台灣與澳洲老人長照設施之失智友善設計EAT環境評量比較研究

A Comparative Study using Environmental Audit Tool (EAT) on Environmental Designs of Residential Aged Care Facilities in Taiwan and Australia

10.53106/101632122022030119002

李秉文(Ping-Wen Lee)；黃志弘(Chih-Hong Huang)；薛方杰(Fang-Jye Shiue)；劉宣伶(Shiuan-Ling Liou)

高齡失智者 ； 環境評量工具 ； 老人長照設施 ； Dementia ； Environment ； Evaluation ； Residential Aged Care Facility

建築學報

119期（2022 / 03 / 31）

23 - 36

繁體中文

本研究實地查訪台灣十九家老人長照設施評估EAT失智友善環境十個設計準則分項（保全安全、規模大小、視覺輔助、環境刺激、導引標示、徘徊空間、熟悉感覺、隱私／社交、社區連結、融入在地）及總分數並與澳洲老人長照設施EAT評分作比較，結果顯示台灣長照政策因應高齡失智人口遞增所興辦的失智照護型老人長照設施（老人福利機構失智專區、護理之家失智專區及失智團體家屋）顯著（p=.002）優於台灣一般型老人長照設施，而並無明顯的（p=.530）城鄉差距，但相較於澳洲失智照護型老人長照設施，整體上並無明顯的（p=.312）差異，惟台灣失智照護型老人長照設施在規模大小、環境刺激、導引標示、徘徊空間等四項失智友善環境設計依然有提升改善的空間。相較於澳洲一般型老人長照設施，整體上也無明顯的（p=.217）差異，台灣一般型老人長照設施在保全安全、環境刺激、導引標示及熟悉感覺等四項失智友善環境設計較優，在規模大小及融入在地兩項失智友善環境設計可以加強及改善。

This study used the Environmental Audit Tool (EAT) to assess environmental designs of 19 residential aged care facilities where 14 located at the Taipei-Keelung metropolitan area and 5 located at Yilan-Hualien rural area. The aim of this study is to compare data on the mean and standard deviation scores of both non-purpose-built and purpose-built facilities in Taiwan and Australia based upon design principals by ten EAT subscales (safety, size, visual access, unwanted stimuli, helpful stimuli, planned wandering, familiarity, privacy and community, community links, and domestic activities). The validated EAT is an observational tool requiring a rater to move through the environment and look for specific design features defined by the 72 questions. The results show non-purpose-built facilities in Taiwan got higher scores in 4 subscales (safety, unwanted stimuli, helpful stimuli and familiarity) while those ones in Australia received better scores in 2 subscales (size and planned wandering). However, there is no significant difference (p= .312) in total score between non-purpose-built facilities in Taiwan and Australia. The purpose-built facilities in Australia got higher scores in 3 subscales (size, unwanted stimuli, helpful stimuli and planned wandering) while there is still no significant difference (p= .217) in total score. The purpose-built facilities in Taiwan had higher scores in 3 subscales (size, helpful stimuli and planned wandering) than the non-purpose-built facilities in Taiwan and there is a significant difference (p= .002) in total score. Facilities located at the Taipei-Keelung metropolitan area got higher scores in only one subscale (unwanted stimuli) in comparison with those at Yilan-Hualien rural area and there is not a significant difference (p= .530) in total score.

1. 曾思瑜(2009)。美日兩國有關高齡者照護環境評估量表之比較分析。建築學報，69，191-210。
   連結：
2. 黃耀榮,張元玫,葉明莉,蘇暄雯(2019)。失智症日照中心環境品質評量指標探討。建築學報，109(S)，21-49。
   連結：
3. 蔡淑瑩(2018)。高齡失智友善社區之研究─以台北市信義區為例。建築學報，104，89-102。
   連結：
4. 蔡淑瑩,李美慧,何明錦,李曼萍,陳鼎岳(2016)。高齡失智者室內居家環境設計準則之研究。建築學報，97，87-98。
   連結：
5. Brawley, E. C.(2001).Environmental design for Alzheimer's disease: a quality of life issue.Aging & Mental Health,5(sup1),79-83.
6. Brennan, S.,Doan, T.,Bennett, K.,Hashimoto, Y.,Fleming, R.(2021).Japanese Translation and Validation of the Environmental Assessment Tool–Higher Care.HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal,14(4)
7. Calkins, M. P.(2018).From research to application: Supportive and therapeutic environments for people living with dementia.The Gerontologist,58(suppl_1),S114-S128.
8. Carder, P. C.(2017).State regulatory approaches for dementia care in residential care and assisted living.The Gerontologist,57(4),776-786.
9. Chaudhury, H.,Cooke, H.(2014).Design matters in dementia care: The role of the physical environment in dementia care settings.Excellence in dementia care,2,144-158.
10. Chaudhury, H.,Cooke, H. A.,Cowie, H.,Razaghi, L.(2018).The influence of the physical environment on residents with dementia in long-term care settings: A review of the empirical literature.The Gerontologist,58(5),e325-e337.
11. Day, K.,Carreon, D.,Stump, C.(2000).The therapeutic design of environments for people with dementia: a review of the empirical research.The gerontologist,40(4),397-416.
12. Department of Health(2015).Department of Health (2015). Health Building Note 08-02 Dementia-friendly Health and Social Care Environments..
13. European Commission(2013).European Commission (2013). A Compilation of Innovative Practices_Action Group on Innovation for Age-Friendly Buildings, Cities and Environments..
14. Fleming, R.(2011).An environmental audit tool suitable for use in homelike facilities for people with dementia.Australasian Journal on Ageing,30(3),108-112.
15. Fleming, R.,Bennett, K.(2015).Assessing the quality of environmental design of nursing homes for people with dementia: Development of a new tool.Australasian Journal on Ageing,34(3),191-194.
16. Fleming, R.,Bennett, K. A.,Preece, T.,Phillipson, L.(2017).The development and testing of the dementia friendly communities environment assessment tool (DFC EAT).International Psychogeriatrics,29(2),303-311.
17. Fleming, R.,Fay, R.,Robinson, A.(2012).Evidence-based facilities design in health care: a study of aged care facilities in Australia.Health Services Management Research,25(3),121-128.
18. Fleming, R.,Goodenough, B.,Low, L.F.,Chenoweth, L.,Brodaty, H.(2016).The relationship between the quality of the built environment and the quality of life of people with dementia in residential care.Dementia,15(4),663-680.
19. Fleming, R.,Purandare, N.(2010).Long-term care for people with dementia: environmental design guidelines.International Psychogeriatrics,22(7),1084-1096.
20. Garre‐Olmo, J.,López‐Pousa, S.,Turon‐Estrada, A.,Juvinyà, D.,Ballester, D.,Vilalta‐Franch, J.(2012).Environmental determinants of quality of life in nursing home residents with severe dementia.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society,60(7),1230-1236.
21. Grant, L. A.(1996).Assessing environments in Alzheimer special care units: nursing unit rating scale.Research on Aging,18(3),275-291.
22. Hadjri, K.,Faith, V.,McManus, M.(2012).Designing dementia nursing and residential care homes.Journal of Integrated Care,20(5),322-340.
23. Hebert, C. A.,Scales, K.(2019).Dementia friendly initiatives: a state of the science review.Dementia,18(5),1858-1895.
24. Kelly, F.,Innes, A.,Dincarslan, O.(2011).Improving care home design for people with dementia.Journal of Care Services Management,5(3),147-155.
25. Kovach, C.,Weisman, G.,Chaudhury, H.,Calkins, M.(1997).Impacts of a therapeutic environment for dementia care.American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease,12(3),99-110.
26. Lawton, M. P.,Weisman, G. D.,Sloane, P.,Norris-Baker, C.,Calkins, M.,Zimmerman, S. I.(2000).Professional environmental assessment procedure for special care units for elders with dementing illness and its relationship to the therapeutic environment screening schedule.Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders,14(1),28-38.
27. Marquardt, G.,Bueter, K.,Motzek, T.(2014).Impact of the design of the built environment on people with dementia: an evidence-based review.HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal,8(1),127-157.
28. Ministry of Health(2016).Secure Dementia Care Home Design: Information Resource.
29. Moos, R. H.,Gauvain, M.,Lemke, S.,Max, W.,Mehren, B.(1979).Assessing the social environments of sheltered care settings.The Gerontologist,19(1),74-82.
30. Neylon, S.,Bulsara, C.,Hill, A. M.(2017).The effectiveness of environment assessment tools to guide refurbishment of Australian residential aged care facilities: A systematic review.Australasian Journal on Ageing,36(2),135-143.
31. Pollock, A.,Fuggle, L.(2013).Designing for dementia: creating a therapeutic environment.Nursing & Residential Care,15(6),438-442.
32. Queensland Government(1999).Design Guidelines for Queensland Residential Aged Care Facilities.
33. Queensland Government(2020).World Alzheimer Report: Design, Dignity, Dementia: Dementia-related Design and the Built Environment.
34. Sloane, P. D.,Mathew, L. J.(1990).The therapeutic environment screening scale: An observational screening instrument to assess the quality of nursing home environments for residents with dementia.American Journal of Alzheimer's Care and Related Disorders & Research,5(6),22-26.
35. Sloane, P. D.,Mitchell, C. M.,Weisman, G.,Zimmerman, S.,Foley, K. M. L.,Lynn, M.,Montgomery, R.(2002).The therapeutic environment screening survey for nursing homes (TESS-NH) an observational instrument for assessing the physical environment of institutional settings for persons with dementia.The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences,57(2),S69-S78.
36. Smith, R.,Fleming, R.,Chenoweth, L.,Jeon, Y. H.,Stein-Parbury, J.,Brodaty, H.(2012).Validation of the Environmental Audit Tool in both purpose-built and non-purpose-built dementia care settings.Australasian Journal on Ageing,31(3),159-163.
37. Sun, J.(2020).The Appropriateness of Adapting the Australian Environmental Assessment Tool–High Care (EAT-HC) for Persons With Dementia in Singapore.HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal,13(4),57-67.
38. Sun, J.,Fleming, R.(2018).Characteristics of the built environment for people with dementia in East and Southeast Asian nursing homes:A scoping review.International Psychogeriatrics,4,469.
39. Sun, J.,Fleming, R.,Crookes, P.,Fay, R.(2016).,未出版
40. Van Hoof, J.,Kort, H. S.,van Waarde, H.,Blom, M. M.(2010).Environmental interventions and the design of homes for older adults with dementia: an overview.American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias®,25(3),202-232.
41. 尹聖道(2005)。桃園市，中原大學建築研究所。
42. 台灣失智症協會 (2013)。台灣失智症人口推估。引用於 2021 年 5 月 28 日，取自於 http://www.tada2002.org.tw/Messages/Content?Id=1207。
43. 行政院主計總處 (2021) 。國情統計通報。第 037 號。
44. 吳孟珊(2012)。台南市，成功大學老年學研究所。
45. 林彥良(2003)。台中市，東海大學建築系。
46. 林哲瑩,鄭晏甄(2016)。以利害關係人觀點評估失智症老人團體家屋照顧模式之執行成果。臺灣老人保健學刊，12(1)，1-21。
47. 郭成森(2013)。桃園市，中原大學建築研究所。
48. 郭姵伶,曾淑芬,陳惠芳,李宗潔,顏童文(2012)。失智症照護單位之環境要素：實證觀點。南臺灣醫學雜誌，8(2)，48-60。
49. 陳柏宗(2020)。內政部建築研究所委託研究報告內政部建築研究所委託研究報告,新北市:內政部建築研究所。
50. 曾建堯(2007)。台北市，臺北醫學大學醫務管理學研究所。
51. 曾建堯,王佳惠,郭乃文(2008)。失智症長期照護機構環境檢查量表之介紹。北市醫學雜誌，5(2)，193-207。
52. 靳燕玲(2013)。內政部建築研究所委託研究報告內政部建築研究所委託研究報告,新北市:內政部建築研究所。
53. 蔡淑瑩(2015)。內政部建築研究所委託研究報告內政部建築研究所委託研究報告,新北市:內政部建築研究所。
54. 關華山,張玫萍(2016)。內政部建築研究所委託研究報告內政部建築研究所委託研究報告,新北市:內政部建築研究所。