農地未登記工廠處理方案之生態系統服務影響分析－以彰化縣為例

The Analysis of Illegal Factories Handling Approaches' Effect on Ecosystem Services- A Case Study of Changhua County, Taiwan

10.3966/101632122020120114003

張學聖(Hsueh-Sheng Chang)；陳朱廷(Jhu-Ting Chen)

農地未登記工廠 ； 生態系統服務 ； 空間分析 ； InVEST模型 ； Illegal Factories ； Ecosystem Services ； Spatial Analysis ； InVEST Model

建築學報

114期（2020 / 12 / 30）

41 - 60

繁體中文

在台灣，工廠違規佔用農地的現象相當普遍。於此，政府也嘗試解決並規劃了一系列的農地未登記工廠處理方案。然而目前政府的處理方案仍偏重於廠商經營面的考量，較少著墨對於多種生態、環境面向的影響。倘若能在處理方案中將生態面向納入考慮，將有助於規劃者在進行相關空間政策擬定時能更臻完善。基此，本文嘗試以目前政府農地未登記工廠的處理方案為基礎，模擬多種農地未登記工廠處理情境，並以InVEST模型進行各情境生態系統服務提供量及空間分布之估算，最後利用空間自相關分析生態系統服務提供的空間區位變化。經實證後發現，在農地未登記工廠處理準則情境，建議以成長管理方案的手法實施，透過以鄰近既有開發地區收容農地未登記工廠，減少零星工廠散布對於多項生態系統服務的影響。本文應用情境模擬及空間自相關檢視不同農地未登記工廠處理方案之成效，探究處理方案對於生態系統服務量及空間區位改變的影響，期供未來農地未登記工廠處理方案之參考。

In Taiwan, the phenomenon of illegal factories on agricultural land is prevailing. As a result, the government attempts to implement a series of handling approaches, trying to solve this problem. However, the current government's handling approaches are merely focusing on the consideration of economic aspect, and putting less attention on ecological and environmental aspects. If the ecological aspect can be taken into consideration in illegal factories handling approaches, it will help planners when formulating spatial planning policies. As a result, this paper attempts to simulate several handling approaches scenarios based on current handling approaches of illegal factories. We apply InVEST to estimate the amount of ecosystem services of each scenarios. Then, we use spatial autocorrelation (LISA) to identify the spatial change of different ecosystem services. After empirical research, it is found that in the case of handling approaches of illegal factories, it is recommended to implement the growth management plan scenario to accommodate illegal factories near the existing development area, which reduces the impact of scattered factories' negative effect on multiple ecosystem services. This article uses scenario simulation and spatial autocorrelation to examine the effect of different illegal factories handling approaches, and it explores the impact of the handling approaches on the amount and location change of multiple ecosystem services. Finally, this article hopes to give suggestions for further illegal factories handling approaches in Taiwan.

1. 李俊霖, C. L.,李俊鴻, C. H.(2012)。農地轉用對生態系統服務功能衝擊之經濟評估。農業經濟叢刊，17(2)，111-144。
   連結：
2. 李玲玲, L. L.,趙榮台, J. T.,邵廣昭, K. T.,林幸助, H. J.,方國運, K. Y.,郭奇芊, C. C.,Huang, I. C.,李芃, P.(2018)。「生態系服務與永續發展」科學計畫。臺灣土地研究，12(2)，137-152。
   連結：
3. 李素馨, S. H.,林敬妤, C. Y.,吳治達, C. D.,莊永忠, Y. C.(2014)。運用生境價值評估工具建構永續農村地景空間配置。都市與計劃，41(1)，67-97。
   連結：
4. 林敬妤, C. Y.,李素馨, S. H.,吳治達, C. D.,莊永忠, Y. C.(2013)。農村生境地圖繪製模式的建構與應用。建築學報，86，169-190。
   連結：
5. 林裕彬, Y. P.,詹士樑, S. L.,陸曉筠, S. Y.,江莉琦, L. C.,徐家雯, C. W.,林昭遠, C. Y.,劉小蘭, H. L.,吳振發, C. F.,林峰田, F. T.,李慧琳, H. L.,陳佳正, C. J.,莊振義, J. Y.,羅敏輝, M. H.,簡旭伸, S. S.,連宛渝,余佳珍, C. J.,吳岱蓉, D. J.,林士淵, S. Y.(2018)。土地資源核心議題－土地系統動態變遷之因果與機制研究。臺灣土地研究，21(2)，111-136。
   連結：
6. 鍾麗娜, L. N.(2019)。台灣農地違章工廠稱霸下的國土亂象。土地問題研究季刊，18(3)，118-129。
   連結：
7. Anselin, L.(1995).Local indicators of spatial Association- LISA.Geographical Analysis,27(2),93-115.
8. Cabral, P.,Feger, C.,Levrel, H.,Chambolle, M.,Basque, D.(2016).Assessing the impact of land-cover changes on ecosystem services: A first step toward integrative planning in Bordeaux, France.Ecosystem Services,22,318-327.
9. Choruma, D. J.,Odume, O. N.(2019).Exploring farmers' management practices and values of ecosystem services in an agroecosystem context--A case study from the eastern cape.South Africa. Sustainability,11(23),22.
10. DeFries, R. S.,Foley, J. A.,Asner, G. P.(2004).Land-use choices: Balancing human needs and ecosystem function.Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,2(5),249-257.
11. Foley, J. A.,Ramankutty, N.,Brauman, K. A.,Cassidy, E. S.,Gerber, J. S.,Johnston, M.,West, P. C.(2011).Solutions for a cultivated planet.Nature,478(7369),337.
12. Goldstein, J. H.,Caldarone, G.,Duarte, T. K.,Ennaanay, D.,Hannahs, N.,Mendoza, G.,Daily, G. C.(2012).Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,109(19),7565-7570.
13. Lin, Y. P.,Lin, W. C.,Wang, Y. C.,Lien, W. Y.,Huang, T.,Hsu, C. C.,Crossman, N. D.(2017).Systematically designating conservation areas for protecting habitat quality and multiple ecosystem services.Environmental Modelling & Software,90,126-146.
14. Manuschevich, D.,Sarricolea, P.,Galleguillos, M.(2019).Integrating socio-ecological dynamics into land use policy outcomes: A spatial scenario approach for native forest conservation in south-central Chile.Land Use Policy,84,31-42.
15. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment=MA(2005).Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis.Washington, D.C.:Island Press.
16. Paudyal, K.,Baral, H.,Burkhard, B.,Bhandari, S. P.,Keenan, R. J.(2015).Participatory assessment and mapping of ecosystem services in a data-poor region: Case study of community-managed forests in central Nepal.Ecosystem Services,13,81-92.
17. Power, A. G.(2010).Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences,365(1554),2959-2971.
18. Swinton, S. M.,Lupi, F.,Robertson, G. P.,Hamilton, S. K.(2007).Ecosystem services and agriculture: Cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits.Ecological Economics,64(2),245-252.
19. Tallis, H.,Polasky, S.(2009).Mapping and Valuing Ecosystem Services as an Approach for Conservation and Natural-Resource Management.Year in Ecology and Conservation Biology 2009,Oxford:
20. TEEB,Kumar, P.(Ed.)(2010).The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations.UNEP/Earthprint.
21. van Zanten, B. T.,Verburg, P. H.,Espinosa, M.,Gomez-y-Paloma, S.,Galimberti, G.,Kantelhardt, J.,Viaggi, D.(2014).European agricultural landscapes, common agricultural policy and ecosystem services: a review.Agronomy for Sustainable Development,34(2),309-325.
22. Wood, S. L.,Jones, S. K.,Johnson, J. A.,Brauman, K. A.,Chaplin-Kramer, R.,Fremier, A.,Declerck, F. A.(2018).Distilling the role of ecosystem services in the sustainable development goals.Ecosystem Services,29,70-82.
23. Zhang, W.,Ricketts, T. H.,Kremen, C.,Carney, K.,Swinton, S. M.(2007).Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture.Ecological Economics,64(2),253-260.
24. 王健豪, C. H.(2018)。台北市=Taipei，中國文化大學都市計畫與開發管理學系=Department of Urban Planning and Development Management, Chinese Culture University。
25. 李素馨, S. H.,林敬妤, C. Y.(2014)。農村地景破碎化與保育：以宜蘭三星鄉農地變遷為例。人文與社會科學簡訊，15(2)，42-49。
26. 柯佑霖, Y. L.,黃文政, W. C.(2016)。以 InVEST 模式評估水庫集區農業非點源污染之模式評估水庫集區農業非點源污染之防治效益。水土保持學報，48(2)，15。
27. 范康登, J.,洪源駿, W.,葉銘凱, M. K.,顏偉益, M.(2015)。結合多方位工具管理農地污染整治之探討。土壤及地下水污染整治，2(2)，103-112。
28. 張筠旋, Y. H.(2018)。新北市=New Taipei，國立臺北大學不動產與城鄉環境學系=Department of Real Estate and Built Environment, National Taipei University。
29. 陳文福, W. F.,顔貽信, Y. S.(2008)。灌溉水源遭受污染之處理對策探討－以台中農田水利會大里灌區爲例。農業工程學報，54(3)，52-63。
30. 蔡翊伶, Y. L.(2019)。新北市=New Taipei，國立臺北大學都市計劃研究所=Graduate Institute of Urban Planning, National Taipei University。

1. 蘇曉瑞,邊泰明(2022)。國土計畫城鄉發展地區第2－3類如何面對未登記工廠？以臺中市的劃設為例。土地問題研究季刊，21(3)，115-129。