從社群媒體觀察屏東菸葉廠文化資產保存的民眾參與意見

Exploring Public Participation and Views on Social Media regarding the Conservation of Cultural Heritage in the Pingtung Tobacco Factory

10.53106/101632122022060120005

吳添熹(Tien-Hsi Wu)；林思玲(Szu-Ling Lin)

屏東菸葉廠 ； 工業遺產 ； 民眾參與 ； 社群媒體 ； 文化資產 ； 文化遺產 ； 永續 ； Pingtung Tobacco Factory ； Industrial Heritage ； Public Participation ； Social Media ； Cultural Property ； Cultural Heritage ； Sustainability

建築學報

120期（2022 / 06 / 30）

79 - 103

繁體中文

文化資產永續保存是目前國際間重視的議題，其中民眾參與更是文化資產永續保存不可或缺的部分。民眾參與的首要目的是讓民眾了解文化資產場域保存的意義與價值，因此，民眾對文化資產保存的觀點成為了重要的觀察指標。再者，具文化資產價值的保存與經營，體現在根源於文化資產有形及無形文化資源的應用。本研究的動機，起因於屏東縣政府目前正積極地進行工業遺產屏東菸葉廠文化資產保存的相關工作，因此籌劃了展覽活動，讓民眾有機會進入昔日不易進入菸葉生產場域，促成本研究欲探討該場域文化資產民眾參與的議題。工業遺產是其中一個需要被積極守護的文化資產類別。許多民眾第一次參加體驗屏東菸葉廠這類工業遺產的空間與活動，民眾參加體驗的意見，正好成為本研究可觀察屏東菸葉廠保存是否可提升民眾對於菸葉廠保存的意識，進而分析民眾對於屏東菸葉廠保存再利用的觀點，此為本研究主要目的。當今民眾普遍應用社群媒體發表意見，恰能提供做為民眾體驗文化資產保存的意見發表媒介。本研究將以屏東菸葉廠作為研究場域，並以2019臺灣設計展的舉辦為研究對象，應用質性研究方法中的文獻分析法及觀察研究法，探討當時活動在屏東菸葉廠的民眾體驗情形。本研究使用社群媒體Google Maps蒐集民眾對於屏東菸葉廠的評論（包含照片及文字），並進行編碼分析，探討2019臺灣設計展的舉辦是否能協助民眾了解屏東菸葉廠的文化資產價值，以及民眾對於屏東菸葉廠保存再利用的看法。本研究發現，2019臺灣設計展的舉辦有助於民眾認識屏東菸葉廠的文化資產保存意義與價值。而在民眾表達的意見上，本研究也整理出民眾對於屏東菸葉廠的介紹、民眾的感受、正面評語、負面評語，以及民眾的期許等訊息與建議。針對民眾的意見，本研究認為在屏東菸葉廠內活動舉辦地點，要以能協助民眾認識該場域的文化資產保存意義與價值為原則，並且可適時地運用屏東菸葉廠的有形與無形文化資源，強化屏東菸葉廠文化資產價值的詮釋（interpretation），這樣才有助於民眾了解文化資產。另外，針對民眾所提出的意見，本研究也提出幾點建議。在廠區的保存規劃上，在修復上須適時保留工廠昔日作業設施與標語以傳遞工廠氛圍，同時兼顧民眾參觀安全。而在導覽解說方面，可針對導覽志工加強培訓。最後在消息的公告上，可再加強推廣，讓更多人認識屏東菸葉廠及其相關資訊，並且也可以多舉辦與屏東菸葉廠規劃相關的講座及說明會等，讓民眾有更多的機會參與保存。此外，目前屏東菸葉廠的民眾參與，對於包容性的原則著墨較少，未來屏東縣政府在規劃屏東菸葉廠的活化再利用，應適度考慮族群、性別等議題，以強化包容性的文化資產保存永續目標。

Sustainable conservation of cultural heritage is a crucial topic that currently receives substantial attention from international communities. Particularly, public participation is an indispensable part. To facilitate public participation in such conservation, the conservation value of cultural heritage fields must be introduced to the public. Therefore, the public's views regarding the conservation of cultural heritage become an important indicator that is worthy to observe. Furthermore, the conservation and management of cultural heritage value is embodied in the application of tangible and intangible cultural resources rooted in cultural heritage. This motivation of study is that the Pingtung County Government has been actively engaging in the conservation of the industrial heritage in the Pingtung Tobacco Factory, and accordingly designed an exhibition to provide the public with an opportunity to visit the tobacco production factory that could not be easily accessed previously. This prompted this study to explore the issue of public participation in the cultural heritage site. Industrial heritage is a type of cultural heritage that requires protection. Numerous people visited this type of industrial heritage (i.e., the Pingtung Tobacco Factory) for the first time. These people's views of an experience tour can be used to understand whether the conservation of the Pingtung Tobacco Factory raises the public's awareness of preserving tobacco factories and that how the public think of reutilization of the factory. This is the main purpose of this study. The public commonly express their views on social media, including their cultural heritage conservation experience. In this study, the Pingtung Tobacco Factory served as the research setting and that Taiwan Design Expo'19, along with the qualitative research methods including documental analysis and observation research methods, was used as an example to explore the public's experience in visiting the Pingtung Tobacco Factory. The social media adopted in this study were Google Maps. By collecting people's comments about the Pingtung Tobacco Factory (including photos and texts) and coded them, we analyzed whether Taiwan Design Expo'19 facilitated people's understanding of the conservation value of the cultural heritage and examined their views regarding preserving and reutilizing the factory. The research results revealed that Taiwan Design Expo'19 did facilitate people's understanding of the conservation value of the Pingtung Tobacco Factory. In addition, this study presented how people introduced the factory, their positive and negative comments, and their expectations and suggestions. According to visitors' opinions, this study considered that the locations for holding activities in the Pingtung Tobacco Factory must be those that can assist people in understanding relevant conservation value of cultural heritage; tangible and intangible cultural resources in the locations to strengthen the interpretation of the cultural heritage value of Pingtung Tobacco Factory. This should also be adequately utilized to facilitate people's understanding of cultural heritage. Moreover, on the basis of the public views, this study proposed several suggestions. In the restoration, the old operating facilities and slogans of the factory must be kept in a timely manner to convey the factory atmosphere and that people's safety during their visit must be considered. Regarding visit guidance, volunteer guides should be provided with intensified training. Finally, the Pingtung Tobacco Factory and relevant information should be publicized to help people learn about the factory. Related forums and seminars can also be held to provide people with opportunities to participate in the conservation of the factory. In addition, the current public participation of Pingtung Tobacco Factory pays little attention to the principle of inclusiveness. In the future, when planning the revitalization and reuse of the Pingtung Tobacco Factory, the Pingtung County Government should appropriately consider issues such as ethnicity and gender in order to strengthen the sustainable goal of inclusive cultural heritage conservation.

1. QGIS Tutorials and Tips－基本向量資料樣式設定。讀取於 2020 年 6 月 4 日，取自http://www.qgistutorials.com/zh_TW/docs/basic_vector_styling.html。QGIS Tutorials and Tips - Basic Vector Styling. Retrieved from http://www.qgistutorials.com/zh_TW/docs/basic_vector_styling.html (June 4, 2020).
2. Australia ICOMOS(2013).The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS charter for places of cultural significance 2013.
3. De LeãoDornelles, L.,Gandolfi, F.,Mercader-Moyano, P.,Mosquera-Adell, E.(2020).Place and memory indicator: Methodology for the formulation of a qualitative indicator, named place and memory, with the intent of contributing to previous works of intervention and restoration of heritage spaces and buildings, in the aspect of sustainability.Sustainable Cities and Society,54,101985.
4. De Smith, M. J.,Goodchild, M. F.,Longley, P.(2018).Geospatial Analysis: A Comprehensive Guide to Principles, Techniques and Software Tools.London, England:The Winchelsea Press.
5. Dian, A. M.,Abdullah, N. C.(2013).Public Participation in Heritage Sites Conservation in Malaysia: Issues and Challenges.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,101,248-255.
6. Dijck, J. van.(2013).The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media.Oxford, England:Oxford University Press.
7. Farahani, L. M.,Motamed, B.,Ghadirinia, M.(2018).Investigating Heritage Sites through the Lens of Social Media.Journal of Architecture and Urbanism,42(2),199-211.
8. Fu, C. C.(2016).Preservation and Conservation of Cultural Heritage in Taiwan: History and Practices.Taiwan:Foundation of Historic City Conservation and Regeneration.
9. Fuchs, C.(2014).Social Media: A Critical Introduction.California, CA:SAGE.
10. Ghermandi, A.,Camacho-Valdez, V.,Trejo-Espinosa, H.(2020).Social media-based analysis of cultural ecosystem services and heritage tourism in a coastal region of Mexico.Tourism Management,77,104002.
11. Ginzarly, M.,Farah, J.,Teller, J.(2019).Claiming a role for controversies in the framing of local heritage values.Habitat International,88,101982.
12. Ginzarly, M.,Pereira Roders, A.,Teller, J.(2019).Mapping historic urban landscape values through social media.Journal of Cultural Heritage,36,1-11.
13. Guzmán, P. C.,Roders, A. R. P.,Colenbrander, B. J. F.(2017).Measuring links between cultural heritage management and sustainable urban development: An overview of global monitoring tools.Cities,60,192-201.
14. Hribar, M. Š.,Bole, D.,Pipan, P.(2015).Sustainable Heritage Management: Social, Economic and Other Potentials of Culture in Local Development.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,188,103-110.
15. ICOMOS (2016). Cultural heritage, UN Sustainable Development Goals and the New Urban Agenda. Retrieved February 17, 2020, from https://www.usicomos.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Final-Concept-Note.pdf
16. Ifko, Sonja(Ed.),Stokin, Marko(Ed.)(2017).Protection and Reuse of Industrial Heritage Dilemmas, Problems, Examples.Ljubljana:ICOMOS Slovenija.
17. Jenkins, H.(2006).Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide.NY, USA:New York University Press.
18. Kaplan, A. M.,Haenlein, M.(2010).Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media.Business Horizons,53(1),59-68.
19. Lin, S. L.(2019).Toward Sustainable Conservation: Pingtung Tobacco Factory.TICCIH Bulletin,84,8-9.
20. Lovink, G.(2011).Networks without a cause: A critique of social media.Cambridge, England:Polity.
21. Martinović, A.,Ifko, S.(2018).Industrial heritage as a catalyst for urban regeneration in post-conflict cities Case study: Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina.Cities,74,259-268.
22. Navratil, J.,Krejci, T.,Martinat, S.,Pasqualetti, M. J.,Klusacek, P.,Frantal, B.,Tochackova, K.(2018).Brownfields do not "only live twice": The possibilities for heritage preservation and the enlargement of leisure time activities in Brno, the Czech Republic.Cities,74,52-63.
23. Radosavljević, U.,Đorđević, A.,Lalović, K.,Živković, J.,Đukanović, Z.(2019).Nodes and networks: The generative role of cultural heritage for urban revival in Kikinda.Sustainability,11(9),2509.
24. Soini, K.,Birkeland, I.(2014).Exploring the scientific discourse on cultural sustainability.Geoforum,51,213-223.
25. UNESCO (2015). Policy Document for the Integration of a Sustainable Development Perspective into the Processes of the World Heritage Convention. Retrieved April 30, 2020, from https://whc.unesco.org/en/sustainabledevelopment/
26. United Nations (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Retrieved December 30, 2019, from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf
27. United Nations. (1992). Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. Retrieved May 16, 2020, from https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_CONF.151_26_Vol.I_Declaration.pdf
28. United Nations (2018). Culture and Sustainable Development. Retrieved April 29, 2020, from https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/72/229
29. United Nations (2019). Culture And Sustainable Development. Retrieved April 29, 2020, from https://undocs.org/en/A/74/286
30. WCED (1987). Our Common Future. Retrieved December 28, 2019, from http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm
31. Zhou, L.,Wang, T.(2014).Social media: A new vehicle for city marketing in China.Cities,37,27-32.
32. 丁智才（編）,林義彬（編）(2018).閩臺文化發展報告（2018 工業遺產卷）.中國=China:廈門大學出版社=Xiamen University Press.
33. 大山開發建築師事務所=Da Shan Developing Architect Associate(2019).屏東菸葉廠文史調查暨修復再利用計畫第一冊.屏東縣=Pingtung:屏東縣政府=Pingtung County Government.
34. 東華印刷局,蔡明忠（主持）, M. C.(project manager),蘇正耀（主持）, Z. Y.(project manager)(2017)。,屏東縣=Pingtung:屏東縣文化資產保護所=Institute of Conservation on Cultural Heritage in Pingtung County。
35. 東華印刷局,蔡明忠（主持）, M. C.(project manager),蘇正耀（主持）, Z. Y.(project manager)(2017)。,屏東縣=Pingtung:屏東縣文化資產保護所=Institute of Conservation on Cultural Heritage in Pingtung County。
36. 東華印刷局,蔡錦佳（主持）, J. J.(project manager),張敦智（主持）, D. J.(project manager)(2015)。,屏東縣=Pingtung:屏東縣文化資產保護所=Institute of Conservation on Cultural Heritage in Pingtung County。
37. 國立屏東大學文化創意產業學系, National Pingtung University,林思玲（主持）, S. L.(project manager)(2016)。,屏東縣=Pingtung:屏東縣文化資產保護所=Institute of Conservation on Cultural Heritage in Pingtung County。
38. 國立屏東教育大學臺灣文化產業經營學系, National Pingtung University of Education,林思玲（主持）, S. L.(project manager)(2010)。,屏東縣=Pingtung:屏東縣政府=Pingtung County Government。
39. 國立高雄大學永續居住環境科技中心,陳啟仁（主持）, C. J.(project manager)(2014)。,屏東縣=Pingtung:屏東縣政府=Pingtung County Government。
40. 張崑振, K. C.(2013).臺灣產業文化資產體系與價值菸、茶、糖篇.臺中市=Taichung:文化部文化資產局=Bureau of Cultural Heritage, Ministry of Culture.
41. 陳坤宏, Kung-Hung,林思玲, S. L.,董維琇, W. S.,陳璽任, H. J.(2019).創意文化空間．商品.臺北市=Taipei:五南=Wunan Publishing Company.
42. 楊敏芝（編）, M. C. (Eds.),馮世人, S. J.,江怡樺, Y. H.(2012).機會：產業文化資產保存與再利用管理參考手冊.臺中市=Taichung:文化部文化資產局=Bureau of Cultural Heritage, Ministry of Culture.
43. 楊舒婷, S. T.(2016)。高雄市=Kaohsiung，國立高雄師範大學跨領域藝術研究所=Graduate Institute of Transdisciplinary Art, National Kaohsiung Normal University。
44. 劉世閔, S. M.,曾世豐, S. F.,鍾明倫, M. L.(2017).NVivo 11 與網路質性研究方法論.臺北市=Taipei:五南=Wunan Publishing Company.