營運階段綠辦公建築管理與維護之評估指標研究

The Evaluation System of Green Office Building for Maintenance and Management in the Operation Period

10.53106/101632122022060120001

孫振義(Chen-Yi Sun)；簡嘉伶(Chia-Ling Chien)

綠建築評估 ； 管理維護 ； 模糊德爾菲法 ； Green Building Evaluation ； Management and Maintenance ； Fuzzy Delphi Method

建築學報

120期（2022 / 06 / 30）

1 - 16

繁體中文

近年來綠建築之議題開始受到關注，我國亦推行綠建築評估系統（EEWH），希冀建築能降低環境污染，亦同時提供舒適健康的使用空間。然而，我國現行評估系統主要針對建築設計、建築型態進行審核評估，對於綠建築管理維護、使用營運仍無相關規範，較無持續性、管理層面的考量，若能加強建築營運階段的性能追蹤、提供完善的管理機制，則更可有效達到綠建築「永續發展」的初衷。爰此，本研究欲探討適宜評估綠建築營運階段「管理與維護」之指標項目，以辦公建築作為研究對象，透過檢視國外商用綠建築營運維護、績效表現、既有建築性能表現之相關評估系統，釐清綠辦公建築營運使用期間，所應著重評估之指標內涵與要素。其次，運用模糊德爾菲法（Fuzzy Delphi Method），透過專家學者的專業填答，確立綠辦公建築營運階段「管理與維護」的評估中，應包含三大面向、七項指標分類，共二十九項指標項目。

In recent years, green building issues have begun to receive attention. Under this trend, Taiwan has implemented the Green Building Evaluation System (EEWH), which enables buildings to reduce environmental pollution and resource waste, while also providing comfortable and healthy space. However, the current evaluation system mainly focuses on the building design and building status. There are no relevant regulations for the management and maintenance of green buildings. Thus, there are relatively no sustainability and management considerations. If we can track the performance during the operation phase, provide a comprehensive management mechanism, and consider energy-saving and carbon-reduction strategies at the same time, it will be more effective to achieve the ＂sustainable development＂ of the original intention of green buildings. Therefore, this research mainly studies appropriate evaluation indicators of green building operating stage, and uses office buildings as the research object. Review the evaluation systems of commercial green buildings in use in other countries, and clarify the indicators that should be emphasized during the operation period. Furthermore, the research uses the Fuzzy Delphi Method to establish the evaluation items for the ＂management and maintenance＂ of the green office building operation phase. After calculation, the ＂management and maintenance＂ framework of the green office building should include three aspects, seven classifications, and a total of 29 indicators.

1. 林奉怡, F. Y.,羅子雯, T. W.,羅時麒, S. C.,王家瑩, C. Y.,林子平, T. P.(2019)。臺灣綠建築維護管理制度改善策略之研究。建築學報，110，99-110。
   連結：
2. 蘇瑛敏, Y. M.,林韻茹, Y. J.(2018)。從建築生命週期觀點探討綠建築管理維護之研究。物業管理學報，9(1)，27-40。
   連結：
3. (1993).Life Cycle Costing for Construction.London, UK:Blackie Academic and Professional, London.
4. BCA(2017).BCA (2017). Green Mark for Existing Non-Residential Buildings (GM ENRB:2017). Singapore: Building and Construction Authority..
5. Bekker, P. C. F.(1982).A life-cycle approach in building.Building and Environment,17(1),55-61.
6. BRE(2016).BRE (2016). BREEAM In-Use: Driving Operational Excellence in Building Performance. UK: Building Research Establishment..
7. BRE(2020).BREEAM In-Use International Technical Manual V6.0.0.UK:Building Research Establishment.
8. Curran, M. A.(Ed.)(2012).Life Cycle Assessment Handbook: A Guide for Environmentally Sustainable Products.NY, USA:John Wiley and Sons.
9. DGNB(2020).DGNB System Building In Use Criteria Set.Germany:Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nachhaltiges Bauen e.V..
10. Falkenbach, H.,Lindholm, A. L.,Schleich, H.(2010).Review articles: environmental sustainability: drivers for the real estate investor.Journal of Real Estate Literature,18(2),201-223.
11. GBCA(2020).Green Star Performance Summary of Categories and Credits.Australia:Green Building Council of Australia.
12. PAM(2011).PAM (2011). Green Building Index: Non-Residential Existing Building (NREB) Design Reference Guide and Submission Format, Version1.01. Malaysia: Pertubuhan Akitek Malaysia..
13. PHILGBC(2020).PHILGBC (2020). BERDE Green Building Rating Schemes (GBRS). Philippine: Philippine Green Building Council..
14. Shear, M. A.(1983).Handbook of Building Maintenance Management.Reston, VA:Reston Publishing Co. Inc..
15. USGBC(2019).USGBC (2019). LEED v4.1 Building Operations and Maintenance. U.S.: U.S. Green Building Council..
16. Zuo, J.,Zhao, Z. Y.(2014).Green building research–current status and future agenda: A review.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,30,271-281.
17. 一般社団法人日本サステナブル建築協会(2014)。CASBEE─建築（既存）評価マニュアル。日本=Tokyo, Japan:一般社団法人建築省エネルギー機構=IBEC。
18. 內政部建築研究所=Architecture and Building Research Institute(2019).綠建築評估手冊─基本型.新北市=New Taipei City:內政部建築研究所=Architecture and Building Research Institute.
19. 朱宏文, H. W.(2020)。臺北市=Taipei，國立政治大學地政學系=Department of Lands Economics, National Chengchi University。
20. 行政院（2018）。綠建築政策推動成果，政策與計畫：重要政策 。取自：https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/94f2adca-dffd-4321-97dc-4b39745e2028。
21. 李永展, Y. J(2014)。邁向韌性社會：脆弱度觀點。經濟前瞻，156，23-26。
22. 林子平, T. P.,蔡耀賢, Y. S.(2018)。內政部建築研究所研究計畫成果報告內政部建築研究所研究計畫成果報告,新北市=New Taipei City:內政部建築研究所=Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior。
23. 林憲德, H. T(2011)。臺灣綠建築政策的成就。科學發展，460，6-13。
24. 張又升=Chang Y. S.(2002)。臺南市=Tainan，國立成功大學建築學系=Department of Architecture, National Cheng Kung University。
25. 曾俊達, C. T.,江哲銘, C. M.(2010)。內政部建築研究所研究計畫成果報告內政部建築研究所研究計畫成果報告,新北市=New Taipei City:內政部建築研究所=Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior。
26. 黃正翰, Z. H.,江學文, X. W.,楊竣丞(2020)。社會住宅 BIM、智慧建築、綠建築於維護管理之應用。營建知訊，444，28-39。
27. 黃國倉, K. T.(2006)。臺南市=Tainan，成功大學建築研究所=Department of Architecture, National Cheng Kung University。
28. 楊謙柔, C. J.(2000)。臺北市=Taipei，中國文化大學建築及都市計畫學系=Department of Architecture and Urban Design, Chinese Culture University。
29. 裴謄兆, T. J.(2010)。臺北市=Taipei，國立臺灣大學土木工程學系=Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University。