務品質關鍵指標之研究─以顧客價值之觀點。物業管理學報，4(2)，25-34。
   連結：
2. 呂文堯、王維歆、郭倩彣、吳霽哲、李淑媚(2017)。推動室內設計技師高考之策略研究。建築學報，100，77-94。
   連結：
3. 呂文堯、王維歆、郭倩彣、林敏哲(2018)。室內設計之新評分方法。建築學報，103，1-15。
   連結：
4. 韓文銘、廖珮妏(2012)。整合田口損失函數與層級分析法於軟體產品使用者品質評估之應用。品質學報，19(2)，97-116。
   連結：
5. Chen, C. T.(2000).Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment.Fuzzy Sets and Systems,114,1-9.
6. Hsu, Y. L.,Lee, C. H.,Kreng, V. B.(2010).The application of fuzzy Delphi method and fuzzy AHP in lubricant regenerative technology selection.Expert System with Application,37,419-425.
7. Hwang, C. L.,Yoon, K.(1981).Multiple Attributes Decision Making Method and Application.Berlin Heidelberg:Springer.
8. Liu, W. K.(2013).Application of the fuzzy Delphi method and the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for the managerial competence of multinational corporation executives.International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and, e-Learning,3(4),313-317.
9. Saaty, T. L.(1980).The Analytic Hierarchy Process.New York, USA:McGraw-Hill.
10. Zadeh, L. A.(1965).Fuzzy sets.Information and Control,8,338-353.
11. 余豐榮、廖奕雯(2015)。田口損失函數與層級分析法應用於學校午餐供應商評選模式。科學與工程技術學刊，11(2)，17-24。
12. 翁在龍、曾世杰、翁偉倫(2015)。室內裝潢工程專案管理評估指標之建立。健康與建築雜誌，2(2)，29-35。

1. 李東明(2021)。多準則群體決策法在評選室內設計師之應用。設計學報，26(1)，39-57。
2. (2024)。多準則群體決策法在室內裝修服務之應用研究。建築學報，128，1-18。