Employ Design Thinking on the Design Creation of the Construction Form A Case Study of the Orchid Pavilion

設計思考應用於構築形式之設計創作－以The Orchid Pavilion蘭亭雅聚為例

10.3966/101632122019060108012

吳細顏(Shi-Yen Wu)；張廖軒曲(Hsuan-Chu Chang Liao)；陳婕芸(Chieh-Yun Chen)；詹雅涵(Ya-Han Chan)；陳韻如(Yun-Ju Chen)；陳俊伍(Jyun-Wu Chen)；胡俊睿(Chun-Jui Hu)

Construction ； Shape ； Thinking Design ； Fractal Geometry ； Cultural Meaning ； Structure Design ； 構築 ； 形式 ； 設計思考 ； 碎形幾何 ； 文化意涵 ； 結構設計

建築學報

108_S期：建築設計案例與分析專刊（2019 / 06 / 30）

11 - 19

英文

The goal of this research is to change how we think about ＂construction＂, to explore the possibilities between constructing behavior and forming with real design creation. The case reconstructed the form of traditional paper industry. The traditional cultural narrative vocabulary and the design concept of re-linking the local industry components are the core of the research model structure. We will use an innovative way of thinking to re-imagine a new structure through observation and analysis. Through practical operating design, the research provided designers different aspects to consider. We argue that the vital point of construction logic is through practical operations. We also conceive an innovative interpretation on ＂construction＂ through the form of traditional cultural history. In order that the abstract concept can create a feasible moment of work with geometric elements in a specific condition.

研究針對「構築」的本質重新思考，以真實的設計創作探析構築行為與形式之間的種種可能。案例透過傳統紙業的形式重新構成，將傳統文化敘事語彙及在地產業構材重新做連結的設計思考方式為研究範例架構，再透過觀察與分析，運用創新的思考模式構想全新的結構狀態及形式可能，並將其文化意涵與結構設計作整體考量，表達出形式構築的具體實踐。研究透過實際的設計操作給予設計者不同面向的思考與體悟，追求構築邏輯至實際操作的重要性，藉由傳統文化歷史的形式與紙材從而構想創新的「結構」詮釋，使抽象的概念能通過幾何元素的具體條件，創造出真實可行的狀態。

1. Frampton, K.(1996).Studies in Tectonic Culture: The Poetics of Construction in Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Architecture.Cambridge, Mass:The MIT Press.
2. Frampton, K.(1992).Modern Architecture: A Critical History.London, UK:Tames and Hudson Ltd.
3. Heidegger, M.,Hofstadter, Albert(trans.)(1985).Poetry. Language, Thought.
4. Marcel, P.,Carter, William C.(Edited and annotated)(2015).In Search of Lost Time.New Haven:Yale University Press.
5. Semper, G.,Mallgrave, H.(Trans.),Herrmann, W.(Trans.)(1989).The Four Elements of Architecture &Other Essays.NY, USA:Cambridge University Press.
6. Stiny, G.(2006).Shape: Talking About Seeing and Doing.Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press.
7. Wikipedia: 鼎https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%BC%8E.
8. Wikipedia: Metaphysics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphysics.
9. 王毅力(2012)。試論鼎功能的歷史演變。西昌學院學報（社會科學版），1，84-86。