地區災害防救工作落實於淹水地區高齡者避難收容課題研究－以823水災台南市麻豆區三里高齡居民避難收容為例

A Research of the Evacuate Behavior and Issues of Elderly Residents under Local Disaster Prevention and Response Works in Flooding Areas-A Case Study of 823 Flooding Evacuate of Elderly People in 3 Villages, Madou District, Tainan City

10.53106/101632122021120118005

董娟鳴(Chuan-Ming Tung)

高齡居民 ； 823水災 ； 避難收容 ； Elderly Residents ； 823 Flood Disaster ； Evacuation

建築學報

118期（2021 / 12 / 30）

89 - 112

繁體中文

本研究以台灣南部持續降雨的823水災為案例進行研究。研究者選取台南市麻豆區人口老化嚴重的北勢里、小埤里和埤頭里作為案例研究地點。並於2019年10月對里長、高齡者、麻豆區民政部門和其他縣市民政防救災單位相關承辦進行深入訪談，了解社區高齡者在水災時經驗與在災害過程中遇到的問題，及地區災害防救工作落實於高齡者避難收容實踐。研究者共訪談了17位高齡者、里長2位與區公所相關承辦人員，受訪高齡者年齡在63至90歲之間。訪談結果顯示，水災對研究地區造成嚴重破壞，由於地區水位監測傳感器被洪水沖走，導致區公所錯過預先撤離機會，社區在具有自救能力居民協助下進行撤離。儘管社區平時有防災社區培訓，但因安全與財產損失歸屬問題，導致社區防災和疏散系統無法有效運作，區公所民政課與社區之間溝通不良，救援支持工作受阻。此外，由於地區受災嚴重，區公所缺乏足夠的救災資源和設備，需要外部援助（軍方）。但因無法及時提供救援，導致社區救災資源枯竭。高齡者與弱勢居民只能垂直避難並等待救援，進行二次或多次避難。根據前述發現，當發生大規模洪災時，社區內部的相互救援和支持極為重要，可向高齡者提供直接和無障礙援助。防救災單位應當增加社區高齡者的主要聯絡人，確定防災和救災專業知識，並提供適當的專業培訓，使這些人可以作為向社區高齡者傳遞信息的橋樑。簡言之，前述措施可幫助高齡社區在災難期間實施自救工作。

This study selected three villages in Madou District, Tainan City - Beishih Village, Siaopi Village, and Pitou Village in 823 flood disaster to be the research site for analysis. These three villages face the common problem of a drastically aging population. The author conducted in-depth interviews to understand the problems faced by community elderly when prolonged flooding occurs, and to expound the issues encountered during the course of natural disasters. The author visited the three villages (in which Siaopi Village has merged into Pitou Village) to conduct interviews with elderly residents and 17 elderly residents were interviewed. The interview results indicate that the flood had caused serious damage in the study area. As the water level monitoring sensor of the area's disaster prevention unit was swept away by the floodwaters, it was impossible to ascertain the extent of the damage caused by the heavy rainfall on the area. Consequently, no preventive evacuation measures were implemented and the decision to evacuate was made by the community, in conjunction with the assistance of residents with self-rescue capabilities. Despite regular training, due to flooding and property considerations, the community's disaster prevention and evacuation system was inoperable, and there was a lack of communication and rescue and support efforts between the district office and the community. Moreover, owing to the size of the disaster area, the district office lacked sufficient disaster relief resources and equipment and required external assistance. However, the assistance was not provided in a timely manner and the community's resources became depleted. The victims could only save themselves while awaiting the district office to transport them to the evacuation shelters. Based on the findings, the author deduced that when natural disasters occur, community elderly victims have a poor response capability and tend to delay their decision to evacuate. During a flooding event, they would prioritize vertical evacuation unless the water supply and power have been cut off from their homes, and they would only move to an evacuation shelter if they are unable to seek refuge somewhere near their homes. Moreover, the elderly residents had a propensity to rely on people they are familiar with to make their evacuation decisions. As a result, if the opportunity for pre-evacuation is missed, rescue efforts would become more difficult. Since most of the elderly residents had chronic diseases and regularly required medical treatment or health care, natural disasters are a threat to their lives and health. Some of them were even hard of hearing and could not articulate their words properly. It is often not possible to achieve effective information transfer. According to the findings, disaster prevention and relief units should also identify and provide adequate professional training on disaster prevention and relief for the key contact persons of elderly residents in a community, such that these people can serve as a bridge for conveying information to elderly victims. In short, these measures can assist aging communities to implement selfrescue efforts during disasters.

1. American Red Cross (2006). Disaster Preparedness：for Seniors by Seniors. Retrieved Dec 26, 2018 from https://www.redcross.org/content/dam/redcross/atg/PDF_s/Preparedness___Disaster_Recovery/Disaster_Preparedness/Disaster_Preparedness_for_SrsEnglish.revised_7-09.pdf.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(2012).Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012). Identifying Vulnerable Older Adults and Legal Options for Increasing Their Protection During All-Hazards Emergencies: A Cross-Sector Guide for States and Communities. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services, 15..
3. Christie, N.,Griffin, L.,Chan, N.,Twigg, J.,Titheridge, H.(2016).Private needs, public responses: vulnerable people’s flood-disrupted mobility.Disaster Prevention and Management,25(2),244-260.
4. Godschalk, D. R.,Kaiser, E. J.,Berke, P. R.(1998).Hazard assessment: the factual basis for planning and 30 mitigation.Cooperating with Nature: Confronting Natural Hazards with Land-Use Planning for Sustainable Communities,Washington, DC:
5. Gusmano, M. K., & Rodwin, V. G. (2006). The Elderly and Social Isolation. Testimony to the New York City Council Committee on Aging. Retrieved Dec 26, 2018 from http://www.nr9.org/releif.org/media/pdfs/ElderlyandSocialIsolation.pdf.
6. Heagele, T.,Pacquiao, D.(2018).Disaster vulnerability of elderly and medically frail populations.Health Emergency and Disaster Nursing
7. Kailes, J. I.,Enders, A.(2007).Moving beyond “special needs” A function-based framework for emergency management and planning.Journal of Disability Policy Studies,17(4),230-237.
8. Lee, Y. J.,Tung, C. M.,Lin, S. C.(2018).Attitudes to climate change, perceptions of disaster risk, and mitigation and adaptation behavior in Yunlin County, Taiwan.Environmental Science and Pollution Research,1-11.
9. Nick, G. A.,Savoia, E.,Elqura, L.,Crowther, M. S.,Cohen, B.,Leary, M.,Koh, H. K.(2009).Emergency preparedness for vulnerable populations: people with special health-care needs.Public Health Reports,124(2),338-343.
10. Tatsuki, S.(2012).Challenges in Counter‐disaster Measures for People with Functional Needs in Times of Disaster Following the Great East Japan Earthquake.International Journal of Japanese Sociology,21(1),12-20.
11. Tuohy, R.,Stephens, C.,Johnston, D.(2014).Qualitative research can improve understandings about disaster preparedness for independent older adults in the community.Disaster Prevention and Management,23(3),296-308.
12. UNISDR, U.(2015).Sendai Framework For Disaster Risk Reduction 2015－2030.3rd United Nations World Conference on DRR,Sendai, Japan:
13. Wang, C.,Yarnal, B.(2012).The vulnerability of the elderly to hurricane hazards in Sarasota, Florida.Natural Hazards,63(2),349-373.
14. Wang, Z.,Wang, H.,Huang, J.,Kang, J.,Han, D.(2018).Analysis of the public flood risk perception in a flood-prone city: The case of Jingdezhen City in China.Water,10(11),15-77.
15. 中央災害防救會報（2018）。災害防救政策及計畫。引用於 2018 年 12 月 26 日，取自https://www.cdprc.ey.gov.tw/Default.aspx。Central Disaster Prevention and Protection Council. (2018). Disaster prevention and protection policies and plans. Retrieved December 26, 2018, from https://www.cdprc.ey.gov.tw/Default.aspx.
16. 王价巨, J. J.(2017).災害管理：13 堂專業的必修課程.臺北市=Taipei:五南=Wu-Nan Book INC.
17. 吳杰穎, J. Y.(2007)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,臺北市=Taipei:行政院國家科學委員會=National Science Council。
18. 吳悅（2015）。從高齡少子趨勢看我國災防科研需求及方向 。引用於 2018 年 12 月 26 日，取自https://www.stpi.narl.org.tw/index.htm。Wu, Y. (2015). Looking at the needs and directions of scientific research on disaster prevention in our country from the perspective of the trend of population ageing and fewer children. Retrieved December 26, 2018, from https://www.stpi.narl.org.tw/index.htm.
19. 國家災害防救科技中心=National Science and Technology Center for Disaster Reduction(2015)。國家災害防救科技中心（2015）。2015-2030 仙台減災綱領。新北市：國家災害防救科技中心。National Science and Technology Center for Disaster Reduction (2015). Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. New Taipei City: National Science and Technology Center for Disaster Reduction.。
20. 陳亮全, L.C.,劉怡君, Y.C.,陳海立, H.L.(2006).防災社區指導手冊.新北市=New Taipei City:行政院災害防救委員會=Central Disaster Prevention and Protection Commission.
21. 黃彙雯, H.W.(2016)。台南市，國立成功大學都市計劃學系=Department of Urban Planning, NCKU。
22. 經濟部（2018）。水災災害防救業務計畫（民國 107 年版 ）。引用於 2018 年 12 月 26 日，取自https://www.cdprc.ey.gov.tw/Default.aspx。Ministry of Economic Affairs. (2018). Operation Plan of Flooding Prevention and Protection. Retrieved December 26, 2018, from https://www.cdprc.ey.gov.tw/Default.aspx.
23. 經濟部水利署（2010）。水災危險潛勢地區疏散撤離標準作業程序（2009/09/07 公布，2010/05/05 修正）。引用於 2018 年 12 月 26 日，取自 https://goo.gl/Fs2tFg。Water Resources Agency, Ministry of Economic Affairs(2010). Standard operating procedures of evacuate in areas of flooding damage potential. Retrieved December 26, 2018, from https://goo.gl/Fs2tFg.
24. 臺南市政府（2017a），臺南市地區災害防救計畫（民國 106 年版）。引用於 2018 年 12 月 26 日，取自https://www.cdprc.ey.gov.tw/Default.aspx。Tainan City Government. (2017a). Tainan City Disaster Prevention and Protection Plan. Retrieved December 26, 2018, from https://www.cdprc.ey.gov.tw/Default.aspx.
25. 臺南市政府（2018b）。0822 豪雨災害應變中心第三次工作會報。用於 2018 年 12 月 26 日，取自https://disaster.tainan.gov.tw。Tainan City Government. (2018b). The third working report of 0822 extremely heavy rain in Tainan City Disaster Response Center. Retrieved December 26, 2018, from https://disaster.tainan.gov.tw.
26. 臺南市政府（2018a）。0822 豪雨臺南市災害應變中心第一次工作會報紀錄。引用於 2018 年 12 月 26 日，取自 https://disaster.tainan.gov.tw。Tainan City Government. (2018a). The first working report of 0822 extremely heavy rain in Tainan City Disaster Response Center. Retrieved December 26, 2018, from https://disaster.tainan.gov.tw.
27. 臺南市政府（2017b）。臺南市水災危險潛勢地區保全計畫（民國 106 年版）。引用於 2018 年 12 月 26 日，取自 http://140.116.77.34/DPRC/indexd106.html。Annual 106 of Tainan City Government. (2017b). Tainan City Flood Protection Plan. Retrieved December 26, 2018, from http://140.116.77.34/DPRC/indexd106.html.
28. 臺南市政府（2018c）。臺南市政府民政局因應 0822 豪雨疏散撤離人數統計。用於 2018 年 12 月 26 日，取自 https://disaster.tainan.gov.tw。Tainan City Government. (2018c). The statistics of the number of people evacuated to 0822 extremely heavy rain in Bureau of Civil Affairs, Tainan City Government. Retrieved December 26, 2018, from https://disaster.tainan.gov.tw.
29. 臺南市政府民政局(2017)。106 年度臺南市民政統計年報 。用於 2018 年 12 月 26 日，取自 19. https://bca.tainan.gov.tw/。Bureau of Civil Affairs, Tainan City Government. (2017). Annual Report 106 of Tainan Civil Affairs Statistics. Retrieved December 26, 2018, from https://bca.tainan.gov.tw/.
30. 臺南市麻豆戶政事務所（2018）。107 年 11 月分性別年齡統計人口數。用於 2018 年 12 月 26 日。取自http://www.madou-house.gov.tw/tnmao70/。Madou Household Registration Office, Tainan City. (2018). Madou District demographics by age percentage in three stages and their dependency ratio. Retrieved December 26, 2018, from http://www.madou-house.gov.tw/tnmao70/.
31. 臺南市麻豆區公所（2017a）。臺南市麻豆區地區災害防救計畫（民國 106 年版）。用於 2018 年 12 月 26日，取自 http://www.madou.gov.tw/。Madou District Office, Tainan City. (2017a). Madou District Office Disaster Prevention and Protection Plan. Retrieved December 26, 2018, from http://www.madou.gov.tw/.
32. 臺南市麻豆區公所（2017b）。臺南市麻豆區各里簡介。用於 2018 年 12 月 26 日 。 取自http://www.madou.gov.tw/ch/deve1.asp。Madou District Office, Tainan City. (2017b). Introduction of Madou district. Retrieved December 26, 2018, from http://www.madou.gov.tw/ch/deve1.asp.
33. 臺南市麻豆區埤頭里（2017b）。臺南市麻豆區埤頭里水患自主防災社區評鑑資料（民國 106 年版）。用於 2018 年 12 月 26 日，取自http://www.tainanfrc.com.tw/。Pitou Village, Madou District, Tainan City. (2017b). Annual 106 of Pitou Village Flood Risk Independent Disaster Prevention Community Evaluation Materials. Retrieved December 26, 2018, from http://www.tainanfrc.com.tw/.
34. 臺南市麻豆區埤頭里（2017c）。臺南市麻豆區埤頭里水患自主防災疏散避難計畫（民國 106 年版）。用於 2018 年 12 月 26 日，取自http://www.tainanfrc.com.tw/。Pitou Village, Madou District, Tainan City. (2017c). Annual 106 of Pitou Village Evacuation Plan. Retrieved December 26, 2018, from http://www.tainanfrc.com.tw/.
35. 臺南市麻豆區埤頭里(2017a)。臺南市麻豆區埤頭里防災社區基本資料。用於 2018 年 12 月 26 日，取自http://www.tainanfrc.com.tw/。Pitou Village, Madou District, Tainan City. (2017a). Basic information of Pitou Village disaster prevention community. Retrieved December 26, 2018, from http://www.tainanfrc.com.tw/.
36. 趙子元, T.Y.,黃彙雯, Y.W.(2015)。台灣老人福利與照護機構分布災害風險初探－以宜蘭縣為例。福祉科技與服務管理學刊，3(1)，83-100。
37. 鄭元良, Y.L.,施邦築, B.J.(2011)。內政部建築研究所協同研究報告內政部建築研究所協同研究報告,新北市=New Taipei City:內政部建築研究所=Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior。