臺灣文化資產水災風險與治理對策

Identification of Flooding Risk and Preventive Strategy to Cultural Heritage in Taiwan

10.3966/101632122020120114005

王价巨(Jieh-Jiuh Wang)；蔡寧又(Ning-Yu Tsai)

文化資產 ； 風險管理 ； 風險地圖 ； 預防性保存 ； 水災 ； Cultural Heritage ； Risk Management ； Risk Map ； Preventive Conservation ； Flood

建築學報

114期（2020 / 12 / 30）

83 - 101

繁體中文

由近年來天然災害發生頻率的增加，可知文化資產的保護必須同時考慮當地環境和極端天氣事件的潛在影響。在臺灣，多數對於文化資產災害管理的建議普遍欠缺對環境整體性的考量，導致國內許多文化資產仍然受到災害事件的威脅。Wang（2015）首度關注臺灣文化資產「靜態結構化風險」地圖。本研究延續上述研究，採用風險辨識視角，以水災為主要災害類型，加以擴大為臺灣整體區域尺度的操作及分析。利用地理資訊系統整合淹水潛勢圖資與文化資產分布位置，分析可能遭受水災災害影響的文化資產類別與數量，探究其可能原因與影響因子，希冀提供未來文化資產風險管理措施和減災策略參考。結果顯示，暴雨對文化資產而言是一個需要因應的重要課題，文化資產類型受水災影響嚴重程度由高至低分別為歷史建築、直轄市／縣市定古蹟、國定古蹟與遺址；聚落和文化景觀並未受水災影響，其原因可能與所在位置高程或傳統文化中的先人經驗或智慧有所關聯。當地環境的改變，如地層下陷、陸域化等，亦是影響文化資產是否受水災影響的重要因素。未來，有必要針對文化資產的災害管理，考量區域及文化資產特性，進行跨領域的專業整合，全面性地運用結構性和非結構性減災措施，來降低文化資產的災害脆弱度、加強文化資產韌性。

The increasing frequency of natural disasters means that cultural heritage conservation must consider both the local environment and potential impact of extreme weather events. Most suggestions for disaster management regarding cultural heritage in Taiwan ignore the integrity of the environment, with the consequence being that many cultural heritage sites in Taiwan remain threatened by disaster events. Wang (2015) conducted the first mapping survey in Taiwan that concentrated on ＂static-structural risks＂ regarding cultural heritage. The present study continues the above one, with adopts a risk-identification perspective with flood as the main disaster type, and enlarges to a regional scale operation and analysis. This study analyzes the categories and amounts of cultural heritage that might suffer from disasters based on a geographic information system that integrates flooding susceptibility data with cultural heritage sites. Through searching the possible flooding causes and impact factors, hoping to provide the information serves to inform the measures of future risk mitigation and disasters reduction efforts. The results reveal that heavy rain is an important issue that needs to be addressed for cultural heritage. The sites most impacted by floods were as follows (most to least): historical buildings, municipal and county monuments, national monuments, and archaeological sites, whereas traditional settlements and cultural landscapes are not impacted. The reason these sites are not affected might be due to their altitudes or the local knowledge of those who built the sites. Changes in the local environment, such as land subsidence and terrestrialization, are also important factors that affect whether cultural heritage are affected by floods. In the future, for disaster management of cultural heritage, it is necessary to conduct cross-disciplinary professional integration and comprehensively use structural and non-structural disaster reduction measures to reduce the disaster vulnerability of cultural heritage and strengthen its resilience after considering regional and cultural heritage characteristics.

1. 劉禹廷, Y. T.(2018)。新北市=New Taipei City，華夏科技大學資產與物業管理系=Department of Assets and Property Management, Hwa Hsia University of Technology。
   連結：
2. 賴炳樹, B. S.,白仁德, J. T.(2015)。災害治理與直轄市洪災調適策略評估。東吳政治學報，33(2)，77-120。
   連結：
3. AFP (2019). Venice Flooding: St Mark's Priceless Mosaics Drowned in Sewage. Retrieved August 12, 2020, from https://reurl.cc/N617m6.
4. Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K.,Willems, P.,Olsson, J.,Beecham, S.,Pathirana, A.,Bulow Gregersen, I,Madsen, H.,Nguyen, V.T.V.(2013).Impacts of climate change on rainfall extremes and urban drainage systems: A review.Water Science and Technology,68(1),16-28.
5. Bwambale, B.,Muhumuza, M.,Nyeko, M.(2018).Traditional ecological knowledge and flood risk management: A preliminary case study of the Rwenzori.Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies,10(1),a536.
6. Dilley, M.,Chen, R. S.,Deichmann, U.,Lerner-Lam, A. L.,Arnold, M.(2005).Natural Disaster Hotspots: A Global Risk Analysis.Washington, DC, USA:The World Bank.
7. Drdácký, M. F.(2010).Flood damage to historic buildings and structures.Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities,24(5),439-445.
8. Driessen, P. P. J.,Hegger, D. L. T.,Kundzewicz, Z. W.,van Rijswick, H. F. M. W.,Crabbé, A.,Larrue, C.,Matczak, P.,Pettersson, M.,Priest, S.,Suykens, C.,Raadgever, G. T.,Wiering, M.(2018).Governance strategies for improving floodresilience in the face of climate change.Water,10,1595.
9. Graham, K.,Spennemann, D.(2006).Disaster management and cultural heritage: An investigation of knowledge and perceptions of New South Wales Rural Fire Service Brigade Captains.The Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies,2006(1),5-31.
10. Hammer, W.(1972).Handbook of System and Product Safety.NJ, USA:Prentice-Hall.
11. Hapciuc, O. E.,Romanescu, G.,Minea, I.,Iosub, M.,Enea, A.,Sandu, I.(2016).Flood susceptibility analysis of the cultural heritage in the sucevita catchment (Romania).International Journal of Conservation Science,7(2),501-510.
12. Herle, I.,Herbstova, V.,Kupka, M.,Kolymbas, D.(2010).Geotechnical problems of cultural heritage due to floods.Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities,25(5),446-451.
13. Huang, P. N.,Li, Z. J.,Li, Q. L.,Zhang, K.,Zhang, H. C.(2016).Application and comparison of coaxial correlation diagram and hydrological model for reconstructing flood series under human disturbance.Journal of Mountain Science,13(7),1245-1264.
14. Kourgialas, N.,Karatzas, G. P.(2011).Flood management and a GIS modelling method to assess flood-hazard areas- A case study.Hydrological Sciences Journal,56(2),212-225.
15. Kumar, D. S.,Arya, D. S.,Vojinovic, Z.(2013).Modeling of urban growth dynamics and its impact on surface runoff characteristics.Computers, Environment and Urban Systems,41,124-135.
16. Lanza, S. G.(2003).Flood hazard threat on cultural heritage in the town of Genoa (Italy).Journal of Cultural Heritage,4(3),159-167.
17. Li, H. B.,Zhang, J. W.,Sun, J. Z.,Wang, J. D.(2017).A visual analytics approach for flood risk analysis and decision-making in cultural heritage.Journal of Visual Languages and Computing,41,89-99.
18. Maierhofer, C.,Kind, T.,Köpp, C.,Helmerich, R.(2011).CHEF - Cultural Heritage Protection against Flooding.Prague, CR:Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics AS CR.
19. Maierhofer, C.,Koepp, C.,Kruschwitz, S.,Drdacky, M.,Hennen, C.,Lanza, S.,Tomaževič, M.,Kolymbas, D.,Herle, T.,Virsta, A.,Binda, L.,Askew, P.(2008).Cultural heritage protection against flood -A European FP6 research project.Structural Analysis of Historic Construction: Preserving Safety and Significance,London, UK:
20. Merecki, N.,Agič, R.,Šunić, L.,Milenković, L.,Ilić, Z.S.(2015).Transfer factor as indicator of heavy metals content in plants.Fresenius Environmental Bulletin,24(11c),4212-4219.
21. Muyambo, F.,Bahta, Y. T.,Jordaan, A.J.(2017).The role of indigenous knowledge in drought risk reduction: A case of communal farmers in South Africa.Jàmbà: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies,9(1),a420.
22. Nakashima, D. J.,Galloway McLean, K.,Thulstrup, H. D.,Ramos Castillo, A.,Rubis, J. T.(2012).Weathering Uncertainty: Traditional Knowledge for Climate Change Assessment and Adaptation.Paris, France:UNESCO.
23. Ortiz, R.,Ortiz, P.,Martin, J. M.,Vázquez, M. A.(2016).A new approach to the assessment of flooding and dampness hazards in cultural heritage, applied to the historic centre of Seville (Spain).Science of the Total Environment,551-552,546-555.
24. Pelling, M.(2011).Adaptation to Climate Change: From Resilience to Transformation.London:Routledge.
25. Porębska, A.,Godyń, I.,Radzicki, K.,Nachlik, E.,Rizzi, P.(2019).Built heritage, sustainable development, and naturalhazards: Flood protection and UNESCO World Heritage Site protection strategies in Krakow, Poland.Sustainability,11,4886.
26. Shaw, R.(ed.),Uy, N.(ed.),Jennifer, B.(ed.)(2008).Indigenous Knowledge for Disaster Risk Reduction: Good Practices and Lessons Learned from Experiences in the Asia-Pacific Region.Geneva, Switzerland:UN/ISDR.
27. Siedel, H.(2010).Historic building stones and flooding: Changes of physical properties due to water saturation.Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities,24(5),452-461.
28. Tran, P.,Shaw, R.,Chantry, G.,Norton, J.(2009).GIS and local knowledge in disaster management: A case study of flood risk mapping in Viet Nam.Disasters,33(1),152-169.
29. Trust.org (2019). Without Better Flood Protection, Venice Risks Loss of Heritage Status. Retrieved August12, 2020 from https://reurl.cc/zzgVn0
30. UNESCO(2010).Managing Disaster Risks for World Heritage.Paris, France:UNESCO.
31. UNESCO (2017). Tangible Cultural Heritage. Retrieved April 9, 2019 from https://reurl.cc/3LrMqM
32. Válek, J.,Kruschwitz, S.,Wöstmann, J,Kind, T.,Valach, J.,Köpp, C.,Lesák, J.(2010).Nondestructive investigation of wet building material: Multimethodical approach.Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities,24(5),462-472.
33. Vojinovic, Z.,Hammond, M.,Golub, D.,Hirunsalee, S.,Weesakul, S.,Meesuk, V.,Medina, N.,Sanchez, A.,Kumara, S.,Abbott, M.(2016).Holistic approach to flood risk assessment in areas with cultural heritage: A practical application in Ayutthaya, Thailand.Natural Hazards,81,589-616.
34. Wang, J. J.(2016).Large-scale debris flow disasters: Hazard-risk-vulnerability analysis approach in Taiwan.Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites,18(4),449-463.
35. Wang, J. J.(2015).Flood risk maps to cultural heritage: Measures and process.Journal of Cultural Heritage,16(2),210-220.
36. 尹政偉, C. W.(2016)。嘉義縣=Chiayi County，吳鳳科技大學消防研究所=Department of Fire Science, Wu Feng University。
37. 王价巨（2019）。文化資產的災害管理策略（下）：全災害取徑與全面性緊急管理。鳴人堂。引用於 2019年 6 月 28 日，取自：https://reurl.cc/GrZjvv。
38. 王价巨, J. J.,楊怡瑩, Y. Y.,許庭雨, T. Y.(2013)。科技部專題研究成果報告科技部專題研究成果報告,臺北市=Taipei City:科技部=Ministry of Science and Technology。
39. 吳中杰, Z. J.,溫仲良, Z. L.,朱玉璽, Y. X.(2012)。,未出版
40. 周岳漢, Y. H.(2019)。嘉義縣=Chiayi County，南華大學文化創意事業管理學系=Department of Cultural and Creative Enterprise Management, Nan Hua University。
41. 林雅新, Y. H.(2018)。臺北市=Taipei City，國立臺北科技大學土木工程系=Department of Civil Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology。
42. 孫仁鍵, J. C.(2002)。臺南市=Tainan City，國立成功大學建築學系=Department of Architecture, National Cheng Kung University。
43. 徐明福, M. F.,謝俊民, J. M.,吳秉聲, P. S.(2012).臺灣文化資產氣候風險地圖建置計畫成果報告書.臺中市=Taichung City:文化部文化資產局文化資產保存研究中心=Institute of Cultural Heritage Research Preservation, Bureau of Cultural Heritage, Ministry of Culture.
44. 許庭語, T. Y.(2014)。桃園市=Taoyuan City，銘傳大學建築學系=Department of Architecture, Ming Chuan University。
45. 郭玉琳, Y. L.(2011)。臺北市=Taipei City，中國科技大學建築研究所=Department of Architecture, China University of Technology。
46. 郭東雄, D. X.(2016)。埋藏在綠色叢林中的寶藏：tjuvecekadan 七佳部落。原住民族文獻，25
47. 雲林縣政府（2017）。雲林縣第一次採用千斤頂抬高整棟歷史建築-海口庄長官舍。引用於 2020 年 8 月6 日，取自 https://reurl.cc/VXpYRb。Yunlin County Government (2017). For the First Time in Yunlin County, Jacks are Used to Raise the Entire Historical Building - Haikouzhuang Changguanshe. Retrieved August 6, 2020 from https://reurl.cc/VXpYRb
48. 黃筱真, H. C.(2014)。臺北市=Taipei City，中華科技大學土木防災工程研究所=Department of Civil Engineering, China University of Science and Technology。
49. 葉日嘉（2012）。誰誤解了聚落保存區？在五溝水的故事。社團法人高雄市美濃農村田野學會。引用於2019 年 3 月 31 日，取自 https://reurl.cc/e8vz7M。Ye, R. J. (2012). Who Misunderstood the Settlement Reserve? The Story of Wugoushui. Rural Meinung Field Learning. Retrieved March 31, 2019 from https://reurl.cc/e8vz7M
50. 詹馨萍, H. P.(2018)。金門縣=Kinmen County，國立金門大學土木與工程管理學系=Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Management, National Quemoy University。
51. 蔡宛錚, W. C.(2016)。臺北市=Taipei City，國立臺北科技大學土木工程系=Department of Civil Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology。
52. 謝玲君, L. J.(2019)。嘉義縣=Chiayi County，吳鳳科技大學消防研究所=Department of Fire Science, Wu Feng University。
53. 薩支平, J. P.,陳亮全, L. C.(2002).都市洪災防治策略之整合型規劃研究（一）從災害管理層面探討都市洪災防治策略之研究.臺北市=Taipei City:內政部建築研究所=Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior.